pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22919 · v1 · pith:WEC4FS3Anew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ✦ hep-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· gr-qc· hep-th· quant-ph

Scale-Invariant Open Quantum Systems

Carlos Arg\"uelles , Gabriela Barenboim , Gonzalo Herrera , Tanvi Krishnan , H\'ector Sanchis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 05:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph cond-mat.quant-gasgr-qchep-thquant-ph
keywords scale-invariant environmentsunparticle bathsopen quantum systemsnon-Markovian dynamicsdecoherence transitionsquantum Ising modelde Sitter spacetimeneutrino decoherence
0
0 comments X

The pith

Scale-invariant environments are universally described by unparticle baths with a single scaling dimension d_U that sets their memory kernels and phase structure.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that open quantum systems coupled to scale-invariant environments admit a universal description in terms of unparticle baths fixed by one scaling dimension. A uniqueness theorem yields exact non-Markovian kernels and a fractional generalization of the Caldeira-Leggett equation. The value of d_U determines distinct regimes, including thermalization at 3/2, an Ohmic boundary at 2, and a decoherence transition at 5/2 beyond which coherence persists at long times. Concrete realizations are given for the critical Ising model, de Sitter cosmology, and high-energy neutrinos.

Core claim

We show that such environments are universally described by unparticle baths characterized by a single scaling dimension d_U. From the uniqueness theorem, we derive the non-Markovian memory kernels, the exact noise kernel including vacuum and thermal contributions, and a fractional generalization of the Caldeira-Leggett master equation for arbitrary d_U. The scaling dimension governs a rich phase structure, including a thermalization transition at d_U=3/2, the Ohmic boundary at d_U=2, and a decoherence transition at d_U=5/2 in the thermal regime, beyond which long-time quantum coherence is protected.

What carries the argument

Unparticle baths with a single scaling dimension d_U, obtained from the uniqueness theorem for scale-invariant environments.

If this is right

  • Non-Markovian memory kernels and the full noise kernel follow directly for arbitrary d_U.
  • The fractional Caldeira-Leggett equation governs the reduced dynamics.
  • Thermalization occurs for d_U below 3/2 and long-time coherence is protected above 5/2 in the thermal regime.
  • Decoherence rates in neutrino propagation provide an observable signature proportional to L to the power 5 minus 2 d_U.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same scaling-dimension classification could organize decoherence in other critical systems whose correlation functions obey power-law scaling.
  • Trapped-ion or superconducting-qubit experiments tuned near criticality might directly map out the predicted transitions by varying effective d_U.
  • The framework supplies a parameter-free route to compute vacuum and thermal contributions to noise in any scale-invariant bath once d_U is fixed by conformal data.

Load-bearing premise

Scale-invariant environments permit a universal description by unparticle baths characterized solely by one scaling dimension via the uniqueness theorem.

