Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 94 references

A Century of Group Theory in Particle Physics and Beyond

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-07-07 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quantum groups map the genetic code's structure

desk verdict Festschrift survey with no new results; the genetic code model is the only distinctive element but is previously published. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.05225 v1 pith:XYPE7HES submitted 2026-07-06 hep-th math-phmath.MP

Paul Sorba This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords grouptheoryquantumgroupsgeneticcodecrystalbasissymmetryparticlephysicsconformalfieldsupersymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper surveys a century of group theory in physics, from the Poincare group through gauge theories and supersymmetry to conformal field theory and integrable models. Its most distinctive claim is that the quantum group U_q(Sl(2)+Sl(2)) at q=0 provides a natural algebraic framework for the genetic code. The four nucleotides (A, C, G, U/T) are assigned to the (1/2, 1/2) representation of this quantum group. Because the crystal basis at q=0 produces ordered tensor products rather than symmetrized linear combinations, three-fold tensor products of nucleotide states yield the 64 codons in a way that respects their order — a feature essential to genetics but absent in ordinary quark classification. The decomposition produces irreducible representations whose codon content can be compared with biological data. The model generates sum rules for codon usage probabilities, a codon-anticodon interaction potential analogous to spin-spin interactions in particle physics, and predictions for amino-acid thermodynamic parameters. The interaction potential, when minimized, reproduces the observed set of 22 anticodons in animal mitochondrial code and yields inequalities for codon usage frequencies consistent with data across species.

What carries the argument

crystal basis of U_q(Sl(2)+Sl(2)) at q=0

What would settle it

If the predicted species-independent sum rules for codon usage fail to hold across a broad sample of vertebrate genomes, or if the minimized interaction potential fails to reproduce observed anticodon sets in genetic code variants not used in calibrating the model, the algebraic framework would lack predictive power beyond formal relabeling.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central mechanism is the crystal basis of U_q(Sl(2)+Sl(2)) at q=0, which enforces ordered tensor products of representation states. This ordering property — absent in ordinary Lie algebra representations where states symmetrize — matches the biological requirement that codons are ordered triples of nucleotides. By assigning the four nucleotides to the four states of the (1/2, 1/2) representation, the three-fold tensor product naturally produces all 64 codons distributed across irreducible representations whose structure encodes degeneracy patterns of the genetic code. The two Sl(2) factors correspond to two 'biological spins' capturing the purine/pyrimidine and complementary-base-pairing

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that assigning the four nucleotides to the four states of the (1/2, 1/2) representation of U_q(Sl(2)+Sl(2)) at q=0 captures biologically meaningful structure, but the biological justification for this specific assignment rests on analogy with quark classification rather than independent biological reasoning.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The codon-anticodon interaction potential, when minimized, reproduces the observed 22-anticodon set of animal mitochondrial code and predicts anticodon structures for Ancient, Archetypal, and Early genetic codes.
  • Sum rules for codon usage probabilities are derived: the sum of usage probabilities of codons with C and A in the third position for quartets and sextets is predicted to be species-independent for vertebrates.
  • The model predicts thermodynamic parameters for amino acids not yet experimentally measured.
  • The framework connects the degeneracy structure of the genetic code to the representation theory of quantum groups, suggesting that algebraic constraints may underlie biological regularities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the crystal basis ordering is genuinely capturing biological structure rather than relabeling it, one could test the model's predicted sum rules and anticodon hierarchies against expanded genomic databases across more species and genetic code variants.
  • The two-parameter interaction potential and its coherent sign change between Early and Eukaryotic codes could be tested by examining whether the same parameter shift reproduces known intermediate or variant genetic codes beyond those already analyzed.
  • The analogy between codon-anticodon interactions and spin-spin interactions suggests that experimental measurements of codon-anticodon binding energies could be compared quantitatively against the model's potential, providing an independent physical test of the algebraic assignment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. This is a proceedings contribution surveying the development and impact of group theory in physics over roughly the past century, presented at a conference honoring Branko Dragovich's 80th birthday. The paper covers space-time symmetries (Section 2: Poincaré group and its contractions/extensions), hadronic spectroscopy (Section 3: SU(3) flavor and color, multiquark states), gauge theories and supersymmetry (Section 4), two-dimensional conformal field theory and integrable models (Section 5), generalized symmetries (Section 6), and an application of quantum groups to the genetic code (Section 7). The survey sections are pedagogical in nature and cover well-established material, while Section 7 presents the author's own research program applying the crystal basis of U_{q=0}(Sl(2)⊕Sl(2)) to the genetic code.

