Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 7 cited by

At quadratic order in the spin of a compact body, the paper proves that motion in type-D Einstein spacetimes with a Killing–Yano tensor remains Liouville–Arnold integrable when the body's spin-induced quadrupole matches a black hole's (defo

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 11:24 UTC pith:VW43GZU7

load-bearing objection Plausibly right and genuinely extends the Kerr result, but the central theorem rests on an unproved identity (5.15); referee should demand the proof before accepting. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2601.06416 v2 pith:VW43GZU7 submitted 2026-01-10 gr-qc nlin.SI

Symplectic mechanics of relativistic spinning compact bodies. III. quadratic-in-spin integrability in Type-D Einstein spacetimes: persistence and breakdown

Paul Ramond , Soichiro Isoyama , Adrien Druart This is my paper
classification gr-qc nlin.SI
keywords spin-induced quadrupoleintegrable systemsKilling-Yano tensorCarter constantRüdiger constantMathisson-Papapetrou-Tulczyjew-Dixonextreme-mass-ratio inspiralstype-D Einstein spacetimes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

At quadratic order in a compact body's spin, the paper establishes whether the motion is integrable in the same sense as geodesics around Kerr. For a body whose spin-induced quadrupole matches a black hole's (deformability κ=1), the answer is yes in any type-D Einstein spacetime with a Killing–Yano tensor: the system admits five independent Poisson-commuting constants of motion, including generalizations of the Carter and Rüdiger constants. For κ≠1, which includes neutron stars and exotic compact objects, those constants fail and integrability breaks down. Because quadratic-in-spin dephasing can reach tens of radians over the mission lifetime of LISA, the result sharpens the question of whether EMRI observations can distinguish the nature of the secondary by the persistence or loss of orbital predictability.

Core claim

Working within the Mathisson–Papapetrou–Tulczyjew–Dixon framework under the Tulczyjew–Dixon spin supplementary condition, the paper shows that the quadratic-in-spin dynamics of a compact body with the black-hole-like spin-induced quadrupole (κ=1) is Liouville–Arnold integrable in any four-dimensional Einstein spacetime admitting a non-degenerate Killing–Yano tensor. Integrability is established by exhibiting five independent Poisson-commuting first integrals on the reduced ten-dimensional physical phase space: the Hamiltonian, two Killing invariants, the linear Rüdiger constant, and a quadratic Carter–Rüdiger constant. For spin-induced quadrupoles with κ≠1, the symmetry-generated invariants

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the covariant Hamiltonian formulation of the MPTD dynamics on a 14-dimensional phase space, reduced to a 10-dimensional physical space P by Dirac brackets that enforce the Tulczyjew–Dixon spin supplementary condition. The key geometric input is a non-degenerate Killing–Yano tensor f_ab, whose existence forces the spacetime to be Petrov type-D; in Einstein spacetimes, a null-bivector decomposition reduces the curvature and Killing–Yano structures to a handful of scalars (the complex Weyl scalar Ψ₂, the cosmological constant Λ, and the KY scalar Z). These simplified forms make the Poisson-bracket computations tractable and yield the five commuting first integrals for κ

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the assumed algebraic form of the spin-induced quadrupole, J_abcd = (3κ/μ³) p_[a Θ_b][c p_d], together with truncation of the multipole expansion at quadrupole order; if a real body's quadrupolar response is frequency-dependent, dissipative, or involves higher multipoles, the conserved quantities and the integrability result cease to apply.

