Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

A chirped linear light drive unlocks longitudinal and out-of-plane spin accumulation in ordinary Rashba 2DEGs that simple linear driving leaves forbidden.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-11 11:05 UTC pith:Y5SWLD4O

load-bearing objection Clean new protocol: chirped linear drive activates forbidden Edelstein channels via Bessel-weighted DC fields; high-frequency assumption is the main soft spot but does not kill the formal claim. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.04946 v1 pith:Y5SWLD4O submitted 2026-07-06 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci

Chirped Floquet linear drives activate forbidden charge-to-spin conversions in Rashba two-dimensional electron gases

Mohsen Yarmohammadi This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords Rashba 2DEGEdelstein effectFloquet engineeringchirped linear drivecharge-to-spin conversionspin-orbit torquetime-reversal symmetry breakingFloquet-Zeeman field
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

In a clean Rashba two-dimensional electron gas, continuous rotational symmetry forces any current-induced spin polarization to stay strictly perpendicular to the applied electric field; longitudinal and out-of-plane components are identically zero. Circular or elliptical light can lift that restriction, but ordinary linearly polarized Floquet driving cannot. This paper shows that adding a controlled phase chirp to a linear drive is enough: the chirp generates static in-plane Floquet-Zeeman fields and an odd-parity momentum drift that simultaneously break time-reversal and two-fold rotational symmetries. Those broken symmetries activate the previously vanishing diagonal and out-of-plane Edelstein susceptibilities, giving all-optical, three-dimensional control of the spin accumulation vector without static magnets or specially engineered interfaces. The protocol is proposed as a practical route to field-free spin-orbit torque switching.

Core claim

A phase-chirped Floquet linear drive induces momentum-independent in-plane Floquet-Zeeman fields proportional to the Bessel function of the chirp parameter together with an odd-parity scalar momentum drift; these terms break time-reversal and C2z symmetries and thereby turn on the forbidden longitudinal and out-of-plane components of the spin Edelstein susceptibility tensor in a Rashba 2DEG.

What carries the argument

The high-frequency Floquet effective Hamiltonian of the phase-chirped bichromatic linear drive, whose time-averaged scalar and Pauli sectors contain the chirp-dependent Zeeman fields Mx,y ∝ (−1)n Jn(c) and the odd-parity drift term that together lift the geometric constraints of the pristine Rashba Hamiltonian.

Load-bearing premise

The entire derivation rests on a high-frequency expansion that assumes the drive frequency is much larger than all electronic energy scales, yet the concrete laser parameters later suggested for experiment sit near the edge of that regime.

What would settle it

Measure the full Edelstein tensor (especially χxx, χyy, χzx, χzy) in a high-mobility Rashba 2DEG while sweeping the optical phase chirp through a Bessel root of Jn(c); the forbidden components must appear, peak, reverse sign with harmonic order, and vanish when the chirp is removed.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Longitudinal and out-of-plane spin polarizations become optically switchable in any ordinary Rashba 2DEG without static magnetic fields or low-symmetry interfaces.
  • The three-dimensional orientation of the current-induced spin vector can be rotated continuously by tuning only the chirp parameter and polarization tilt angle.
  • Sign of the out-of-plane spin accumulation can be flipped simply by changing the harmonic order of the drive via the (−1)n factor.
  • The same protocol supplies a field-free optical route to spin-orbit torque switching for high-density spintronic devices.
  • Host materials with weaker Rashba strength are preferred when maximizing the out-of-plane component.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the in-plane response is independent of Rashba strength while the out-of-plane response is suppressed by it, the same chirped drive could be used to map the relative weight of planar versus perpendicular spin-orbit channels across different 2DEG platforms.
  • The odd-parity drift term is formally a DC vector potential; its presence suggests analogous activation of forbidden orbital Edelstein or nonlinear Hall responses under the same chirped protocol.
  • If the high-frequency assumption is only marginally satisfied, residual 1/ω commutator corrections could generate additional out-of-plane fields that either enhance or mask the predicted Bessel scaling, offering a clear experimental diagnostic of expansion validity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript shows that a phase-chirped linearly polarized Floquet drive (bichromatic or monochromatic) applied to a Rashba 2DEG generates static, momentum-independent in-plane Floquet-Zeeman fields Mx,y ∝ (−1)n Jn(c) together with an odd-parity scalar momentum drift. These terms break time-reversal and C2z symmetries that otherwise force the Edelstein susceptibility to be purely transverse and antisymmetric. Using a high-frequency Floquet expansion (effective Hamiltonian given by the time average, Eqs. 1–2 and SM S2) and the Kubo formula, the authors demonstrate that the previously vanishing diagonal (χxx, χyy) and out-of-plane (χzx, χzy) components become finite and optically tunable via the chirp parameter c, harmonic order n and polarization angle β. Numerical results and an experimental proposal based on mid-infrared two-color driving of oxide or semiconductor 2DEGs are presented.

