pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16587 · v1 · pith:X5SLHSEKnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · ✦ hep-th

3d QFT IR divergences as UV divergences in 4d Holographic Cosmology

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 16:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords IR divergencesholographic cosmology3d QFTUV finitenesscosmological singularitiesgeneralized conformal structureloop calculationslattice results
0
0 comments X

The pith

IR finiteness in a 3d toy model implies UV finiteness and no singularities in its 4d holographic cosmology dual.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies infrared divergences in a three-dimensional quantum field theory designed as a toy model for four-dimensional holographic cosmology. By introducing a mass term that maintains a generalized form of conformal invariance, the authors perform two-loop calculations of two- and three-point functions and analyze their infrared behavior below the mass scale. From this, they argue that the infrared divergences may be absent non-perturbatively, in agreement with existing lattice results. In the holographic dual, this would mean the four-dimensional cosmology is free of ultraviolet divergences, which translates to the absence of cosmological singularities. The techniques developed for the 3d theory could apply to broader problems in holographic cosmology.

Core claim

We consider IR divergences in a 3d toy model field theory for 4d holographic cosmology and analyze them by introducing a mass term that preserves generalized conformal structure. This allows computation of 2- and 3-point functions at 2-loops and study of their IR structure below the mass scale, from which we argue for possible IR finiteness beyond perturbation theory consistent with lattice results. In the holographically dual 4d cosmology this corresponds to UV finiteness, i.e. the absence of cosmological singularities.

What carries the argument

The mass term in the 3d toy model that preserves the generalized conformal structure, enabling controlled loop computations of correlation functions in the infrared regime.

If this is right

  • Possible IR finiteness beyond perturbation theory in the 3d model.
  • This finiteness corresponds to absence of cosmological singularities in the 4d dual.
  • Consistency with lattice results supports the conclusion.
  • The 3d methods may extend to other applications in holographic cosmology.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Such a correspondence could offer a field-theoretic resolution to cosmological singularity problems.
  • Similar mass regularization might be useful in other holographic setups involving IR/UV mappings.
  • Non-perturbative methods beyond two loops could further test the finiteness claim.

Load-bearing premise

The 3d toy model with the chosen mass term that preserves generalized conformal structure faithfully captures the IR physics whose finiteness would control the UV behavior of the 4d holographic cosmology.

What would settle it

A direct lattice simulation or non-perturbative calculation demonstrating that IR divergences persist in the 3d theory even at strong coupling, or evidence of singularities in the corresponding 4d holographic cosmology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16587 by Horatiu Nastase, Matheus Cravo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The five diagrams that contribute for the correlator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Two-loop diagrams contributing to ⟨Φ 2 (q¯1), Φ 2 (q¯2), Φ 2 (q¯3). 4.2.1 Chain-type triangle diagrams There are three variants of the chain-type diagram, corresponding to attaching a 1-loop two-point bubble to one of the three external vertices of the triangle diagram K0 using a quartic vertex. These variations are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Three variants of the chain-type diagram for the three-point function. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Three independent diagrams that contribute to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Three independent diagrams contributing to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Variants of the K3 diagram. 4.2.5 Gauge-exchange between internal scalar lines The three variants of the K3 diagram are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this paper we consider IR divergences in a 3d toy model field theory for 4d holographic cosmology, and we analyze them by introducing a mass term in a way that preserves a certain form of the generalized conformal structure. This allows us to compute 2- and 3-point functions at 2-loops and study their IR structure below the mass scale, from which we argue for a possible IR finiteness beyond perturbation theory, consistent with lattice results. In the holographically dual 4d cosmology, this corresponds to UV finiteness, i.e., the absence of cosmological singularities. The 3d IR field theory methods could be extended beyond this specific application.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a 3d QFT toy model for 4d holographic cosmology. A mass term is added in a manner that preserves generalized conformal structure, enabling explicit 2-loop computations of 2- and 3-point functions. The IR behavior of these correlators below the mass scale is analyzed, from which the authors argue for possible non-perturbative IR finiteness. This is stated to be consistent with lattice results and, via holography, to imply UV finiteness (absence of cosmological singularities) in the dual 4d cosmology. The 3d methods are suggested to be more broadly applicable.

