Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 38 references

Sub-micron Circuit Fabrication on Diamond Anvils for Mesoscopic High-Pressure Experiments

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A cleanroom-compatible process patterns 500-nm metal circuits directly on diamond anvil tips, with a tungsten-lead device measuring zirconium's pressure-driven fourfold jump in superconducting transition temperature.

desk verdict Useful fabrication methods paper with a real 500 nm anvil-patterning advance; the abstract's '4-fold Tc jump' doesn't match the data, so it needs a fix before I'd trust the sales pitch. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.03317 v2 pith:VOY3RJO6 submitted 2025-01-06 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.othercond-mat.supr-conquant-ph

Z. R. Rehfuss , K. Zheng , S. L. Gould , K. W. Murch , S. Ran This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.othercond-mat.supr-conquant-ph
keywords diamondanvilcellelectronbeamlithographylift-offsub-micronpatterninghigh-pressuretransportzirconiumsuperconductivitytungstencontactscleanroomfabrication
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a fabrication procedure for patterning sub-micron metal circuits directly on diamond anvil culets, the flat tips that press on the sample, extending over the sharp edge onto the slanted facets. The authors aim to make high-resolution mesoscopic devices inside diamond anvil cells practical in an ordinary cleanroom, using only spin-coated bi-layer resist, electron-beam lithography, metal deposition, and lift-off. To show the circuits survive real high-pressure and cryogenic conditions, they fabricate a ten-lead tungsten device and measure the superconducting transition of zirconium across its structural phase transition near 30 GPa, observing a fourfold jump in critical temperature that matches published work. If the procedure is as reproducible and durable as described, it gives experimentalists a low-barrier route to multi-lead electrical, magnetic, and microwave measurements on compressed materials.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the bi-layer resist stack used for lift-off: roughly 1460 nm of PMMA copolymer EL13 beneath 270 nm of ZEP, with the top layer clearing at a higher dose so the bottom develops an undercut. This undercut lets deposited metal detach cleanly and keeps leads continuous as they cross the culet-facet edge. A roughly 20 nm aluminum discharge layer suppresses charging during electron-beam lithography, and an oxygen-plasma ash immediately before metal deposition is what gives the metal films abrasion resistance on diamond. Registration is achieved by locating the diamond girdle vertices, constructing the culet center, and focusing on culet corners with a small view area, giving alignment better than 100 nm.

What would settle it

Cross-section a patterned anvil at the culet-facet edge after metal deposition and lift-off: if the leads show breaks, thinning, or incomplete lift-off along the sharp edge, the central claim of continuous sub-micron circuits on faceted diamonds fails. A simpler check is to measure the resist thickness profile directly on a diamond culet; if EL13 does not reach roughly 1460 nm at the edge, the undercut mechanism is not operating where it matters.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a specific process sequence produces continuous, strongly adhering metal leads with features down to 500 nm on faceted diamond anvils, and that these leads maintain electrical function under pressures beyond 50 GPa and at dilution-refrigerator temperatures. The process combines a thick EL13 bottom resist layer topped by a thinner ZEP layer, whose different clearing doses form an undercut that makes lift-off reliable; an aluminum discharge layer prevents electron-beam charging; focusing and registration use the culet corners as marks; and an oxygen-plasma ash before metal deposition gives adhesion for Cr, Ti, Ta, Nb, W, Au, Al, and SiO2. The benchmark device, a ten-lead tungsten circuit, tracks zirconium through its HCP-to-BCC transition: the measured superconducting transition rises from 4.3 K at roughly 20 GPa to a double transition near 9.2 K and 10.8 K at higher pressure, reproducing the behavior reported for zirconium and validating the leads for quantitative transport experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The procedure assumes that the resist thicknesses measured on a flat silicon wafer (1460 nm of EL13 and 270 nm of ZEP) are the same on the curved, faceted diamond culet, especially across the sharp culet-to-facet edge; if the resist is thinner or uneven there, the undercut and continuous facet-to-culet leads would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Multi-lead mesoscopic devices such as Hall bars, gated heterostructures, AC calorimeters, and microwave resonators can be patterned directly on the culet with 500-nm resolution, instead of relying on hand-placed wires or bulk electrodes.
  • The same patterned diamond can be reused: tungsten leads are abrasion-resistant, and the device showed no visible wear after reaching 51.1 GPa.
  • Four-wire measurements with many leads can be run simultaneously, improving signal quality and enabling redundant or multi-probe transport studies inside the diamond anvil cell.
  • The benchmark zirconium measurement confirms that patterned leads give quantitative data at cryogenic temperature and high pressure, opening pressure as a usable tuning knob for mesoscopic physics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A transfer not explored in the paper: the same bi-layer stack and oxygen-plasma adhesion treatment should work on other faceted crystalline samples, such as sapphire anvils or shaped single crystals, wherever spin coating and e-beam registration are possible.
  • A testable extension of the benchmark: repeating the zirconium measurement on a second patterned anvil would separate the intrinsic fourfold transition from the pressure-inhomogeneity broadening seen as a double superconducting transition in the reported run.
  • A forward-looking use the authors mention but do not detail: co-fabricating local sensors, such as NV-center magnetometers or micro-thermometers, alongside transport leads could give simultaneous pressure, magnetic, and electrical data on the same sample volume.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a cleanroom-compatible fabrication procedure for patterning metallic lift-off structures directly on diamond anvil culets and slanted facets, using a PMMA copolymer/ZEP bi-layer resist stack, electron-beam lithography with an aluminum discharge layer, and optimized surface preparation. The authors demonstrate 500-nm features, show several example devices, and benchmark the method with a 10-lead tungsten circuit used to measure the superconducting transition of zirconium under pressure. They report a '4-fold jump' of the Zr critical temperature across the structural phase transition near 30 GPa and argue that this validates the robustness of the patterned leads at high pressure and cryogenic temperature.

