Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 226 references

Nuclear parton distributions and nuclear shadowing

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Model-agnostic fits to nuclear hard-process data confirm collinear factorization and leading-twist dominance for nuclear PDFs even at small x.

desk verdict A competent review summarizing nuclear PDFs and shadowing with no new results. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.08830 v1 pith:V7O2Y3X6 submitted 2026-06-07 hep-ph nucl-th

Petja Paakkinen , Vadim Guzey This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phnucl-th
keywords nuclearpartondistributionfunctionsshadowingcollinearfactorizationsmall-xQCDheavy-ioncollisionsultraperipheralElectron-IonCollider
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reviews how the distributions of quarks and gluons inside nuclei differ from those in free protons, with the main effect at small momentum fraction being nuclear shadowing, a suppression of parton densities. It collects evidence from experiments on hard scattering with nuclei and shows that global analyses performed without committing to any particular shadowing model still describe the data accurately. This outcome indicates that the standard perturbative framework used for proton PDFs continues to work when nuclei are the target. The review contrasts several competing models for the origin of shadowing and sketches how upcoming measurements can tighten the constraints further.

What carries the argument

Nuclear parton distribution functions (nPDFs), which encode the momentum distributions of quarks and gluons bound inside nuclei and exhibit modifications such as shadowing relative to free-nucleon PDFs.

What would settle it

A global re-analysis of existing or new data that requires large, kinematics-dependent higher-twist corrections to achieve acceptable fits would undermine the claim of leading-twist dominance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Model-agnostic extractions of nuclear PDFs from global data on hard processes with nuclei support the validity of collinear factorization and the dominance of leading-twist nuclear PDFs, including in the small-x region governed by nuclear shadowing.

Load-bearing premise

The collected experimental measurements and model comparisons are representative enough to establish that leading-twist contributions dominate over higher-twist or non-perturbative effects across the studied kinematics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Photonuclear processes measured in ultraperipheral heavy-ion collisions at the LHC supply independent constraints on nuclear gluon distributions at small x.
  • Lepton-nucleus deep-inelastic scattering at the future Electron-Ion Collider will extend the kinematic reach and reduce uncertainties on nuclear PDFs.
  • Improved nPDF determinations will sharpen predictions for hard probes in heavy-ion collisions used to study quark-gluon plasma properties.
  • Consistency between different hard processes strengthens the case that nuclear modifications are universal and factorizable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the leading-twist picture holds, nuclear effects can be absorbed into modified PDFs without invoking new non-perturbative mechanisms at the scales currently accessible.
  • The same framework may then be applied to other nuclear targets or to nuclei at higher energies where small-x dynamics become more pronounced.
  • Tension could appear if saturation-based models predict effects that cannot be reproduced by any leading-twist nPDF fit once higher-precision data arrive.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reviews the physics and phenomenology of nuclear parton distribution functions (nPDFs), with emphasis on small-x nuclear shadowing. It summarizes experimental evidence for nuclear modifications, contrasts theoretical models of shadowing, overviews model-agnostic global extractions from hard processes in nuclei that support collinear factorization and leading-twist dominance, and outlines perspectives for LHC ultraperipheral collisions and future EIC lepton-nucleus DIS.

Significance. As a review, the manuscript synthesizes current understanding of nPDFs and provides a useful reference point for the community by underscoring the empirical support for factorization from global fits. The forward-looking discussion of precision measurements at existing and planned facilities adds value for planning future work in small-x QCD and nuclear structure.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the scope clearly but does not indicate the approximate number of data sets or the kinematic range covered by the reviewed global fits; adding one sentence would improve reader orientation.
  2. Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state whether the plotted ratios are normalized to free-proton PDFs or to a specific baseline nPDF set.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, accurate summary of its scope, and recommendation to accept. No major comments were raised that require addressing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Review paper with no derivation chain or predictions

full rationale

This is a review summarizing experimental evidence, model contrasts, and existing extractions of nuclear PDFs. No original derivations, equations, or predictions are presented whose outputs reduce to the paper's own inputs or self-citations by construction. The central claim rests on external data and prior literature rather than any internal reduction. No load-bearing steps match any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced by the authors.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nuclear parton distributions and nuclear shadowing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V7O2Y3X6

@misc{pith2026260608830,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nuclear parton distributions and nuclear shadowing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V7O2Y3X6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.08830}
}
read the original abstract

In this contribution, we review the physics and phenomenology of nuclear parton distribution functions (PDFs), with a particular focus on the small-x region of nuclear shadowing. We summarise experimental evidence for nuclear modifications of PDFs and discuss their theoretical explanations; in particular, we contrast different models of nuclear shadowing. We also overview model-agnostic extractions of nuclear PDFs from global data on hard processes with nuclei, emphasizing the validity of collinear factorization and the dominance of leading-twist nuclear PDFs. Finally, we discuss perspectives for present and future precision studies of nuclear PDFs and small-x QCD dynamics, including photonuclear reactions in heavy-ion ultraperipheral collisions at the Large Hadron Collider and lepton-nucleus deep inelastic scattering at the future Electron-Ion Collider.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08830 by the authors.

Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. The structure function ratio Fig. 1 (Left) Measure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Nuclear modification factor RpPb as a function of pT for prompt D0 meson production ´ık et al., 2016) parametrisations of nuclear PDFs. Adapted from Acharya et al. (2022a) under CC BY 4.0. (Right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

226 extracted references · 220 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Color Glass Condensate and High Energy Scattering in QCD

    Iancu, Edmond and Venugopalan, Raju. The Color glass condensate and high-energy scattering in QCD. Quark-gluon plasma 4. 2003. doi:10.1142/9789812795533_0005. arXiv:hep-ph/0303204

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1142/9789812795533_0005 2003

  2. [2]

    and Hashamipour, Hadi and Soleymaninia, Maryam

    Salajegheh, Maral and Khanpour, Hamzeh and Mei ner, Ulf-G. and Hashamipour, Hadi and Soleymaninia, Maryam. Determination of diffractive PDFs from a global QCD analysis of inclusive diffractive DIS and dijet cross-section measurements at HERA. Phys. Rev. D. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.094038. arXiv:2301.10284

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.094038 2023

  3. [3]

    and Hashamipour, Hadi and Soleymaninia, Maryam

    Salajegheh, Maral and Khanpour, Hamzeh and Mei ner, Ulf-G. and Hashamipour, Hadi and Soleymaninia, Maryam. Global QCD analysis of diffractive parton distribution function considering higher twist corrections within the xFitter framework. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.054012. arXiv:2206.13788

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.054012 2022

  4. [4]

    First global next-to-leading order determination of diffractive parton distribution functions and their uncertainties within the {\tt xFitter} framework

    Goharipour, Muhammad and Khanpour, Hamzeh and Guzey, Vadim. First global next-to-leading order determination of diffractive parton distribution functions and their uncertainties within the xFitter framework. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2018. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5787-z. arXiv:1802.01363

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5787-z 2018

  5. [5]

    The Hadronic Final State at HERA

    Newman, Paul and Wing, Matthew. The Hadronic Final State at HERA. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2014. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.86.1037. arXiv:1308.3368

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.1037 2014

  6. [6]

    Collider Physics at HERA

    Klein, M. and Yoshida, R. Collider Physics at HERA. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2008. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2008.05.002. arXiv:0805.3334

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2008.05.002 2008

  7. [7]

    Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier - Understanding the glue that binds us all

    Accardi, A. and others. Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier : Understanding the glue that binds us all. Eur. Phys. J. A. 2016. doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16268-9. arXiv:1212.1701

    work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16268-9 2016

  8. [8]

    Evidence for J/ suppression in incoherent photonuclear production

    Acharya, Shreyasi and others. Evidence for J/ suppression in incoherent photonuclear production. 2025. arXiv:2503.18708

    work page arXiv 2025

Show all 226 references
  1. [9]

    Observation of impact parameter dependent modifications of nuclear parton distributions in photonuclear Pb+Pb collisions at s_NN = 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    Aad, Georges and others. Observation of impact parameter dependent modifications of nuclear parton distributions in photonuclear Pb+Pb collisions at s_NN = 5.02 TeV with the ATLAS detector. 2026. arXiv:2604.20559

    2026 arXiv

  2. [10]

    New probes of nuclear gluon dynamics through photoproduction of charm in inelastic ultra-peripheral PbPb collisions with ALICE

    Nese, Sigurd. New probes of nuclear gluon dynamics through photoproduction of charm in inelastic ultra-peripheral PbPb collisions with ALICE. EPJ Web Conf. 2026. doi:10.1051/epjconf/202636413001. arXiv:2509.11814

    2026 doi

  3. [11]

    Inclusive open charm photoproduction in ultraperipheral collisions at the LHC with in the generalized photon-nucleus fixed-order next-to-leading logarithm framework

    Cacciari, Matteo and Innocenti, Gian Michele and Sta \'s to, Anna M. Inclusive open charm photoproduction in ultraperipheral collisions at the LHC with in the generalized photon-nucleus fixed-order next-to-leading logarithm framework. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/1w13-r2tr....