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the quadratic-in-spin MPTD equations in Kerr with the Tulczyjew–Dixon condition for a body with κ=2 and monitor the Carter–Rüdiger constant Q: if Q remains conserved to numerical precision over long times (rather than exhibiting secular drift or chaotic phase-space structure), the claim that integrability breaks down for κ≠1 would be falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For black-hole-like secondaries (κ=1), EMRI waveform models can be built with action-angle variables and two-timescale methods at quadratic order in spin, extending established geodesic and linear-in-spin templates.
  • The covariant construction of the Carter–Rüdiger constant provides new constants of motion valid beyond Kerr, enabling symmetry-based tests of black-hole uniqueness (no-hair) across type-D Einstein spacetimes.
  • For material or exotic secondaries (κ≠1), integrability fails, implying that long-term orbital coherence is lost; waveform templates for such systems must account for non-integrable or chaotic effects.
  • The deformability parameter κ becomes an observational discriminant: precise EMRI observations can in principle distinguish black holes from neutron stars or exotic objects by whether the inspiral preserves the quadratic constants.
  • The conserved mass μ̃ and the generalized constants are defined covariantly and reduce to Kerr results, providing a foundation for realistic beyond-Kerr inspiral models for LISA.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The common vanishing of {K,Q} on P hints at a deeper tie between these two KY-generated invariants and the underlying SO(1,3) spin-phase-space algebra, possibly predicting which higher multipole moments would still preserve integrability for κ=1.
  • A natural testable extension is to perturb the quadrupole ansatz (1.7) with small corrections (e.g., tidal or dissipative terms) and compute the first non-vanishing bracket {Q,H}; this would quantify how much effective 'black-hole-likeness' is needed to keep integrability approximately intact.
  • For realistic neutron-star κ values (2–14), numerical Poincaré sections of the quadratic-in-spin MPTD dynamics in Kerr could identify the timescale on which chaos emerges, telling observers how long a coherent waveform can be trusted for non-black-hole secondaries.
  • Because the proof relies on the Einstein condition (Ricci ∝ metric), the result likely does not extend to spacetimes with non-trivial matter sources; electromagnetic or scalar hair on the background could break conservation of Q even for κ=1, which is interesting for no-hair tests.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a covariant Hamiltonian formulation of Mathisson–Papapetrou–Tulczyjew–Dixon dynamics at quadratic order in spin under the Tulczyjew–Dixon spin supplementary condition, in four-dimensional Einstein spacetimes admitting a non-degenerate Killing–Yano tensor. It models the spin-induced quadrupole with a deformability parameter κ and reduces the dynamics to a 10-dimensional Dirac-bracket phase space. The central claim is that for κ=1 (black-hole-like quadrupole), the system is Liouville–Arnold integrable, with five Poisson-commuting first integrals H, Ξ, X, K, Q, including generalized Carter and Rüdiger constants; for κ≠1 these symmetry-generated invariants are claimed to fail and integrability is said not to persist. The proof proceeds by covariant Poisson-bracket computations using a null-bivector decomposition, with Kerr as a special case.

Significance. If the central theorem is fully established, it would be a valuable extension of Kerr integrability to the full class of type-D Einstein spacetimes with Killing–Yano symmetry at quadratic order in spin, with potential consequences for EMRI waveform modelling and tests of compact-object structure. The paper is methodically covariant, parameter-free in the integrability construction, and explicitly identifies the κ-dependent cancellations that make κ=1 special. The claimed extension beyond Kerr and beyond linear order is significant. However, the proof as written contains several load-bearing gaps, and the positive result cannot be regarded as established until these are addressed.