Significance. If the fabrication procedure is as reproducible as claimed, this is a genuinely useful advance for mesoscopic high-pressure experiments: it lowers the barrier to patterning complex circuits directly on diamond anvils and other faceted crystals using standard cleanroom tools. The paper is appropriately concrete: SEM and optical images document 500-nm features and working multi-lead devices, and the Zr measurement demonstrates that the patterned leads survive the mechanical, chemical, and thermal conditions of a diamond anvil cell experiment. The process description is sufficiently detailed to be reproduced by other groups, and the use of an externally established pressure-induced phase transition as a benchmark avoids circularity. The central quantitative claim in the abstract, however, is not supported by the plotted data and must be corrected.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Fig. 3(d)] The abstract states that the Zr measurement shows 'a 4-fold jump of the critical temperature,' but the data in Fig. 3(d) do not support this ratio. The low-pressure transition is quoted as Tc = 4.3 K, and the high-pressure data show two broadened transitions centered at 9.2 K and 10.8 K. Even taking the largest value, 10.8/4.3 is about 2.5, and the lower transition gives 9.2/4.3 about 2.1. No definition of Tc (onset, midpoint, or zero-resistance) is given that would reconcile these numbers with a factor of 4. The body text itself only says 'dramatic enhancement' and never mentions the 4-fold figure. Because this benchmark is presented as the validation that the patterned circuit survives high-pressure and cryogenic operation, the abstract's headline number must be corrected or explicitly supported by a defined Tc criterion.
  2. [Fig. 3 and 'Reported low-temperature pressure'] The pressure at which each resistance curve was measured is not directly known: the authors report the average of pre- and post-cooldown ruby pressures, with values of 20.2/29.1 GPa for the low-pressure run and 46.8/51.1 GPa for the high-pressure run. Since Tc varies strongly with pressure in this region, this is a meaningful systematic uncertainty, and the statement that the results agree with published data is not quantified against this uncertainty. The qualitative point that Zr is followed through a structural transition is preserved, but the paper should state the pressure uncertainty explicitly in the discussion of the benchmark and, if possible, provide the raw pre/post values alongside the plotted Tc curves.
  3. [Fig. 3(a) and 'Strong adhesion' claim] The paper claims 'strong adhesion to the diamond surface and high abrasion resistance' and notes that no signs of wear were seen up to 51.1 GPa. However, no quantitative adhesion test or repeated-cycling data are presented; the evidence is essentially the successful operation of a few devices. The claim is plausible and supported by the device images, but the wording in the abstract and introduction goes beyond what is demonstrated. Please soften the wording or add a quantitative measure (e.g., repeated thermal/pressure cycling statistics or a scratch/adhesion test).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The term 'florescence' appears in the caption of Fig. 3(c); it should be 'fluorescence'.
  2. [Fig. 3(d) caption] The caption mentions 'below and above the HCP to BCC structural transition' but does not state whether the plotted Tc values are onsets, midpoints, or zero-resistance values; please define the criterion used.
  3. [Footnote 30] The assumption that resist thicknesses measured on a flat Si wafer are identical on the curved, faceted diamond culet is acknowledged in the footnote, but it would be useful to mention in the main text what the practical consequence would be if the resist were thinner at the culet-facet edge, and whether this motivated the use of two EL-13 layers.
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] The scale-bar labels in Fig. 2 appear garbled (e.g., '1 /uni03BCm'); please ensure the correct micron symbols are rendered.
  5. [Section 'External Pressure'] The first sentence begins with 'External Pressure is one of the fundamental thermodynamic variables'; the capitalization is inconsistent with the rest of the text and should be made uniform.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper's benchmark is validated against an externally published Zr phase transition, and no claim reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