    2025 doi

  4. [12]

    Inclusive D0 photoproduction in ultraperipheral collisions

    Gimeno-Estivill, Patricia and Lappi, Tuomas and M. Inclusive D0 photoproduction in ultraperipheral collisions. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/7741-585p. arXiv:2503.16108

    2025 doi

  5. [13]

    and Santana, Luana and Sch

    Goncalves, Victor P. and Santana, Luana and Sch. Investigating the inclusive D0 photoproduction in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at the Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Lett. B. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139859. arXiv:2506.02223

    2025 doi

  6. [14]

    and Klasen, M

    Guzey, V. and Klasen, M. Inclusive dijet photoproduction in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions at the CERN Large Hadron Collider in next-to-leading order QCD. Phys. Rev. C. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.065202. arXiv:1811.10236

    2019 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    and Guzey, Vadim and Helenius, Ilkka and Paakkinen, Petja and Paukkunen, Hannu

    Eskola, Kari J. and Guzey, Vadim and Helenius, Ilkka and Paakkinen, Petja and Paukkunen, Hannu. Spatial resolution of dijet photoproduction in near-encounter ultraperipheral nuclear collisions. Phys. Rev. C. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.054906. arXiv:2404.09731

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    and Flett, Christopher A

    Eskola, Kari J. and Flett, Christopher A. and Guzey, Vadim and L. Predictions for exclusive photoproduction in ultraperipheral Pb + Pb collisions at the LHC at next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2023. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11927-8. arXiv:2303.03007

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    and Flett, Christopher A

    Eskola, Kari J. and Flett, Christopher A. and Guzey, Vadim and L. Exclusive J/ photoproduction in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions at the CERN Large Hadron Collider calculated at next-to-leading order perturbative QCD. Phys. Rev. C. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.106.035202. arXiv...

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    and Flett, Christopher A

    Eskola, Kari J. and Flett, Christopher A. and Guzey, Vadim and L. Next-to-leading order perturbative QCD predictions for exclusive J/ photoproduction in oxygen-oxygen and lead-lead collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. C. 2023. doi:10.1...

    2023 doi

  11. [19]

    Nuclear geometry at high energy from exclusive vector meson production

    M. Nuclear geometry at high energy from exclusive vector meson production. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074019. arXiv:2207.03712

    2022 doi

  12. [20]

    and Harland-Lang, L

    Dyndal, M. and Harland-Lang, L. A. A First Account of the Impact of Ion Electromagnetic Dissociation on Event Exclusivity in Ultraperipheral LHC Collisions. 2026. arXiv:2604.19879

    2026 arXiv

  13. [21]

    and Strikman, M

    Guzey, V. and Strikman, M. and Zhalov, M. Accessing transverse nucleon and gluon distributions in heavy nuclei using coherent vector meson photoproduction at high energies in ion ultraperipheral collisions. Phys. Rev. C. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.95.025204. arXiv:1611.05471

    2017 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    Coherent photoproduction of J/ in nucleus-nucleus collisions in the color dipole approach. Phys. Rev. C. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.044905. arXiv:1901.07989

    2019 doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    Ryskin, M. G. Diffractive J / psi electroproduction in LLA QCD. Z. Phys. C. 1993. doi:10.1007/BF01555742

    1993 doi

  16. [24]

    and Klein, Spencer R

    Bertulani, Carlos A. and Klein, Spencer R. and Nystrand, Joakim. Physics of ultra-peripheral nuclear collisions. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2005. doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.55.090704.151526. arXiv:nucl-ex/0502005

    2005 doi

  17. [25]

    Contreras, J. G. and Tapia Takaki, J. D. Ultra-peripheral heavy-ion collisions at the LHC. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A. 2015. doi:10.1142/S0217751X15420129

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    Klein, Spencer R. and M. Imaging the nucleus with high-energy photons. Nature Rev. Phys. 2019. doi:10.1038/s42254-019-0107-6. arXiv:1910.10858

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    First measurement of the t -dependence of coherent J/ photonuclear production

    Acharya, Shreyasi and others. First measurement of the t -dependence of coherent J/ photonuclear production. Phys. Lett. B. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136280. arXiv:2101.04623

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    First Measurement of the |t| Dependence of Incoherent J/ Photonuclear Production

    Acharya, Shreyasi and others. First Measurement of the |t| Dependence of Incoherent J/ Photonuclear Production. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.162302. arXiv:2305.06169

    2024 doi

  21. [29]

    The Color Glass Condensate

    Gelis, Francois and Iancu, Edmond and Jalilian-Marian, Jamal and Venugopalan, Raju. The Color Glass Condensate. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2010. doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.010909.083629. arXiv:1002.0333

    2010 doi

  22. [30]

    Operator expansion for high-energy scattering

    Balitsky, I. Operator expansion for high-energy scattering. Nucl. Phys. B. 1996. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00638-9. arXiv:hep-ph/9509348

    1996 doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    Small x F(2) structure function of a nucleus including multiple pomeron exchanges

    Kovchegov, Yuri V. Small x F(2) structure function of a nucleus including multiple pomeron exchanges. Phys. Rev. D. 1999. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.034008. arXiv:hep-ph/9901281

    1999 doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    and Rummukainen, K

    Freund, A. and Rummukainen, K. and Weigert, H. and Schafer, A. Geometric scaling in inclusive eA reactions and nonlinear perturbative QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.222002. arXiv:hep-ph/0210139

    2003 doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    and Zurita, P \' a

    Marquet, Cyrille and Moldes, Manoel R. and Zurita, P \' a. Unveiling saturation effects from nuclear structure function measurements at the EIC. Phys. Lett. B. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.035. arXiv:1702.00839

    2017 doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    and Contreras, J

    Cepila, J. and Contreras, J. G. and Matas, M. Predictions for nuclear structure functions from the impact-parameter dependent Balitsky-Kovchegov equation. Phys. Rev. C. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.044318. arXiv:2002.11056

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    Coherent and incoherent J/ photonuclear production in an energy-dependent hot-spot model

    Cepila, Jan and Contreras, Jesus Guillermo and Krelina, Michal. Coherent and incoherent J/ photonuclear production in an energy-dependent hot-spot model. Phys. Rev. C. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.024901. arXiv:1711.01855

    2018 doi arXiv

  28. [36]

    and Cepila, J

    Bendova, D. and Cepila, J. and Contreras, J. G. and Matas, M. Photonuclear J/ production at the LHC: Proton-based versus nuclear dipole scattering amplitudes. Phys. Lett. B. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136306. arXiv:2006.12980

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    and Mantysaari, H

    Lappi, T. and Mantysaari, H. J/|psi production in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb and p +Pb collisions at energies available at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. C. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.032201. arXiv:1301.4095

    2013 doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    Probing subnucleon scale fluctuations in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions

    M. Probing subnucleon scale fluctuations in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions. Phys. Lett. B. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.063. arXiv:1703.09256

    2017 doi arXiv

  31. [39]

    Gon c alves, V. P. and Machado, M. V. T. and Moreira, B. D. and Navarra, F. S. and dos Santos, G. Sampaio. Color dipole predictions for the exclusive vector meson photoproduction in pp , pPb , and PbPb collisions at run 2 LHC energies. Phys. Rev. D. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD....