Significance. If the high-frequency derivation remains quantitatively reliable, the work supplies a clean, material-agnostic optical route to field-free longitudinal and out-of-plane spin accumulation without static magnets or interface engineering. The analytic structure is transparent: the vanishing of the first-order commutator for real Fourier coefficients, the explicit Bessel dependence of the induced fields, and the symmetry tables (I–II) constitute falsifiable, parameter-light predictions that can be checked by varying c or n. The protocol is therefore of genuine interest for spin-orbit-torque architectures and for Floquet control of spin-orbitronics more broadly.

major comments (2)
  1. The entire effective Hamiltonian (Eqs. 1–2) and the subsequent activation of the forbidden Edelstein components rest on the high-frequency expansion of SM S2, which is introduced with ℏω ≈ 1–3 eV. The experimental-feasibility paragraph, however, proposes a 10 µm fundamental (ℏω ≈ 124 meV) that is comparable to or smaller than typical Fermi and Rashba scales in the cited LaAlO3/SrTiO3 and GaAs platforms. In that regime the neglected O(1/ω^{2}) corrections and multi-photon resonances can renormalize or even reverse the DC Floquet-Zeeman fields, so the predicted χxx, χyy, χzx, χzy are no longer guaranteed. Either a full Floquet (or Magnus) calculation at the proposed frequencies, or a revised experimental window that restores ℏω ≫ band energies, is required before the central claim can be regarded as experimentally supported.
  2. Table II and Figs. 3–4 assert that all six tensor components become finite once T and C2z are broken. The Kubo numerics are performed only inside the high-frequency effective model; no check is given that the same components survive when the drive frequency is lowered to the mid-infrared values later advocated. A single frequency-dependent scan of the full time-periodic Hamiltonian (or at least of the next-order Floquet correction) would establish whether the activation is robust or an artifact of the expansion.
minor comments (4)
  1. The abstract and introduction repeatedly contrast “a simple Floquet linear drive” with the chirped protocol; a short explicit statement that the monochromatic limit (A → 0, n → 1) is recovered and still works would remove any ambiguity.
  2. Fig. 2(c) and the accompanying text give Mx,y in units of eÃα/ℏ; the sign convention relative to the (−1)n factor should be stated once in the caption for immediate readability.
  3. Several self-citations (Refs. 55, 56, 66) are to contemporaneous arXiv preprints; a brief parenthetical note that they treat related but distinct geometries would help the reader assess novelty.
  4. In the experimental section the peak field ≈ 36 kV cm⁻¹ is quoted for eA/ℏkF ≈ 0.3; the corresponding kF value assumed for each material platform should be listed so that the intensity estimate can be reproduced.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: effective Hamiltonian and Edelstein tensor follow from standard high-frequency Floquet averaging plus Kubo response applied to an explicit chirped drive; Bessel factors and symmetry breaking are derived, not fitted or self-defined.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The vector potential is written explicitly, expanded via the Jacobi-Anger identity, and time-averaged to obtain the DC components Ax,0 = Ã cos β (−1)n Jn(c) (and Ay,0). Because the Fourier coefficients are real, the first-order commutator [HF−m, HFm] vanishes identically, so Heff reduces exactly to the zeroth-order average (Eqs. 1–2 and Sec. S2). The resulting Mx,y and odd-parity drift break T and C2z by direct transformation (Tab. I, Sec. S3). The spin Edelstein tensor is then evaluated with the ordinary Kubo formula (Eq. 3) on the Floquet bands; the previously vanishing components appear only when those fields are present and scale with |Jn(c)|. No parameter is fitted to data and then re-used as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the author’s prior work, and the self-citations (arXiv:2606.21281, 2606.31867, etc.) address related but distinct Floquet phenomena. The high-frequency assumption is a validity condition, not a circular step. Score 0 is therefore required.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard Floquet high-frequency machinery, Peierls substitution, and the relaxation-time Kubo formula; the only paper-specific ingredients are the particular bichromatic chirped vector potential and the numerical parameter choices used to illustrate the activated tensor components. No new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (5)
