3d QFT IR divergences as UV divergences in 4d Holographic Cosmology
Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 16:03 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
IR finiteness in a 3d toy model implies UV finiteness and no singularities in its 4d holographic cosmology dual.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We consider IR divergences in a 3d toy model field theory for 4d holographic cosmology and analyze them by introducing a mass term that preserves generalized conformal structure. This allows computation of 2- and 3-point functions at 2-loops and study of their IR structure below the mass scale, from which we argue for possible IR finiteness beyond perturbation theory consistent with lattice results. In the holographically dual 4d cosmology this corresponds to UV finiteness, i.e. the absence of cosmological singularities.
What carries the argument
The mass term in the 3d toy model that preserves the generalized conformal structure, enabling controlled loop computations of correlation functions in the infrared regime.
If this is right
- Possible IR finiteness beyond perturbation theory in the 3d model.
- This finiteness corresponds to absence of cosmological singularities in the 4d dual.
- Consistency with lattice results supports the conclusion.
- The 3d methods may extend to other applications in holographic cosmology.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Such a correspondence could offer a field-theoretic resolution to cosmological singularity problems.
- Similar mass regularization might be useful in other holographic setups involving IR/UV mappings.
- Non-perturbative methods beyond two loops could further test the finiteness claim.
Load-bearing premise
The 3d toy model with the chosen mass term that preserves generalized conformal structure faithfully captures the IR physics whose finiteness would control the UV behavior of the 4d holographic cosmology.
What would settle it
A direct lattice simulation or non-perturbative calculation demonstrating that IR divergences persist in the 3d theory even at strong coupling, or evidence of singularities in the corresponding 4d holographic cosmology.
Figures
read the original abstract
In this paper we consider IR divergences in a 3d toy model field theory for 4d holographic cosmology, and we analyze them by introducing a mass term in a way that preserves a certain form of the generalized conformal structure. This allows us to compute 2- and 3-point functions at 2-loops and study their IR structure below the mass scale, from which we argue for a possible IR finiteness beyond perturbation theory, consistent with lattice results. In the holographically dual 4d cosmology, this corresponds to UV finiteness, i.e., the absence of cosmological singularities. The 3d IR field theory methods could be extended beyond this specific application.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript introduces a 3d QFT toy model for 4d holographic cosmology. A mass term is added in a manner that preserves generalized conformal structure, enabling explicit 2-loop computations of 2- and 3-point functions. The IR behavior of these correlators below the mass scale is analyzed, from which the authors argue for possible non-perturbative IR finiteness. This is stated to be consistent with lattice results and, via holography, to imply UV finiteness (absence of cosmological singularities) in the dual 4d cosmology. The 3d methods are suggested to be more broadly applicable.
Significance. If the extrapolation from 2-loop IR structure to non-perturbative finiteness holds and the holographic map is reliable, the result would provide a concrete mechanism linking 3d IR properties to the resolution of 4d cosmological singularities. The technical device of a mass regulator that preserves generalized conformal invariance is a potentially useful addition to the holographic cosmology toolkit, and the reported consistency with lattice data strengthens the case. The work remains preliminary because the central claim rests on perturbative evidence plus external lattice input rather than a self-contained non-perturbative demonstration.
major comments (3)
- [§3] §3 (2-loop computation of the 2-point function): the IR finiteness reported below the mass scale is obtained after a specific regularization whose details (subtraction scheme, handling of the mass-dependent counterterms) are not fully specified. Without an explicit check that the same finiteness is recovered in the massless limit or that the result is independent of the regulator choice, it is unclear whether the observed cancellation is intrinsic or an artifact of the mass term introduced to preserve generalized conformal structure.
- [Discussion] Discussion section (argument for non-perturbative finiteness): the claim that the 2-loop IR structure persists beyond perturbation theory is supported only by consistency with external lattice results. No internal equation or computation reduces the finiteness statement to a quantity computed within the present model; the extrapolation therefore remains an assumption rather than a derived result.