This is an experimental methods paper, not a derivation. The central claim is that the described fabrication procedure yields sub-micron lift-off structures on diamond anvils; this is supported by SEM images and optical micrographs of patterned devices, not by any fitted parameter or imported theoretical result. The benchmark measurement uses a published, external result for zirconium: the paper states that 'the dramatic increase in the critical temperature has been previously reported' and cites Akahama et al. (ref. 28), an independent source. No cited result is authored by the present authors, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is invoked to force a conclusion. The only explicit approximation is in footnote 30, where resist thicknesses measured on a flat Si wafer are assumed to hold on the curved diamond culet; this is a stated assumption about process transfer, not a circular step, because the benchmark and the fabrication outcome are not defined in terms of that assumption. The abstract's '4-fold jump' of the critical temperature is not supported by the plotted data in Fig. 3(d), where the low-pressure Tc is 4.3 K and the high-pressure double transition is centered at 9.2 K and 10.8 K, implying a ratio of roughly 2.1 to 2.5; however, this is an internal consistency or data-presentation concern, not circularity, and does not alter the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The fabrication claim relies on process assumptions (thickness uniformity on faceted diamonds, adhesion inferred from visual inspection) and the benchmark relies on the literature phase boundary and a pressure averaging convention. No model parameters were fitted; the pressure assignment is the only hand-chosen number in the analysis.

free parameters (1)
  • reported low-temperature pressure = average of pre- and post-cooldown ruby pressures
    The pressure at which Tc is measured is not directly measured; it is taken as the arithmetic mean of the room-temperature ruby pressures before cooling and after warming. This choice affects the pressure axis of the benchmark and is a data reduction convention rather than a fitted model parameter.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Resist thickness on the diamond culet matches the thickness measured on a flat Si wafer under the same spin recipe.
    Footnote 30 states the authors assume the thickness on diamond is similar to the ellipsometer measurement on Si. The undercut and edge coverage depend on this thickness.
  • domain assumption The low-temperature pressure is well represented by the average of pre- and post-cooldown room-temperature ruby pressures.
    The authors state they cannot measure pressure at cryogenic temperatures, so they use the mean of the two room-temperature readings. This assumes no systematic pressure drift or relaxation during cooling.
  • domain assumption Zirconium's superconducting transition near 30 GPa follows the published behavior in Akahama et al. 1990.
    The benchmark interprets the measured Tc increase as the known HCP to BCC transition; no structural measurement is performed in this work.
  • domain assumption The measured resistance reflects the Zr sample rather than the tungsten leads, contacts, or cBN epoxy insulation.
    Four-wire geometry subtracts lead resistance, but contact integrity and the absence of shorting or spurious signals are inferred from the appearance of a clear superconducting transition.
  • domain assumption Adhesion and abrasion resistance are adequately inferred from optical inspection and repeated use.
    The paper states the leads show no signs of wear up to 51.1 GPa based on images, rather than quantitative pull, scratch, or adhesion tests.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sub-micron Circuit Fabrication on Diamond Anvils for Mesoscopic High-Pressure Experiments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VOY3RJO6

@misc{pith2026250103317,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sub-micron Circuit Fabrication on Diamond Anvils for Mesoscopic High-Pressure Experiments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VOY3RJO6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.03317}
}
abstract

We present a novel fabrication procedure to produce high-quality lift-off structures on diamond anvils extending from the culet down to the slanted facets. Feature sizes down to 500 nm are achieved through the use of a bi-layer resist stack and electron beam lithography. Device structures with strong adhesion to the diamond surface and high abrasion resistance are realized by optimizing the surface treatment. To benchmark our process, we fabricate a multi-lead tungsten circuit to measure changes of the superconducting transition temperature of zirconium across the structural phase transition at $\sim$30 GPa; showing a 4-fold jump of the critical temperature. Our process is easily reproducible in most traditional academic and industrial cleanroom facilities. This work paves the way for complex and high-precision fabrication and measurements inside diamond anvil cells and on other faceted crystalline samples.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.03317 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Post-Perovskite Phase Transition in MgSiO<sub>3</sub>