major comments (4)
  1. [§V.B.4, Eq. (5.15)] The proof of {Q,C_λ}|_P=0, and hence the stability of P under the flow of Q and the Liouville–Arnold integrability claim, depends critically on the identity F_a(bc)d+4 M̃_a(bc)d=0. The text states that this is 'largely non-trivial', was 'found serendipitously using coordinate calculations in Kerr', and that a proof exists but is 'long and not very illuminating'. No proof or reference is supplied. Since the theorem is asserted for all Einstein spacetimes with a Killing–Yano tensor, a Kerr coordinate verification is not sufficient. Please provide a complete covariant proof, or a precise published reference, for (5.15) and for the consequent relation (5.16).
  2. [§V.A.1 and §V.A.3] Liouville–Arnold integrability requires five functionally independent first integrals in involution on the 10-dimensional phase space. The paper asserts independence but does not check that the Jacobian of (H,Ξ,X,K,Q) has rank 5 on P. This is not automatic from the commutation relations; for example, the quadratic expression Q may degenerate or become functionally dependent on the other integrals on open subsets of P. Please provide an explicit functional-independence check, or at least a clear argument showing that the five gradients are linearly independent on P.
  3. [Abstract and §V.A.4/§V.B.1] The statement that integrability 'does not persist' for κ≠1 is stronger than what the calculation shows. Equation (5.4) demonstrates that the particular symmetry-generated invariant K fails generically when 1−κ≠0, and Q was constructed only for κ=1. But absence of these two constructed constants does not rule out the existence of another complete set of five commuting first integrals. If the paper intends to claim genuine non-integrability for κ≠1, a dedicated argument is required; otherwise the conclusion should be weakened to 'the constructed Rüdiger and Carter constants are not conserved in general'.
  4. [Appendix E, Eqs. (E3)–(E4)] The covariant proof of the identities (E3) used to extend the vacuum result of [49] relies on the asserted 'symmetric property' L_ab L_cd = L_ad L_cb, with L_ab=2ℓ_a n_b. This identity is not correct as written: L_ab L_cd = 4ℓ_a n_b ℓ_c n_d, whereas L_ad L_cb = 4ℓ_a n_d ℓ_c n_b, which are not equal for a generic null tetrad. The analogous statement for M_ab is also not justified. Since (E3) is used to establish conservation of Q in vacuum type-D spacetimes and thus feeds into {Q,H}=0, please correct the definition or supply a valid proof of (E3).
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that all results are 'numerically verified', but the body of the paper contains no numerical experiment or verification section. Either add the numerical checks or remove this claim.
  2. [References] Paper I is cited as [91] with arXiv:2210.0386 and date (2026), and the companion paper [125] is listed as unpublished (2026). Since the present paper relies on these for the Hamiltonian reduction and the conserved mass, the authors should ensure that the references are complete and accessible, or include the necessary derivations in an appendix.
  3. [§IV (introductory paragraph)] The text mentions 'type-D Einstein spacetimes admitting a rank-4 KY tensor'; a Killing–Yano tensor is rank 2. This appears to be a typo and should be corrected.
  4. [§II.C, Fig. 1] The dimensions in the figure caption and the surrounding text are easy to confuse (11D T, 12D N, 10D P). Please clarify the notation in the figure, for instance by explicitly writing the dimensions of T, N, and P in the caption.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No constructional circularity: the bracket computation is direct and parameter-free; self-citations provide framework/baseline, and the unproved identity (5.15) is an omitted proof rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation is a direct covariant Poisson-bracket computation with no fitted parameters: the only free input, κ, is an assumed constitutive parameter (Eq. 1.7), and it enters explicitly in the Hamiltonian and brackets rather than being adjusted to produce the claimed integrals. The Carter–Rüdiger candidate Q is taken from Ref. [49], but the paper does not treat [49] as a black box: Sec. IV corrects the symmetrization of M̃abcd (Eq. 4.5), supplies a dictionary to type-D spacetimes, and Appendix E gives a covariant proof of the only previously numerical identity (Eq. (103) of [48]). Thus the generalization to Einstein/KY spacetimes is not imported merely by citation. The self-citations to Paper I and [50] provide the linear-order and Kerr baselines and technical bracket lemmas; the new content is the explicit computation of the four brackets {K,H}, {Q,H}, {K,Q}, and {Q,Cα} in Sec. V. There is one genuine gap: identity (5.15), F_a(bc)d + 4 M̃_a(bc)d = 0, is asserted with the text 'found serendipitously using coordinate calculations in Kerr' and a proof that is 'long and not very illuminating' is not given; it is essential for (5.16) and hence for {Q,Cα}|P=0. This is an omitted proof, not a circular reduction: the identity is a tensor statement independent of the conclusion, and if it failed the theorem would be unproved rather than trivially true. The κ≠1 'breakdown' is likewise an inference from the failure of the constructed invariants, not a no-go theorem. I found no definitional equivalence, fitted-input-as-prediction, or author-imported uniqueness chain that would make the central result circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; κ is a physical deformability parameter, not a fitted constant. The abelian axioms listed include the key constitutive model, the spacetime class, the Hamiltonian-reduction framework, and the unproven identity (5.15). The most fragile is (5.15), which is load-bearing for the {Q,Cα}=0 bracket and hence for the central integrability claim.

axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The spin-induced quadrupole constitutive relation J_abcd = (3κ/μ³) p_[a Θ_b][c p_d] and the truncation at quadrupole order (neglecting octupoles and higher).
    The entire κ-dependent result is built on this algebraic model; it is adopted from previous work, not derived here. Location: Eq. (1.7), Section I.B.
  • domain assumption The background is a 4D Einstein (vacuum/Λ-vacuum) spacetime admitting a non-degenerate Killing–Yano tensor (3.1); this implies Petrov type D and the curvature form (3.24).
    The class of spacetimes is not derived; the proof relies on the KY-induced curvature decomposition (3.21)-(3.24). Location: Section III.
  • standard math The Poisson bracket structure (2.3) and the Dirac–Bergmann reduction to a 10D physical phase space P are correct, including the invertibility of {C_α, C_β} and the bracket shortcut (2.17).
    The framework is standard Souriau–Künzle Poisson brackets and Dirac–Bergmann reduction; however, details are delegated to Paper I [91], which is not fully accessible. Location: Section II.
  • ad hoc to paper The identity F_{a(bc)d} + 4M̃_{a(bc)d} = 0 (Eq. 5.15) holds in type-D Einstein spacetimes.
    The paper states this 'largely non-trivial' identity and says a proof exists but is 'long and not very illuminating' (Section V.B.4); the proof is not shown, so it functions as an unproved assumption in the presented derivation.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 36594 in / 16708 out tokens · 158614 ms · 2026-08-03T11:24:50.469847+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the integrability of spinning compact body dynamics at quadratic order in spin in four-dimensional Einstein spacetimes admitting a non-degenerate Killing--Yano tensor. Working within the Mathisson--Papapetrou--Tulczyjew--Dixon framework under the Tulczyjew--Dixon spin supplementary condition, we model the spin-induced quadrupole with a deformability parameter $\kappa$, where $\kappa=1$ corresponds to black holes. The dynamics is formulated as a Hamiltonian system on a 10-dimensional physical phase space obtained by Dirac--Bergmann reduction. For $\kappa=1$, we establish Liouville--Arnold integrability at quadratic order in spin by constructing five independent, Poisson-commuting first integrals, including a generalization of the Carter constant and the R\"udiger constant to quadratic-in-spin order in Einstein spacetimes beyond Kerr. For $\kappa \neq 1$, the R\"udiger and Carter constants are no longer conserved; integrability does not persist at this order. All our results are carried out in a covariant manner and numerically verified, and Kerr is recovered as a special case. These results show that integrability can extend beyond Kerr and beyond the linear-in-spin regime, while its breakdown for $\kappa \neq 1$ points to the spin-induced quadrupole as a decisive probe of compact body structure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.06416 by Adrien Druart, Paul Ramond, Soichiro Isoyama.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Different sub-manifolds are necessary to lift the degeneracies associated to the existence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quadrupolar tidal effects destroy the integrability of black hole geodesics: analytic proof and numerical evidence of chaos