    2017 doi arXiv

  32. [40]

    Finite-size effects on small-x evolution and saturation in proton and nuclear targets

    M. Finite-size effects on small-x evolution and saturation in proton and nuclear targets. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.054033. arXiv:2411.13533

    2025 doi

  33. [41]

    and others

    Arneodo, M. and others. The Structure Function ratios F2(li) / F2(D) and F2(C) / F2(D) at small x. Nucl. Phys. B. 1995. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00023-2. arXiv:hep-ex/9504002

    1995 doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    Adams, M. R. and others. Saturation of shadowing at very low x_ BJ. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3266

    1992 doi

  35. [43]

    Resummed QCD power corrections to nuclear shadowing

    Qiu, Jian-wei and Vitev, Ivan. Resummed QCD power corrections to nuclear shadowing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.262301. arXiv:hep-ph/0309094

    2004 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    Gribov, L. V. and Levin, E. M. and Ryskin, M. G. Semihard Processes in QCD. Phys. Rept. 1983. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(83)90022-4

    1983 doi

  37. [45]

    and Qiu, Jian-wei

    Mueller, Alfred H. and Qiu, Jian-wei. Gluon Recombination and Shadowing at Small Values of x. Nucl. Phys. B. 1986. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90164-1

    1986 doi

  38. [46]

    Eskola, K. J. and Qiu, Jian-wei and Wang, Xin-Nian. Perturbative gluon shadowing in heavy nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.36. arXiv:nucl-th/9307025

    1994 doi arXiv

  39. [47]

    Adams, M. R. and others. Shadowing in Inelastic Scattering of Muons on Carbon, Calcium and Lead at Low x_ Bj. Z. Phys. C. 1995. doi:10.1007/BF01624583. arXiv:hep-ex/9505006

    1995 doi arXiv

  40. [48]

    and others

    Abbas, E. and others. Charmonium and e^+e^- pair photoproduction at mid-rapidity in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at s_ NN =2.76 TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2013. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2617-1. arXiv:1305.1467

    2013 doi arXiv

  41. [49]

    Coherent J/ photoproduction in ultra-peripheral PbPb collisions at s_ NN = 2.76 TeV with the CMS experiment

    Khachatryan, Vardan and others. Coherent J/ photoproduction in ultra-peripheral PbPb collisions at s_ NN = 2.76 TeV with the CMS experiment. Phys. Lett. B. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.07.001. arXiv:1605.06966

    2017 doi arXiv

  42. [50]

    Coherent J/ photoproduction in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at s_ NN = 2.76 TeV

    Abelev, Betty and others. Coherent J/ photoproduction in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at s_ NN = 2.76 TeV. Phys. Lett. B. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.11.059. arXiv:1209.3715

    2013 doi arXiv

  43. [51]

    Coherent J/ and ' photoproduction at midrapidity in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at s_ NN = 5.02 TeV

    Acharya, Shreyasi and others. Coherent J/ and ' photoproduction at midrapidity in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at s_ NN = 5.02 TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2021. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09437-6. arXiv:2101.04577

    2021 doi

  44. [52]

    Energy dependence of coherent photonuclear production of J/ mesons in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at s _ NN = 5.02 TeV

    Acharya, Shreyasi and others. Energy dependence of coherent photonuclear production of J/ mesons in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at s _ NN = 5.02 TeV. JHEP. 2023. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2023)119. arXiv:2305.19060

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    Probing Small Bjorken-x Nuclear Gluonic Structure via Coherent J/ Photoproduction in Ultraperipheral Pb-Pb Collisions at sNN=5.02 \, \, TeV

    Tumasyan, Armen and others. Probing Small Bjorken-x Nuclear Gluonic Structure via Coherent J/ Photoproduction in Ultraperipheral Pb-Pb Collisions at sNN=5.02 \, \, TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.262301. arXiv:2303.16984

    2023 doi

  46. [54]

    and others

    Aaij, R. and others. Study of exclusive photoproduction of charmonium in ultra-peripheral lead-lead collisions. JHEP. 2023. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)146. arXiv:2206.08221

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    Measurement of coherent exclusive J/ ^ + ^ - production in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions at s_ NN =5.36 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    Aad, Georges and others. Measurement of coherent exclusive J/ ^ + ^ - production in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions at s_ NN =5.36 TeV with the ATLAS detector. JHEP. 2026. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2026)020. arXiv:2509.04135

    2026 doi arXiv

  48. [56]

    Observation of nuclear suppression in coherent Y(1S) photoproduction off heavy nuclei at the LHC

    Belyaev, Andrey and others. Observation of nuclear suppression in coherent Y(1S) photoproduction off heavy nuclei at the LHC. 2026. arXiv:2604.05814

    2026 arXiv

  49. [57]

    and others

    Afanasiev, S. and others. Photoproduction of J/psi and of high mass e+e- in ultra-peripheral Au+Au collisions at s**(1/2) = 200-GeV. Phys. Lett. B. 2009. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.07.061. arXiv:0903.2041

    2009 doi arXiv

  50. [58]

    Abdulhamid, M. I. and others. Exclusive J/ , (2s), and e+e - pair production in Au+Au ultraperipheral collisions at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. Phys. Rev. C. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.014911. arXiv:2311.13632

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    Abdulhamid, M. I. and others. Observation of Strong Nuclear Suppression in Exclusive J/ Photoproduction in Au+Au Ultraperipheral Collisions at RHIC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.052301. arXiv:2311.13637

    2024 doi

  52. [60]

    Probing the Gluonic Structure of the Deuteron with J/ Photoproduction in d+Au Ultraperipheral Collisions

    Abdallah, Mohamed and others. Probing the Gluonic Structure of the Deuteron with J/ Photoproduction in d+Au Ultraperipheral Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.122303. arXiv:2109.07625

    2022 doi

  53. [61]

    Measurement of photonuclear jet production in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 \, \, TeV with the ATLAS detector

    Aad, Georges and others. Measurement of photonuclear jet production in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02 \, \, TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.052006. arXiv:2409.11060

    2025 doi

  54. [62]

    Measurement of D0 Meson Photoproduction in Ultraperipheral Heavy Ion Collisions

    Chekhovsky, Vladimir and others. Measurement of D0 Meson Photoproduction in Ultraperipheral Heavy Ion Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2026. doi:10.1103/lckg-sdh9. arXiv:2509.08626

    2026 doi arXiv

  55. [63]

    Aschenauer, E. C. and Fazio, S. and Lee, J. H. and Mantysaari, H. and Page, B. S. and Schenke, B. and Ullrich, T. and Venugopalan, R. and Zurita, P. The electron ion collider: assessing the energy dependence of key measurements. Rept. Prog. Phys. 2019. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa...

    2019 doi arXiv

  56. [64]

    Kopeliovich, B. Z. and Krelina, M. and Nemchik, J. and Potashnikova, I. K. Ultraperipheral nuclear collisions as a source of heavy quarkonia. Phys. Rev. D. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054005. arXiv:2008.05116

    2023 doi

  57. [65]

    Gluon shadowing in nuclei and the role of the cc g state in the coherent photoproduction of J/ in nucleus-nucleus collisions. Phys. Lett. B. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138917. arXiv:2406.10371

    2024 doi

  58. [66]

    and Raufeisen, Jorg and Tarasov, Alexander V

    Kopeliovich, Boris Z. and Raufeisen, Jorg and Tarasov, Alexander V. Nuclear shadowing and coherence length for longitudinal and transverse photons. Phys. Rev. C. 2000. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.62.035204. arXiv:hep-ph/0003136

    doi arXiv

  59. [67]

    An Impact parameter dipole saturation model

    Kowalski, Henri and Teaney, Derek. An Impact parameter dipole saturation model. Phys. Rev. D. 2003. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.114005. arXiv:hep-ph/0304189

    2003 doi arXiv

  60. [68]

    and Itakura, K

    Iancu, E. and Itakura, K. and Munier, S. Saturation and BFKL dynamics in the HERA data at small x. Phys. Lett. B. 2004. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.02.040. arXiv:hep-ph/0310338

    2004 doi arXiv

  61. [69]

    and Motyka, L

    Kowalski, H. and Motyka, L. and Watt, G. Exclusive diffractive processes at HERA within the dipole picture. Phys. Rev. D. 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.074016. arXiv:hep-ph/0606272

    2006 doi arXiv

  62. [70]

    and Lappi, T

    Kowalski, H. and Lappi, T. and Venugopalan, R. Nuclear enhancement of universal dynamics of high parton densities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.022303. arXiv:0705.3047

    2008 doi arXiv

  63. [71]

    and Wusthoff, M

    Golec-Biernat, Krzysztof J. and Wusthoff, M. Saturation effects in deep inelastic scattering at low Q**2 and its implications on diffraction. Phys. Rev. D. 1998. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.014017. arXiv:hep-ph/9807513