- [Introduction] Introduction (holographic identification): the mapping from 3d IR finiteness to 4d UV finiteness (absence of singularities) assumes that the chosen 3d toy model with the mass term faithfully encodes the relevant IR physics of the original holographic setup. A concrete test—e.g., recovery of the expected IR divergences when the mass is removed—would be required to make this identification load-bearing for the central cosmological claim.
minor comments (2)
- Notation for the generalized conformal structure is introduced without a compact summary equation; a single displayed relation collecting the preserved Ward identities would improve readability.
- Figure captions for the 2- and 3-point function plots should explicitly state the momentum range used to extract the IR behavior below the mass scale.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We are grateful to the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments in detail below and indicate the revisions we plan to make.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: §3 (2-loop computation of the 2-point function): the IR finiteness reported below the mass scale is obtained after a specific regularization whose details (subtraction scheme, handling of the mass-dependent counterterms) are not fully specified. Without an explicit check that the same finiteness is recovered in the massless limit or that the result is independent of the regulator choice, it is unclear whether the observed cancellation is intrinsic or an artifact of the mass term introduced to preserve generalized conformal structure.
Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. Upon review, we agree that additional details on the regularization procedure would strengthen the presentation. In the revised version, we will expand §3 to include a more explicit description of the subtraction scheme and the treatment of mass-dependent counterterms. Furthermore, we will perform and report an explicit computation in the massless limit to verify that the IR finiteness persists and is not dependent on the specific choice of regulator. This will confirm the intrinsic nature of the cancellation. revision: yes
-
Referee: Discussion section (argument for non-perturbative finiteness): the claim that the 2-loop IR structure persists beyond perturbation theory is supported only by consistency with external lattice results. No internal equation or computation reduces the finiteness statement to a quantity computed within the present model; the extrapolation therefore remains an assumption rather than a derived result.
Authors: The referee is correct that our suggestion of non-perturbative IR finiteness is not derived from an internal non-perturbative calculation but rather inferred from the 2-loop results combined with consistency to lattice data. In the revised manuscript, we will modify the Discussion section to more clearly state that this is a plausible extrapolation based on perturbative evidence and external validation, rather than a rigorous proof. We will also discuss potential avenues for future non-perturbative studies within the model. revision: yes
-
Referee: Introduction (holographic identification): the mapping from 3d IR finiteness to 4d UV finiteness (absence of singularities) assumes that the chosen 3d toy model with the mass term faithfully encodes the relevant IR physics of the original holographic setup. A concrete test—e.g., recovery of the expected IR divergences when the mass is removed—would be required to make this identification load-bearing for the central cosmological claim.
Authors: We appreciate this point regarding the validity of the holographic map. To address it, we will add to the Introduction a more detailed justification for why the mass term preserves the essential IR physics relevant to the dual cosmology. Additionally, as part of the revisions to §3, we will include the check of recovering IR divergences in the massless limit, which serves as the suggested consistency test. This will bolster the reliability of the identification for the cosmological implications. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; derivation relies on explicit perturbative computations plus external lattice benchmarks
full rationale
The paper introduces a mass term chosen to preserve generalized conformal structure in the 3d toy model, performs direct 2-loop calculations of 2- and 3-point functions, observes the IR structure below the mass scale, and argues for possible non-perturbative IR finiteness on that basis together with consistency against independent lattice results. This is then mapped to UV finiteness (absence of singularities) in the dual 4d holographic cosmology. No equation or step reduces a claimed prediction or finiteness result to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the lattice consistency is external and the perturbative results are computed outputs rather than inputs renamed as predictions. The extrapolation beyond perturbation theory is presented as an argument, not a forced equivalence by construction.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption The 3d toy model with mass term preserving generalized conformal structure faithfully represents the relevant IR sector of the holographic cosmology.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.leanalexander_duality_circle_linking echoes?
echoesECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.
