Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Quasi-local gravity eliminates singular black-hole cores

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 16:13 UTC pith:W5QSW34P

load-bearing objection A careful Frobenius classification of quasi-local Einstein-Weyl gravity shows no singular core solutions within its stated ansatz, but the abstract's 'only regular solutions' claim is broader than the proof. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.14148 v2 pith:W5QSW34P submitted 2025-12-16 gr-qc hep-th

Spherically symmetric solutions in quasi-local Einstein-Weyl gravity

Johanna Borissova , Breno L. Giacchini , Aaron Held This is my paper
classification gr-qc hep-th MSC 83C1583C5783D05 PACS 04.20.Jb04.50.Kd04.60.-m
keywords quasi-local gravityEinstein-Weyl gravityFrobenius seriesKundt coordinatessingularity regularizationnon-local gravitySchwarzschild correctionswormhole throats
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies static, spherically symmetric solutions of quasi-local Einstein-Weyl gravity, a higher-derivative theory whose action contains a quasi-local inverse-operator factor acting on the Weyl tensor squared. By classifying all local Frobenius-series solutions in Kundt coordinates, it argues that, unlike local Einstein-Weyl or general quadratic gravity, the quasi-local theory admits no singular solutions at the centre: every solution family found has finite Ricci and Kretschmann scalars. It also shows that Schwarzschild spacetime is not a solution (unless a coupling vanishes) and that the leading large-distance corrections to Schwarzschild begin at order 1/r^6. If true, this provides a concrete mechanism by which non-locality can regularize the singularities of general relativity.

Core claim

The central claim is a contrast between local and quasi-local Einstein-Weyl gravity. In the local theory, and in quadratic gravity more generally, Frobenius expansions around r=0 admit singular branches; in the quasi-local theory, the extra non-locality parameter η adds constraints at the core that exclude these singular branches, leaving only regular solutions with finite curvature scalars. All solution classes found deform continuously to corresponding solutions of the local theory, but Schwarzschild itself is excluded whenever both μ and η are nonzero. At infinity the metric approaches Schwarzschild with corrections starting at order 1/r^6.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on two tools. First, localization: the non-local term C(η□−m²)⁻¹C is rewritten by introducing an auxiliary tensor field ψ with the symmetries of the Weyl tensor, turning the non-local action into a local one with a single scalar radial profile ψ(r). Second, a Frobenius-series classification in conformal-to-Kundt coordinates (ρ,u,θ,φ), where the metric functions and ψ are expanded as integer-step power series with leading exponents (n,p,q) that are independent of the couplings. The indicial equations fix the allowed structures [0,1,q], [0,0,q], [−1,2,q], and [−1,2,−6]∞; the new η-dependent terms in the recurrence relations are what eliminate the singular-core branches.

Load-bearing premise

The classification assumes every solution is expandable as an integer-step Frobenius series in Kundt coordinates with leading exponents independent of the couplings and with nonzero recurrence determinants; singular solutions outside this class, or with coupling-dependent exponents, could still exist and would break the 'only regular solutions' conclusion.