    1998 doi arXiv

  64. [72]

    Soft gluons in the infinite momentum wave function and the BFKL pomeron

    Mueller, Alfred H. Soft gluons in the infinite momentum wave function and the BFKL pomeron. Nucl. Phys. B. 1994. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90116-3

    1994 doi

  65. [73]

    A Simple model for nuclear structure functions at small x in the dipole picture

    Armesto, N. A Simple model for nuclear structure functions at small x in the dipole picture. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2002. doi:10.1007/s10052-002-1021-z. arXiv:hep-ph/0206017

    2002 doi arXiv

  66. [74]

    Kopeliovich, B. Z. and Nemchik, J. and Potashnikova, I. K. and Schmidt, I. Gluon Shadowing in DIS off Nuclei. J. Phys. G. 2008. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/35/11/115010. arXiv:0805.4613

    2008 doi arXiv

  67. [75]

    Interplay of soft and hard interactions in nuclear shadowing at high q**2 and low x

    Kopeliovich, Boris and Povh, Bogdan. Interplay of soft and hard interactions in nuclear shadowing at high q**2 and low x. Z. Phys. A. 1997. doi:10.1007/s002180050202. arXiv:nucl-th/9607035

    1997 doi arXiv

  68. [76]

    and Kryshen, E

    Guzey, V. and Kryshen, E. and Strikman, M. and Zhalov, M. Evidence for nuclear gluon shadowing from the ALICE measurements of PbPb ultraperipheral exclusive J/ production. Phys. Lett. B. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.08.043. arXiv:1305.1724

    2013 doi arXiv

  69. [77]

    and Zhalov, M

    Guzey, V. and Zhalov, M. Exclusive J/ production in ultraperipheral collisions at the LHC: constrains on the gluon distributions in the proton and nuclei. JHEP. 2013. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2013)207. arXiv:1307.4526

    2013 doi arXiv

  70. [78]

    and Strikman, M

    Guzey, V. and Strikman, M. Nuclear suppression of coherent J/ photoproduction in heavy-ion ultraperipheral collisions and leading twist nuclear shadowing. Phys. Rev. C. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.110.045201. arXiv:2404.17476

    2024 doi

  71. [79]

    and Guzey, V

    Frankfurt, L. and Guzey, V. and McDermott, M. and Strikman, M. Nuclear shadowing in deep inelastic scattering on nuclei: Leading twist versus eikonal approaches. JHEP. 2002. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/02/027. arXiv:hep-ph/0201230

    2002 doi arXiv

  72. [80]

    and Salgado, Carlos A

    Armesto, Nestor and Kaidalov, Alexei B. and Salgado, Carlos A. and Tywoniuk, Konrad. Nuclear shadowing in Glauber-Gribov theory with Q2-evolution. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2010. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-010-1360-0. arXiv:1003.2947

    2010 doi arXiv

  73. [81]

    and Kaidalov, A

    Capella, A. and Kaidalov, A. and Merino, C. and Pertermann, D. and Tran Thanh Van, J. Structure functions of nuclei at small x and diffraction at HERA. Eur. Phys. J. C. 1998. doi:10.1007/s100520050252. arXiv:hep-ph/9707466

    1998 doi arXiv

  74. [82]

    and Sadzikowski, M

    Motyka, L. and Sadzikowski, M. and Slominski, W. Evidence of strong higher twist effects in diffractive DIS at HERA at moderate Q^2. Phys. Rev. D. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.111501. arXiv:1203.5461

    2012 doi arXiv

  75. [83]

    Role of higher twist effects in diffractive DIS and determination of diffractive parton distribution functions

    Maktoubian, Atefeh and Mehraban, Hossein and Khanpour, Hamzeh and Goharipour, Muhammad. Role of higher twist effects in diffractive DIS and determination of diffractive parton distribution functions. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.054020. arXiv:1908.10154

    2019 doi

  76. [84]

    Lai, H. L. and Huston, J. and Kuhlmann, S. and Morfin, J. and Olness, Fredrick I. and Owens, J. F. and Pumplin, J. and Tung, W. K. Global QCD analysis of parton structure of the nucleon: CTEQ5 parton distributions. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2000. doi:10.1007/s100529900196. arXiv:hep-ph/9903282

    doi arXiv

  77. [85]

    and others

    Aktas, A. and others. Measurement and QCD analysis of the diffractive deep-inelastic scattering cross-section at HERA. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2006. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-006-0035-3. arXiv:hep-ex/0606004

    2006 doi arXiv

  78. [86]

    and others

    Aktas, A. and others. Diffractive deep-inelastic scattering with a leading proton at HERA. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2006. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-006-0046-0. arXiv:hep-ex/0606003

    2006 doi arXiv

  79. [87]

    and others

    Chekanov, S. and others. A QCD analysis of ZEUS diffractive data. Nucl. Phys. B. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.01.014. arXiv:0911.4119

    2010 doi arXiv

  80. [88]

    Handbook of perturbative QCD: Version 1.0

    Brock, Raymond and others. Handbook of perturbative QCD: Version 1.0. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1995. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.67.157

    1995 doi

  81. [89]

    Proof of factorization for diffractive hard scattering

    Collins, John C. Proof of factorization for diffractive hard scattering. Phys. Rev. D. 1998. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.019902. arXiv:hep-ph/9709499

    1998 doi arXiv

  82. [90]

    and Strikman, M

    Frankfurt, L. and Strikman, M. Diffraction at HERA, color opacity and nuclear shadowing. Eur. Phys. J. A. 1999. doi:10.1007/s100500050288. arXiv:hep-ph/9812322

    1999 doi arXiv

  83. [91]

    and Guzey, V

    Frankfurt, L. and Guzey, V. and Stasto, A. and Strikman, M. Selected topics in diffraction with protons and nuclei: past, present, and future. Rept. Prog. Phys. 2022. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac8228. arXiv:2203.12289

    2022 doi

  84. [92]

    and Qiu, Jian-wei and Roberts, R

    Close, Frank E. and Qiu, Jian-wei and Roberts, R. G. QCD Parton Recombination and Applications to Nuclear Structure Functions. Phys. Rev. D. 1989. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.40.2820

    1989 doi

  85. [93]

    Glauber, R. J. and Matthiae, G. High-energy scattering of protons by nuclei. Nucl. Phys. B. 1970. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(70)90511-0

    1970 doi

  86. [94]

    Gribov, V. N. Glauber Corrections and the Interaction between High-energy Hadrons and Nuclei. Sov. Phys. JETP. 1969

    1969

  87. [95]

    Salgado, C. A. and others. Proton-Nucleus Collisions at the LHC: Scientific Opportunities and Requirements. J. Phys. G. 2012. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/39/1/015010. arXiv:1105.3919

    2012 doi arXiv

  88. [96]

    Bauer, T. H. and Spital, R. D. and Yennie, D. R. and Pipkin, F. M. The Hadronic Properties of the Photon in High-Energy Interactions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1978. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.50.261

    1978 doi

  89. [97]

    and Zakharov, B

    Nikolaev, Nikolai N. and Zakharov, B. G. Color transparency and scaling properties of nuclear shadowing in deep inelastic scattering. Z. Phys. C. 1991. doi:10.1007/BF01483577

    1991 doi

  90. [98]

    Abramovsky, V. A. and Gribov, V. N. and Kancheli, O. V. Character of Inclusive Spectra and Fluctuations Produced in Inelastic Processes by Multi - Pomeron Exchange. Yad. Fiz. 1973

    1973

  91. [99]

    and Treleani, D

    Bertocchi, L. and Treleani, D. Glauber Theory, Unitarity, and the AGK Cancellation. J. Phys. G. 1977. doi:10.1088/0305-4616/3/2/007

    1977 doi

  92. [100]

    and Thomas, Anthony William

    Melnitchouk, W. and Thomas, Anthony William. Shadowing in deuterium. Phys. Rev. D. 1993. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.3783. arXiv:nucl-th/9301016

    1993 doi arXiv

  93. [101]

    and Niesler, G

    Piller, G. and Niesler, G. and Weise, W. Diffractive phenomena and shadowing in deep inelastic scattering. Z. Phys. A. 1997. doi:10.1007/s002180050348. arXiv:hep-ph/9707266

    1997 doi arXiv

  94. [102]

    and Thomas, Anthony William

    Melnitchouk, W. and Thomas, Anthony William. Nuclear shadowing at small x and Q**2. Phys. Lett. B. 1993. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)91021-E. arXiv:nucl-th/9310005