In this paper we consider IR divergences in a 3d toy model field theory for 4d holographic cosmology... the action in Euclidean signature is SEuc.[Φi,A]=Tr∫d^dx(1/2 FμνFμν + ... ) with d=3
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
the log-divergences cancel and the result is log-finite, up to 2-loops... ⟨O(q;m)O(−q;m)⟩|q→0 saturates to a value that only depends on m
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity
G. ’t Hooft, “Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,”Conf. Proc.C930308 (1993) 284–296,arXiv:gr-qc/9310026 [gr-qc]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993
-
[2]
L. Susskind, “The World as a hologram,”J. Math. Phys.36(1995) 6377–6396, arXiv:hep-th/9409089 [hep-th]. 68
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
-
[3]
The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity
J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,”Int. J. Theor. Phys.38(1999) 1113–1133,arXiv:hep-th/9711200 [hep-th]. [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2,231(1998)]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
-
[4]
Nastase,Introduction to the ADS/CFT Correspondence
H. Nastase,Introduction to the ADS/CFT Correspondence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015
work page 2015
-
[5]
M. Ammon and J. Erdmenger,Gauge/gravity duality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015
work page 2015
-
[6]
Quantum Gravity In De Sitter Space
E. Witten, “Quantum gravity in de Sitter space,” inStrings 2001: International Conference Mumbai, India, January 5-10, 2001. 2001.arXiv:hep-th/0106109 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
-
[7]
A. Strominger, “The dS / CFT correspondence,”JHEP10(2001) 034, arXiv:hep-th/0106113
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
-
[8]
Inflation and the dS/CFT Correspondence
A. Strominger, “Inflation and the dS / CFT correspondence,”JHEP11(2001) 049, arXiv:hep-th/0110087
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
-
[10]
On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation
J. M. Maldacena and G. L. Pimentel, “On graviton non-Gaussianities during inflation,”JHEP09(2011) 045,arXiv:1104.2846 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[11]
P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, “Holography for Cosmology,”Phys. Rev. D81 (2010) 021301,arXiv:0907.5542 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
-
[12]
P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, “The Holographic Universe,”J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 222(2010) 012007,arXiv:1001.2007 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
-
[15]
Constraining holographic cosmology using Planck data
N. Afshordi, E. Gould, and K. Skenderis, “Constraining holographic cosmology using Planck data,”Phys. Rev. D95(2017) no. 12, 123505,arXiv:1703.05385 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[16]
How Superrenormalizable Interactions Cure their Infrared Divergences ,
R. Jackiw and S. Templeton, “How Superrenormalizable Interactions Cure their Infrared Divergences ,”Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 2291
work page 1981
-
[17]
High-Temperature Yang-Mills Theories and Three-Dimensional Quantum Chromodynamics,
T. Appelquist and R. D. Pisarski, “High-Temperature Yang-Mills Theories and Three-Dimensional Quantum Chromodynamics,”Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 2305. 69
work page 1981
-
[18]
Nonperturbative Infrared Finiteness in a Superrenormalizable Scalar Quantum Field Theory,
G. Cossu, L. Del Debbio, A. Juttner, B. Kitching-Morley, J. K. L. Lee, A. Portelli, H. B. Rocha, and K. Skenderis, “Nonperturbative Infrared Finiteness in a Superrenormalizable Scalar Quantum Field Theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) no. 22, 221601,arXiv:2009.14768 [hep-lat]
-
[19]
Holography for the very early Universe and the classic puzzles of Hot Big Bang cosmology,
H. N˘ astase and K. Skenderis, “Holography for the very early Universe and the classic puzzles of Hot Big Bang cosmology,”Phys. Rev. D101(2020) no. 2, 021901, arXiv:1904.05821 [hep-th]
-
[20]
Holographic cosmology solutions of problems with pre-inflationary cosmology,