Significance. The paper serves as a broad pedagogical overview suitable for a proceedings volume. The survey sections (2–6) are mathematically sound at the level of a review talk and correctly report standard commutation relations, group structures, and historical milestones. Section 7 is the most distinctive contribution, presenting a parameter-free algebraic framework (the crystal basis model) for the genetic code with falsifiable predictions (sum rules for codon usage, anticodon structure predictions). The model's predictions are compared to biological data in referenced prior work [92, 94, 95]. The nucleotide-to-representation assignment is explicitly stated as an assumption, which is appropriate for a survey of an ongoing research program.

major comments (2)
  1. Section 7, paragraph beginning 'In our model that we called the Crystal Basis Model': the statement that 'the four nucleotides as basic states of the (1/2, 1/2) representation of the U_q(Sl(2)⊕Sl(2)) quantum enveloping algebra in the limit q=0 [90]' cites reference [90], which is Schrödinger's 1944 book 'What is life?'. This is a misattribution; the crystal basis model originates in the author's own work [92] (Frappat, Sciarrino, Sorba, 1998). This reference error is load-bearing because it obscures the origin of the central construction of Section 7 and should be corrected.
  2. Section 7: the claims of 'almost universal' behaviour of codon usage frequencies and 'very good agreement' with observed anticodons are stated without any supporting data, tables, or quantitative comparison in this manuscript. While these results are referenced to prior work [94, 95], the strength of the language ('very good agreement', 'almost universal') is not substantiated within the paper itself. For a proceedings survey this may be acceptable, but a brief quantitative summary or a single comparison table would materially strengthen the case that the quantum group structure is doing non-trivial work beyond a relabeling of the four nucleotide states.
minor comments (7)
  1. Section 2, BMS/Witt algebra commutation relations: '[l′_n, l′_n] = (m−n)l′_{m+n}' should read '[l′_m, l′_n] = (m−n)l′_{m+n}' (subscript mismatch on the left-hand side).
  2. Section 2, Table 1 caption and surrounding text: the contraction arrows in the text diagram (c→0 and c→∞) are placed beneath the Carroll and Galilean labels but the directionality (which limit gives which algebra) could be clearer; the table itself lists 'Carroll' on the left and 'Galilean' on the right, which is consistent but the reader must cross-check carefully.
  3. Section 4: 'I representing the identity generator of the U(1) Lie algebra' — the notation 'I.eA_μ' in the covariant derivative is unusual; standard notation would use 'e' (the coupling) rather than 'I.e'. Clarify whether 'I' here is the identity or a typo.
  4. Section 5, Virasoro algebra: the commutation relations are written with [L_m, L_n] and [L′_m, L′_n] but the prime notation for the second (anti-holomorphic) copy is introduced without explicit comment; a brief note would help the reader.
  5. Section 7: the biological spin structure diagram uses '↔' for horizontal (Sl(2)_H) and '↕' for vertical (Sl(2)_V) assignments, but the arrows for C↔U and G↔A are labeled with Sl(2)_V on both sides, which is confusing. The diagram would benefit from clearer labeling of which algebra acts along which axis.
  6. Throughout: numerous minor typographical issues (e.g., 'extenr sions' in Section 1, 'Had that a part of their success' in Section 1, 'disgarded' in Section 6, 'to coloured clusters' in Section 3). A careful proofreading pass is recommended.
  7. Reference list: several arXiv identifiers have formatting inconsistencies (e.g., 'hep/th' vs 'hep-th', missing version numbers, extra spaces). Standardize the format.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful reading and for identifying two issues in Section 7, both of which are well-taken. We address them in turn below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Section 7, paragraph beginning 'In our model that we called the Crystal Basis Model': the statement that 'the four nucleotides as basic states of the (1/2, 1/2) representation of the U_q(Sl(2)⊕Sl(2)) quantum enveloping algebra in the limit q=0 [90]' cites reference [90], which is Schrödinger's 1944 book 'What is life?'. This is a misattribution; the crystal basis model originates in the author's own work [92].

    Authors: The referee is entirely correct. Reference [90] (Schrödinger's 'What is life?') is cited in the preceding paragraph as the historical motivation for applying physics to biology, and was inadvertently carried over as the citation for the crystal basis construction. The correct reference for the statement that the four nucleotides are basic states of the (1/2, 1/2) representation of U_{q=0}(Sl(2)⊕Sl(2)) is [92] (Frappat, Sciarrino, Sorba, 1998). We will correct this citation in the revised manuscript. We thank the referee for catching this error. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Section 7: the claims of 'almost universal' behaviour of codon usage frequencies and 'very good agreement' with observed anticodons are stated without any supporting data, tables, or quantitative comparison in this manuscript. A brief quantitative summary or a single comparison table would materially strengthen the case.

