Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

OLMES: A Standard for Language Model Evaluations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.08446 v2 pith:VNNHU5KK submitted 2024-06-12 cs.CL cs.AI

OLMES: A Standard for Language Model Evaluations

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords modelsolmesstandardformulationmodeldifferentdocumentedevaluated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Progress in AI is often demonstrated by new models claiming improved performance on tasks measuring model capabilities. Evaluating language models can be particularly challenging, as choices of how a model is evaluated on a task can lead to large changes in measured performance. There is no common standard setup, so different models are evaluated on the same tasks in different ways, leading to claims about which models perform best not being reproducible. We propose OLMES, a completely documented, practical, open standard for reproducible LLM evaluations. In developing this standard, we identify and review the varying factors in evaluation practices adopted by the community - such as details of prompt formatting, choice of in-context examples, probability normalizations, and task formulation. In particular, OLMES supports meaningful comparisons between smaller base models that require the unnatural "cloze" formulation of multiple-choice questions against larger models that can utilize the original formulation. OLMES includes well-considered, documented recommendations guided by results from existing literature as well as new experiments resolving open questions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fluid Language Model Benchmarking

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 8.0

    Fluid Benchmarking, combining IRT-based ability estimation with Fisher-information-based adaptive item selection, improves LM evaluation across efficiency, validity, variance, and saturation in pretraining settings.

  2. HERMES: A Multi-Granularity Labeling Substrate for Pre-training Data Mixtures

    cs.LG 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    HERMES provides a reusable hierarchical labeling substrate for pre-training data that reveals granularity-specific effects in data mixing rules during model training.

  3. Scratchpad Patching: Decoupling Compute from Patch Size in Byte-Level Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    Scratchpad Patching decouples compute from patch size in byte-level language models by inserting entropy-triggered scratchpads to update patch context dynamically.

  4. Safety Under Scaffolding: How Evaluation Conditions Shape Measured Safety

    cs.SE 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    Map-reduce scaffolding degrades measured safety mainly by stripping multiple-choice options (40–89% of the loss is format conversion); scaffold architecture explains only 0.4% of variance and composite safety scores h...

  5. Sparse Layers are Critical to Scaling Looped Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Looped MoE models scale better than standard transformers because different experts activate on each loop pass, recovering expressivity without extra parameters, and support superior early exits.

  6. PLATE: Plasticity-Tunable Efficient Adapters for Geometry-Aware Continual Learning

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    PLATE constructs frozen weight-derived bases B and Q and trains only a small core A, reducing catastrophic forgetting during data-free continual fine-tuning.

  7. Sparse Layers are Critical to Scaling Looped Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Looped-MoE models scale better than dense looped or standard transformers because routing changes across loops, and they enable stronger compute-quality trade-offs via early exits at loop boundaries.

  8. SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Model

    cs.CL 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SmolLM2 is a 1.7B-parameter language model that outperforms Qwen2.5-1.5B and Llama3.2-1B after overtraining on 11 trillion tokens using custom FineMath, Stack-Edu, and SmolTalk datasets in a multi-stage pipeline.