H. N˘ astase, “Holographic cosmology solutions of problems with pre-inflationary cosmology,”JHEP12(2020) 026,arXiv:2008.05630 [hep-th]
-
[21]
The monopole problem in holographic cosmology,
H. N˘ astase and U. M. Portugal, “The monopole problem in holographic cosmology,” Phys. Lett. B815(2021) 136141,arXiv:2012.14829 [hep-th]
-
[22]
3-point function of currents for holographic cosmology and monopole non-gaussianities,
M. Cravo and H. Nastase, “3-point function of currents for holographic cosmology and monopole non-gaussianities,”Journal of High Energy Physics2024(2024) no. 5, 1–50
work page 2024
-
[23]
Topology of cosmic domains and strings,
T. W. Kibble, “Topology of cosmic domains and strings,”Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General9(1976) no. 8, 1387–1398
work page 1976
-
[24]
Some implications of a cosmological phase transition,
T. W. Kibble, “Some implications of a cosmological phase transition,”Physics Reports67(1980) no. 1, 183–199
work page 1980
-
[25]
Supergravity and the large n limit of theories with sixteen supercharges,
N. Itzhaki, J. M. Maldacena, J. Sonnenschein, and S. Yankielowicz, “Supergravity and the large n limit of theories with sixteen supercharges,”Physical Review D58 (1998) no. 4, 046004
work page 1998
-
[26]
Space-time uncertainty principle and conformal symmetry in d-particle dynamics,
A. Jevicki and T. Yoneya, “Space-time uncertainty principle and conformal symmetry in d-particle dynamics,”Nuclear Physics B535(1998) no. 1-2, 335–348
work page 1998
-
[27]
Generalized conformal symmetry in d-brane matrix models,
A. Jevicki, Y. Kazama, and T. Yoneya, “Generalized conformal symmetry in d-brane matrix models,”Physical Review D59(1999) no. 6, 066001
work page 1999
-
[28]
Precision holography for non-conformal branes,
I. Kanitscheider, K. Skenderis, and M. Taylor, “Precision holography for non-conformal branes,”Journal of High Energy Physics2008(2008) no. 09, 094
work page 2008
-
[29]
P. McFadden and K. Skenderis, “The holographic universe,” inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing. 2010
work page 2010
-
[30]
Renormalisation of ir divergences and holography in de sitter,
A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, “Renormalisation of ir divergences and holography in de sitter,”Journal of High Energy Physics2024(2024) no. 5, 1–85
work page 2024
-
[31]
M. Veltmanet al., “Scalar one-loop integrals,”Nuclear Physics B153(1979) 365–401. 70
work page 1979
-
[32]
Recursive algorithm for evaluating vertex-type feynman integrals,
A. I. Davydychev, “Recursive algorithm for evaluating vertex-type feynman integrals,”Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General25(1992) no. 21, 5587
work page 1992
-
[33]
One-loop three-point feynman integrals with appell f 1 hypergeometric functions,
K. H. Phan and D. T. Tran, “One-loop three-point feynman integrals with appell f 1 hypergeometric functions,”Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2019 (2019) no. 6, 063B01
work page 2019
-
[34]
Massless and massive one-loop three-point functions in negative dimensional approach,
A. Suzuki, E. Santos, and A. Schmidt, “Massless and massive one-loop three-point functions in negative dimensional approach,”The European Physical Journal C-Particles and Fields26(2002) no. 1, 125–137
work page 2002
-
[35]
Two-point function at two loops via triangle diagram insertion,
A. T. Suzuki, A. GM Schmidt, and J. D. Bolzan, “Two-point function at two loops via triangle diagram insertion,”Journal of the Physical Society of Japan81(2012) no. 4, 044101
work page 2012
-
[36]
Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models
J. Maldacena, “Non-gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,”Journal of High Energy Physics2003(2003) no. 05, 013–013, arXiv:astro-ph/0210603 [astro-ph]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
-
[37]
Single field consistency relation for the 3-point function
P. Creminelli and M. Zaldarriaga, “Single field consistency relation for the 3-point function,”JCAP10(2004) 006,arXiv:astro-ph/0407059
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
-
[38]
J. Z. Finotti, M. Cravo, and H. Nastase,To appear.2026
work page 2026
-
[39]
Foundation and generalization of the expansion by regions,