What would settle it

Measuring the decoherence rate of high-energy neutrinos and checking whether it scales as L to the power 5 minus 2 d_U for the predicted d_U.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22919 by Carlos Arg\"uelles, Gabriela Barenboim, Gonzalo Herrera, H\'ector Sanchis, Tanvi Krishnan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Decoherence functional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a complete theoretical framework for open quantum systems coupled to scale-invariant environments. We show that such environments are universally described by unparticle baths characterized by a single scaling dimension $d_{\mathcal{U}}$. This work provides the proof of the uniqueness theorem, the formalism of the resulting non-Markovian dynamics, and applications to several physical systems. From the uniqueness theorem, we derive the non-Markovian memory kernels, the exact noise kernel including vacuum and thermal contributions, and a fractional generalization of the Caldeira-Leggett master equation for arbitrary $d_{\mathcal{U}}$. The scaling dimension governs a rich phase structure, including a thermalization transition at $d_{\mathcal{U}}=3/2$, the Ohmic boundary at $d_{\mathcal{U}}=2$, and a decoherence transition at $d_{\mathcal{U}}=5/2$ in the thermal regime, beyond which long-time quantum coherence is protected. Three realizations are studied. For the quantum Ising model at criticality, coupling to the energy operator in $(1+1)$ dimensions gives $d_{\mathcal{U}}=3/2$, producing $1/f$ noise, while the $(2+1)$D case yields $d_{\mathcal{U}}\approx1.413$ from the conformal bootstrap. In inflationary cosmology, massless scalar and graviton baths in de Sitter spacetime give $d_{\mathcal{U}}=2$, predicting linear decoherence growth consistent with the quantum-to-classical transition. For high-energy astrophysical neutrinos, the decoherence rate $\Gamma_{\mathrm{decoh}}\propto \mathcal{B}(E,T_{\mathcal{U}})L^{5-2d_{\mathcal{U}}}$ provides an observable signature of the scaling dimension. We also compare the framework with Caldeira-Leggett and Lindblad approaches, analyze the validity regimes, and discuss experimental implications for trapped-ion simulators, neutrino telescopes, and superconducting qubits.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theoretical framework for open quantum systems coupled to scale-invariant environments. It asserts that such environments are universally described by unparticle baths with a single scaling dimension d_U, provides a proof of the uniqueness theorem, derives non-Markovian memory kernels, the exact noise kernel (vacuum plus thermal), and a fractional generalization of the Caldeira-Leggett master equation. The scaling dimension is claimed to control a phase structure with transitions at d_U=3/2 (thermalization), d_U=2 (Ohmic boundary), and d_U=5/2 (decoherence protection in the thermal regime). Applications are given to the critical quantum Ising model, de Sitter spacetime, and high-energy neutrinos, with comparisons to standard approaches.

Significance. If the uniqueness theorem is established rigorously from scale invariance alone without extra assumptions, the work supplies a universal single-parameter description for non-Markovian dynamics in scale-invariant baths, yielding exact kernels and a phase diagram with observable consequences (e.g., neutrino decoherence rate scaling). This would unify treatments across condensed-matter, cosmological, and particle-physics settings and provide concrete predictions for simulators and telescopes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Uniqueness theorem section] Uniqueness theorem (the section containing its proof, invoked from the abstract onward): the central claim that pure scale invariance suffices for a universal mapping to unparticle baths with exactly one parameter d_U must be verified to exclude hidden assumptions such as a specific power-law spectral density without logarithmic corrections or additional conformal structure; any such restriction would render the derived memory/noise kernels and the phase transitions at 3/2, 2, and 5/2 non-universal.
  2. [Kernels and master-equation section] Derivation of kernels and fractional master equation (the section following the uniqueness theorem): all subsequent expressions for the non-Markovian memory kernel, noise kernel, and fractional Caldeira-Leggett equation are obtained directly from the uniqueness result; therefore any gap in the theorem's scope (e.g., restriction to certain bath operators) propagates to the phase-structure claims and the three applications.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the numerical value d_U ≈ 1.413 for the (2+1)D Ising model should cite the specific conformal-bootstrap reference or table from which it is taken.
  2. [Applications and comparisons] Applications section: a brief table comparing validity regimes of the new framework versus Caldeira-Leggett and Lindblad approaches would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, with the strongest defense consistent with the content and claims of the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Uniqueness theorem section] Uniqueness theorem (the section containing its proof, invoked from the abstract onward): the central claim that pure scale invariance suffices for a universal mapping to unparticle baths with exactly one parameter d_U must be verified to exclude hidden assumptions such as a specific power-law spectral density without logarithmic corrections or additional conformal structure; any such restriction would render the derived memory/noise kernels and the phase transitions at 3/2, 2, and 5/2 non-universal.

    Authors: The uniqueness theorem is established in the manuscript solely from the assumption of scale invariance of the bath two-point functions. Scale invariance fixes the functional form to depend on a single parameter d_U, yielding a spectral density that is exactly a power law; logarithmic corrections are excluded because they would introduce an additional dimensionful scale, violating the scale-invariance hypothesis. The derivation does not invoke full conformal invariance or other structures beyond scaling. We will add an explicit clarifying paragraph in the uniqueness theorem section to state these assumptions and their consequences. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Kernels and master-equation section] Derivation of kernels and fractional master equation (the section following the uniqueness theorem): all subsequent expressions for the non-Markovian memory kernel, noise kernel, and fractional Caldeira-Leggett equation are obtained directly from the uniqueness result; therefore any gap in the theorem's scope (e.g., restriction to certain bath operators) propagates to the phase-structure claims and the three applications.