What would settle it

Find analytically or numerically a static spherically symmetric solution of quasi-local Einstein-Weyl gravity with a curvature singularity at r=0 that is not expandable as an integer-step Frobenius series in Kundt coordinates, or one with coupling-dependent exponents; alternatively, construct a global regular black-hole solution and check whether an extremal limit exists, since the paper predicts the extremal limit is not captured by Frobenius expansions.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the classification is complete, quasi-local Einstein-Weyl gravity cannot describe singular black-hole interiors of the kind found in Einstein-Weyl or quadratic gravity; any global solution must join a regular core to a horizon.
  • Schwarzschild is not an exact solution of the theory; the exterior of a compact object would carry Yukawa-type and 1/r^6 corrections, potentially distinguishing the theory observationally.
  • The absence of [0,2,q] double-horizon solutions implies that if regular black holes exist, their extremal limit is not captured by this Frobenius expansion and requires separate investigation.
  • The constraints linking free parameters to the couplings (e.g., Eq. (60)) can create forbidden regions in solution space, which affects the physical interpretation of horizon and wormhole-throat solutions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the regularizing mechanism is plausibly generic — any quasi-local form factor analytic at □=0 may impose analogous constraints that kill singular Frobenius branches, so the effect could extend beyond this particular action.
  • Inference: a numerical construction of global solutions connecting the regular core, horizon, and asymptotic region is the natural next test; if such solutions fail to exist, the regular core might be isolated rather than part of any black-hole spacetime.
  • Inference: the 1/r^6 leading correction coincides with the order expected from local curvature corrections, so quasi-local and local effective-field-theory corrections may be degenerate in weak-field observations; distinguishing them would require higher-order terms or non-perturbative effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes static spherically symmetric solutions of a quasi-local Einstein-Weyl gravity, i.e., an action with a Weyl-squared term containing the inverse of (η□−m²). The action is localized by introducing an auxiliary field ψ with the symmetries of the Weyl tensor, and the full set of second-order field equations is reduced to three ODEs in both Schwarzschild and conformal-to-Kundt coordinates. The authors perform a weak-field analysis and then a systematic Frobenius-series classification around arbitrary points and at infinity, under the assumptions of integer power steps, coupling-independent leading exponents, nonzero leading coefficients, and nonvanishing recurrence determinants. They find several solution families: regular cores, horizons, wormhole throats, and asymptotic expansions with 1/r⁶ corrections to Schwarzschild. In contrast to local Einstein-Weyl and quadratic gravity, within the analyzed class they find no singular core solutions, and they conclude that the quasi-local theory 'admits only regular solutions at the radial core.' The paper also shows that Schwarzschild is not a solution for generic parameters and discusses the ghost-free parameter choice η+2μ=0.

Significance. If the conclusion holds, this is a notable result: a concrete nonlocal higher-derivative gravity model would avoid the singular cores that plague local quadratic gravity, while reproducing Schwarzschild at large distances with corrections of order 1/r⁶. The paper is technically substantial: it provides explicit field equations, recurrence systems, determinant conditions, and comparison tables with local Einstein-Weyl and quadratic gravity. It also gives analytic weak-field solutions and openly discusses the limitations of the ansatz. The strength of the paper is the transparent and systematic Frobenius analysis within the stated ansatz; the main advertised claim, however, goes beyond what that analysis proves. The manuscript is therefore a solid contribution to the solution-space program in nonlocal gravity, provided the claims are brought in line with the proven scope.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Section V (first paragraph)] The abstract states that 'the quasi-local theory admits only regular solutions at the radial core,' but the analysis covers only Frobenius-series solutions of the form (44) and (47) with integer steps and coupling-independent exponents n, p, q. The paper itself explicitly acknowledges in Section IV that solutions not of this form, or with coupling-dependent exponents, may exist, and in Section V cautions that 'we cannot exclude the existence of solutions, which, either do not admit for a Frobenius expansion in the investigated coordinates, or for which the Frobenius exponents are coupling dependent.' Since singular solutions in related higher-derivative theories are known to arise precisely through such excluded branches (refs. [31,107]), the abstract's unqualified 'admits only' overstates the result. The claim should be restricted to the analyzed class, e.g., 'within the Frobenius-class
  2. [Section IV A 3, Eq. (79); Section III (ghost-free case)] The determinant conditions that underpin the classification contain the factor (η+2μ). In particular, Eq. (79), which is the nondegeneracy condition for the only regular-core family [−1,2]∞, vanishes when η+2μ=0. This is exactly the 'ghost-free' parameter choice highlighted in Section III, obtained formally in the limit m̃²→∞ and motivated by the absence of additional spin-2 poles. Similarly, Eq. (54) for the [0,1] and [0,0] classes also contains (η+2μ). The paper does not analyze these degenerate cases; the footnote after Eq. (54) merely states that solutions there 'would probably have a different structure of free parameters.' Since η+2μ=0 is physically central rather than a marginal corner, the conclusion that the quasi-local theory 'admits only regular solutions' is not established for this important parameter choice. Either the degenerate case must be analyzed separately, or the cla
  3. [Section IV A 1, footnote after Eq. (54); Section V, first paragraph] The claim 'all of the Frobenius classes of solutions found here deform continuously to the corresponding solutions of the local theory and are regular' relies on the recurrence determinant (54) being nonzero. The footnote after (54) sets aside degenerate cases, but the paper does not investigate whether such degenerate cases admit singular solutions. Moreover, the classification assumes nonzero leading coefficients and integer power steps; the text acknowledges that solutions with coupling-dependent exponents may exist, and cites known singular solutions of this type in quadratic and six-derivative gravity (refs. [31,107]). Therefore the statement that 'singular solutions ... seem to be absent in the quasi-local theory' is a plausible extrapolation, not a proven theorem. The manuscript should either tighten the claim to the proven ansatz or supply additional analysis of the excluded bran
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table I, row [−1,2]] The column 'free param.' lists '3→0' for the [−1,2] family, but the text in Section IV A 3 says the family has three free parameters (ρ₀, A₋₁, B₃) and, after gauge fixing, one physical parameter (the mass a₁). It should be '3→1'.
  2. [Appendix A 1, text after Eq. (A11)] Typo: 'The equation of motion for E_ψ is has no GR contribution' — 'is has' should be 'has'.
  3. [Eq. (39) and subsequent equations] The quantity m̃² is defined as sqrt(m²/(2μ+η)), which has dimensions of mass, but it is written as m̃² and used in exponents such as m̃² r. This is notationally confusing; suggest using m̃ (or m̃² for the mass-squared and m̃ for the exponent).
  4. [Section V, first bullet] The statement 'The Schwarzschild spacetime is not a solution' is presented without qualification, although the detailed check is performed only within the [0,1] Frobenius family (Section IV A 1) and the weak-field analysis. It would be more precise to say 'Within the classified Frobenius families, the Schwarzschild spacetime is not a solution (except for μ=0 or η=0),' or to add a direct argument from the field equations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the regularity classification and 1/r^6 asymptotics are derived from the quasi-local action by explicit Frobenius recurrences, with the paper itself flagging the ansatz restrictions.

