Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Visual representations in the human brain are aligned with large language models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.11737 v2 pith:VUKQSLKU submitted 2022-09-23 cs.CV cs.LGq-bio.NC

Visual representations in the human brain are aligned with large language models

classification cs.CV cs.LGq-bio.NC
keywords braininformationrepresentationscaptionscomplexmodelsscenevisual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The human brain extracts complex information from visual inputs, including objects, their spatial and semantic interrelations, and their interactions with the environment. However, a quantitative approach for studying this information remains elusive. Here, we test whether the contextual information encoded in large language models (LLMs) is beneficial for modelling the complex visual information extracted by the brain from natural scenes. We show that LLM embeddings of scene captions successfully characterise brain activity evoked by viewing the natural scenes. This mapping captures selectivities of different brain areas, and is sufficiently robust that accurate scene captions can be reconstructed from brain activity. Using carefully controlled model comparisons, we then proceed to show that the accuracy with which LLM representations match brain representations derives from the ability of LLMs to integrate complex information contained in scene captions beyond that conveyed by individual words. Finally, we train deep neural network models to transform image inputs into LLM representations. Remarkably, these networks learn representations that are better aligned with brain representations than a large number of state-of-the-art alternative models, despite being trained on orders-of-magnitude less data. Overall, our results suggest that LLM embeddings of scene captions provide a representational format that accounts for complex information extracted by the brain from visual inputs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ErrorRadar: Benchmarking Complex Mathematical Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models Via Error Detection

    cs.CL 2024-10 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    ErrorRadar is a new benchmark of 2,500 multimodal K-12 math problems for MLLM error step identification and categorization, where GPT-4o trails human experts by ~10%.

  2. A foundation model of vision, audition, and language for in-silico neuroscience

    q-bio.NC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    TRIBE v2 is a multimodal AI model that predicts human brain activity more accurately than linear encoding models and recovers established neuroscientific findings through in-silico testing.

  3. NeuroFlow: Toward Unified Visual Encoding and Decoding from Neural Activity

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    NeuroFlow is the first unified flow model for bidirectional visual encoding and decoding from neural activity using NeuroVAE and cross-modal flow matching.

  4. Meta-learning In-Context Enables Training-Free Cross Subject Brain Decoding

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A meta-optimized in-context learning approach enables training-free cross-subject semantic visual decoding from fMRI by inferring individual neural encoding patterns via hierarchical inference on a few examples.

  5. Task-conditioned probing of instruction-tuned multimodal LLMs: Region-specific brain alignment patterns under naturalistic stimuli

    q-bio.NC 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Instruction-tuned multimodal LLMs show higher brain alignment (~9-20% over baselines) under task-specific instructions during naturalistic video stimuli, with task-conditioned subspaces and weak semantic coupling.