    1993 doi arXiv

  95. [103]

    and Ratzka, W

    Piller, G. and Ratzka, W. and Weise, W. Phenomenology of nuclear shadowing in deep inelastic scattering. Z. Phys. A. 1995. doi:10.1007/BF01299761. arXiv:hep-ph/9504407

    1995 doi arXiv

  96. [104]

    and Capella, A

    Armesto, N. and Capella, A. and Kaidalov, A. B. and Lopez-Albacete, J. and Salgado, C. A. Nuclear structure functions at small x from inelastic shadowing and diffraction. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2003. doi:10.1140/epjc/s2003-01243-0. arXiv:hep-ph/0304119

    2003 doi arXiv

  97. [105]

    Chapin, T. J. and Cool, R. L. and Goulianos, Konstantin A. and Jenkins, K. A. and Silverman, J. P. and Snow, G. R. and Sticker, H. and White, Sebastian N. and Chou, Yue-Hua. Diffraction Dissociation of Photons on Hydrogen. Phys. Rev. D. 1985. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.31.17

    1985 doi

  98. [106]

    and Fai, G

    Adeluyi, A. and Fai, G. Mass dependence of nuclear shadowing at small Bjorken-x from diffractive scattering. Phys. Rev. C. 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.74.054904. arXiv:hep-ph/0610214

    2006 doi arXiv

  99. [107]

    Baltz, A. J. and others. The Physics of Ultraperipheral Collisions at the LHC. Phys. Rept. 2008. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.12.001. arXiv:0706.3356

    2008 doi arXiv

  100. [108]

    Glauber, R. J. Cross-sections in deuterium at high-energies. Phys. Rev. 1955. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.100.242

    1955 doi

  101. [109]

    Graphs and glauber

    Bertocchi, L. Graphs and glauber. Nuovo Cim. A. 1972. doi:10.1007/BF02722777

    1972 doi

  102. [110]

    Gribov, V. N. and Lipatov, L. N. Deep inelastic e p scattering in perturbation theory. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 1972

    1972

  103. [111]

    Lipatov, L. N. The parton model and perturbation theory. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 1975

    1975

  104. [112]

    Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language

    Altarelli, Guido and Parisi, G. Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language. Nucl. Phys. 1977

    1977

  105. [113]

    Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering and e+ e- Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics

    Dokshitzer, Yuri L. Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering and e+ e- Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics. Sov. Phys. JETP. 1977

    1977

  106. [114]

    and Soper, Davison E

    Collins, John C. and Soper, Davison E. Parton Distribution and Decay Functions. Nucl. Phys. B. 1982. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90021-9

    1982 doi

  107. [115]

    and others

    Badier, J. and others. Test of Nuclear Effects in Hadronic Dimuon Production. Phys. Lett. B. 1981. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90137-4

    1981 doi

  108. [116]

    Aubert, J. J. and others. The ratio of the nucleon structure functions F2_n for iron and deuterium. Phys. Lett. B. 1983. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90437-9

    1983 doi

  109. [117]

    Benvenuti, A. C. and others. Nuclear Effects in Deep Inelastic Muon Scattering on Deuterium and Iron Targets. Phys. Lett. B. 1987. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90664-2

    1987 doi

  110. [118]

    and others

    Bordalo, P. and others. Nuclear Effects on the Nucleon Structure Functions in Hadronic High Mass Dimuon Production. Phys. Lett. B. 1987. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91253-6

    1987 doi

  111. [119]

    Frankfurt, L. L. and Strikman, M. I. Hard Nuclear Processes and Microscopic Nuclear Structure. Phys. Rept. 1988. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(88)90179-2

    1988 doi

  112. [120]

    and Soper, Davison E

    Collins, John C. and Soper, Davison E. and Sterman, George F. Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD. Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 1989. doi:10.1142/9789814503266_0001. arXiv:hep-ph/0409313

    1989 doi arXiv

  113. [121]

    Bickerstaff, R. P. and Thomas, Anthony William. The EMC Effect: With Emphasis on Conventional Nuclear Corrections. J. Phys. G. 1989. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/15/10/006

    1989 doi

  114. [122]

    Heinrich, J. G. and others. Measurement of the Ratio of Sea to Valence Quarks in the Nucleon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1989. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.356

    1989 doi

  115. [123]

    Berge, J. P. and others. A Measurement of Differential Cross-Sections and Nucleon Structure Functions in Charged Current Neutrino Interactions on Iron. Z. Phys. C. 1991. doi:10.1007/BF01555493

    1991 doi

  116. [124]

    Alde, D. M. and others. Nuclear Dependence of Dimuon Production at 800-GeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1990. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2479

    1990 doi

  117. [125]

    Nuclear effects in structure functions

    Arneodo, Michele. Nuclear effects in structure functions. Phys. Rept. 1994. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(94)90048-5

    1994 doi

  118. [126]

    and others

    Gomez, J. and others. Measurement of the A-dependence of deep inelastic electron scattering. Phys. Rev. D. 1994. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.49.4348

    1994 doi

  119. [127]

    Bazarko, A. O. and others. Determination of the strange quark content of the nucleon from a next-to-leading order QCD analysis of neutrino charm production. Z. Phys. C. 1995. doi:10.1007/BF01571875. arXiv:hep-ex/9406007

    1995 doi arXiv

  120. [128]

    and others

    Amaudruz, P. and others. A Reevaluation of the nuclear structure function ratios for D, He, Li-6, C and Ca. Nucl. Phys. B. 1995. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)00023-9. arXiv:hep-ph/9503291

    1995 doi arXiv

  121. [129]

    and Saito, K

    Geesaman, Donald F. and Saito, K. and Thomas, Anthony William. The nuclear EMC effect. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 1995. doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.45.120195.002005

    1995 doi

  122. [130]

    Vasilev, M. A. and others. Parton Energy Loss Limits and Shadowing in Drell-Yan Dimuon Production. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2304. arXiv:hep-ex/9906010

    1999 doi arXiv

  123. [131]

    Nuclear deep inelastic lepton scattering and coherence phenomena

    Piller, Gunther and Weise, Wolfram. Nuclear deep inelastic lepton scattering and coherence phenomena. Phys. Rept. 2000. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00107-6. arXiv:hep-ph/9908230

    2000 doi arXiv

  124. [132]

    Measurements of F_2 and xF^ _3 - x F^ _3 from CCFR _ - Fe and _ - Fe data in a physics model independent way

    Yang, Un-Ki and others. Measurements of F_2 and xF^ _3 - x F^ _3 from CCFR _ - Fe and _ - Fe data in a physics model independent way. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2742. arXiv:hep-ex/0009041

    2001 doi arXiv

  125. [133]

    and others

    Goncharov, M. and others. Precise Measurement of Dimuon Production Cross-Sections in _ Fe and _ Fe Deep Inelastic Scattering at the Tevatron. Phys. Rev. D. 2001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.112006. arXiv:hep-ex/0102049

    2001 doi arXiv

  126. [134]

    Norton, P. R. The EMC effect. Rept. Prog. Phys. 2003. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/66/8/201

    2003 doi

  127. [135]

    Adler, S. S. and others. Absence of suppression in particle production at large transverse momentum in S(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV d + Au collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.072303. arXiv:nucl-ex/0306021

    2003 doi arXiv

  128. [136]

    and Petti, R

    Kulagin, Sergey A. and Petti, R. Global study of nuclear structure functions. Nucl. Phys. A. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.10.011. arXiv:hep-ph/0412425

    2006 doi arXiv

  129. [137]

    and others

    Tzanov, M. and others. Precise measurement of neutrino and anti-neutrino differential cross sections. Phys. Rev. D. 2006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.012008. arXiv:hep-ex/0509010

    2006 doi arXiv

  130. [138]

    and others

    Onengut, G. and others. Measurement of nucleon structure functions in neutrino scattering. Phys. Lett. B. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.10.062

    2006 doi

  131. [139]

    and others

    Adams, J. and others. Identified hadron spectra at large transverse momentum in p+p and d+Au collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV. Phys. Lett. B. 2006. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.04.032. arXiv:nucl-ex/0601033

    2006 doi arXiv

  132. [140]

    Adler, S. S. and others. Centrality dependence of pi0 and eta production at large transverse momentum in s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV d+Au collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.172302. arXiv:nucl-ex/0610036