B. Jantzen, “Foundation and generalization of the expansion by regions,”Journal of High Energy Physics2011(2011) no. 12, 76
work page 2011
-
[40]
Asymptotic expansion of feynman integrals near threshold,
M. Beneke and V. A. Smirnov, “Asymptotic expansion of feynman integrals near threshold,”Nuclear Physics B522(1998) no. 1-2, 321–344
work page 1998
-
[41]
V. A. Smirnov,Evaluating feynman integrals, vol. 211. Springer, 2004
work page 2004
-
[42]
A. Grozin, “Lectures on qed and qcd,”arXiv preprint hep-ph/0508242(2005)
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
-
[43]
A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,
F. V. Tkachov, “A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,”Physics Letters B100(1981) no. 1, 65–68
work page 1981
-
[44]
Integration by parts: the algorithm to calculateβ-functions in 4 loops,
K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov, “Integration by parts: the algorithm to calculateβ-functions in 4 loops,”Nuclear Physics B192(1981) no. 1, 159–204
work page 1981
-
[45]
Polylogarithms and associated functions,
L. Lewin, “Polylogarithms and associated functions,”(No Title)(1981)
work page 1981
-
[46]
The dilogarithm function, frontiers in number theory, physics, and geometry. ii, 3–65,
D. Zagier, “The dilogarithm function, frontiers in number theory, physics, and geometry. ii, 3–65,”
-
[47]
The dilogarithm function for complex argument,
L. C. Maximon, “The dilogarithm function for complex argument,”Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences459(2003) no. 2039, 2807–2819. 71
work page 2003
-
[48]
The Creation of the Universe as a Quantum Phenomenon,
R. Brout, F. Englert, and E. Gunzig, “The Creation of the Universe as a Quantum Phenomenon,”Annals Phys.115(1978) 78
work page 1978
-
[49]
The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe,
S. W. Hawking, “The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe,”Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 295
work page 1982
-
[50]
Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe,
A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi, “Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe,”Phys. Rev. Lett.49(1982) 1110–1113
work page 1982
-
[51]
Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe,
A. A. Starobinsky, “Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early state of the universe,”JETP Lett.30(1979) 682–685
work page 1979
-
[52]
A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,
A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,”Phys. Lett. B91(1980) 99–102
work page 1980
-
[53]
A. D. Linde, “A new inflationary universe scenario: a possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems,”Physics Letters B108(1982) no. 6, 389–393
work page 1982
-
[54]
N˘ astase,Cosmology and string theory, vol
H. N˘ astase,Cosmology and string theory, vol. 197. Springer, 2019
work page 2019
-
[55]
Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck
N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, and et al., “Planck 2018 results,”Astronomy & Astrophysics641(2020) ,arXiv:1807.06205 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
-
[56]
Trans-Planckian Issues for Inflationary Cosmology
R. H. Brandenberger and J. Martin, “Trans-Planckian Issues for Inflationary Cosmology,”Class. Quant. Grav.30(2013) 113001,arXiv:1211.6753 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
-
[57]
Robustness of the inflationary perturbation spectrum to trans-Planckian physics
A. A. Starobinsky, “Robustness of the inflationary perturbation spectrum to transPlanckian physics,”Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.73(2001) 415–418, arXiv:astro-ph/0104043
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
-
[58]
A critical review of inflation,
N. Turok, “A critical review of inflation,”Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 3449–3467
work page 2002
-
[59]
Inflationary cosmology: Progress and problems,
R. H. Brandenberger, “Inflationary cosmology: Progress and problems,” Astrophysics and Space Science Library247(2000) 169–212
work page 2000
-
[60]
Large-order Perturbation Theory and de Sitter/Anti de Sitter Effective Actions
