pith. sign in

arxiv: 1605.01316 · v2 · pith:WPGMNHD4new · submitted 2016-05-04 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th· math-ph· math.MP

Waiting for Unruh

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords textdeltaunruhbalancedetaileddetectorfieldhold
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

How long does a uniformly accelerated observer need to interact with a quantum field in order to record thermality in the Unruh temperature? We address this question for a pointlike Unruh-DeWitt detector, coupled linearly to a real Klein-Gordon field of mass $m\ge0$ and treated within first order perturbation theory, in the limit of large detector energy gap $E_{\text{gap}}$. We first show that when the interaction duration $\Delta T$ is fixed, thermality in the sense of detailed balance cannot hold as $E_{\text{gap}}\to\infty$, and this property generalises from the Unruh effect to any Kubo-Martin-Schwinger state satisfying certain technical conditions. We then specialise to a massless field in four spacetime dimensions and show that detailed balance does hold when $\Delta T$ grows as a power-law in $E_{\text{gap}}$ as $E_{\text{gap}}\to\infty$, provided the switch-on and switch-off intervals are stretched proportionally to $\Delta T$ and the switching function has sufficiently strong Fourier decay. By contrast, if $\Delta T$ grows by stretching a plateau in which the interaction remains at constant strength but keeping the duration of the switch-on and switch-off intervals fixed, detailed balance at $E_{\text{gap}}\to\infty$ requires $\Delta T$ to grow faster than any polynomial in $E_{\text{gap}}$, under mild technical conditions. These results also hold for a static detector in a Minkowski heat bath. The results limit the utility of the large $E_{\text{gap}}$ regime as a probe of thermality in time-dependent versions of the Hawking and Unruh effects, such as an observer falling into a radiating black hole. They may also have implications on the design of prospective experimental tests of the Unruh effect.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.