    2007 doi arXiv

  133. [141]

    Nuclear shadowing

    Armesto, Nestor. Nuclear shadowing. J. Phys. G. 2006. doi:10.1088/0954-3899/32/11/R01. arXiv:hep-ph/0604108

    2006 doi arXiv

  134. [142]

    and others

    Mason, D. and others. Measurement of the Nucleon Strange-Antistrange Asymmetry at Next-to-Leading Order in QCD from NuTeV Dimuon Data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.192001

    2007 doi

  135. [143]

    and others

    Seely, J. and others. New measurements of the EMC effect in very light nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.202301. arXiv:0904.4448

    2009 doi arXiv

  136. [144]

    Abelev, B. I. and others. Inclusive ^0 , , and direct photon production at high transverse momentum in p+p and d+ Au collisions at s_ NN =200 GeV. Phys. Rev. C. 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.81.064904. arXiv:0912.3838

    2010 doi arXiv

  137. [145]

    and Peng, J

    Dutta, D. and Peng, J. C. and Cloet, I. C. and Gaskell, D. Pion-induced Drell-Yan processes and the flavor-dependent EMC effect. Phys. Rev. C. 2011. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.83.042201. arXiv:1007.3916

    2011 doi arXiv

  138. [146]

    Foundations of Perturbative QCD

    Collins, John. Foundations of Perturbative QCD. 2011. doi:10.1017/9781009401845

    2011 doi

  139. [147]

    and Guzey, V

    Frankfurt, L. and Guzey, V. and Strikman, M. Leading Twist Nuclear Shadowing Phenomena in Hard Processes with Nuclei. Phys. Rept. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.12.002. arXiv:1106.2091

    2012 doi arXiv

  140. [148]

    Kopeliovich, B. Z. and Morfin, J. G. and Schmidt, Ivan. Nuclear Shadowing in Electro-Weak Interactions. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2012.09.004. arXiv:1208.6541

    2013 doi arXiv

  141. [149]

    Agreement of Neutrino Deep Inelastic Scattering Data with Global Fits of Parton Distributions

    Paukkunen, Hannu and Salgado, Carlos A. Agreement of Neutrino Deep Inelastic Scattering Data with Global Fits of Parton Distributions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.212301. arXiv:1302.2001

    2013 doi arXiv

  142. [150]

    and others

    Samoylov, O. and others. A Precision Measurement of Charm Dimuon Production in Neutrino Interactions from the NOMAD Experiment. Nucl. Phys. B. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2013.08.021. arXiv:1308.4750

    2013 doi arXiv

  143. [151]

    and Cloet, Ian

    Malace, Simona and Gaskell, David and Higinbotham, Douglas W. and Cloet, Ian. The Challenge of the EMC Effect: existing data and future directions. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E. 2014. doi:10.1142/S0218301314300136. arXiv:1405.1270

    2014 doi arXiv

  144. [152]

    and Paukkunen, Hannu

    Paakkinen, Petja and Eskola, Kari J. and Paukkunen, Hannu. Applicability of pion nucleus Drell Yan data in global analysis of nuclear parton distribution functions. Phys. Lett. B. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.02.009. arXiv:1609.07262

    2017 doi arXiv

  145. [153]

    and Miller, G

    Hen, O. and Miller, G. A. and Piasetzky, E. and Weinstein, L. B. Nucleon-Nucleon Correlations, Short-lived Excitations, and the Quarks Within. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2017. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.89.045002. arXiv:1611.09748

    2017 doi arXiv

  146. [154]

    Multiplicity dependence of charged pion, kaon, and (anti)proton production at large transverse momentum in p-Pb collisions at s _ NN = 5.02 TeV

    Adam, Jaroslav and others. Multiplicity dependence of charged pion, kaon, and (anti)proton production at large transverse momentum in p-Pb collisions at s _ NN = 5.02 TeV. Phys. Lett. B. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.07.050. arXiv:1601.03658

    2016 doi arXiv

  147. [155]

    Charged-particle nuclear modification factors in PbPb and pPb collisions at s_ N\;N =5.02 TeV

    Khachatryan, Vardan and others. Charged-particle nuclear modification factors in PbPb and pPb collisions at s_ N\;N =5.02 TeV. JHEP. 2017. doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2017)039. arXiv:1611.01664

    2017 doi arXiv

  148. [156]

    Study of prompt D ^ 0 meson production in p Pb collisions at s_ NN =5 TeV

    Aaij, Roel and others. Study of prompt D ^ 0 meson production in p Pb collisions at s_ NN =5 TeV. JHEP. 2017. doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)090. arXiv:1707.02750

    2017 doi arXiv

  149. [157]

    Gluon Shadowing in Heavy-Flavor Production at the LHC

    Kusina, Aleksander and Lansberg, Jean-Philippe and Schienbein, Ingo and Shao, Hua-Sheng. Gluon Shadowing in Heavy-Flavor Production at the LHC. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.052004. arXiv:1712.07024

    2018 doi arXiv

  150. [158]

    Neutral pion and meson production in p-Pb collisions at s_NN = 5.02 TeV

    Acharya, Shreyasi and others. Neutral pion and meson production in p-Pb collisions at s_NN = 5.02 TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2018. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6013-8. arXiv:1801.07051

    2018 doi arXiv

  151. [159]

    Constraining gluon distributions in nuclei using dijets in proton-proton and proton-lead collisions at s_ _NN = 5.02 TeV

    Sirunyan, Albert M and others. Constraining gluon distributions in nuclei using dijets in proton-proton and proton-lead collisions at s_ _NN = 5.02 TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.062002. arXiv:1805.04736

    2018 doi arXiv

  152. [160]

    Dijet azimuthal correlations and conditional yields in pp and p+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV with the ATLAS detector

    Aaboud, Morad and others. Dijet azimuthal correlations and conditional yields in pp and p+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02TeV with the ATLAS detector. Phys. Rev. C. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100.034903. arXiv:1901.10440

    2019 doi

  153. [161]

    and others

    Schmookler, B. and others. Modified structure of protons and neutrons in correlated pairs. Nature. 2019. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0925-9. arXiv:2004.12065

    2019 doi

  154. [162]

    Measurement of prompt photon production in s_NN = 8.16 TeV p +Pb collisions with ATLAS

    Aaboud, Morad and others. Measurement of prompt photon production in s_NN = 8.16 TeV p +Pb collisions with ATLAS. Phys. Lett. B. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.07.031. arXiv:1903.02209

    2019 doi

  155. [163]

    Observation of nuclear modifications in W ^ boson production in pPb collisions at s_NN = 8.16 TeV

    Sirunyan, Albert M and others. Observation of nuclear modifications in W ^ boson production in pPb collisions at s_NN = 8.16 TeV. Phys. Lett. B. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135048. arXiv:1905.01486

    2020 doi

  156. [164]

    and Paakkinen, Petja and Paukkunen, Hannu

    Eskola, Kari J. and Paakkinen, Petja and Paukkunen, Hannu. Non-quadratic improved Hessian PDF reweighting and application to CMS dijet measurements at 5.02 TeV. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2019. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6982-2. arXiv:1903.09832

    2019 doi

  157. [165]

    and Soper, Davison E

    Kova r \' k, Karol and Nadolsky, Pavel M. and Soper, Davison E. Hadronic structure in high-energy collisions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2020. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.92.045003. arXiv:1905.06957

    2020 doi

  158. [166]

    and Rojo, Juan and Ubiali, Maria

    Faura, Ferran and Iranipour, Shayan and Nocera, Emanuele R. and Rojo, Juan and Ubiali, Maria. The Strangest Proton?. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2020. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08749-3. arXiv:2009.00014

    2020 doi

  159. [167]

    and Nocera, Emanuele R

    Ethier, Jacob J. and Nocera, Emanuele R. Parton Distributions in Nucleons and Nuclei. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2020. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-011720-042725. arXiv:2001.07722

    2020 doi

  160. [168]

    Nuclear modification factor of light neutral-meson spectra up to high transverse momentum in p Pb collisions at sNN=8.16 TeV

    Acharya, Shreyasi and others. Nuclear modification factor of light neutral-meson spectra up to high transverse momentum in p Pb collisions at sNN=8.16 TeV. Phys. Lett. B. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.136943. arXiv:2104.03116

    2022 doi

  161. [169]

    and others

    Arrington, J. and others. Measurement of the EMC effect in light and heavy nuclei. Phys. Rev. C. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.104.065203. arXiv:2110.08399