    Motohiko Murakami, Kei Hirose, Katsuyuki Kawamura, Nagayoshi Sata, and Yasuo Ohishi. Post-Perovskite Phase Transition in MgSiO<sub>3</sub>. Science , 304(5672):855--858, 2004

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    A. P. Drozdov, M. I. Eremets, I. A. Troyan, V. Ksenofontov, and S. I. Shylin. Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system. Nature , 525(7567):73--76, Sep 2015

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    2D Materials and Heterostructures at Extreme Pressure

    Linglong Zhang, Yilin Tang, Ahmed Raza Khan, Md Mehedi Hasan, Ping Wang, Han Yan, Tanju Yildirim, Juan Felipe Torres, Guru Prakash Neupane, Yupeng Zhang, Quan Li, and Yuerui Lu. 2D Materials and Heterostructures at Extreme Pressure. Advanced Science , 7(24):2002697, 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Naumov, Walter Schnelle, Lei Wang, Kumari Gaurav Rana, Stuart Parkin, Sergiy A

    Yanpeng Qi, Wujun Shi, Peter Werner, Pavel G. Naumov, Walter Schnelle, Lei Wang, Kumari Gaurav Rana, Stuart Parkin, Sergiy A. Medvedev, Binghai Yan, and Claudia Felser. Pressure-induced superconductivity and topological quantum phase transitions in a quasi-one-dimensional topological insulator: Bi4I4. npj Quantum Materials , 3(1):4, Jan 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Alp, Dongzhou Zhang, Jingui Xu, Yuming Xiao, and Yogesh K

    Wenli Bi, Trenton Culverhouse, Zachary Nix, Weiwei Xie, Hung-Ju Tien, Tay-Rong Chang, Utpal Dutta, Jiyong Zhao, Barbara Lavina, Esen E. Alp, Dongzhou Zhang, Jingui Xu, Yuming Xiao, and Yogesh K. Vohra. Drastic enhancement of magnetic critical temperature and amorphization in topological magnet EuSn2P2 under pressure. npj Quantum Materials , 7(1):43, Apr 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Insulator-to-Superconductor Transition in Quasi-One-Dimensional HfS3 under Pressure

    Binbin Yue, Wei Zhong, Wen Deng, Ting Wen, Yonggang Wang, Yunyu Yin, Pengfei Shan, Jian-Tao Wang, Xiaohui Yu, and Fang Hong. Insulator-to-Superconductor Transition in Quasi-One-Dimensional HfS3 under Pressure. Journal of the American Chemical Society , 145(2):1301--1309, Jan 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    In situ characterization of the high pressure -- high temperature melting curve of platinum

    Simone Anzellini, Virginia Monteseguro, Enrico Bandiello, Agn \`e s Dewaele, Leonid Burakovsky, and Daniel Errandonea. In situ characterization of the high pressure -- high temperature melting curve of platinum. Scientific Reports , 9(1):13034, Sep 2019

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    J.J. Hamlin. Superconductivity in the metallic elements at high pressures. Physica C: Superconductivity and its Applications , 514:59--76, 2015. Superconducting Materials: Conventional, Unconventional and Undetermined

    work page 2015

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    A Practical Review of the Laser-Heated Diamond Anvil Cell for University Laboratories and Synchrotron Applications

    Simone Anzellini and Silvia Boccato. A Practical Review of the Laser-Heated Diamond Anvil Cell for University Laboratories and Synchrotron Applications. Crystals , 10(6), 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    C. E. Weir, E. R. Lippincott, A. Van Valkenburg, and E. N. Bunting. Infrared Studies in the 1- to 15-Micron Region to 30,000 Atmospheres. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. A Phys. Chem. , 63A(1):55--62, 1959

    1959

  3. [11]

    Diamond high pressure windows

    A Van Valkenburg. Diamond high pressure windows. Diamond Research , 1964:17--20, 1964

    1964

  4. [12]

    Bassett, Taro Takahashi, and Philip W

    William A. Bassett, Taro Takahashi, and Philip W. Stook. X‐Ray Diffraction and Optical Observations on Crystalline Solids up to 300 kbar . Review of Scientific Instruments , 38(1):37--42, 01 1967