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Leading-order tidally induced quadrupoles destroy Kerr geodesic integrability: no polynomial deformation of the Carter constant is conserved for generic Love couplings and Kerr spin.

  2. Quadrupole and quadratic-in-spin effects in quasicircular, spinning, asymmetric binaries

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Calculates energy fluxes with quadratic-in-spin and quadrupole effects for small-mass-ratio spinning binaries in self-force theory, providing numerical data and sixth-order PN expansions.

  3. Dynamics of a relativistic discrete body: rigidity conditions, and covariant equations of motion

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A discrete-particle approach to relativistic rigid bodies is introduced via new rigidity conditions and compatible covariant equations of motion that allow six degrees of freedom.

  4. Dynamics of a relativistic discrete body: rigidity conditions, and covariant equations of motion

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    New Poincaré-covariant rigidity conditions plus equations of motion for a discrete relativistic body give six degrees of freedom and generalize Born's theory.

  5. Octupole moments and the non-universality of free-fall in general relativity

    gr-qc 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Octupole moments act on a falling body in general relativity through only 24 of their 40 components, and in Kerr-type spacetimes they enable torques that quadrupole moments cannot.

  6. Dynamics of a relativistic discrete body: rigidity conditions, and covariant equations of motion

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proposes Poincaré-covariant equations of motion for a discrete relativistic body with six dynamical degrees of freedom, allowing more general motions than Born's theory.

  7. Universality in Relativistic Spinning Particle Models

    hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Four relativistic spinning particle models (vector oscillator, spinor oscillator, spherical top, massive twistor) describe identical physics in free and interacting theories within the spin-magnitude-preserving sector.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

176 extracted references · 91 linked inside Pith · cited by 5 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    detached

    Bases for bivectors and symmetric tensors To begin, define a null tetrad consisting of four null vectors(ℓa, na, ma,¯ma), whereℓ a and na are real,m a is complex, and¯ma denotes the complex conjugate ofma. These vectors satisfy the following orthogonality relations: naℓa =−1andm a ¯ma = 1,(3.5) with all other inner products vanishing. The metric tensor ca...

  2. [2]

    This is ensured by the Liouville-Arnold theorem [63, 91, 131] and the existence of five commuting and linearly independent first integrals, denoted (H,Ξ,X, K, Q)

    Statement of the integrability result In any Einstein spacetime endowed with a KY tensor, the quadrupolar, quadratic-in-spin MPTD + TD SSC equations correspond to anintegrableHamiltonian system defined on a 10-dimensional phase space when the (spinning) body’s deformation parameter isκ= 1 (black-hole-like deformation). This is ensured by the Liouville-Arn...

  3. [3]

    hidden symmetries

    About the five first integrals Physically speaking, the five first integrals(H,Ξ,X, K, Q)involved in the integrability have the following properties: •His the Hamiltonian, numerically equal to−˜µ 2/2, with˜µthe conserved mass [cf Sec. IIB]. This mass isnotthe dynamical massµ(norm of the four-momentum; (1.4)), which is not conserved at quadratic order in s...

  4. [4]

    VA1, we need to compute 5 2 = 10P-brackets, corresponding to the number of independent unordered pairs between the five first integrals (H,Ξ,X, Q, K)

    Method for proving our result To prove our result summarized in Sec. VA1, we need to compute 5 2 = 10P-brackets, corresponding to the number of independent unordered pairs between the five first integrals (H,Ξ,X, Q, K). This will be done in several steps. First, show that∀I∈(H,Ξ,X, Q), {I, Cα}=O(C α). Second, demonstrate that∀(I 1, I2)∈(H,Ξ,X, K, Q) 2,{I ...