Significance. If the extrapolation from 2-loop IR structure to non-perturbative finiteness holds and the holographic map is reliable, the result would provide a concrete mechanism linking 3d IR properties to the resolution of 4d cosmological singularities. The technical device of a mass regulator that preserves generalized conformal invariance is a potentially useful addition to the holographic cosmology toolkit, and the reported consistency with lattice data strengthens the case. The work remains preliminary because the central claim rests on perturbative evidence plus external lattice input rather than a self-contained non-perturbative demonstration.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (2-loop computation of the 2-point function): the IR finiteness reported below the mass scale is obtained after a specific regularization whose details (subtraction scheme, handling of the mass-dependent counterterms) are not fully specified. Without an explicit check that the same finiteness is recovered in the massless limit or that the result is independent of the regulator choice, it is unclear whether the observed cancellation is intrinsic or an artifact of the mass term introduced to preserve generalized conformal structure.
  2. [Discussion] Discussion section (argument for non-perturbative finiteness): the claim that the 2-loop IR structure persists beyond perturbation theory is supported only by consistency with external lattice results. No internal equation or computation reduces the finiteness statement to a quantity computed within the present model; the extrapolation therefore remains an assumption rather than a derived result.
  3. [Introduction] Introduction (holographic identification): the mapping from 3d IR finiteness to 4d UV finiteness (absence of singularities) assumes that the chosen 3d toy model with the mass term faithfully encodes the relevant IR physics of the original holographic setup. A concrete test—e.g., recovery of the expected IR divergences when the mass is removed—would be required to make this identification load-bearing for the central cosmological claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the generalized conformal structure is introduced without a compact summary equation; a single displayed relation collecting the preserved Ward identities would improve readability.
  2. Figure captions for the 2- and 3-point function plots should explicitly state the momentum range used to extract the IR behavior below the mass scale.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments in detail below and indicate the revisions we plan to make.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: §3 (2-loop computation of the 2-point function): the IR finiteness reported below the mass scale is obtained after a specific regularization whose details (subtraction scheme, handling of the mass-dependent counterterms) are not fully specified. Without an explicit check that the same finiteness is recovered in the massless limit or that the result is independent of the regulator choice, it is unclear whether the observed cancellation is intrinsic or an artifact of the mass term introduced to preserve generalized conformal structure.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. Upon review, we agree that additional details on the regularization procedure would strengthen the presentation. In the revised version, we will expand §3 to include a more explicit description of the subtraction scheme and the treatment of mass-dependent counterterms. Furthermore, we will perform and report an explicit computation in the massless limit to verify that the IR finiteness persists and is not dependent on the specific choice of regulator. This will confirm the intrinsic nature of the cancellation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Discussion section (argument for non-perturbative finiteness): the claim that the 2-loop IR structure persists beyond perturbation theory is supported only by consistency with external lattice results. No internal equation or computation reduces the finiteness statement to a quantity computed within the present model; the extrapolation therefore remains an assumption rather than a derived result.

    Authors: The referee is correct that our suggestion of non-perturbative IR finiteness is not derived from an internal non-perturbative calculation but rather inferred from the 2-loop results combined with consistency to lattice data. In the revised manuscript, we will modify the Discussion section to more clearly state that this is a plausible extrapolation based on perturbative evidence and external validation, rather than a rigorous proof. We will also discuss potential avenues for future non-perturbative studies within the model. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Introduction (holographic identification): the mapping from 3d IR finiteness to 4d UV finiteness (absence of singularities) assumes that the chosen 3d toy model with the mass term faithfully encodes the relevant IR physics of the original holographic setup. A concrete test—e.g., recovery of the expected IR divergences when the mass is removed—would be required to make this identification load-bearing for the central cosmological claim.