full rationale

The central claims — absence of singular Frobenius core solutions and asymptotic 1/r^6 corrections to Schwarzschild — are obtained by inserting a static spherically symmetric ansatz into the explicitly derived equations of motion (Eqs. (6)-(7), (21)-(24), (30)-(33)) and solving indicial equations and recurrence systems (e.g., Eqs. (53), (62), (72)-(74), (77)-(79)). No parameter is fitted to a known target, and the regularity conclusion is not inserted by definition; it emerges from the recurrence structure. The paper is also unusually explicit that the classification is restricted: 'We caution that we cannot exclude the existence of solutions, which, either do not admit for a Frobenius expansion in the investigated coordinates, or for which the Frobenius exponents are coupling dependent, see also [31,107]. Further, the formal limit of m→0, in which the theory becomes truly non-local, is non-trivial and requires separate investigation, as well as the particular cases in which the conditions (54) and (79) are not satisfied.' This internal caveat shows that the 'admits only regular solutions' statement is a derived result within a stated ansatz, not a restatement of the ansatz or of the action. Self-citations to area-metric/spin-foam work ([83,92,93]) motivate the form of the action, but the localisation procedure and the entire solution classification are carried out independently in this paper; no load-bearing step invokes an unverified uniqueness theorem or prior result as a substitute for computation. The ghost-free parameter choice μ=-η/2 makes some recurrence determinants vanish, but the paper explicitly excludes those cases rather than silently assuming them. Any concern that the proof does not cover non-Frobenius or coupling-dependent-exponent branches is a matter of scope/completeness, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the chosen non-local action, the localization via the auxiliary field, and the restricted Frobenius ansatz. The only numerical 'free parameters' are the model couplings and solution integration constants; none are fitted to data. All substantive assumptions are explicitly stated in the paper, though the 'only regular solutions' wording in the abstract generalizes beyond them.

