REVIEW 8 cited by
TOMATO: Assessing Visual Temporal Reasoning Capabilities in Multimodal Foundation Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
TOMATO: Assessing Visual Temporal Reasoning Capabilities in Multimodal Foundation Models
read the original abstract
Existing benchmarks often highlight the remarkable performance achieved by state-of-the-art Multimodal Foundation Models (MFMs) in leveraging temporal context for video understanding. However, how well do the models truly perform visual temporal reasoning? Our study of existing benchmarks shows that this capability of MFMs is likely overestimated as many questions can be solved by using a single, few, or out-of-order frames. To systematically examine current visual temporal reasoning tasks, we propose three principles with corresponding metrics: (1) Multi-Frame Gain, (2) Frame Order Sensitivity, and (3) Frame Information Disparity. Following these principles, we introduce TOMATO, Temporal Reasoning Multimodal Evaluation, a novel benchmark crafted to rigorously assess MFMs' temporal reasoning capabilities in video understanding. TOMATO comprises 1,484 carefully curated, human-annotated questions spanning six tasks (i.e., action count, direction, rotation, shape & trend, velocity & frequency, and visual cues), applied to 1,417 videos, including 805 self-recorded and -generated videos, that encompass human-centric, real-world, and simulated scenarios. Our comprehensive evaluation reveals a human-model performance gap of 57.3% with the best-performing model. Moreover, our in-depth analysis uncovers more fundamental limitations beyond this gap in current MFMs. While they can accurately recognize events in isolated frames, they fail to interpret these frames as a continuous sequence. We believe TOMATO will serve as a crucial testbed for evaluating the next-generation MFMs and as a call to the community to develop AI systems capable of comprehending human world dynamics through the video modality.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
EvoGround: Self-Evolving Video Agents for Video Temporal Grounding
A proposer-solver agent pair achieves supervised-level video temporal grounding and fine-grained captioning from 2.5K unlabeled videos via self-reinforcing evolution.
-
Reasoning Resides in Layers: Restoring Temporal Reasoning in Video-Language Models with Layer-Selective Merging
MERIT restores temporal reasoning in VLMs via layer-selective self-attention merging guided by a TR-improving objective that penalizes TP degradation.
-
DenseStep2M: A Scalable, Training-Free Pipeline for Dense Instructional Video Annotation
A scalable training-free pipeline using video segmentation, filtering, and off-the-shelf multimodal models creates DenseStep2M, a dataset of 100K videos and 2M detailed instructional steps that improves dense captioni...
-
SVCBench: A Streaming Video Counting Benchmark for Spatial-Temporal State Maintenance
Streaming multi-point counting on 406 videos with three trajectory metrics reveals large human-model gaps in spatial-temporal state maintenance, worst on periodic events.
-
V-JEPA 2: Self-Supervised Video Models Enable Understanding, Prediction and Planning
V-JEPA 2 pre-trained on massive unlabeled video achieves strong results on motion understanding and action anticipation, SOTA video QA at 8B scale, and enables zero-shot robotic planning on Franka arms using only 62 h...
-
VLMaxxing through FrameMogging Training-Free Anti-Recomputation for Video Vision-Language Models
Training-free adaptive reuse of stable visual state in video VLMs reduces follow-up latency by 15-36x on Qwen2.5-VL while preserving correctness on VideoMME, with smaller first-query speedups via pruning.
-
The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes
A literature survey that introduces a taxonomy for LLM reasoning paradigms, analyzes methodological trends, and synthesizes failure modes from over 300 papers.
-
Seed1.5-VL Technical Report
Seed1.5-VL is a compact multimodal model that sets new records on dozens of vision-language benchmarks and outperforms prior systems on agent-style tasks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.