REVIEW 5 cited by
CAPTURe: Evaluating Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models via Occluded Object Counting
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recognizing and reasoning about occluded (partially or fully hidden) objects is vital to understanding visual scenes, as occlusions frequently occur in real-world environments and act as obstacles for spatial comprehension. To test models' ability to reason about multiple occluded objects, we introduce a novel task, Counting Amodally for Patterns Through Unseen REgions (CAPTURe), which requires a model to count objects arranged in a pattern by inferring how the pattern continues behind an occluder (an object which blocks parts of the scene). CAPTURe requires both recognizing visual patterns and reasoning, making it a useful testbed for evaluating vision-language models (VLMs) on whether they understand occluded patterns and possess spatial understanding skills. By requiring models to reason about occluded objects, CAPTURe also tests VLMs' ability to form world models that would allow them to fill in missing information. CAPTURe consists of two parts: (1) CAPTURe-real, with manually filtered images of real objects in patterns and (2) CAPTURe-synthetic, a controlled diagnostic with generated patterned images. We evaluate four strong VLMs (GPT-4o, Intern-VL2, Molmo, and Qwen2-VL) on CAPTURe, finding that models struggle to count on both occluded and unoccluded patterns. Crucially, we find that models perform worse with occlusion, suggesting that VLMs are also deficient in inferring unseen spatial relationships: even the strongest VLMs like GPT-4o fail to count with occlusion. In contrast, we find that humans achieve very little error on CAPTURe. We also find that providing auxiliary information of occluded object locations increases performance, underscoring that the model error comes both from an inability to handle occlusion as well as difficulty in counting in images. Code and data: https://github.com/atinpothiraj/CAPTURe
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
VIEW2SPACE: Studying Multi-View Visual Reasoning from Sparse Observations
Sparse multi-view reasoning is largely unsolved for VLMs; grounded CoT with visual evidence improves moderate cases and transfers to real data, but deep multi-hop reasoning still scales poorly.
-
Using street view images and visual LLMs to predict heritage values for governance support: Risks, ethics, and policy implications
Zero-shot GPT-4o scoring of street-view façades can flag likely heritage buildings at national scale, but the threshold choices and validation are too weak to support use without expert oversight.
-
CoSPlan: Corrective Sequential Planning via Scene Graph Incremental Updates
VLMs perform near chance at detecting and correcting an erroneous step in visual sequential planning, and incrementally updating scene graphs step-by-step (SGI) yields small, partially inconsistent gains.
-
AntiGrounding: Lifting Robotic Actions into VLM Representation Space for Decision Making
AntiGrounding lifts candidate robot trajectories into the VLM's visual space via multi-view rendering and structured VQA, and reports 57.5% average success across eight manipulation tasks, beating three intermediate-r...
-
Jigsaw-Puzzles: From Seeing to Understanding to Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
Current vision-language models fall far short of humans on spatial reasoning, especially when they must generate answers directly instead of choosing from options.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.