Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

RWKU: Benchmarking Real-World Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.10890 v1 pith:X3IIGKAA submitted 2024-06-16 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords unlearningknowledgemodelsreal-worldcorpusforgetretainrwku
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) inevitably memorize sensitive, copyrighted, and harmful knowledge from the training corpus; therefore, it is crucial to erase this knowledge from the models. Machine unlearning is a promising solution for efficiently removing specific knowledge by post hoc modifying models. In this paper, we propose a Real-World Knowledge Unlearning benchmark (RWKU) for LLM unlearning. RWKU is designed based on the following three key factors: (1) For the task setting, we consider a more practical and challenging unlearning setting, where neither the forget corpus nor the retain corpus is accessible. (2) For the knowledge source, we choose 200 real-world famous people as the unlearning targets and show that such popular knowledge is widely present in various LLMs. (3) For the evaluation framework, we design the forget set and the retain set to evaluate the model's capabilities across various real-world applications. Regarding the forget set, we provide four four membership inference attack (MIA) methods and nine kinds of adversarial attack probes to rigorously test unlearning efficacy. Regarding the retain set, we assess locality and utility in terms of neighbor perturbation, general ability, reasoning ability, truthfulness, factuality, and fluency. We conduct extensive experiments across two unlearning scenarios, two models and six baseline methods and obtain some meaningful findings. We release our benchmark and code publicly at http://rwku-bench.github.io for future work.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Control-Plane Placement Shapes Forgetting: An Architectural Study of Agent Memory Across Thirteen System Configurations

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    An empirical comparison of thirteen control-plane placements in agent memory pipelines identifies three regimes with complementary forgetting recovery on a new 385-case adversarial benchmark, with mutation-time placem...

  2. Towards Evaluation for Real-World LLM Unlearning

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DCUE evaluates LLM unlearning by comparing core-token confidence score distributions of the unlearned model and the original model, corrected by a validation set, using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.

  3. What Should LLMs Forget? Quantifying Personal Data in LLMs for Right-to-Be-Forgotten Requests

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    WikiMem, a Wikidata-derived canary dataset and a calibrated NLL-ranking metric, identifies which human-fact associations an LLM has memorized, with higher rates for famous people and larger models.

  4. Revisiting the Past: Data Unlearning with Model State History

    cs.LG 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    MSA performs data unlearning in LLMs by arithmetic operations on prior model checkpoints to remove targeted datapoint influence, with experiments showing competitive or better results than existing unlearning methods.

Pith tools