    Authors: We appreciate this point regarding the validity of the holographic map. To address it, we will add to the Introduction a more detailed justification for why the mass term preserves the essential IR physics relevant to the dual cosmology. Additionally, as part of the revisions to §3, we will include the check of recovering IR divergences in the massless limit, which serves as the suggested consistency test. This will bolster the reliability of the identification for the cosmological implications. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on explicit perturbative computations plus external lattice benchmarks

full rationale

The paper introduces a mass term chosen to preserve generalized conformal structure in the 3d toy model, performs direct 2-loop calculations of 2- and 3-point functions, observes the IR structure below the mass scale, and argues for possible non-perturbative IR finiteness on that basis together with consistency against independent lattice results. This is then mapped to UV finiteness (absence of singularities) in the dual 4d holographic cosmology. No equation or step reduces a claimed prediction or finiteness result to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the lattice consistency is external and the perturbative results are computed outputs rather than inputs renamed as predictions. The extrapolation beyond perturbation theory is presented as an argument, not a forced equivalence by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the assumption that the chosen mass term preserves enough of the generalized conformal structure for the IR analysis to be meaningful, plus standard QFT axioms such as locality and unitarity; no new particles or forces are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The 3d toy model with mass term preserving generalized conformal structure faithfully represents the relevant IR sector of the holographic cosmology.
    Invoked when mapping IR finiteness in 3d to UV finiteness in 4d (abstract).

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5644 in / 1334 out tokens · 52428 ms · 2026-05-20T16:03:06.694408+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity

    G. ’t Hooft, “Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,”Conf. Proc.C930308 (1993) 284–296,arXiv:gr-qc/9310026 [gr-qc]

  2. [2]

    The World as a Hologram

    L. Susskind, “The World as a hologram,”J. Math. Phys.36(1995) 6377–6396, arXiv:hep-th/9409089 [hep-th]. 68

  3. [3]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,”Int. J. Theor. Phys.38(1999) 1113–1133,arXiv:hep-th/9711200 [hep-th]. [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2,231(1998)]

  4. [4]

    Nastase,Introduction to the ADS/CFT Correspondence

    H. Nastase,Introduction to the ADS/CFT Correspondence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015

  5. [5]

    Ammon and J

    M. Ammon and J. Erdmenger,Gauge/gravity duality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015

  6. [6]

    Quantum Gravity In De Sitter Space

    E. Witten, “Quantum gravity in de Sitter space,” inStrings 2001: International Conference Mumbai, India, January 5-10, 2001. 2001.arXiv:hep-th/0106109 [hep-th]

  7. [7]

    The dS/CFT Correspondence

    A. Strominger, “The dS / CFT correspondence,”JHEP10(2001) 034, arXiv:hep-th/0106113

  8. [8]

    Inflation and the dS/CFT Correspondence

    A. Strominger, “Inflation and the dS / CFT correspondence,”JHEP11(2001) 049, arXiv:hep-th/0110087

  9. [10]

    On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation

    J. M. Maldacena and G. L. Pimentel, “On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation,”JHEP09(2011) 045,arXiv:1104.2846 [hep-th]

  10. [11]

    Holography for Cosmology

    P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, “Holography for Cosmology,”Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 021301,arXiv:0907.5542 [hep-th]

  11. [12]

    The Holographic Universe

    P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, “The Holographic Universe,”J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 222(2010) 012007,arXiv:1001.2007 [hep-th]

  12. [15]

    Constraining holographic cosmology using Planck data

    N. Afshordi, E. Gould, and K. Skenderis, “Constraining holographic cosmology using Planck data,”Phys. Rev. D95(2017) no. 12, 123505,arXiv:1703.05385 [astro-ph.CO]

  13. [16]

    How Superrenormalizable Interactions Cure their Infrared Divergences ,

    R. Jackiw and S. Templeton, “How Superrenormalizable Interactions Cure their Infrared Divergences ,”Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 2291

  14. [17]

    High-Temperature Yang-Mills Theories and Three-Dimensional Quantum Chromodynamics,

    T. Appelquist and R. D. Pisarski, “High-Temperature Yang-Mills Theories and Three-Dimensional Quantum Chromodynamics,”Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 2305. 69

  15. [18]

    Nonperturbative Infrared Finiteness in a Superrenormalizable Scalar Quantum Field Theory,