  • phase chirp c
    Continuous control parameter of the drive; values (c≈2–4) are chosen by hand to maximize |Jn(c)| and illustrate non-monotonic response.
  • amplitude ratio Ã/A
    Drive-strength ratio scanned numerically (0–1); sets the magnitude of the induced Floquet-Zeeman fields.
  • harmonic order n
    Integer (n=1–4) selected to demonstrate parity and Bessel hierarchy; not fitted but free.
  • polarization tilt β
    Angle of the chirped component; free experimental knob used to show π- and 2π-periodic responses.
  • relaxation rates ħ/τ_intra, ħ/τ_inter
    Set to 0.1 eV for numerical Kubo evaluation; phenomenological and affect absolute scale of susceptibilities.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption High-frequency Floquet expansion truncates at zeroth order once the 1/ω commutator vanishes for real Fourier coefficients.
    Invoked throughout Sec. S2 and the main-text derivation of Heff; validity requires ℏω large compared with bandwidth and drive-induced scales.
  • domain assumption Peierls substitution k → k + eA(t)/ℏ correctly captures the light-matter coupling for the continuum Rashba model.
    Standard starting point of the driven Hamiltonian (main text and SM S2).
  • domain assumption Relaxation-time approximation separates intra- and interband contributions to the Kubo spin-Edelstein tensor.
    Used to evaluate χij (Eq. 3); common but uncontrolled for quantitative magnitudes.
  • standard math Jacobi-Anger expansion of the phase-modulated cosine yields the DC components Ax,0, Ay,0 ∝ (−1)n Jn(c).
    Exact mathematical identity applied in SM S2 to obtain the time-averaged vector potential.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 21826 in / 2800 out tokens · 25883 ms · 2026-07-11T11:05:15.196114+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In Rashba two-dimensional electron gases (2DEGs), charge-to-spin conversion via the Edelstein effect is conventionally limited to the transverse plane. Accessing longitudinal or out-of-plane pathways typically requires static magnetic fields or interface engineering, which cause stray fields and lack tunability. While dynamic circular or elliptical Floquet drives can also unlock these forbidden pathways, a simple Floquet linear drive cannot. Here, we propose an alternative approach: a \textit{chirped} Floquet linear drive. The chirp induces in-plane Floquet-Zeeman fields and an odd-parity momentum drift, which simultaneously break rotational and time-reversal symmetries. This mechanism activates the forbidden Edelstein charge-to-spin conversions in Rashba 2DEGs. Experimentally accessible via programmable spatial light modulators or optical delay lines, this tunable chirped linear drive offers a broadly applicable route to spin-orbit torque switching and high-efficiency spintronics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.04946 by Mohsen Yarmohammadi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a–c) presents the relationship between the chirp parameter c and the intrinsic RSOC strength α. Across all configurations, the susceptibilities exhibit a non-monotonic profile governed by the |J2(c)| Bessel scaling that peaks at c ≈ 3. The in-plane trans￾port—encompassing both the longitudinal [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Parity-selective spin splitting in coplanar antiferromagnets via bichromatic driving

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    In a bilayer coplanar antiferromagnet, ω–2ω bichromatic light generates odd- and mixed-parity spin splittings, while n≥3 harmonics yield only even-parity states.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Manchon, H

    A. Manchon, H. C. Koo, J. Nitta, S. M. Frolov, and R. A. Duine, New perspectives for Rashba spin–orbit coupling, Nature Materials14, 871 (2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    Soumyanarayanan, N