  5. [5]

    First,{K, H}= 0 and{Q, H}= 0simply mean that(K, Q)are conserved under the MPTD + TD SSC (for κ= 1)

    A perspective The vanishing of the four brackets can be given the following meaning. First,{K, H}= 0 and{Q, H}= 0simply mean that(K, Q)are conserved under the MPTD + TD SSC (for κ= 1). Second,{Q, C α}= 0means that the sub-manifoldPis stable under the flow of Q, like it is under the flow of Killing invariants [91] and the Hamiltonian (2.11). Third, {K, Q}=...

  6. [6]

    Proof of{K, H}| P = 0forκ= 1 We start with the first integralKdefined in (5.2). Using the Hamiltonian (2.4), the brackets (2.3) and the decomposition (1.9), we find {K, H}=∇ αf ⋆ βγ pαSβγ + 4R λ αβ[γ f ⋆ δ]λ ¯pαSβ ¯pγSδ + (1−κ)R λ αβγ f ⋆ λδ ¯pαSβ ¯pγSδ +O(3, Cα),(5.4) where we also used the intermediate brackets{S λµ,Θ βγ }= 2(g λ(γΘβ)µ −Θ λ(γgβ)µ)and {S...

  7. [7]

    Proof of{Q, H}| P = 0forκ= 1 Next, the first integralQdefined in (5.2). Using the Hamiltonian (2.4) withκ= 1and the brackets (2.3), a long but otherwise straightforward calculation gives {Q, H}= gαδK ρ ν ∇ρRλβγµ + 1 2 gλµL ρ αβ Rγδνρ +g λµ∇ν ˜Mαβγδ SαβSγδ ¯pλ ¯pµpν,(5.5) where we have already removed the linear-in-spin contributions, which was shown to va...

  8. [8]

    Again, the linear-in-spin term in the first line has been shown to vanish in Paper 1

    Proof of{K, Q}| P = 0 Using the definitions (5.2) and the brackets (2.3), the bracket{K, Q}is given by {K, Q}= 2 K δ γ ∇δf ⋆ αβ + 2f⋆δ β Lδαγ Sαβpγ (5.8) + (L λ γδ ∇λf ⋆ αβ −8f ⋆λ α ˜Mλβγδ )SαβSγδ +O(C α). Again, the linear-in-spin term in the first line has been shown to vanish in Paper 1. For the quadratic-in-spin terms in the second line, we first cons...

  9. [9]

    The linear-in-spin term was shown to beO(Cα)in any spacetime admitting a KY tensor in Paper I

    Proof of{Q, C α}|P = 0 Repeated uses of definitions (5.2), brackets (2.3) and the Leibniz rule lead to the following expression {Q, Cλ}= (∇ γKαβ −2L γαβ )p αpβSγλ (5.12) + (Rαβδµ K µ γ +∇ δLαβγ + 4 ˜Mαβγδ )S αβpγSδλ +O(C α). The linear-in-spin term was shown to beO(Cα)in any spacetime admitting a KY tensor in Paper I. We show that the quadratic-in-spin pi...

    2025

  10. [10]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), GWTC-1: A gravitational-wave transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first and second observing runs, Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coales- cences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coales- cences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run, Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Akiyama, A

    K. Akiyama, A. Alberdi, W. Alef, K. Asada, R. Azulay, A.-K. Baczko, D. Ball, M. Baloković, J. Barrett, D. Bintley,et al., First m87 event horizon telescope results. iv. imaging the central supermassive black hole, The Astrophysical Journal Letters875, L4 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    Akiyama, A

    K. Akiyama, A. Alberdi, W. Alef, J. C. Algaba, R. Anantua, K. Asada, R. Azulay, U. Bach, A.-K. Baczko, D. Ball,et al., First sagittarius a* event horizon telescope results. iii. imaging of the galactic center supermassive black hole, The Astrophysical Journal Letters930, L14 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    Amaro-Seoane, H

    P. Amaro-Seoane, H. Audley, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Barausse, P. Bender, E. Berti, P. Bi- netruy, M. Born, D. Bortoluzzi,et al., Laser interferometer space antenna, arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.00786 (2017)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  18. [18]

    M.Colpiet al.(LISA),LISADefinitionStudyReport(2024),arXiv:2402.07571[astro-ph.CO]. 31

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    K. G. Arunet al.(LISA), New horizons for fundamental physics with LISA, Living Rev. Rel. 25, 4 (2022), arXiv:2205.01597 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Cárdenas-Avendaño and C