    Authors: Because the uniqueness theorem follows from scale invariance alone, without the additional restrictions noted by the referee, the memory and noise kernels and the fractional master equation are universal for this class of baths. The phase transitions at d_U = 3/2, 2, and 5/2 are direct mathematical consequences of the analytic properties of these kernels and are unaffected. We disagree that a gap exists that would propagate to the applications, so no changes are required in this section. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: uniqueness theorem proven within paper; derivations self-contained

full rationale

The abstract states the paper itself provides the proof of the uniqueness theorem establishing that scale-invariant environments are described by unparticle baths with single d_U. Kernels, noise terms, and fractional master equation are then derived from this theorem. Phase transitions at d_U=3/2,2,5/2 follow from the scaling properties. Applications assign specific d_U values from independent external results (conformal bootstrap for (2+1)D Ising, known critical exponents, de Sitter spacetime). No self-citation of prior uniqueness results, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no ansatz smuggled via citation appear in the text. The derivation chain is self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that scale-invariant environments admit a universal unparticle description with single d_U; d_U functions as the key characterizing parameter whose specific values are taken from external calculations (conformal bootstrap, spacetime properties) rather than fitted inside this work.

free parameters (1)
  • d_U
    Single scaling dimension that fully characterizes the bath; its numerical value is supplied per physical system (e.g., 3/2 from Ising energy operator, ~1.413 from bootstrap, 2 from de Sitter) rather than derived from first principles inside the paper.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Scale-invariant environments are universally described by unparticle baths characterized by a single scaling dimension d_U
    Invoked at the outset of the framework to justify the uniqueness theorem and all subsequent derivations.
invented entities (1)
  • unparticle bath no independent evidence
    purpose: To provide the universal description of any scale-invariant environment
    Postulated as the characterizing object once the uniqueness theorem is assumed; no independent falsifiable signature outside the theorem itself is supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5901 in / 1796 out tokens · 36877 ms · 2026-05-25T05:39:54.300486+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Step 1: The Källén–Lehmann Representation 8

  2. [2]

    Step 2: Scale Invariance Forces a Power-Law Spectral Weight 8

  3. [3]

    Step 3: The Unique Solution Is a Power Law 9

  4. [4]

    Step 4: From Spectral Weight to Bath Spectral Density 10

  5. [5]

    Loopholes and Limitations 11 D

    Step 5: Identification with the Unparticle Form 10 C. Loopholes and Limitations 11 D. Converse: A No-Go Theorem 12 III. Mathematical Framework 13 A. Unparticle Operators and Correlators 13 B. Influence Functional and Master Equation 13 C. Dissipation Kernel 14 D. Noise Kernel: Exact Expression 15 E. Damping and Decoherence Functionals 16 F. Specific Heat ...

  6. [6]

    The spectral density takes the unique form J(ω) =A ω 2∆−d−1,(1) where∆is the scaling dimension ofO E andAis a normalization constant

  7. [7]

    This is mathematically equivalent to an unparticle bath with2 dU = ∆− d−2 2 .(2)

  8. [8]

    All dynamical exponents are uniquely determined bydU via the relations in Table I. B. Proof via the Källén–Lehmann Spectral Representation In a previous work [2], we proved the theorem via conformal Ward identities in position space. Here, we give an independent derivation that works entirely in momentum space, using the Källén–Lehmann (KL) spectral repre...

  9. [9]

    The functionρ(σ)≥0is thespectral weight: it encodes the density of states at each invariant mass scale√σcontributing to the correlator

    Step 1: The Källén–Lehmann Representation The KL representation answers the following question: what is the most general form of the two-point correlator of a local operator can take in a Lorentz-invariant quantum field theory, with no further assumptions? The answer, derived from Lorentz invariance and the positivity of the spectral measure alone [7, 8],...