    Authors: The referee raises a legitimate point. The phrases 'almost universal' and 'very good agreement' refer to results established in [94, 95], but the current manuscript does not include any quantitative material to substantiate them within its own pages. We agree that a proceedings survey making such claims should provide at least a minimal quantitative anchor. In the revised version, we will add a compact table comparing the predicted anticodon set for the animal mitochondrial code with the observed set, as well as a brief summary of the codon usage sum rules with representative numerical values from the data analyzed in [95]. This will allow the reader to assess the non-triviality of the quantum group framework without needing to consult the referenced papers. We note that a full quantitative treatment is beyond the scope of a proceedings contribution, but the additions we propose will address the referee's concern adequately. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Survey paper with self-citations to author's own prior work for the genetic code model; no circularity in the derivation chain itself.

full rationale

This is a proceedings survey paper covering a century of group theory in physics. Sections 2-6 present standard, well-established results (Poincaré group, gauge theories, supersymmetry, conformal field theory, generalized symmetries) with citations to the broader literature. The only section with substantive original claims is Section 7, which presents the 'Crystal Basis Model' for the genetic code. There, the nucleotide-to-representation assignment is explicitly stated as an assumption ('we will assume the following biological spin structure'), not a derived result, so there is no self-definitional circularity. The downstream results (sum rules, codon-anticodon interaction potential, anticodon structure predictions) are attributed to the author's prior work (refs [92], [94], [95]) and are said to be compared against experimental data in those publications. The two parameters in the interaction potential are fitted, but the paper does not claim their values as predictions — it analyzes their sign change across evolutionary codes. The self-citations to [92], [94], [95] are load-bearing for the genetic code model's substantive claims, but these are prior published works, not unverified assertions invoked to close a logical loop within this paper. The framework's assumptions (quantum group assignment) are interpretive premises, not circular definitions. No step in the paper's derivation chain reduces to its inputs by construction. The minor self-citation pattern is normal for a survey of one's own research program and does not constitute circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper is primarily a survey, so most content draws on standard mathematical axioms. The genetic code model section introduces one ad hoc modeling choice (nucleotide-to-representation assignment) and two fitted parameters in the interaction potential, all from prior published work.

free parameters (1)
  • Two parameters in codon-anticodon interaction potential = Not explicitly stated in this paper; referenced to prior work [94]
    Section 7 mentions 'an analysis of the coherent change of sign, in the evolution from the Early to the Eukaryotic code, of the two parameters regulating our interaction potential.' These parameters are fitted to biological data in the referenced prior publications.
assumptions (3)
  • ad hoc to paper The four nucleotides A, C, G, T/U are basic states of the (1/2, 1/2) representation of U_q(Sl(2)⊕Sl(2)) at q=0
    Section 7: 'the four nucleotides as basic states of the (1/2, 1/2) representation... we will assume the following biological spin structure.' This assignment is a modeling choice, not derived from biological first principles.
  • standard math Standard mathematical structures: Poincaré group, Lie algebra classification, Virasoro algebra, Kac-Moody algebras, quantum groups
    Sections 2–6 rely on well-established mathematical frameworks from the cited literature.
  • domain assumption Codons are ordered triples of nucleotides (unlike baryons which are symmetrized)
    Section 7: 'the main and essential difference stands in the property of a codon to be an ordered set of three nucleotides.' This biological fact motivates the use of crystal basis representations.
invented entities (1)
  • Biological spin structure (Sl(2)_H and Sl(2)_V quantum numbers assigned to nucleotides)
    purpose: To algebraically represent the complementary rule and purine/pyrimidine distinction in DNA
    The assignment maps biological properties onto quantum numbers, but the paper provides no independent experimental evidence that this algebraic structure reflects a physical mechanism in molecular biology. Validation is limited to fitting codon usage data and anticodon structures.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Century of Group Theory in Particle Physics and Beyond." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XYPE7HES

@misc{pith2026260705225,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Century of Group Theory in Particle Physics and Beyond},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XYPE7HES}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.05225}
}
read the original abstract

The development of Group Theory in Mathematics as well as its impact in Physics has been spectacular during the twentieth century, and more particularly these last fifty years. If its contribution to Particle Physics deserves a special consideration, its usefulness cannot be neglected in other domains like Statistical Physics for example, and might also be of interest in Theoretical Biology. Some of these aspects will be examined.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages

  1. [90]

    p-Adic Modelling of the Genome and the Genetic Code

    B. Dragovich and A. Dragovich, “p-Adic Modelling of the Genome and the Genetic Code” arXiv:0707.3043 [q-bio.OT]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [92]

    Kashiwara, Comm.Math.Phys

    M. Kashiwara, Comm.Math.Phys. 133, 249 (1990)

    work page 1990

  3. [1]