    2021 doi

  162. [170]

    Acharya, U. A. and others. Systematic study of nuclear effects in p + Al, p + Au, d + Au, and ^ 3 He + Au collisions at s_ _ NN =200 GeV using ^0 production. Phys. Rev. C. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105.064902. arXiv:2111.05756

    2022 doi

  163. [171]

    Light-nuclei gluons from dijet production in proton-oxygen collisions

    Paakkinen, Petja. Light-nuclei gluons from dijet production in proton-oxygen collisions. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L031504. arXiv:2111.05368

    2022 doi

  164. [172]

    Heavy quarks and jets as probes of the QGP

    Apolin \'a rio, Liliana and Lee, Yen-Jie and Winn, Michael. Heavy quarks and jets as probes of the QGP. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103990. arXiv:2203.16352

    2022 doi

  165. [173]

    W ^ -boson production in p - Pb collisions at s_ NN = 8.16 TeV and PbPb collisions at s_ NN = 5.02 TeV

    Acharya, Shreyasi and others. W ^ -boson production in p - Pb collisions at s_ NN = 8.16 TeV and PbPb collisions at s_ NN = 5.02 TeV. JHEP. 2023. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2023)036. arXiv:2204.10640

    2023 doi

  166. [174]

    Muzakka, K. F. and others. Compatibility of neutrino DIS data and its impact on nuclear parton distribution functions. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074004. arXiv:2204.13157

    2022 doi

  167. [175]

    and others

    Aaij, R. and others. Measurement of the Prompt D0 Nuclear Modification Factor in p-Pb Collisions at sNN=8.16 \, \, TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.102301. arXiv:2205.03936

    2023 doi

  168. [176]

    and others

    Karki, A. and others. First Measurement of the EMC effect in B10 and B11. Phys. Rev. C. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.035201. arXiv:2207.03850

    2023 doi

  169. [177]

    Nuclear Modification Factor of Neutral Pions in the Forward and Backward Regions in p-Pb Collisions

    Aaij, Roel and others. Nuclear Modification Factor of Neutral Pions in the Forward and Backward Regions in p-Pb Collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.042302. arXiv:2204.10608

    2023 doi

  170. [178]

    and others

    Feng, Jonathan L. and others. The Forward Physics Facility at the High-Luminosity LHC. J. Phys. G. 2023. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ac865e. arXiv:2203.05090

    2023 doi

  171. [179]

    and others

    Ruiz, R. and others. Target mass corrections in lepton nucleus DIS: Theory and applications to nuclear PDFs. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104096. arXiv:2301.07715

    2024 doi

  172. [180]

    and Paukkunen, H

    Klasen, M. and Paukkunen, H. Nuclear PDFs After the First Decade of LHC Data. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2024. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102122-022747. arXiv:2311.00450

    2024 doi

  173. [181]

    Dimuons from neutrino-nucleus collisions in the semi-inclusive DIS approach

    Helenius, Ilkka and Paukkunen, Hannu and Yrj. Dimuons from neutrino-nucleus collisions in the semi-inclusive DIS approach. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2024)043. arXiv:2405.12677

    2024 doi

  174. [182]

    Description of di-hadron saturation signals within a universal nuclear parton distribution function approach

    Perepelitsa, Dennis V. Description of di-hadron saturation signals within a universal nuclear parton distribution function approach. Phys. Rev. C. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.111.054901. arXiv:2501.18347

    2025 doi

  175. [183]

    Measurement of isolated prompt photon production in pp and p Pb collisions at the LHC

    Acharya, Shreyasi and others. Measurement of isolated prompt photon production in pp and p Pb collisions at the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2025. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14802-w. arXiv:2502.18054

    2025 doi

  176. [184]

    and others

    Arleo, F. and others. Nuclear cold QCD: Review and future strategy. Phys. Rev. C. 2026. doi:10.1103/4jd1-tgh5. arXiv:2506.17454

    2026 doi arXiv

  177. [185]

    and Gratieri, Diego R

    Francener, Reinaldo and Goncalves, Victor P. and Gratieri, Diego R. Investigating nuclear effects in lepton-ion DIS at the LHC. JHEP. 2026. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2026)149. arXiv:2509.00144

    2026 doi

  178. [186]

    A compendium of cold-nuclear matter baseline predictions in light-ion collisions

    Jonas, Florian and Loizides, Constantin and Mazeliauskas, Aleksas and Paakkinen, Petja and Strangmann, Nicolas. A compendium of cold-nuclear matter baseline predictions in light-ion collisions. 2026. arXiv:2602.15928

    2026

  179. [187]

    Study of Drell-Yan dimuon production in proton-lead collisions at s_NN = 8.16 TeV

    Sirunyan, Albert M and others. Study of Drell-Yan dimuon production in proton-lead collisions at s_NN = 8.16 TeV. JHEP. 2021. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)182. arXiv:2102.13648

    2021 doi

  180. [188]

    Z-boson production in p-Pb collisions at s_ NN =8.16 TeV and Pb-Pb collisions at s_ NN =5.02 TeV

    Acharya, Shreyasi and others. Z-boson production in p-Pb collisions at s_ NN =8.16 TeV and Pb-Pb collisions at s_ NN =5.02 TeV. JHEP. 2020. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)076. arXiv:2005.11126

    2020 doi

  181. [189]

    Measurement of the Z boson production cross-section in proton-lead collisions at s_ NN = 8.16 TeV

    Aaij, Roel and others. Measurement of the Z boson production cross-section in proton-lead collisions at s_ NN = 8.16 TeV. JHEP. 2023. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2023)022. arXiv:2205.10213

    2023 doi

  182. [190]

    Z boson production in PbPb collisions at s_ NN = 5.02 TeV measured by the ATLAS experiment

    Aad, Georges and others. Z boson production in PbPb collisions at s_ NN = 5.02 TeV measured by the ATLAS experiment. Phys. Lett. B. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135262. arXiv:1910.13396

    2020 doi

  183. [191]

    Measurement of W^ boson production in Pb+Pb collisions at s_ NN = 5.02 Te V with the ATLAS detector

    Aad, Georges and others. Measurement of W^ boson production in Pb+Pb collisions at s_ NN = 5.02 Te V with the ATLAS detector. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2019. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7439-3. arXiv:1907.10414

    2019 doi

  184. [192]

    Constraints on the initial State of PbPb collisions via measurements of Z-boson yields and azimuthal anisotropy at s_ NN =5.02 \, \, TeV

    Sirunyan, Albert M and others. Constraints on the initial State of PbPb collisions via measurements of Z-boson yields and azimuthal anisotropy at s_ NN =5.02 \, \, TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.102002. arXiv:2103.14089

    2021 doi

  185. [193]

    Observation of top quark production in proton-nucleus collisions

    Sirunyan, Albert M and others. Observation of top quark production in proton-nucleus collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.242001. arXiv:1709.07411

    2017 doi arXiv

  186. [194]

    Observation of t t production in the lepton+jets and dilepton channels in p+Pb collisions at s_ NN = 8.16 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    Aad, Georges and others. Observation of t t production in the lepton+jets and dilepton channels in p+Pb collisions at s_ NN = 8.16 TeV with the ATLAS detector. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2024)101. arXiv:2405.05078

    2024 doi

  187. [195]

    Observation of tt Production in Pb+Pb Collisions at sNN=5.02 \, \, TeV with the ATLAS Detector

    Aad, Georges and others. Observation of tt Production in Pb+Pb Collisions at sNN=5.02 \, \, TeV with the ATLAS Detector. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.142301. arXiv:2411.10186

    2025 doi

  188. [196]

    Measurement of the top quark pair production cross section in PbPb collisions at s_NN = 5.36 TeV

    Belyaev, Andrey and others. Measurement of the top quark pair production cross section in PbPb collisions at s_NN = 5.36 TeV. 2026. arXiv:2604.27091

    2026 arXiv

  189. [197]

    Eskola, K. J. and Kolhinen, V. J. and Ruuskanen, P. V. Scale evolution of nuclear parton distributions. Nucl. Phys. B. 1998. doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00589-6. arXiv:hep-ph/9802350

    1998 doi arXiv

  190. [198]

    Eskola, K. J. and Kolhinen, V. J. and Salgado, C. A. The Scale dependent nuclear effects in parton distributions for practical applications. Eur. Phys. J. C. 1999. doi:10.1007/s100520050513. arXiv:hep-ph/9807297