    A. Soumyanarayanan, N. Reyren, A. Fert, and C. Panagopoulos, Emergent phenomena induced by spin– orbit coupling at surfaces and interfaces, Nature539, 509 (2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    Žutić, J

    I. Žutić, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fun- damentals and applications, Reviews of Modern Physics 76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  4. [4]

    Varotto, L

    S. Varotto, L. Nessi, S. Cecchi, J. Sławińska, P. Noël, S. Petrò, F. Fagiani, A. Novati, M. Cantoni, D. Petti, E. Albisetti, M. Costa, R. Calarco, M. Buon- giorno Nardelli, M. Bibes, S. Picozzi, J.-P. Attané, L. Vila, R. Bertacco, and C. Rinaldi, Room-temperature ferroelectricswitchingofspin-to-chargeconversioninger- manium telluride, Nature Electronics4,...

    2021

  5. [5]

    M.-J. Jin, G. Yang, D.-S. Um, J. Linder, and J. W. Robinson, Interfacial spin–orbit-coupling-induced strong spin-to-charge conversion at an all-oxide ferromagnetic/quasi-two-dimensional electron gas interface, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces17, 19026 (2025)

    2025

  6. [6]

    Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, Properties of a 2D elec- tron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy, JETP Letters 39, 78 (1984)

    1984

  7. [7]

    Nitta, T

    J. Nitta, T. Akazaki, H. Takayanagi, and T. Enoki, Gate control of spin-orbit interaction in an inverted In0.53Ga0.47As/In0.52Al0.48As heterostructure, Physical Review Letters78, 1335 (1997)

    1997

  8. [8]

    Bordoloi, A

    A. Bordoloi, A. C. Garcia-Castro, Z. Romestan, A. H. Romero, and S. Singh, Promises and technological prospects of two-dimensional Rashba materials, Journal of Applied Physics135, 220901 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    V. M. Edelstein, Spin polarization of conduction elec- trons induced by electric current in two-dimensional asymmetric electron systems, Solid State Communica- tions73, 233 (1990)

    1990

  10. [10]

    S. D. Ganichev, E. L. Ivchenko, V. V. Bel’kov, S. A. Tarasenko, M. Sollinger, D. Weiss, W. Wegscheider, and W. Prettl, Spin-galvanic effect, Nature417, 153 (2002)

    2002

  11. [11]

    Johansson, Theory of spin and orbital Edelstein ef- fects, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter36, 423002 (2024)

    A. Johansson, Theory of spin and orbital Edelstein ef- fects, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter36, 423002 (2024)

    2024

  12. [12]

    Železný, H

    J. Železný, H. Gao, K. Výborný, J. Zemen, J. Mašek, A. Manchon, J. Wunderlich, J. Sinova, and T. Jung- wirth, Spin-orbit torques in locally and globally noncen- trosymmetric crystals: Antiferromagnets and ferromag- 6 nets, Physical Review B95, 014403 (2017)

    2017

  13. [13]

    Johansson, B

    A. Johansson, B. Göbel, J. Henk, I. Mertig, and I. Mer- tig, Spin Edelstein effect in anisotropic two-dimensional electron gases, Physical Review B103, 024405 (2021)

    2021

  14. [14]

    A.Johansson, B.Göbel, J.Henk, M.Bibes,andI.Mertig, Spin and orbital Edelstein effects in a two-dimensional electron gas: Theory and application to SrTiO3 inter- faces, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013275 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    MacNeill, G

    D. MacNeill, G. M. Stiehl, M. H. D. Guimarães, N. D. Reynolds, D. C. Ralph, and G. D. Fuchs, Con- trol of spin–orbit torques through crystal symmetry in WTe2/ferromagnet bilayers, Nature Physics13, 300 (2017)

    2017

  16. [16]

    S.-H. C. Baek, V. P. Amin, Y.-W. Oh, G. Go, S.-J. Lee, G.-H. Lee, K.-J. Kim, M. D. Stiles, B.-G. Park, and K.-J. Lee, Spin currents and spin–orbit torques in ferromag- netic trilayers, Nature Materials17, 509 (2018)

    2018

  17. [17]