    Introduction to Exceptional Lie groups and Algebras

    P. Ramond, “Introduction to Exceptional Lie groups and Algebras” CALT-68-577

    work page

  4. [2]

    Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincar´ e

    J.M. Levy-Leblond, “Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincar´ e” Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e, 2 (1965) 1

    work page 1965

  5. [3]

    Carroll Structures, Null Geometry and Conformal Isometries

    L. Ciambelli, R. G. Leigh, C. Marteau and P.M. Petropoulos, “Carroll Structures, Null Ge- ometry and Conformal Theories”, arXiv: hep-th/1905.02221; N. Athanasiou, P.M. Petropoulos, S. M. Schulz and G. Taujanskas “One dimensional Carrollian fluids. Part 1.Carroll-Galilei duality” arXiv: hep/th 2407. 05962, ibid “One-dimensional Carrollian fluids II: C1 blo...

    work page Pith review arXiv 1905

  6. [4]

    Dictionary on Lie algebras and Superalgebras

    L. Frappat, A. Sciarrino and P. Sorba, “Dictionary on Lie algebras and Superalgebras”, Academic Press (2000)

    work page 2000

  7. [5]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    Juan M. Maldacena, “The large N limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Super gravity”, arXiv: hep-th/9711200

    work page Pith review arXiv

  8. [6]

    N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals

    O. Aharoni, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis, J. Maldacena, “N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons- matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals”, arXiv : hep/th: 0806.1218

    work page Pith review arXiv

Show all 94 references
  1. [7]

    Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics

    P.K. Kovtun, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets, “Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics”, arXiv: hep/th: 0405231

  2. [8]

    ”Strange and stringy”

    Sachdev, Subir (2013). ”Strange and stringy”. Scientific American. 308 (44): 44–51

    2013

  3. [9]

    Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from antisymmetric isolated systems

    H. Bondi, M.G.J. van der Burg and A.W. K. Metzner, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from antisymmetric isolated systems” Proc.Roy.Soc. Lond. A269 (1962) 21- 52; R.K. Sachs, “Gravitational waves in general relativity.8.Waves in asymptotically flat space- tim...

    1962

  4. [10]

    On the various extensions of the BMS group

    R. Ruzziconi, “On the various extensions of the BMS group” Thesis, Bruxelles (2020) hep-th: 2009.01926

    2020 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Symmetries of asymptotically flat 4-dimensional space-times at null infinities revisited

    G. Barnich and C. Trossaert, “Symmetries of asymptotically flat 4-dimensional space-times at null infinities revisited” Phys.Rev.Lett.105 (2010)111103, hep-th: 0909.2617; “Supertransla- tions call for superrotations”hep-th: 1102-4632, and references therein

    2010 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Infinite conformal symmetry in two-dimensional field theory

    A.A. Belavin, A.M. Polyakov and A.B. Zamolodchikov, “Infinite conformal symmetry in two-dimensional field theory” Nucl.Phys. B241, 333 (1984)

    1984

  7. [13]

    Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symme- try

    C. Duval, G.W. Gibbons and P.A. Horvathy, “Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symme- try” hep-th: 1402.5894

    arXiv

  8. [14]

    Conformal Carroll groups

    C. Duval, G.W. Gibbons and P.A. Horvathy, “Conformal Carroll groups” hep-th: 1403.4213

    arXiv

  9. [15]

    The Maximal Kinematical invariance Group of the Free Schr¨ odinger Equation

    U. Niederer, “The Maximal Kinematical invariance Group of the Free Schr¨ odinger Equation” 22 Helv.Phys.Acta, 45 (1972) 802

    1972

  10. [16]

    About the Non-relativistic structure of the Conformal algebra

    G. Burdet, M. Perrin and P. Sorba, “About the Non-relativistic structure of the Conformal algebra” Comm.Math.Phys. 34 (1973) 85

    1973

  11. [17]

    Schr¨ odinger invariance and strongly anisotropic critical systems

    M. Henkel, “Schr¨ odinger invariance and strongly anisotropic critical systems” J.Stat.Phys.75 (1994) 1023-1061

    1994

  12. [18]

    Phenomenology of local scale invariance:from conformal invariance to dynam- ical scaling

    M. Henkel, “Phenomenology of local scale invariance:from conformal invariance to dynam- ical scaling”, Nucl.Phys. B 641 (2002) 405-486; “Ageing, dynamical scaling and conformal invariance”, Int.J.Mod.Phys. A 19 (2004) 2207-2216

    2002

  13. [19]

    Schr¨ odinger Symmetry : an historical review

    C. Duval, M. Henkel, P.A. Horvathy, S. Rouhani and P.M. Zhang, “Schr¨ odinger Symmetry : an historical review”, arXiv: 2403.20316v3 hep-th/ 19 May 2025