    G. Cossu, L. Del Debbio, A. Juttner, B. Kitching-Morley, J. K. L. Lee, A. Portelli, H. B. Rocha, and K. Skenderis, “Nonperturbative Infrared Finiteness in a Superrenormalizable Scalar Quantum Field Theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) no. 22, 221601,arXiv:2009.14768 [hep-lat]

  16. [19]

    Holography for the very early Universe and the classic puzzles of Hot Big Bang cosmology,

    H. N˘ astase and K. Skenderis, “Holography for the very early Universe and the classic puzzles of Hot Big Bang cosmology,”Phys. Rev. D101(2020) no. 2, 021901, arXiv:1904.05821 [hep-th]

  17. [20]

    Holographic cosmology solutions of problems with pre-inflationary cosmology,

    H. N˘ astase, “Holographic cosmology solutions of problems with pre-inflationary cosmology,”JHEP12(2020) 026,arXiv:2008.05630 [hep-th]

  18. [21]

    The monopole problem in holographic cosmology,

    H. N˘ astase and U. M. Portugal, “The monopole problem in holographic cosmology,” Phys. Lett. B815(2021) 136141,arXiv:2012.14829 [hep-th]

  19. [22]

    3-point function of currents for holographic cosmology and monopole non-gaussianities,

    M. Cravo and H. Nastase, “3-point function of currents for holographic cosmology and monopole non-gaussianities,”Journal of High Energy Physics2024(2024) no. 5, 1–50

  20. [23]

    Topology of cosmic domains and strings,

    T. W. Kibble, “Topology of cosmic domains and strings,”Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General9(1976) no. 8, 1387–1398

  21. [24]

    Some implications of a cosmological phase transition,

    T. W. Kibble, “Some implications of a cosmological phase transition,”Physics Reports67(1980) no. 1, 183–199

  22. [25]

    Supergravity and the large n limit of theories with sixteen supercharges,

    N. Itzhaki, J. M. Maldacena, J. Sonnenschein, and S. Yankielowicz, “Supergravity and the large n limit of theories with sixteen supercharges,”Physical Review D58 (1998) no. 4, 046004

  23. [26]

    Space-time uncertainty principle and conformal symmetry in d-particle dynamics,

    A. Jevicki and T. Yoneya, “Space-time uncertainty principle and conformal symmetry in d-particle dynamics,”Nuclear Physics B535(1998) no. 1-2, 335–348

  24. [27]

    Generalized conformal symmetry in d-brane matrix models,

    A. Jevicki, Y. Kazama, and T. Yoneya, “Generalized conformal symmetry in d-brane matrix models,”Physical Review D59(1999) no. 6, 066001

  25. [28]

    Precision holography for non-conformal branes,

    I. Kanitscheider, K. Skenderis, and M. Taylor, “Precision holography for non-conformal branes,”Journal of High Energy Physics2008(2008) no. 09, 094

  26. [29]

    The holographic universe,

    P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, “The holographic universe,” inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing. 2010

  27. [30]

    Renormalisation of ir divergences and holography in de sitter,

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, “Renormalisation of ir divergences and holography in de sitter,”Journal of High Energy Physics2024(2024) no. 5, 1–85

  28. [31]

    Scalar one-loop integrals,

    M. Veltmanet al., “Scalar one-loop integrals,”Nuclear Physics B153(1979) 365–401. 70

  29. [32]

    Recursive algorithm for evaluating vertex-type feynman integrals,

    A. I. Davydychev, “Recursive algorithm for evaluating vertex-type feynman integrals,”Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General25(1992) no. 21, 5587

  30. [33]

    One-loop three-point feynman integrals with appell f 1 hypergeometric functions,

    K. H. Phan and D. T. Tran, “One-loop three-point feynman integrals with appell f 1 hypergeometric functions,”Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2019 (2019) no. 6, 063B01

  31. [34]

    Massless and massive one-loop three-point functions in negative dimensional approach,

    A. Suzuki, E. Santos, and A. Schmidt, “Massless and massive one-loop three-point functions in negative dimensional approach,”The European Physical Journal C-Particles and Fields26(2002) no. 1, 125–137

  32. [35]

