REVIEW 2 cited by
Bypassing LLM Watermarks with Color-Aware Substitutions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Watermarking approaches are proposed to identify if text being circulated is human or large language model (LLM) generated. The state-of-the-art watermarking strategy of Kirchenbauer et al. (2023a) biases the LLM to generate specific (``green'') tokens. However, determining the robustness of this watermarking method is an open problem. Existing attack methods fail to evade detection for longer text segments. We overcome this limitation, and propose {\em Self Color Testing-based Substitution (SCTS)}, the first ``color-aware'' attack. SCTS obtains color information by strategically prompting the watermarked LLM and comparing output tokens frequencies. It uses this information to determine token colors, and substitutes green tokens with non-green ones. In our experiments, SCTS successfully evades watermark detection using fewer number of edits than related work. Additionally, we show both theoretically and empirically that SCTS can remove the watermark for arbitrarily long watermarked text.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SoK: On the Role and Future of AIGC Watermarking in the Era of Gen-AI
A systematization of AI-generated content watermarking that introduces a formal supply-chain definition and a property-based taxonomy.
-
I'm Spartacus, No, I'm Spartacus: Measuring and Understanding LLM Identity Confusion
Seven of 27 tested LLMs (25.93%) exhibited identity confusion, which the authors link to hallucination and show reduces user trust, especially in critical tasks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.