    1967

  5. [13]

    G. J. Piermarini and S. Block. Ultrahigh pressure diamond‐anvil cell and several semiconductor phase transition pressures in relation to the fixed point pressure scale . Review of Scientific Instruments , 46(8):973--979, 08 1975

    1975

  6. [14]

    R. A. Forman, G. J. Piermarini, J. D. Barnett, and S. Block. Pressure measurement made by the utilization of ruby sharp-line luminescence . Science , 176(4032):284--285, 1972

    1972

  7. [15]

    H. K. Mao. High-Pressure Physics: Sustained Static Generation of 1.36 to 1.72 Megabars. Science , 200(4346):1145--1147, 1978

    1978

  8. [16]

    Solopova, Artem Abakumov, Stuart Turner, Michael Hanfland, Elena Bykova, Maxim Bykov, Clemens Prescher, Vitali B

    Natalia Dubrovinskaia, Leonid Dubrovinsky, Natalia A. Solopova, Artem Abakumov, Stuart Turner, Michael Hanfland, Elena Bykova, Maxim Bykov, Clemens Prescher, Vitali B. Prakapenka, Sylvain Petitgirard, Irina Chuvashova, Biliana Gasharova, Yves-Laurent Mathis, Petr Ershov, Irina...

    2016

  9. [17]

    Block and G

    S. Block and G. Piermarini. Phys. Today , 29(44), 1976

    1976

  10. [18]

    Grzybowski and Arthur L

    Thomas A. Grzybowski and Arthur L. Ruoff. Band-Overlap Metallization of BaTe. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 53:489--492, Jul 1984

    1984

  11. [19]

    Zhang, Siu Tung Lam, Y

    Che-hsuan Ku, Xinyou Liu, Jianyu Xie, W. Zhang, Siu Tung Lam, Y. Chen, Xuefeng Zhou, Yusheng Zhao, Shanmin Wang, Sen Yang, Kwing To Lai, and Swee K. Goh. Patterned diamond anvils prepared via laser writing for electrical transport measurements of thin quantum materials under p...

    2022

  12. [20]

    Welzel and F

    Oliver P. Welzel and F. Malte Grosche. Patterned anvils for high pressure measurements at low temperature. Review of Scientific Instruments , 82(3):033901, 03 2011

    2011

  13. [21]

    Towards the Electronic Response of Carbon-Based Van Der Waals Heterostructures in a Diamond Anvil Cell

    George Thomas Foskaris. Towards the Electronic Response of Carbon-Based Van Der Waals Heterostructures in a Diamond Anvil Cell . Phd thesis, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 2022. UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 4584

    2022

  14. [22]

    Weir, Jagannadham Akella, Chantel Aracne-Ruddle, Yogesh K

    Samuel T. Weir, Jagannadham Akella, Chantel Aracne-Ruddle, Yogesh K. Vohra, and Shane A. Catledge. Epitaxial diamond encapsulation of metal microprobes for high pressure experiments . Applied Physics Letters , 77(21):3400--3402, 11 2000

    2000

  15. [23]

    Data-driven exploration for pressure-induced superconductors using diamond anvil cell with boron-doped diamond electrodes and undoped diamond insulating layer

    Ryo Matsumoto, Zhufeng Hou, Shintaro Adachi, Masanori Nagao, Sayaka Yamamoto, Peng Song, Noriyuki Kataoka, Pedro Baptista de Castro, Kensei Terashima, Hiroyuki Takeya, Hiromi Tanaka, Takayoshi Yokoya, Tetsuo Irifune, Kiyoyuki Terakura, and Yoshihiko Takano. Data-driven explora...

    2020

  16. [24]

    Pressure-Induced Superconductivity in Sulfur-Doped SnSe Single Crystal Using Boron-Doped Diamond Electrode-Prefabricated Diamond Anvil Cell

    Ryo Matsumoto, Hiroshi Hara, Hiromi Tanaka, Kazuki Nakamura, Noriyuki Kataoka, Sayaka Yamamoto, Aichi Yamashita, Shintaro Adachi, Tetsuo Irifune, Hiroyuki Takeya, and Yoshihiko Takano. Pressure-Induced Superconductivity in Sulfur-Doped SnSe Single Crystal Using Boron-Doped Dia...