    1999 doi arXiv

  191. [199]

    and Kolhinen, Vesa J

    Eskola, Kari J. and Kolhinen, Vesa J. and Paukkunen, Hannu and Salgado, Carlos A. A Global reanalysis of nuclear parton distribution functions. JHEP. 2007. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/05/002. arXiv:hep-ph/0703104

    2007 doi arXiv

  192. [200]

    and Paukkunen, Hannu and Salgado, Carlos A

    Eskola, Kari J. and Paukkunen, Hannu and Salgado, Carlos A. An Improved global analysis of nuclear parton distribution functions including RHIC data. JHEP. 2008. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/102. arXiv:0802.0139

    2008 doi arXiv

  193. [201]

    Eskola, K. J. and Paukkunen, H. and Salgado, C. A. EPS09: A New Generation of NLO and LO Nuclear Parton Distribution Functions. JHEP. 2009. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/04/065. arXiv:0902.4154

    2009 doi arXiv

  194. [202]

    and Paakkinen, Petja and Paukkunen, Hannu and Salgado, Carlos A

    Eskola, Kari J. and Paakkinen, Petja and Paukkunen, Hannu and Salgado, Carlos A. EPPS16: Nuclear parton distributions with LHC data. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2017. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4725-9. arXiv:1612.05741

    2017 doi arXiv

  195. [203]

    and Paakkinen, Petja and Paukkunen, Hannu and Salgado, Carlos A

    Eskola, Kari J. and Paakkinen, Petja and Paukkunen, Hannu and Salgado, Carlos A. EPPS21: a global QCD analysis of nuclear PDFs. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2022. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10359-0. arXiv:2112.12462

    2022 doi

  196. [204]

    and Kumano, S

    Hirai, M. and Kumano, S. and Miyama, M. Determination of nuclear parton distributions. Phys. Rev. D. 2001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.034003. arXiv:hep-ph/0103208

    2001 doi arXiv

  197. [205]

    and Kumano, S

    Hirai, M. and Kumano, S. and Nagai, T. -H. Nuclear parton distribution functions and their uncertainties. Phys. Rev. C. 2004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.70.044905. arXiv:hep-ph/0404093

    2004 doi arXiv

  198. [206]

    and Kumano, S

    Hirai, M. and Kumano, S. and Nagai, T. -H. Determination of nuclear parton distribution functions and their uncertainties in next-to-leading order. Phys. Rev. C. 2007. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.76.065207. arXiv:0709.3038

    2007 doi arXiv

  199. [207]

    Nuclear parton densities and their uncertainties at the next-to-leading order

    Atashbar Tehrani, S. Nuclear parton densities and their uncertainties at the next-to-leading order. Phys. Rev. C. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.86.064301

    2012 doi

  200. [208]

    Global Analysis of Nuclear Parton Distribution Functions and Their Uncertainties at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order

    Khanpour, Hamzeh and Atashbar Tehrani, S. Global Analysis of Nuclear Parton Distribution Functions and Their Uncertainties at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order. Phys. Rev. D. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.014026. arXiv:1601.00939

    2016 doi arXiv

  201. [209]

    and Spiesberger, Hubert and Guzey, Vadim

    Khanpour, Hamzeh and Soleymaninia, Maryam and Atashbar Tehrani, S. and Spiesberger, Hubert and Guzey, Vadim. Nuclear parton distribution functions with uncertainties in a general mass variable flavor number scheme. Phys. Rev. D. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.034010. arXiv:2010.00555

    2021 doi

  202. [210]

    and Rojo, Juan

    Abdul Khalek, Rabah and Ethier, Jacob J. and Rojo, Juan. Nuclear parton distributions from lepton-nucleus scattering and the impact of an electron-ion collider. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2019. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6983-1. arXiv:1904.00018

    2019 doi arXiv

  203. [211]

    and Rojo, Juan and van Weelden, Gijs

    Abdul Khalek, Rabah and Ethier, Jacob J. and Rojo, Juan and van Weelden, Gijs. nNNPDF2.0: quark flavor separation in nuclei from LHC data. JHEP. 2020. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)183. arXiv:2006.14629

    2020 doi

  204. [212]

    and Rabemananjara, Tanjona R

    Abdul Khalek, Rabah and Gauld, Rhorry and Giani, Tommaso and Nocera, Emanuele R. and Rabemananjara, Tanjona R. and Rojo, Juan. nNNPDF3.0: evidence for a modified partonic structure in heavy nuclei. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2022. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10417-7. arXiv:2201.12363

    2022 doi

  205. [213]

    and Yu, J

    Schienbein, I. and Yu, J. Y. and Kova r \' k, K. and Keppel, C. and Morfin, J. G. and Olness, F. and Owens, J. F. PDF Nuclear Corrections for Charged and Neutral Current Processes. Phys. Rev. D. 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.094004. arXiv:0907.2357

    2009 doi arXiv

  206. [214]

    and others

    Kova r \' k, K. and others. nCTEQ15 - Global analysis of nuclear parton distributions with uncertainties in the CTEQ framework. Phys. Rev. D. 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.085037. arXiv:1509.00792

    2016 doi arXiv

  207. [215]

    and others

    Kusina, A. and others. Impact of LHC vector boson production in heavy ion collisions on strange PDFs. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2020. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08532-4. arXiv:2007.09100

    2020 doi

  208. [216]

    Segarra, E. P. and others. Extending nuclear PDF analyses into the high- x , low- Q^2 region. Phys. Rev. D. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114015. arXiv:2012.11566

    2021 doi

  209. [217]

    and Husov\'a, L

    Duwent\"aster, P. and Husov\'a, L. A. and Je. Impact of inclusive hadron production data on nuclear gluon PDFs. Phys. Rev. D. 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094005. arXiv:2105.09873

    2021 doi

  210. [218]

    Duwent\"aster, P. and Je. Impact of heavy quark and quarkonium data on nuclear gluon PDFs. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.114043. arXiv:2204.09982

    2022 doi

  211. [219]

    and Risse, P

    Derakhshanian, N. and Risse, P. and Je z o, T. and Klasen, M. and Kova r \' k, K. and Kusina, A. Determination of Nuclear PDFs using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods. 2026. arXiv:2603.13150

    2026

  212. [220]

    Open-source QCD analysis of nuclear parton distribution functions at NLO and NNLO

    Walt, Marina and Helenius, Ilkka and Vogelsang, Werner. Open-source QCD analysis of nuclear parton distribution functions at NLO and NNLO. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.096015. arXiv:1908.03355

    2019 doi

  213. [221]

    NNLO nuclear parton distribution functions with electroweak-boson production data from the LHC

    Helenius, Ilkka and Walt, Marina and Vogelsang, Werner. NNLO nuclear parton distribution functions with electroweak-boson production data from the LHC. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.094031. arXiv:2112.11904

    2022 doi

  214. [222]

    and Sassot, R

    de Florian, D. and Sassot, R. Nuclear parton distributions at next-to-leading order. Phys. Rev. D. 2004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.074028. arXiv:hep-ph/0311227

    2004 doi arXiv

  215. [223]

    Global Analysis of Nuclear Parton Distributions

    de Florian, Daniel and Sassot, Rodolfo and Zurita, Pia and Stratmann, Marco. Global Analysis of Nuclear Parton Distributions. Phys. Rev. D. 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.074028. arXiv:1112.6324

    2012 doi arXiv

  216. [224]

    and Paakkinen, Petja and Paukkunen, Hannu and Salgado, Carlos A

    Eskola, Kari J. and Paakkinen, Petja and Paukkunen, Hannu and Salgado, Carlos A. Proton-PDF uncertainties in extracting nuclear PDFs from W^ production in p+Pb collisions. Eur. Phys. J. C. 2022. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10179-2. arXiv:2202.01074

    2022 doi

  217. [225]

    Denniston, A. W. and others. Modification of Quark-Gluon Distributions in Nuclei by Correlated Nucleon Pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.152502. arXiv:2312.16293

    2024 doi

  218. [226]

    Scaling properties of nuclear parton distributions in short-range-correlation motivated two-component parametrization

    Paakkinen, Petja. Scaling properties of nuclear parton distributions in short-range-correlation motivated two-component parametrization. Phys. Rev. D. 2026. doi:10.1103/kzwm-czbb. arXiv:2510.00252

    2026 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.