A. K. Das and G. V. Dunne, “Large-order Perturbation Theory and de Sitter/Anti de Sitter Effective Actions,”Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 044029, arXiv:hep-th/0607168
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
-
[61]
de sitter holography and the cosmic microwave background,
F. Larsen, J. P. Van Der Schaar, and R. G. Leigh, “de sitter holography and the cosmic microwave background,”Journal of High Energy Physics2002(2002) no. 04, 047
work page 2002
-
[62]
Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence
D. Anninos, T. Hartman, and A. Strominger, “Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence,”Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) no. 1, 015009, arXiv:1108.5735 [hep-th]. 72
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[63]
On de sitter spacetime and string theory,
P. Berglund, T. H¨ ubsch, and D. Minic, “On de sitter spacetime and string theory,” International Journal of Modern Physics D32(2023) no. 09, 2330002
work page 2023
-
[64]
ads/cf ttods/cf t: Some recent developments,
G. Yadav, “ads/cf ttods/cf t: Some recent developments,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02852(2026)
-
[65]
V. E. Hubeny, “The ads/cft correspondence,”Classical and Quantum Gravity32 (2015) no. 12, 124010
work page 2015
-
[66]
Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and the AdS/CFT Correspondence
E. D’Hoker and D. Z. Freedman, “Supersymmetric gauge theories and the ads/cft correspondence (tasi 2001 lecture notes),”arXiv preprint hep-th/0201253(2002)
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
-
[67]
Review of ads/cft integrability: an overview,
N. Beisert, C. Ahn, L. F. Alday, Z. Bajnok, J. M. Drummond, L. Freyhult, N. Gromov, R. A. Janik, V. Kazakov, T. Klose,et al., “Review of ads/cft integrability: an overview,”Letters in Mathematical Physics99(2012) no. 1, 3–32
work page 2012
-
[68]
Constraining holographic inflation with WMAP
R. Easther, R. Flauger, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, “Constraining holographic inflation with wmap,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2011(2011) no. 09, 030–030,arXiv:1104.2040 [astro-ph]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[69]
From Planck data to Planck era: Observational tests of Holographic Cosmology
N. Afshordi, C. Coriano, L. Delle Rose, E. Gould, and K. Skenderis, “From planck data to planck era: Observational tests of holographic cosmology,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(2017) no. 4, ,arXiv:1607.04878 [astro-ph.CO]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[70]
Holographic predictions for cosmological 3-point functions
A. Bzowski, P. McFadden, and K. Skenderis, “Holographic predictions for cosmological 3-point functions,”JHEP03(2012) 091,arXiv:1112.1967 [hep-th]
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[71]
Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Theories,
G. ’t Hooft, “Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Theories,” in17th International Conference on High-Energy Physics, pp. III.84–85. 1974
work page 1974
-
[72]
SL(2,Z) Action On Three-Dimensional Conformal Field Theories With Abelian Symmetry
E. Witten, “SL(2,Z) action on three-dimensional conformal field theories with Abelian symmetry,” inFrom Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics: A Conference in Tribute to Ian Kogan, pp. 1173–1200. 7, 2003. arXiv:hep-th/0307041
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
-
[73]
Particle-vortex and maxwell duality in the ads4×cp3/abjm correspondence,
J. Murugan, H. Nastase, N. Rughoonauth, and J. P. Shock, “Particle-vortex and maxwell duality in the ads4×cp3/abjm correspondence,”Journal of High Energy Physics2014(2014) no. 10, 1–28
work page 2014
-
[74]
The large-n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,
J. Maldacena, “The large-n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” International journal of theoretical physics38(1999) no. 4, 1113–1133
work page 1999
-
[75]
N˘ astase,Cosmology and String Theory, vol
H. N˘ astase,Cosmology and String Theory, vol. 197 ofFundamental Theories of Physics. Springer, 2019. 73
work page 2019
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.