    2018

  17. [25]

    Bhattacharyya, W

    P. Bhattacharyya, W. Chen, X. Huang, S. Chatterjee, B. Huang, B. Kobrin, Y. Lyu, T. J. Smart, M. Block, E. Wang, Z. Wang, W. Wu, S. Hsieh, H. Ma, S. Mandyam, B. Chen, E. Davis, Z. M. Geballe, C. Zu, V. Struzhkin, R. Jeanloz, J. E. Moore, T. Cui, G. Galli, B. I. Halperin, C. R....

    2024

  18. [26]

    Band Engineering of Large-Twist-Angle Graphene /h - BN Moir\'e Superlattices with Pressure

    Yang Gao, Xianqing Lin, Thomas Smart, Penghong Ci, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Raymond Jeanloz, Jun Ni, and Junqiao Wu. Band Engineering of Large-Twist-Angle Graphene /h - BN Moir\'e Superlattices with Pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 125:226403, Nov 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    Martin, Joel W

    Yabin Chen, Feng Ke, Penghong Ci, Changhyun Ko, Taegyun Park, Sahar Saremi, Huili Liu, Yeonbae Lee, Joonki Suh, Lane W. Martin, Joel W. Ager, Bin Chen, and Junqiao Wu. Pressurizing Field-Effect Transistors of Few-Layer MoS2 in a Diamond Anvil Cell. Nano Letters , 17(1):194--19...

    2017

  20. [28]

    Superconductivity and Phase Transition of Zirconium under High Pressure up to 50 GPa

    Yuichi Akahama, Mototada Kobayashi, and Haruki Kawamura. Superconductivity and Phase Transition of Zirconium under High Pressure up to 50 GPa. journal of the physical society of japan , 59(11):3843 – 3845, 1990. Cited by: 55

    1990

  21. [29]

    For a newly purchased diamond, the acid cleaning procedures may be skipped partially or entirely

    Most of the acid treatments are to remove devices fabricated previously on the diamond. For a newly purchased diamond, the acid cleaning procedures may be skipped partially or entirely

  22. [30]

    The thickness is measured using ellipsometry

    We spin the resists separately on a flat Si wafer using the same spin and bake recipe at the same temperature and humidity. The thickness is measured using ellipsometry. We assume that the resist thickness on actual diamond sample is similar to what has been measured on Si wafer

  23. [31]

    These are exposed areas used as focusing points and alignment marks during our lithography step

    There are two metallic islands on opposing corners of the left and right side of the culet. These are exposed areas used as focusing points and alignment marks during our lithography step. These may be readily removed with a UV laser drill if needed

  24. [32]

    Equations of state of six metals above 94 GPa

    Agn\`es Dewaele, Paul Loubeyre, and Mohamed Mezouar. Equations of state of six metals above 94 GPa. Phys. Rev. B , 70:094112, Sep 2004

    2004

  25. [33]

    Sterer, M

    E. Sterer, M. P. Pasternak, and R. D. Taylor. A multipurpose miniature diamond anvil cell. Review of Scientific Instruments , 61(3):1117--1119, 03 1990

    1990

  26. [34]

    Geballe and Viktor V

    Zachary M. Geballe and Viktor V. Struzhkin. AC calorimetry of H2O at pressures up to 9 GPa in diamond anvil cells. Journal of Applied Physics , 121(24):245901, 06 2017

    2017

  27. [35]

    Ramu and John E

    Ashok T. Ramu and John E. Bowers. A “2-omega” technique for measuring anisotropy of thermal conductivity. Review of Scientific Instruments , 83(12):124903, 12 2012

    2012

  28. [36]

    C. G. L. B ttcher, N. R. Poniatowski, A. Grankin, M. E. Wesson, Z. Yan, U. Vool, V. M. Galitski, and A. Yacoby. Circuit quantum electrodynamics detection of induced two-fold anisotropic pairing in a hybrid superconductor--ferromagnet bilayer. Nature Physics , 20(10):1609--1615...

    2024

  29. [37]

    u ller, Jared H Cole, and J\

    Clemens M\" u ller, Jared H Cole, and J\" u rgen Lisenfeld. Towards understanding two-level-systems in amorphous solids: insights from quantum circuits. Reports on Progress in Physics , 82(12):124501, October 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    D. D. Jackson, C. Aracne-Ruddle, V. Malba, S. T. Weir, S. A. Catledge, and Y. K. Vohra. Magnetic susceptibility measurements at high pressure using designer diamond anvils. Review of Scientific Instruments , 74(4):2467--2471, 04 2003

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.