free parameters (2)
  • model couplings mu, eta, m^2 = not fitted
    Parameters of the quasi-local Einstein-Weyl action (1). They are inputs, not fitted to data, but the solution classes depend on them, e.g., the weak-field condition 2*mu+eta > 0 and the non-zero determinant conditions (54), (74), (79).
  • Frobenius coefficients / integration constants = n/a
    Series coefficients such as A0, B1, C0, A_{-1}, B3, B0 appear as free parameters in the solution families listed in Tables I-II. They are arbitrary integration constants, not fitted to observations; their count is the paper's free-parameter count.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Solutions expand in integer-step Frobenius series in Kundt coordinates with coupling-independent exponents n, p, q and nonzero leading coefficients.
    Section IV, ansatz (44) and (47), plus the restriction to exponents independent of model parameters. The paper acknowledges in Section V that non-Frobenius or coupling-dependent-exponent singular solutions are not excluded.
  • ad hoc to paper Recurrence determinants (54), (74), (79) are non-zero; degenerate cases are not considered.
    Footnote 2 after Eq. (54) states that solutions might exist even if the determinant vanishes, but those are not considered. This weakens the completeness of the classification.
  • domain assumption The operator eta*box - m^2 is invertible; the homogeneous solution is set to zero and the retarded Green's function is used.
    Section II A: equivalence of the non-local definition (2) and the localized equation (4) requires a trivial kernel. This is needed to fix the field psi and ensure asymptotic flatness.
  • domain assumption Static spherical symmetry allows the Weyl-like ansatz for the auxiliary field, plus the principle of symmetric criticality.
    Section II C: the ansatz (16) for psi in Schwarzschild coordinates and (29) in Kundt coordinates reduces the field equations to ODEs. This relies on the principle of symmetric criticality [98-100], so non-symmetric perturbations are outside scope.
invented entities (1)
  • Auxiliary/fiducial tensor field psi_mu_nu_rho_sigma (and its Kundt scalar Psi) no independent evidence
    purpose: Localize the non-local action (1) into the two-field action (5), turning the equations of motion into ordinary differential equations.
    Introduced in Eq. (2) as the inverse-operator image of the Weyl tensor. It is a bookkeeping field with the symmetries of the Weyl tensor; its homogeneous mode is set to zero, so it carries no independently observable physical degrees of freedom beyond the localisation.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 30525 in / 10345 out tokens · 85606 ms · 2026-08-03T16:13:57.923185+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum-gravitational effective actions with higher-derivative and non-local operators are expected to regularize the singularities of general relativity. Here we focus on quasi-local Einstein-Weyl gravity and obtain a local classification of static spherically symmetric solutions expandable as Frobenius series in Kundt coordinates. In contrast to local Einstein-Weyl gravity, and more generally quadratic gravity, we find that the quasi-local theory admits only regular solutions at the radial core. In addition, we find asymptotic $1/r^{6}$-corrections to the Schwarzschild geometry at large radial distances. Other solution classes around generic expansion points describe Schwarzschild-like and other types of horizons, as well as symmetric and non-symmetric wormhole throats.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.14148 by Aaron Held, Breno L. Giacchini, Johanna Borissova.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Metric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Effective geometrodynamics for renormalization-group improved black-hole spacetimes in spherical symmetry

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    RG-improved black hole spacetimes with scale-dependent gravitational coupling are derived as vacuum solutions to 2D Horndeski master field equations, embedding prior works and exposing implementation discrepancies.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

135 extracted references · 101 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    To solve the field equations order by order, one can solve Euu = 0,E θθ = 0 andE Ψ = 0

    Solutions[0,1, q] The analysis of the field equations together with a solution ansatz in the form [0,1, q] reveals that the only possibilities areq∈ {0,1}. To solve the field equations order by order, one can solve Euu = 0,E θθ = 0 andE Ψ = 0. As a result, the other components will be automatically satisfied due to the Bianchi identities. At each orderN, ...

  2. [2]

    Solutions[0,0, q] In the case of solutions [0,0, q], the only possibilities areq∈ {0,1,2}. By using the generalized Bianchi identities, one can show that in order to solve the field equations order by order, it suffices to solveE uu = 0,E θθ = 0 andE Ψ = 0 order by order, andE ρρ = 0 at the zeroth order. To verify whether and how this can actually be done...