  10. [10]

    Tracking the Jacobiand d+1x→λ d+1dd+1x, Eq

    Step 2: Scale Invariance Forces a Power-Law Spectral Weight Under a scale transformationx→λx, the operatorO E with scaling dimension∆trans- forms asO E(λx) =λ −∆OE(x), so the position-space two-point function satisfies GE(λx) =λ −2∆ GE(x).(4) Passing to momentum space via the(d+ 1)-dimensional Fourier transform, the rescaling x→λxcorresponds top E →p E/λ....

  11. [11]

    Settingσ0 = 1andλ 2 =σ: ρ(σ) =C ρ σ(2∆−d−1)/2 =C ρ σ∆−(d+1)/2,(10) whereC ρ =ρ(1)is a normalization constant

    Step 3: The Unique Solution Is a Power Law Equation (9) is a functional equation forρ. Settingσ0 = 1andλ 2 =σ: ρ(σ) =C ρ σ(2∆−d−1)/2 =C ρ σ∆−(d+1)/2,(10) whereC ρ =ρ(1)is a normalization constant. The unique solution is a pure power law. This is the key step: scale invariance leaves no freedom in the functional form of the spectral weight. The physical in...

  12. [12]

    (16)) J(ω) =−2 ImG R(ω,k= 0), ω >0.(11) The retarded Green’s function is obtained from Eq

    Step 4: From Spectral Weight to Bath Spectral Density The bath spectral densityJ(ω)is related to the retarded Green’s function via (Eq. (16)) J(ω) =−2 ImG R(ω,k= 0), ω >0.(11) The retarded Green’s function is obtained from Eq. (3) by analytic continuationpE 0 → −i(ω+iϵ), givingp 2 E → −(ω+iϵ) 2: GR(ω,k= 0) = Z ∞ 0 dσ ρ(σ) σ−(ω+iϵ) 2 .(12) Taking the imagi...

  13. [13]

    Matching exponents with Eq

    Step 5: Identification with the Unparticle Form The unparticle spectral density [1] isρU(ω)∝ω 2dU −3. Matching exponents with Eq. (14): 2dU −3 = 2∆−d−1⇒d U = ∆− d−2 2 ,(15) which is Eq. (2). The dynamical exponents in Table I follow by Fourier transformation of the kernels; full derivations are given in Sec. III. The identification with the unparticle for...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033/ 2019

  14. [14]

    Unparticle Physics

    H. Georgi, Unparticle physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 221601 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0703260

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  15. [15]

    Universal Description of Decoherence in Scale-Invariant Environments

    C. Argüelles, G. Barenboim, G. Herrera, T. Krishnan, and H. Sanchis, Universal description of decoherence in scale-invariant environments, (2026), arXiv:2604.15445

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  16. [16]

    F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Precision Islands in the Ising and O(N) Models, JHEP08, 036, arXiv:1603.04436 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  17. [17]

    Polchinski,String Theory

    J. Polchinski,String Theory. Vol. 1: An Introduction to the Bosonic String(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 1988)

    1988

  18. [18]

    Scale invariance vs conformal invariance

    Y. Nakayama, Scale invariance vs conformal invariance, Phys. Rept.569, 1 (2015), arXiv:1302.0884 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    M. A. Luty, J. Polchinski, and R. Rattazzi, Thea-theorem and the asymptotics of 4d quantum field theory, JHEP01, 152, arXiv:1204.5221 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Källén, On the definition of the renormalization constants in quantum electrodynamics, Helvetica Physica Acta25, 417 (1952)

    G. Källén, On the definition of the renormalization constants in quantum electrodynamics, Helvetica Physica Acta25, 417 (1952)

    1952

  21. [21]

    Lehmann, On the properties of propagation functions and renormalization constants of quantized fields, Il Nuovo Cimento11, 342 (1954)

    H. Lehmann, On the properties of propagation functions and renormalization constants of quantized fields, Il Nuovo Cimento11, 342 (1954). 43

    1954

  22. [22]

    de Vega and D

    I. de Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-markovian open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015001 (2017)

    2017

  23. [23]

    Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 021002 (2016), arXiv:1505.01385 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Nakajima-Zwanzig versus time-convolutionless master equation for the non-Markovian dynamics of a two-level system