    A. Cárdenas-Avendaño and C. F. Sopuerta, Testing Gravity with Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspi- rals (2024) arXiv:2401.08085 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Amaro-Seoane, Relativistic dynamics and extreme mass ratio inspirals, Living Rev

    P. Amaro-Seoane, Relativistic dynamics and extreme mass ratio inspirals, Living Rev. Rel. 21, 4 (2018), arXiv:1205.5240 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Babak, J

    S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sopuerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro- Seoane, A. Petiteau, and A. Klein, Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D95, 103012 (2017), arXiv:1703.09722 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    P. A. Seoaneet al.(LISA), Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Rev. Rel.26, 2 (2023), arXiv:2203.06016 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Afshordiet al.(LISA Consortium Waveform Working Group), Waveform modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Rev

    N. Afshordiet al.(LISA Consortium Waveform Working Group), Waveform modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Rev. Rel.28, 9 (2025), arXiv:2311.01300 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Ehlers and reprinted in Gen

    M.Mathisson,Neuemechanikmateriellersysteme,ActaPhys.Polon.6,163(1937),translated in English by A. Ehlers and reprinted in Gen. Rel. Grav.42, 1011 (2010)

    1937

  26. [26]

    Papapetrou, Spinning test-particles in general relativity

    A. Papapetrou, Spinning test-particles in general relativity. i, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A209, 248 (1951)

    1951

  27. [27]

    Tulczyjew, Motion of multiple particles in general relativity theory, Acta Phys

    W. Tulczyjew, Motion of multiple particles in general relativity theory, Acta Phys. Polon.18, 393 (1959)

    1959

  28. [28]

    W. G. Dixon, Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity III. Equations of motion, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A277, 59 (1974)

    1974

  29. [29]

    A. I. Harte, Mechanics of extended masses in general relativity, Class. Quant. Grav.29, 055012 (2012), arXiv:1103.0543 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  30. [30]

    Ramond,The First Law of Mechanics in General Relativity & Isochrone Orbits in Newto- nian Gravity, PhD Thesis, Paris Cité Univ

    P. Ramond,The First Law of Mechanics in General Relativity & Isochrone Orbits in Newto- nian Gravity, PhD Thesis, Paris Cité Univ. (2021) (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    G. A. Piovano, A. Maselli, and P. Pani, Extreme mass ratio inspirals with spinning sec- ondary: a detailed study of equatorial circular motion, Phys. Rev. D102, 024041 (2020), arXiv:2004.02654 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Mathews, A

    J. Mathews, A. Pound, and B. Wardell, Self-force calculations with a spinning secondary, Physical Review D105, 084031 (2022), arXiv:2112.13069

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    L. V. Drummond and S. A. Hughes, Precisely computing bound orbits of spinning bodies around black holes. i. general framework and results for nearly equatorial orbits, Physical Review D105, 124040 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    L. V. Drummond and S. A. Hughes, Precisely computing bound orbits of spinning bodies around black holes. ii. generic orbits, Physical Review D105, 124041 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    L.V.Drummond, P.Lynch, A.G.Hanselman, D.R.Becker,andS.A.Hughes,Extrememass- ratioinspiralandwaveformsforaspinningbodyintoaKerrblackholeviaosculatinggeodesics and near-identity transformations, Phys. Rev. D109, 064030 (2024), arXiv:2310.08438 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Skoupý, G

    V. Skoupý, G. A. Piovano, and V. Witzany, Spherical inspirals of spinning bodies into Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D112, 124054 (2025), arXiv:2506.20726 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Skoupý and V

    V. Skoupý and V. Witzany, Post-Newtonian expansions of extreme mass ratio inspirals of spinning bodies into Schwarzschild black holes, Phys. Rev. D110, 084061 (2024), arXiv:2406.14291 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    G. A. Piovano, Particles with precessing spin in Kerr spacetime: analytic solutions for eccen- tric orbits and homoclinic motion near the equatorial plane (2025), arXiv:2510.09597 [gr-qc]. 32

    arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    G. A. Piovano, C. Pantelidou, J. Mac Uilliam, and V. Witzany, Spinning particles near Kerr black holes: Orbits and gravitational-wave fluxes through the Hamilton-Jacobi formalism, Phys. Rev. D111, 044009 (2025), arXiv:2410.05769 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Honet, J

    L. Honet, J. Mathews, G. Compère, A. Pound, B. Wardell, G. A. Piovano, M. van de Meent, andN.Warburton,Spin-alignedinspiralwaveformsfromself-forceandpost-Newtoniantheory (2025), arXiv:2510.16112 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Mathews, B