  3. [3]

    regularised

    Solutions[−1,2, q] There exists only one family of solutions of this type, with indicial structure [−1,2,−1]. Solu- tions can be obtained by solving, for example, the equationsE uu = 0,E ρρ = 0 andE Ψ = 0 order by order, and as a consequence the other components will be automatically satisfied due to the Bianchi identities. At the first two orders, the fi...

  4. [4]

    Equations of motion in Schwarzschild coordinates The equations of motion (21) can be split into a part corresponding to the general relativity (GR) limitµ→0 of the original quasi-local Einstein-Weyl action (1) and its reduced localized version (5) together with another part proportional to the parameterµwhich stands in front of the Weyl-curvature squared ...

  5. [5]

    Equations of motion in Kundt coordinates The equations of motion (30) can be written as EΩ ≡ EGR Ω −µ E (0) Ω +ηE (η) Ω = 0,(A12) EH ≡ EGR H −µ E (0) H +ηE (η) H = 0,(A13) EΨ ≡ −µ E (0) Ψ +ηE (η) Ψ = 0.(A14) where E GR Ω = Ω 10 − HΩ8Ω′2 + Ω9H′Ω′ + 2HΩ′′ ,(A15) E (0) Ω = 4Ω 5 Ψ H′Ω′ + 2HΩ′′ + 4HΨ′Ω′ + 2Ω6 ΨH′′ − H′Ψ′ −2HΨ ′′ −6ΨΩ 4 4HΩ′2 −m 2Ψ ,(A16) E (η)...

  6. [6]

    Penrose,Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity,Riv

    R. Penrose,Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity,Riv. Nuovo Cim.1(1969) 252–276

    1969

  7. [7]

    R. M. Wald,Gravitational collapse and cosmic censorship, pp. 69–85, 10, 1997.gr-qc/9710068

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  8. [8]

    Penrose,Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,Phys

    R. Penrose,Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,Phys. Rev. Lett.14(1965) 57–59

    1965

  9. [9]

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis,The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2, 2023

    2023

  10. [10]

    Berti et al.,Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations,Class

    E. Berti et al.,Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations,Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015) 243001, [arXiv:1501.07274]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    Barack et al.,Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap,Class

    L. Barack et al.,Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap,Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019), no. 14 143001, [arXiv:1806.05195]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Cardoso and P

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani,Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,Living Rev. Rel. 22(2019), no. 1 4, [arXiv:1904.05363]. 29

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Ayzenberg et al.,Fundamental physics opportunities with future ground-based mm/sub-mm VLBI arrays,Living Rev

    D. Ayzenberg et al.,Fundamental physics opportunities with future ground-based mm/sub-mm VLBI arrays,Living Rev. Rel.28(2025), no. 1 4, [arXiv:2312.02130]. [Erratum: Living Rev.Rel. 28, 7 (2025)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Carballo-Rubio et al.,Towards a Non-singular Paradigm of Black Hole Physics, arXiv:2501.05505

    R. Carballo-Rubio et al.,Towards a Non-singular Paradigm of Black Hole Physics, arXiv:2501.05505

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [15]

    Yunes, X

    N. Yunes, X. Siemens, and K. Yagi,Gravitational-wave tests of general relativity with ground-based detectors and pulsar-timing arrays,Living Rev. Rel.28(2025), no. 1 3

    2025

  16. [16]

    Afshordi et al.,Black Holes Inside and Out 2024: visions for the future of black hole physics, 10, 2024.arXiv:2410.14414

    N. Afshordi et al.,Black Holes Inside and Out 2024: visions for the future of black hole physics, 10, 2024.arXiv:2410.14414

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Buoninfante et al.,Visions in quantum gravity,arXiv:2412.08696

    L. Buoninfante et al.,Visions in quantum gravity,arXiv:2412.08696

    arXiv

  18. [18]

    Bambi et al.,Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation, 5, 2025.arXiv:2505.09014