    Two-point function at two loops via triangle diagram insertion,

    A. T. Suzuki, A. GM Schmidt, and J. D. Bolzan, “Two-point function at two loops via triangle diagram insertion,”Journal of the Physical Society of Japan81(2012) no. 4, 044101

  33. [36]

    Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models

    J. Maldacena, “Non-gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,”Journal of High Energy Physics2003(2003) no. 05, 013–013, arXiv:astro-ph/0210603 [astro-ph]

  34. [37]

    Single field consistency relation for the 3-point function

    P. Creminelli and M. Zaldarriaga, “Single field consistency relation for the 3-point function,”JCAP10(2004) 006,arXiv:astro-ph/0407059

  35. [38]

    J. Z. Finotti, M. Cravo, and H. Nastase,To appear.2026

  36. [39]

    Foundation and generalization of the expansion by regions,

    B. Jantzen, “Foundation and generalization of the expansion by regions,”Journal of High Energy Physics2011(2011) no. 12, 76

  37. [40]

    Asymptotic expansion of feynman integrals near threshold,

    M. Beneke and V. A. Smirnov, “Asymptotic expansion of feynman integrals near threshold,”Nuclear Physics B522(1998) no. 1-2, 321–344

  38. [41]

    V. A. Smirnov,Evaluating feynman integrals, vol. 211. Springer, 2004

  39. [42]

    Lectures on QED and QCD

    A. Grozin, “Lectures on qed and qcd,”arXiv preprint hep-ph/0508242(2005)

  40. [43]

    A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,

    F. V. Tkachov, “A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,”Physics Letters B100(1981) no. 1, 65–68

  41. [44]

    Integration by parts: the algorithm to calculateβ-functions in 4 loops,

    K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov, “Integration by parts: the algorithm to calculateβ-functions in 4 loops,”Nuclear Physics B192(1981) no. 1, 159–204

  42. [45]

    Polylogarithms and associated functions,

    L. Lewin, “Polylogarithms and associated functions,”(No Title)(1981)

  43. [46]

    The dilogarithm function, frontiers in number theory, physics, and geometry. ii, 3–65,

    D. Zagier, “The dilogarithm function, frontiers in number theory, physics, and geometry. ii, 3–65,”

  44. [47]

    The dilogarithm function for complex argument,

    L. C. Maximon, “The dilogarithm function for complex argument,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences459(2003) no. 2039, 2807–2819. 71

  45. [48]

    The Creation of the Universe as a Quantum Phenomenon,

    R. Brout, F. Englert, and E. Gunzig, “The Creation of the Universe as a Quantum Phenomenon,”Annals Phys.115(1978) 78

  46. [49]

    The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe,

    S. W. Hawking, “The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe,”Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 295

  47. [50]

    Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe,

    A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi, “Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe,”Phys. Rev. Lett.49(1982) 1110–1113

  48. [51]

    Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe,”JETP Lett.30(1979) 682–685

  49. [52]

    A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,”Phys. Lett. B91(1980) 99–102

  50. [53]

    A new inflationary universe scenario: a possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems,

    A. D. Linde, “A new inflationary universe scenario: a possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems,”Physics Letters B108(1982) no. 6, 389–393

  51. [54]

    N˘ astase,Cosmology and string theory, vol

    H. N˘ astase,Cosmology and string theory, vol. 197. Springer, 2019

  52. [55]

    Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck

    N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, and et al., “Planck 2018 results,”Astronomy & Astrophysics641(2020) ,arXiv:1807.06205 [astro-ph.CO]

  53. [56]

    Trans-Planckian Issues for Inflationary Cosmology

    R. H. Brandenberger and J. Martin, “Trans-Planckian Issues for Inflationary Cosmology,”Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 113001,arXiv:1211.6753 [astro-ph.CO]

  54. [57]

    Robustness of the inflationary perturbation spectrum to trans-Planckian physics

    A. A. Starobinsky, “Robustness of the inflationary perturbation spectrum to transPlanckian physics,”Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.73(2001) 415–418, arXiv:astro-ph/0104043

  55. [58]

    A critical review of inflation,

    N. Turok, “A critical review of inflation,”Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 3449–3467

  56. [59]