    2025 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Comments on string theory back- grounds with non relativistic conformal symmetry

    Juan Maldacena, Dario Martelli and Yuji Tachikawa, “Comments on string theory back- grounds with non relativistic conformal symmetry”, arXiv: hep-th/0807.1100

    arXiv

  15. [21]

    Lectures on Holographic methods for Condensed Matter Physics

    Sean Hartnoll,“Lectures on Holographic methods for Condensed Matter Physics”, arXiv: hep-th/0903.3246 V3

    arXiv

  16. [22]

    Non relativistic conformal field theories“ arXiv : 0706.3746 ; D.T. Son “Toward an AdS/cold atoms correspondence

    Y. Nishida and D.T. Son, “Non relativistic conformal field theories“ arXiv : 0706.3746 ; D.T. Son “Toward an AdS/cold atoms correspondence”arXiv: hep-th/0804.3972

    arXiv

  17. [23]

    Galilean conformal algebras and AdS/CFT

    A. Bagchi and R. Gopakumar,“Galilean conformal algebras and AdS/CFT”arXiv: hep/th 0902.1385V3

    arXiv

  18. [24]

    Schr¨ odinger manifolds

    C. Duval and S. Lazzarini, “Schr¨ odinger manifolds”math-ph: 1201.0683

    arXiv

  19. [25]

    A Non-Lorentzian Primer

    E.A. Bergshoeff, J.M. Figueroa-O’Farrill and J. Gomis, “A Non-Lorentzian Primer”hep-th: 2206.12177

    arXiv

  20. [26]

    The Eightfold Way

    see M. Gell-Mann and Y. Ne’eman “The Eightfold Way”, W.A. Benjamin, New-York, 1964

    1964

  21. [27]

    A schematic model of Baryons and Mesons

    M. Gell-Mann, “A schematic model of Baryons and Mesons”, Phys.Lett.8 (3) 214-215 ; G. Zweig, “An SU(3) model for Strong Interaction Symmetry and its Breaking” CERN-TH-401 and CERN-TH-412

  22. [28]

    Three-Triplet with double SU(3) Symmetry

    M.Y. Han and Y. Nambu,“Three-Triplet with double SU(3) Symmetry”Phys.rev.B139 (4B) :1006 (1965)

    1965

  23. [29]

    Advantages of the Color octet gluon picture

    H. Fritzsch, M. Gell-Mann and H. Leutwyler, “Advantages of the Color octet gluon picture”, Phys.Lett.B47 (4), 365-368 (1973)

    1973

  24. [30]

    On Quarks and Flavour Symmetry

    H. Hogaasen and P. Sorba, “On Quarks and Flavour Symmetry”, hep-th: 0711.3157

    arXiv

  25. [31]

    Multiquark Hadrons 1, The Phenomenology of q2q*2 Mesons

    R.J. Jaffe, “Multiquark Hadrons 1, The Phenomenology of q2q*2 Mesons”Phys.Lett.D15 (1977) 267; id. “Multiquark Hadrons 2. Methods”, Phys.Rev.D15 (1977) 281

    1977

  26. [32]

    Is deuteron a six quark system?

    V.A. Matveev and P. Sorba, “Is deuteron a six quark system?” Lett.Nuovo Cim.20 (1977) 435

    1977

  27. [33]

    Quark analysis of multibaryonic systems

    V.A. Matveev and P. Sorba “Quark analysis of multibaryonic systems” Nuovo Cim.A45, 257 (1978); H. Hogaasen, P. Sorba and R. Viollier, Z. Physik C4, 131 (1980)

    1978

  28. [34]

    Color structure of deuteron on the light front

    S. Kaur, J. Wu, S. Xu, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, J.P. Vary,“Color structure of deuteron on the light front” hep-th :2503.21371; S. Kaur, C. Mondal, X. Zhao, C.-R. Ji, “Structure of lightest nuclei in the visible Universe” hep-th :2507.09886

    arXiv

  29. [35]

    Baryonium states in multiquark spectroscopy

    H.-M. Chan and H. Hogaasen,“Baryonium states in multiquark spectroscopy”,Phys. Lett.B72 (1977) 121; id. “A model for baryonium”, Phys.Lett. B136 (1978) 634

    1977

  30. [36]

    The systematic of possibly narrow states with baryon number 23 one

    H. Hogaasen and P. Sorba, “The systematic of possibly narrow states with baryon number 23 one”Nucl.Phys.B145 (1978) 119; M. De Combrugghe, H. Hogaasen and P. Sorba, “Narrow multiquark baryons”, Nuclear Phys.B156 (1979), 261

    1978

  31. [37]

    What is happening to multiquark baryons?