    C. Bambi et al.,Black hole mimickers: from theory to observation, 5, 2025.arXiv:2505.09014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    I. L. Buchbinder and I. Shapiro,Introduction to Quantum Field Theory with Applications to Quantum Gravity. Oxford Graduate Texts. Oxford University Press, 3, 2021

    2021

  20. [20]

    K. S. Stelle,Renormalization of Higher Derivative Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 953–969

    1977

  21. [21]

    Asorey, J

    M. Asorey, J. L. Lopez, and I. L. Shapiro,Some remarks on high derivative quantum gravity,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A12(1997) 5711–5734, [hep-th/9610006]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  22. [22]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman,One-loop divergencies in the theory of gravitation,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A20(1974), no. 1 69–94

    1974

  23. [23]

    Deser and P

    S. Deser and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,One Loop Divergences of Quantized Einstein-Maxwell Fields, Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 401

    1974

  24. [24]

    Deser, H.-S

    S. Deser, H.-S. Tsao, and P. van Nieuwenhuizen,One Loop Divergences of the Einstein Yang-Mills System,Phys. Rev. D10(1974) 3337

    1974

  25. [25]

    M. H. Goroff and A. Sagnotti,The Ultraviolet Behavior of Einstein Gravity,Nucl. Phys. B266 (1986) 709–736

    1986

  26. [26]

    J. F. Donoghue,General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 3874–3888, [gr-qc/9405057]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  27. [27]

    J. F. Donoghue,Quantum General Relativity and Effective Field Theory, pp. 3–26. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 2024

    2024

  28. [28]

    K. S. Stelle,Classical Gravity with Higher Derivatives,Gen. Rel. Grav.9(1978) 353–371

    1978

  29. [29]

    H. Lu, A. Perkins, C. N. Pope, and K. S. Stelle,Black Holes in Higher-Derivative Gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015), no. 17 171601, [arXiv:1502.01028]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    H. L¨ u, A. Perkins, C. N. Pope, and K. S. Stelle,Spherically Symmetric Solutions in Higher-Derivative Gravity,Phys. Rev. D92(2015), no. 12 124019, [arXiv:1508.00010]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    Kokkotas, R

    K. Kokkotas, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko,Non-Schwarzschild black-hole metric in four dimensional higher derivative gravity: analytical approximation,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 064007, [arXiv:1705.09875]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Podolsk´ y, R.ˇSvarc, V

    J. Podolsk´ y, R.ˇSvarc, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdov´ a,Explicit black hole solutions in higher-derivative gravity,Phys. Rev. D98(2018), no. 2 021502, [arXiv:1806.08209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    ˇSvarc, J

    R. ˇSvarc, J. Podolsk´ y, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdov´ a,Exact black holes in quadratic gravity with any cosmological constant,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018), no. 23 231104, [arXiv:1806.09516]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Podolsk´ y, R.ˇSvarc, V

    J. Podolsk´ y, R.ˇSvarc, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdov´ a,Black holes and other exact spherical solutions in Quadratic Gravity,Phys. Rev. D101(2020), no. 2 024027, [arXiv:1907.00046]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Held and J

    A. Held and J. Zhang,Instability of spherically symmetric black holes in quadratic gravity,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 6 064060, [arXiv:2209.01867]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    B. L. Giacchini and I. Kol´ aˇ r,Neglected solutions in quadratic gravity,arXiv:2509.07317. 30

    arXiv

  37. [37]

    de Rham, J

    C. de Rham, J. Francfort, and J. Zhang,Black Hole Gravitational Waves in the Effective Field Theory of Gravity,Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 2 024079, [arXiv:2005.13923]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    B. L. Giacchini and I. Kol´ aˇ r,Black holes and other exact solutions in six-derivative gravity,Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 2 024051, [arXiv:2503.17318]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Cardoso, M

    V. Cardoso, M. Kimura, A. Maselli, and L. Senatore,Black Holes in an Effective Field Theory Extension of General Relativity,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018), no. 25 251105, [arXiv:1808.08962]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 131, 109903 (2023)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    P. A. Cano and A. Ruip´ erez,Leading higher-derivative corrections to Kerr geometry,JHEP05 (2019) 189, [arXiv:1901.01315]. [Erratum: JHEP 03, 187 (2020)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    P. A. Cano, K. Fransen, and T. Hertog,Ringing of rotating black holes in higher-derivative gravity, Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 4 044047, [arXiv:2005.03671]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    Endlich, V