    Inflationary cosmology: Progress and problems,

    R. H. Brandenberger, “Inflationary cosmology: Progress and problems,” Astrophysics and Space Science Library247(2000) 169–212

  57. [60]

    Large-order Perturbation Theory and de Sitter/Anti de Sitter Effective Actions

    A. K. Das and G. V. Dunne, “Large-order Perturbation Theory and de Sitter/Anti de Sitter Effective Actions,”Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 044029, arXiv:hep-th/0607168

  58. [61]

    de sitter holography and the cosmic microwave background,

    F. Larsen, J. P. Van Der Schaar, and R. G. Leigh, “de sitter holography and the cosmic microwave background,”Journal of High Energy Physics2002(2002) no. 04, 047

  59. [62]

    Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence

    D. Anninos, T. Hartman, and A. Strominger, “Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence,”Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) no. 1, 015009, arXiv:1108.5735 [hep-th]. 72

  60. [63]

    On de sitter spacetime and string theory,

    P. Berglund, T. H¨ ubsch, and D. Minic, “On de sitter spacetime and string theory,” International Journal of Modern Physics D32(2023) no. 09, 2330002

  61. [64]

    ads/cf ttods/cf t: Some recent developments,

    G. Yadav, “ads/cf ttods/cf t: Some recent developments,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02852(2026)

  62. [65]

    The ads/cft correspondence,

    V. E. Hubeny, “The ads/cft correspondence,”Classical and Quantum Gravity32 (2015) no. 12, 124010

  63. [66]

    Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and the AdS/CFT Correspondence

    E. D’Hoker and D. Z. Freedman, “Supersymmetric gauge theories and the ads/cft correspondence (tasi 2001 lecture notes),”arXiv preprint hep-th/0201253(2002)

  64. [67]

    Review of ads/cft integrability: an overview,

    N. Beisert, C. Ahn, L. F. Alday, Z. Bajnok, J. M. Drummond, L. Freyhult, N. Gromov, R. A. Janik, V. Kazakov, T. Klose,et al., “Review of ads/cft integrability: an overview,”Letters in Mathematical Physics99(2012) no. 1, 3–32

  65. [68]

    Constraining holographic inflation with WMAP

    R. Easther, R. Flauger, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, “Constraining holographic inflation with wmap,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2011(2011) no. 09, 030–030,arXiv:1104.2040 [astro-ph]

  66. [69]

    From Planck data to Planck era: Observational tests of Holographic Cosmology

    N. Afshordi, C. Coriano, L. Delle Rose, E. Gould, and K. Skenderis, “From planck data to planck era: Observational tests of holographic cosmology,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(2017) no. 4, ,arXiv:1607.04878 [astro-ph.CO]

  67. [70]

    Holographic predictions for cosmological 3-point functions

    A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, “Holographic predictions for cosmological 3-point functions,”JHEP03(2012) 091,arXiv:1112.1967 [hep-th]

  68. [71]

    Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Theories,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Theories,” in17th International Conference on High-Energy Physics, pp. III.84–85. 1974

  69. [72]

    SL(2,Z) Action On Three-Dimensional Conformal Field Theories With Abelian Symmetry

    E. Witten, “SL(2,Z) action on three-dimensional conformal field theories with Abelian symmetry,” inFrom Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics: A Conference in Tribute to Ian Kogan, pp. 1173–1200. 7, 2003. arXiv:hep-th/0307041

  70. [73]

    Particle-vortex and maxwell duality in the ads4×cp3/abjm correspondence,

    J. Murugan, H. Nastase, N. Rughoonauth, and J. P. Shock, “Particle-vortex and maxwell duality in the ads4×cp3/abjm correspondence,”Journal of High Energy Physics2014(2014) no. 10, 1–28

  71. [74]

    The large-n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. Maldacena, “The large-n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” International journal of theoretical physics38(1999) no. 4, 1113–1133

  72. [75]

    N˘ astase,Cosmology and String Theory, vol

    H. N˘ astase,Cosmology and String Theory, vol. 197 ofFundamental Theories of Physics. Springer, 2019. 73