    J. Mathews, B. Wardell, A. Pound, and N. Warburton, Post-adiabatic self-force waveforms: slowly spinning primary and precessing secondary (2025), arXiv:2510.16113 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Mathews and A

    J. Mathews and A. Pound, Postadiabatic waveform-generation framework for asymmetric precessing binaries, Phys. Rev. D112, 104078 (2025), arXiv:2501.01413 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Skoupý and V

    V. Skoupý and V. Witzany, Analytic Solution for the Motion of Spinning Particles in Kerr Spacetime, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 171401 (2025), arXiv:2411.16855 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Blanchet, Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves, Living Rev

    L. Blanchet, Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves, Living Rev. Rel.17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  45. [45]

    Levi, Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review, Rept

    M. Levi, Effective Field Theories of Post-Newtonian Gravity: A comprehensive review, Rept. Prog. Phys.83, 075901 (2020), arXiv:1807.01699 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    G. Cho, R. A. Porto, and Z. Yang, Gravitational radiation from inspiralling compact ob- jects: Spin effects to the fourth post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D106, L101501 (2022), arXiv:2201.05138 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Poisson, Gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: The Quadrupole moment term, Phys

    E. Poisson, Gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries: The Quadrupole moment term, Phys. Rev. D57, 5287 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9709032

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  48. [49]

    Cardoso and P

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report, Living Rev. Rel.22, 4 (2019), arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  49. [50]

    N. V. Krishnendu, K. G. Arun, and C. K. Mishra, Testing the binary black hole nature of a compact binary coalescence, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 091101 (2017), arXiv:1701.06318 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [51]

    Harry and T

    I. Harry and T. Hinderer, Observing and measuring the neutron-star equation-of-state in spin- ning binary neutron star systems, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 145010 (2018), arXiv:1801.09972 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  51. [52]

    Rahman and A

    M. Rahman and A. Bhattacharyya, Prospects for determining the nature of the secondaries of extreme mass-ratio inspirals using the spin-induced quadrupole deformation, Physical Review D107, 024006 (2023)

    2023

  52. [53]

    Rüdiger, Conserved quantities of spinning test particles in general relativity

    R. Rüdiger, Conserved quantities of spinning test particles in general relativity. i, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences375, 185 (1981)

    1981

  53. [54]

    Rüdiger, Conserved quantities of spinning test particles in general relativity

    R. Rüdiger, Conserved quantities of spinning test particles in general relativity. ii, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences385, 229 (1983)

    1983

  54. [55]

    Witzany, Hamilton-jacobi equation for spinning particles near black holes, Physical Review D100, 104030 (2019), arXiv:1903.03651 [gr-qc]

    V. Witzany, Hamilton-jacobi equation for spinning particles near black holes, Physical Review D100, 104030 (2019), arXiv:1903.03651 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  55. [56]

    Ramond and S

    P. Ramond and S. Isoyama, Symplectic mechanics of relativistic spinning compact bod- ies: Canonical formalism in the Schwarzschild spacetime, Phys. Rev. D111, 064027 (2025), arXiv:2402.05049 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  56. [57]

    Compère and A

    G. Compère and A. Druart, Complete set of quasi-conserved quantities for spinning particles around kerr, SciPost Physics12, 012 (2022), arXiv:2105.12454 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  57. [58]

    Compère, A

    G. Compère, A. Druart, and J. Vines, Generalized Carter constant for quadrupolar test bodies in Kerr spacetime, SciPost Phys.15, 226 (2023), arXiv:2302.14549 [gr-qc]. 33

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  58. [60]

    Boyleet al., High-accuracy numerical simulation of black-hole binaries: Computation of the gravitational-wave energy flux and comparisons with post-Newtonian approximants, Phys

    M. Boyleet al., High-accuracy numerical simulation of black-hole binaries: Computation of the gravitational-wave energy flux and comparisons with post-Newtonian approximants, Phys. Rev. D78, 104020 (2008), arXiv:0804.4184 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  59. [61]

    Vines, D

    J. Vines, D. Kunst, J. Steinhoff, and T. Hinderer, Canonical hamiltonian for an extended test body in curved spacetime: To quadratic order in spin, Physical Review D93, 103008 (2016), arXiv:1601.07529 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [62]

    V.Witzany, J.Steinhoff,andG.Lukes-Gerakopoulos,Hamiltoniansandcanonicalcoordinates forspinningparticlesincurvedspace-time,ClassicalandQuantumGravity36,075003(2019), arXiv:1808.06582 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [63]

    F. M. Blanco and E. E. Flanagan, Motion of a spinning particle under the conservative piece of the self-force is Hamiltonian to first order in mass and spin, Phys. Rev. D107, 124017 (2023), arXiv:2302.10233 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  62. [64]