    S. Endlich, V. Gorbenko, J. Huang, and L. Senatore,An effective formalism for testing extensions to General Relativity with gravitational waves,JHEP09(2017) 122, [arXiv:1704.01590]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  43. [43]

    Sennett, R

    N. Sennett, R. Brito, A. Buonanno, V. Gorbenko, and L. Senatore,Gravitational-Wave Constraints on an Effective Field-Theory Extension of General Relativity,Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 4 044056, [arXiv:1912.09917]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Bernard, S

    L. Bernard, S. Giri, L. Lehner, and R. Sturani,Generic EFT-motivated beyond General Relativity gravitational wave tests and their curvature dependence: from observation to interpretation, arXiv:2507.17143

    arXiv

  45. [45]

    Held and H

    A. Held and H. Lim,Nonlinear dynamics of quadratic gravity in spherical symmetry,Phys. Rev. D 104(2021), no. 8 084075, [arXiv:2104.04010]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    Cayuso and L

    R. Cayuso and L. Lehner,Nonlinear, noniterative treatment of EFT-motivated gravity,Phys. Rev. D 102(2020), no. 8 084008, [arXiv:2005.13720]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  47. [47]

    Held and H

    A. Held and H. Lim,Nonlinear evolution of quadratic gravity in 3+1 dimensions,Phys. Rev. D108 (2023), no. 10 104025, [arXiv:2306.04725]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Cayuso, P

    R. Cayuso, P. Figueras, T. Fran¸ ca, and L. Lehner,Self-Consistent Modeling of Gravitational Theories beyond General Relativity,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023), no. 11 111403, [arXiv:2303.07246]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Figueras, A

    P. Figueras, A. Held, and ´A. D. Kov´ acs,Well-posed initial value formulation of general effective field theories of gravity,arXiv:2407.08775

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Held and H

    A. Held and H. Lim,Black-hole binaries and waveforms in Quadratic Gravity,arXiv:2503.13428

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Appelquist and J

    T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone,Infrared Singularities and Massive Fields,Phys. Rev. D11(1975) 2856

    1975

  52. [52]

    E. V. Gorbar and I. L. Shapiro,Renormalization group and decoupling in curved space,JHEP02 (2003) 021, [hep-ph/0210388]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  53. [53]

    E. V. Gorbar and I. L. Shapiro,Renormalization group and decoupling in curved space. 2. The Standard model and beyond,JHEP06(2003) 004, [hep-ph/0303124]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  54. [54]

    E. V. Gorbar and I. L. Shapiro,Renormalization group and decoupling in curved space. 3. The Case of spontaneous symmetry breaking,JHEP02(2004) 060, [hep-ph/0311190]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  55. [55]

    A. O. Barvinsky and G. A. Vilkovisky,The Generalized Schwinger-Dewitt Technique in Gauge Theories and Quantum Gravity,Phys. Rept.119(1985) 1–74

    1985

  56. [56]

    A. O. Barvinsky and G. A. Vilkovisky,Beyond the Schwinger-Dewitt Technique: Converting Loops Into Trees and In-In Currents,Nucl. Phys. B282(1987) 163–188

    1987

  57. [57]

    A. O. Barvinsky and G. A. Vilkovisky,Covariant perturbation theory. 2: Second order in the curvature. General algorithms,Nucl. Phys. B333(1990) 471–511

    1990

  58. [58]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, J. F. Donoghue, and B. R. Holstein,Quantum corrections to the Schwarzschild and Kerr metrics,Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 084005, [hep-th/0211071]. [Erratum: 31 Phys.Rev.D 71, 069904 (2005)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  59. [59]

    A. O. Barvinsky,Nonlocal action for long distance modifications of gravity theory,Phys. Lett. B572 (2003) 109–116, [hep-th/0304229]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  60. [60]