    H. Hogaasen and P. Sorba, “What is happening to multiquark baryons?” Proc.of the 4th Intern.Conf. on Baryon resonances “ (1980),p.401, Toronto, Canada

    1980

  32. [38]

    Hadron masses in a gauge theory

    A. de Rujula, H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow, “Hadron masses in a gauge theory” Phys.Rev. D12 (1975) 147

    1975

  33. [39]

    Possibility of stable multiquark baryons

    C. Gignoux, B. Sylvestre-Brac and J.M. Richard, “Possibility of stable multiquark baryons”, Phys.Lett.B193 (1987) 323

    1987

  34. [40]

    On the discrete charm of multiquark states

    H. Hogaasen and P. Sorba, “On the discrete charm of multiquark states” July 2020, unpub- lished

    2020

  35. [41]

    A chromomagnetic mechanism for the X(3872) resonance

    H. Hogaasen, J.M. Richard and P. Sorba, “A chromomagnetic mechanism for the X(3872) resonance”,hep-th/0511039; [B&H&R&S]

    arXiv

  36. [42]

    Chromomagnetism, flavour sym- metry breaking and S-wave tetraquarks

    F. Buccella, H. Hogaasen, J.M. Richard and P. Sorba, “Chromomagnetism, flavour sym- metry breaking and S-wave tetraquarks”, hep-th/ 0608001

  37. [43]

    Aaij et al , hep-ex/1507.03414

    LHCb Collab., R. Aaij et al , hep-ex/1507.03414

    arXiv

  38. [44]

    Aaij et al , hep-ex/ 2006.16957

    LHCb Collab., R. Aaij et al , hep-ex/ 2006.16957

    2006

  39. [45]

    b decays: a factory for hidden charm multiquark states

    F. Buccella“b decays: a factory for hidden charm multiquark states” hep-th/ 1801.03723

    arXiv

  40. [46]

    Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance

    C.N. Yang and R. Mills, “Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance”, Phys.Rev.96 (1954) 19

    1954

  41. [47]

    A model of Leptons

    S. Glashow ”The renormalizability of vector meson interactions”, Nucl. Phys. 10, 107 (1959); A.Salam, in Elementary Particle Theory, ed.N.Swartholm (Almquist and Forlag,Stockholm, 1968; S. Weinberg,“A model of Leptons”, Phys. Rev. Letters 19 (21): 1264–66

    1959

  42. [48]

    Broken symmetries and the mass of the Gauge Bosons

    P.W. Higgs, “Broken symmetries and the mass of the Gauge Bosons” Phys.Rev.Lett. 12 (1964) 132; F. Englert and R. Brout, “Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons”, Phys.Rev.Letters, 13 (1964) 321

    1964

  43. [49]

    Neveu and Schwarz, Nucl.Phys.B31(1971) 86; P

    A. Neveu and Schwarz, Nucl.Phys.B31(1971) 86; P. Ramond, Phys.Rev.D3 (1971) 2415; Y. Aharonov, A. Casher and L. Susskind, Phys.Lett.B35 (1971) 512; J.L. Gervais and B. Sakita, Nucl.Phys.B34 (1971) 633

    1971

  44. [50]

    Supergauge transformations in four dimensions

    J. Wess and B. Zumino,“Supergauge transformations in four dimensions”Nucl.phys.B70 (1974) 39

    1974

  45. [51]

    All possible symmetries of the S-matrix

    S. Coleman and J. Mandula, “All possible symmetries of the S-matrix”,Phys.rev. 159 (1967) 1251

    1967

  46. [52]

    Extension of the algebra of the Poincar´ e group gen- erators and violation of P invariance

    Yu.A. Golfand and E.P. Likhtmann, “Extension of the algebra of the Poincar´ e group gen- erators and violation of P invariance”, JETP Lett.13 (1971) 323

    1971

  47. [53]

    All possible generators of supersymmetries of the S-Matrix

    R. Haag, J.T. Lopuszanski, M.F. Sohnius “All possible generators of supersymmetries of the S-Matrix”, Nucl.Phys.B88 (1975) 257

    1975

  48. [54]

    Supersymmetry

    P. Fayet and S. Ferrara, “Supersymmetry”,Phys.Reports 32C (1977) 249

    1977

  49. [55]

    Introducing Supersymmetry

    M.F. Sohnius, “Introducing Supersymmetry”, Phys.Reports 128 (1985) 39

    1985

  50. [56]

    Harmonic superspace

    A.S. Galperin, E.A. Ivanov, V.I. Ogievetsky and E.S. Sokatchev,“Harmonic superspace” (2001) Cambridge University Press, p.306

    2001

  51. [57]

    Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino

    P. Fayet, “Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino”Nucl.Phys. B90 (1975) 104-124 24

    1975

  52. [58]

    Fermi-Bose-Hypersymmetry

    P. Fayet, “Fermi-Bose-Hypersymmetry”Nucl.Phys.B113(1976) 135 P. Fayet, “Spontaneous generation of massive multiplets and central charges in extended supersymmetric theories” Nucl. Phys. B149 (1979) 137-169

    1976

  53. [59]

    Supersymmetry and Supergravity

    J. Wess and J. Bagger, “Supersymmetry and Supergravity”, Princeton University Press, 1992

    1992

  54. [60]

    Classification of Lie Superalgebras

    V. Kac, “Classification of Lie Superalgebras”, Funct. Anal. Appl. 9(1975)263; “Lie Superalgebras”, Adv.Math.Phys. 26(1977)8; “A sketch on Lie Superalgebra theory”, Comm. Math.Phys.53 (1977) 31; “Characters of typical representations of classical Lie Superalgebras”, Comm. Math....

    1975

  55. [61]

    Symmetries in Modern Physics

    E. D’Hoker and P. Sorba, “Symmetries in Modern Physics” in preparation

  56. [62]

    Dynamics of Dimensional Reduction

    P.G.O. Freund and M.A. Rubin, “Dynamics of Dimensional Reduction” Phys.Lett. B97, (1980) 233; L.J. Romans, “New compactification of chiral N=2 D=10 Supergravity”, Phys.Lett.B153 (1985) 392; J. Figueroa-O’Farrill and G. Papadopoulos, “Maximally supersymmetric solutions of ten a...

    1980 arXiv

  57. [63]

    String theory and M-theory: a modern introduction

    K. Becker, M. Becker and J. Schwarz, “String theory and M-theory: a modern introduction”, Cambridge (2007)

    2007

  58. [64]

    Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and the ADS/CFT Cor- respondence

    E. D’Hoker and D.Z. Freedman,“Supersymmetric Gauge Theories and the ADS/CFT Cor- respondence”, hep-th / 0201253

  59. [65]

    Dark energy from String Theory: an introductory review

    D. Andriot,“Dark energy from String Theory: an introductory review”hep-th/2603.2579

  60. [66]

    Anomaly cancellations in supersymmetric D=10 gauge theory and superstring theory

    M.B. Green and J. Schwarz, “Anomaly cancellations in supersymmetric D=10 gauge theory and superstring theory” Phys. Lett. 149 (1984) 11

    1984

  61. [67]

    Witten, “String theories dynamics in various dimensions“ hep-th/ 9503124

    Ed. Witten, “String theories dynamics in various dimensions“ hep-th/ 9503124

  62. [68]

    Conformal Field Theory

    Ph. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal, “Conformal Field Theory”, Springer (1997)

    1997

  63. [69]

    Modular invariant partition functions in two di- mensions

    A. Cappelli, C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber, “Modular invariant partition functions in two di- mensions”, Nucl.Phys.B280 (1987) 445; “The A-D-E classification of minimal and A1(1)conformal invariant theories”,Comm.Math.Phys.13 (1987) 1

    1987

  64. [70]

    Kac-Moody and Virasoro algebras in relation to Quantum Physics

    P. Goddard and D. Olive, “Kac-Moody and Virasoro algebras in relation to Quantum Physics”, Int.Journ.of Mod.Phys.A, Vol.1, No 2 (1986) 303-414[71] D. Lust and S. Theisen, “Lectures on String Theory”, Lecture Notes in Physics 346 (1989) Springer-Verlag

    1986

  65. [71]

    Current Algebra and Wess-Zumino models in two dimensions

    Ed. Witten,”Non Abelian Bosonisation in two dimensions” Comm.Math.Phys.92 (1984) 455; V.G. Knizhnik and A.B. Zamolodchikov, “Current Algebra and Wess-Zumino models in two dimensions”Nucl.Phys. B247 (1984) 83; D. Gepner and E. Witten, “String Theory on Group Manifolds” Nucl.Phy...