    Vines and É

    J. Vines and É. É. Flanagan, Is motion under the conservative self-force in black hole space- times an integrable Hamiltonian system?, Phys. Rev. D92, 064039 (2015), arXiv:1503.04727 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  63. [65]

    Fujita, S

    R. Fujita, S. Isoyama, A. Le Tiec, H. Nakano, N. Sago, and T. Tanaka, Hamiltonian Formu- lation of the Conservative Self-Force Dynamics in the Kerr Geometry, Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 134001 (2017), arXiv:1612.02504 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  64. [66]

    F. M. Blanco and E. E. Flanagan, Particle Motion under the Conservative Piece of the Self- Force is Hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 051201 (2023), arXiv:2205.01667 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  65. [67]

    C. R. Galley, Classical mechanics of nonconservative systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 174301 (2013), arXiv:1210.2745

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  66. [68]

    Gonzo, J

    R. Gonzo, J. Lewis, and A. Pound, First Law of Binary Black Hole Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 131401 (2025), arXiv:2409.03437 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  67. [69]

    Lewis, T

    J. Lewis, T. Kakehi, A. Pound, and T. Tanaka, Post-adiabatic dynamics and wave- form generation in self-force theory: an invariant pseudo-Hamiltonian framework (2025), arXiv:2507.08081 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  68. [70]

    Haier, C

    E. Haier, C. Lubich, and G. Wanner,Geometric Numerical integration: structure-preserving algorithms for ordinary differential equations(Springer, 2006)

    2006

  69. [71]

    Y. Wang, W. Sun, F. Liu, and X. Wu, Construction of explicit symplectic integrators in general relativity. i. schwarzschild black holes, The Astrophysical Journal907, 66 (2021)

    2021

  70. [72]

    Hinderer and E

    T. Hinderer and E. E. Flanagan, Two-timescale analysis of extreme mass ratio inspirals in kerr spacetime: Orbital motion, Physical Review D78, 064028 (2008), arXiv:0805.3337 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  71. [73]

    Miller and A

    J. Miller and A. Pound, Two-timescale evolution of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals: waveform generation scheme for quasicircular orbits in schwarzschild spacetime, Physical Review D103, 064048 (2021), arXiv:2006.11263 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  72. [74]

    Handbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy

    A. Pound and B. Wardell, Black hole perturbation theory and gravitational self-force (2021), invited chapter for "Handbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy" (Eds. C. Bambi, S. Kat- sanevas, and K. Kokkotas; Springer, Singapore, 2021), arXiv:2101.04592 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  73. [75]

    A. J. K. Chua, M. L. Katz, N. Warburton, and S. A. Hughes, Rapid generation of fully relativistic extreme-mass-ratio-inspiral waveform templates for LISA data analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 051102 (2021), arXiv:2008.06071

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  74. [76]

    M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, L. Speri, N. Warburton, and S. A. Hughes, FastEMRIWaveforms: New tools for millihertz gravitational-wave data analysis, Phys. Rev. D104, 064047 (2021), 34 arXiv:2104.04582

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  75. [77]

    Speri, M

    L. Speri, M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, S. A. Hughes, N. Warburton, J. E. Thompson, C. E. A. Chapman-Bird, and J. R. Gair, Fast and Fourier: Extreme Mass Ratio Inspiral Waveforms in the Frequency Domain, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2307.12585 (2023), arXiv:2307.12585 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  76. [78]

    C. E. A. Chapman-Birdet al., Efficient waveforms for asymmetric-mass eccentric equatorial inspirals into rapidly spinning black holes, Phys. Rev. D112, 104023 (2025), arXiv:2506.09470 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  77. [79]

    N. Sago, T. Tanaka, W. Hikida, K. Ganz, and H. Nakano, The Adiabatic evolution of orbital parameters in the Kerr spacetime, Prog. Theor. Phys.115, 873 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0511151

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  78. [80]

    Drasco, E

    S. Drasco, E. E. Flanagan, and S. A. Hughes, Computing inspirals in Kerr in the adiabatic regime. I. The Scalar case, Class. Quant. Grav.22, S801 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0505075

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  79. [81]

    Isoyama, H

    S. Isoyama, H. Nakano, and T. Nakamura, Multiband gravitational-wave astronomy: Observ- ing binary inspirals with a decihertz detector, b-decigo, Progress of Theoretical and Experi- mental Physics2018, 073E01 (2018)

    2018

  80. [82]

    Akcay, S

    S. Akcay, S. R. Dolan, C. Kavanagh, J. Moxon, N. Warburton, and B. Wardell, Dissipation in extreme-mass ratio binaries with a spinning secondary, Phys. Rev. D102, 064013 (2020), arXiv:1912.09461 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

Showing first 80 references.