    Deser and R

    S. Deser and R. P. Woodard,Nonlocal Cosmology,Phys. Rev. Lett.99(2007) 111301, [arXiv:0706.2151]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  61. [61]

    P. G. Ferreira and A. L. Maroto,A few cosmological implications of tensor nonlocalities,Phys. Rev. D88(2013), no. 12 123502, [arXiv:1310.1238]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  62. [62]

    R. P. Woodard,Nonlocal Models of Cosmic Acceleration,Found. Phys.44(2014) 213–233, [arXiv:1401.0254]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  63. [63]

    Maggiore and M

    M. Maggiore and M. Mancarella,Nonlocal gravity and dark energy,Phys. Rev. D90(2014), no. 2 023005, [arXiv:1402.0448]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  64. [64]

    Christiansen, B

    N. Christiansen, B. Knorr, J. M. Pawlowski, and A. Rodigast,Global Flows in Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D93(2016), no. 4 044036, [arXiv:1403.1232]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [65]

    Knorr and F

    B. Knorr and F. Saueressig,Towards reconstructing the quantum effective action of gravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018), no. 16 161304, [arXiv:1804.03846]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Bosma, B

    L. Bosma, B. Knorr, and F. Saueressig,Resolving Spacetime Singularities within Asymptotic Safety, Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019), no. 10 101301, [arXiv:1904.04845]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    Knorr, C

    B. Knorr, C. Ripken, and F. Saueressig,Form Factors in Asymptotic Safety: conceptual ideas and computational toolbox,Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019), no. 23 234001, [arXiv:1907.02903]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    Knorr and M

    B. Knorr and M. Schiffer,Non-Perturbative Propagators in Quantum Gravity,Universe7(2021), no. 7 216, [arXiv:2105.04566]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Bonanno, T

    A. Bonanno, T. Denz, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert,Reconstructing the graviton,SciPost Phys. 12(2022), no. 1 001, [arXiv:2102.02217]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  70. [70]

    Fehre, D

    J. Fehre, D. F. Litim, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert,Lorentzian Quantum Gravity and the Graviton Spectral Function,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 8 081501, [arXiv:2111.13232]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert, and J. Wessely,Self-consistent graviton spectral function in Lorentzian quantum gravity,arXiv:2507.22169

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [72]

    J. M. Pawlowski and J. Tr¨ ankle,Effective action and black hole solutions in asymptotically safe quantum gravity,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 8 086011, [arXiv:2309.17043]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin,Quantum String Theory Effective Action,Nucl. Phys. B261 (1985) 1–27. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 269, 745–745 (1986)]

    1985

  74. [74]

    Zwiebach,Closed string field theory: Quantum action and the B-V master equation,Nucl

    B. Zwiebach,Closed string field theory: Quantum action and the B-V master equation,Nucl. Phys. B390(1993) 33–152, [hep-th/9206084]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  75. [75]

    Calcagni and L

    G. Calcagni and L. Modesto,Nonlocality in string theory,J. Phys. A47(2014), no. 35 355402, [arXiv:1310.4957]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  76. [76]

    Calcagni and L

    G. Calcagni and L. Modesto,Nonlocal quantum gravity and M-theory,Phys. Rev. D91(2015), no. 12 124059, [arXiv:1404.2137]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  77. [77]

    Surya,The causal set approach to quantum gravity,Living Rev

    S. Surya,The causal set approach to quantum gravity,Living Rev. Rel.22(2019), no. 1 5, [arXiv:1903.11544]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  78. [78]

    Henson,The Causal set approach to quantum gravity,gr-qc/0601121

    J. Henson,The Causal set approach to quantum gravity,gr-qc/0601121

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [79]

    Ashtekar and E

    A. Ashtekar and E. Bianchi,A short review of loop quantum gravity,Rept. Prog. Phys.84(2021), no. 4 042001, [arXiv:2104.04394]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  80. [80]

    Rovelli,Loop quantum gravity,Living Rev

    C. Rovelli,Loop quantum gravity,Living Rev. Rel.1(1998) 1, [gr-qc/9710008]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

Showing first 80 references.