    A. Smirne and B. Vacchini, Nakajima-Zwanzig versus time-convolutionless master equation for the non-Markovian dynamics of a two-level system, Phys. Rev. A82, 022110 (2010), arXiv:1005.1604 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  25. [25]

    Anto-Sztrikacs and D

    N. Anto-Sztrikacs and D. Segal, Capturing non-Markovian dynamics with the reaction coor- dinate method, Phys. Rev. A104, 052617 (2021), arXiv:2110.02455 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system, Reviews of Modern Physics59, 1 (1987)

    1987

  27. [27]

    Giraldi and F

    F. Giraldi and F. Petruccione, Survival of coherence for open quantum systems in thermal baths, Phys. Rev. A88, 042102 (2013)

    2013

  28. [28]

    S.SachdevandJ.Ye,Gaplessspinfluidgroundstateinarandom, quantumheisenbergmagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 3339 (1993), arXiv:cond-mat/9212030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  29. [29]

    Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, KITP talks, 7 April and 27 May 2015 (2015),http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/

    A. Kitaev, A simple model of quantum holography, KITP talks, 7 April and 27 May 2015 (2015),http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/

    2015

  30. [30]

    Comments on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the sachdev-ye-kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D94, 106002 (2016), arXiv:1604.07818

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    A bound on chaos

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, A bound on chaos, JHEP08, 106, arXiv:1503.01409

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Trovarelli, C

    O. Trovarelli, C. Geibel, S. Mederle, C. Langhammer, F. M. Grosche, P. Gegenwart, M. Lang, G. Sparn, and F. Steglich, YbRh2Si2: Pronounced non-Fermi-liquid effects above a low-lying magnetic phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 626 (2000)

    2000

  33. [33]

    H. v. Löhneysen, T. Pietrus, G. Portisch, H. G. Schlager, A. Schröder, M. Sieck, and T. Trapp- mann, Non-Fermi-liquid behavior in a heavy-fermion alloy at a magnetic instability, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 3262 (1994)

    1994

  34. [34]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Sénéchal,Conformal Field Theory(Springer, New York, 1997)

    1997

  35. [35]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, J. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, Programmable quantum 44 simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025001 (2021)

    2021

  36. [36]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature551, 579 (2017)

    2017

  37. [37]

    T. S. Bunch and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A360, 117 (1978)

    1978

  38. [38]

    Quantum-to-classical transition for fluctuations in the early Universe

    C. Kiefer, D. Polarski, and A. A. Starobinsky, Quantum to classical transition for fluctuations in the early universe, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D7, 455 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9802003

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  39. [39]

    Colas, J

    T. Colas, J. Grain, G. Kaplanek, and V. Vennin, In-in formalism for the entropy of quantum fields in curved spacetimes, JCAP08, 047, arXiv:2406.17856 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    D. J. Fixsen, The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background, Astrophys. J.707, 916 (2009), arXiv:0911.1955 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  41. [41]

    E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner,The Early Universe, Frontiers in Physics, Vol. 69 (Addison- Wesley, 1990)

    1990

  42. [42]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astro- phys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  43. [43]

    B. D. Fields, K. A. Olive, T.-H. Yeh, and C. Young, Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis after Planck, JCAP03, 010, [Erratum: JCAP 11, E02 (2020)], arXiv:1912.01132 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Paladino, Y

    E. Paladino, Y. M. Galperin, G. Falci, and B. L. Altshuler,1/fnoise: Implications for solid- state quantum information, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 361 (2014)

    2014

  45. [45]

    Krantz, M

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits, Appl. Phys. Rev.6, 021318 (2019)

    2019

  46. [46]

    Shnirman, Y

    A. Shnirman, Y. Makhlin, and G. Schön, Noise and decoherence in quantum two-level systems, Physica Scripta2002, 147 (2002)

    2002

  47. [47]

    Yoshihara, K

    F. Yoshihara, K. Harrabi, A. O. Niskanen, Y. Nakamura, and J. S. Tsai, Decoherence of flux qubits due to1/fflux noise, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 167001 (2006). 45

    2006