Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Simulation-based inference for Precision Neutrino Physics through Neural Monte Carlo tuning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2507.23297 v1 pith:XSH3HMHH submitted 2025-07-31 physics.data-an cs.LGhep-exhep-phphysics.ins-det

Simulation-based inference for Precision Neutrino Physics through Neural Monte Carlo tuning

classification physics.data-an cs.LGhep-exhep-phphysics.ins-det
keywords neutrinoinferencelikelihoodsneuralcalibrationdataenergyflows
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Precise modeling of detector energy response is crucial for next-generation neutrino experiments which present computational challenges due to lack of analytical likelihoods. We propose a solution using neural likelihood estimation within the simulation-based inference framework. We develop two complementary neural density estimators that model likelihoods of calibration data: conditional normalizing flows and a transformer-based regressor. We adopt JUNO - a large neutrino experiment - as a case study. The energy response of JUNO depends on several parameters, all of which should be tuned, given their non-linear behavior and strong correlations in the calibration data. To this end, we integrate the modeled likelihoods with Bayesian nested sampling for parameter inference, achieving uncertainties limited only by statistics with near-zero systematic biases. The normalizing flows model enables unbinned likelihood analysis, while the transformer provides an efficient binned alternative. By providing both options, our framework offers flexibility to choose the most appropriate method for specific needs. Finally, our approach establishes a template for similar applications across experimental neutrino and broader particle physics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Flow-Based Surrogates for High-Dimensional Likelihoods in Experimental Neutrino Physics

    hep-ex 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    A hybrid coupling-plus-autoregressive normalizing flow reproduces a 110-parameter non-Gaussian near-detector likelihood at 98% relative ESS versus ~5% for the post-fit Gaussian, matching MCMC while remaining evaluable...

  2. Flow-Based Surrogates for High-Dimensional Likelihoods in Experimental Neutrino Physics

    hep-ex 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    A hybrid coupling-plus-autoregressive normalizing flow trained on a 110-parameter T2K-like near-detector likelihood reaches 98% relative ESS versus 5% for the post-fit Gaussian and matches MCMC flux predictions.