    1984

  66. [72]

    Structure of basic superalgebras and of their affine extensions

    L. Frappat, A. Sciarrino and P. Sorba,“Structure of basic superalgebras and of their affine extensions”, Comm.Math.Phys.121 (1989) 457

    1989

  67. [73]

    Extended Kac-Moody algebras and applications

    E. Ragoucy and P. Sorba,“Extended Kac-Moody algebras and applications”, Intern.Journ.of Mod.Phys.A ,Vol7, No13 (1992) 2883-2971

    1992

  68. [74]

    New perspectives in Kac-Moody algebras associated to higher dimensional manifolds

    R. Campoamor-Stursberg, A. Marrani and M. Rausch de Traubenberg, “New perspectives in Kac-Moody algebras associated to higher dimensional manifolds” , hep-th/2510.02953 and ref.therein

  69. [75]

    Exactly and Completely Integrable Nonlinear Dynamical Systems

    A.N. Leznov and M.V. Saveliev,“Exactly and Completely Integrable Nonlinear Dynamical Systems”, Acta Appl.Math.116 (1989) and ref. therein 25

    1989

  70. [76]

    Feher, L

    L. Feher, L. O’Raifeartaigh, P. Ruelle, I. Tsutsui and A. Wipf,”On Hamiltonian reduction of the Wess-Zumino-Novikov-Witten theories”Phys.Rep. 222 (1992)1, and ref.therein

    1992

  71. [77]

    General properties of Classical W alge- bras

    F. Delduc, L. Frappat, E. Ragoucy and P. Sorba,“General properties of Classical W alge- bras”, hep-th/931204

  72. [78]

    Representations of zero curvature for the system of non- linear partial differential equationsx α,zz =exp(kx) α and its integrability

    A.N. Leznov and M.V. Saveliev,“Representations of zero curvature for the system of non- linear partial differential equationsx α,zz =exp(kx) α and its integrability”, Lett.Math.Phys.3 (1979) 485

    1979

  73. [79]

    Lectures on Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory and Integrable Systems

    E. D’Hoker and D.H. Phong, “Lectures on Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory and Integrable Systems”, hep-th/9912271

    arXiv

  74. [80]

    Electro-magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confine- ment in N = 2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Electro-magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confine- ment in N = 2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory”, hep-th/9407087; “Monopoles, duality, and chiral symmetry breaking in N = 2 supersymmetric QCD”, hep-th/9410167

    arXiv

  75. [81]

    Exactly solvable one-dimensional many-body problems

    F. Calogero, “Exactly solvable one-dimensional many-body problems”, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 13 (1975) 411-416; J. Moser, “Three integrable Hamiltonian systems connected with isospectral deformations”, Advances Math. 16 (1975) 197

    1975

  76. [82]

    A guide to Quantum Groups

    V. Chari and A. Pressley, “A guide to Quantum Groups”, Cambridge University Press (1994)

    1994

  77. [83]

    Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics

    R.J. Baxter, “Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics”. Academic Press” (1982)

    1982

  78. [84]

    Deformed Virasoro and W algebras from elliptic algebras

    P. Sorba,“Deformed Virasoro and W algebras from elliptic algebras”, Max-Planck Institute f¨ ur Mathematik Preprint MPI 99-39 (1999)

    1999

  79. [85]

    Generalized Global Symmetries

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett, “Generalized Global Symmetries”hep- th/ 1412.5148

    arXiv

  80. [86]

    Higher-form Symmetries and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking

    E. Lake,“Higher-form Symmetries and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking”, hep-th/1802.07747 ; P. Gomez, “An Introduction to Higher Form Symmetries”, hep-th/2303. 01817; L. Bhardwaj et al, “Lectures on Generalized Symmetries”,hep-th/ 2307.07547; J. McGreevy, “Generalized Symmmetries ...

    arXiv

  81. [87]

    A non-semisimple non-invertible symmetry

    C. Delcamp, E. Heng and M. Yu,“A non-semisimple non-invertible symmetry” hep-th/2412.19635

  82. [88]

    Topological Defect Lines and renormal- ization Group Flows in Two Dimensions

    C. Chang, Y. Lin, S. Shao, Y. Wang and X. Yin, “Topological Defect Lines and renormal- ization Group Flows in Two Dimensions” , hep-th/ 1802.04445

    arXiv

  83. [89]

    What is life?

    E. Schr¨ odinger,“What is life?”, Cambridge University Press (1944)

    1944

  84. [91]

    A Crystal Basis for the Genetic Code

    F. Frappat, A. Sciarrino and P. Sorba, “A Crystal Basis for the Genetic Code”,Phys. Lett. A 250 (1998) 214; “Symmetry and Codon Usage correlations in the Genetic Code”, Phys. Lett. A 259 (1999)339

    1998

  85. [93]

    Symmetry and Minimum Principle at the basis of the Genetic Code

    A. Sciarrino and P. Sorba, “Symmetry and Minimum Principle at the basis of the Genetic Code”, arXiv: 1704.0094 [q-bio.OT]

  86. [94]

    Hierarchy of codon usage frequencies from codon-anticodon interaction in the crystal basis model

    A. Sciarrino and P. Sorba, “Hierarchy of codon usage frequencies from codon-anticodon interaction in the crystal basis model”, arXiv: 2312.11107 [q-bio.OT] 26

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed July 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.