    L. Liu, J. Zhou, R.-X. Zhang, J. K. Furdyna, and W. Luo, Symmetry-dependent spin-orbit torques in two- dimensional quantum materials, Nature Reviews Physics 3, 392 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    H. Wu, J. Zhang, B. Cui, S. A. Razavi, X. Che, Q. Pan, D. Wu, G. Yu, X. Han, and K. L. Wang, Field-free ap- proaches for deterministic spin-orbit torque switching of the perpendicular magnet, Materials Futures1, 022201 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Liu, C.-F

    L. Liu, C.-F. Pai, Y. Li, H. W. Tseng, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Spin-torque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum, Science336, 555 (2012)

    2012

  20. [20]

    C. K. Safeer, N. Ontoso, J. Ingla-Aynés, F. Herling, V. T. Pham, A. Kurzmann, K. Ensslin, A. Chuvilin, L. E. Hueso, and F. Casanova, Room-temperature spin-orbit torqueinNiFe/SrTiO 3 interfacialelectrongas,NanoLet- ters19, 8758 (2019)

    2019

  21. [21]

    D. N. Basov, R. D. Averitt, and D. Hsieh, Towards prop- ertiesondemandinquantummaterials,NatureMaterials 16, 1077 (2017)

    2017

  22. [22]

    V. V. Bryksin and P. Kleinert, Dynamic magnetoelec- tric and charge-Hall effects in the Rashba–Dresselhaus model, International Journal of Modern Physics B20, 4937 (2006)

    2006

  23. [23]

    Y. H. Wang, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N.Gedik,ObservationofFloquet-Blochstatesonthesur- face of a topological insulator, Science342, 453 (2013)

    2013

  24. [26]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonther- mal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  25. [27]

    Yarmohammadi, U

    M. Yarmohammadi, U. Zülicke, J. Berakdar, J. Linder, and J. K. Freericks, Anisotropic light-tailored RKKY in- teraction in two-dimensionald-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B111, 224412 (2025)

    2025

  26. [28]

    N. H. Lindner, G. Refael, and V. Galitski, Floquet topo- logical insulator in semiconductor quantum wells, Nature Physics7, 490 (2011)

    2011

  27. [29]

    J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F.-U. Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene, Nature Physics16, 38 (2020)

    2020

  28. [30]

    Kitamura, T

    S. Kitamura, T. Oka, and H. Aoki, Probing and control- ling spin chirality in Mott insulators by circularly polar- ized laser, Phys. Rev. B96, 014406 (2017)

    2017

  29. [31]

    Gómez-León and G

    A. Gómez-León and G. Platero, Floquet-Bloch theory and topology in periodically driven lattices, Physical Re- view Letters110, 200403 (2013)

    2013

  30. [32]

    D.YudinandI.A.Shelykh,Two-dimensionalelectrongas in the regime of strong light-matter coupling: Dynamical conductivity and all-optical measurements of Rashba and Dresselhaus coupling, Physical Review B94, 161404(R) (2016)

    2016

  31. [33]

    Bhattacharya and S

    A. Bhattacharya and S. F. Islam, Photoinduced spin- Hall resonance in ak 3-Rashba spin-orbit coupled two- dimensional hole system, Phys. Rev. B104, L081411 (2021)

    2021

  32. [34]

    See the Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for the symmetry analyses of the pristine and chirped Floquet-Rashba 2DEG Hamiltonians, along- side the explicit derivation of the effective Floquet Hamil- tonian

  33. [35]

    Sato and T

    M. Sato and T. N. Ikeda, Floquet theory and applications in open quantum and classical systems, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan94, 111007 (2025)

    2025

  34. [36]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quantum materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 387 (2019)

    2019

  35. [37]

    Castro, U

    A. Castro, U. De Giovannini, S. A. Sato, H. Hübener, and A. Rubio, Floquet engineering the band structure of materials with optimal control theory, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033213 (2022)

    2022

  36. [38]

    M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Band structure engi- neering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topo- logical insulators, Nature Reviews Physics2, 229 (2020)

    2020

  37. [39]

    U. D. Giovannini and H. Hübener, Floquet analysis of excitations in materials, Journal of Physics: Materials3, 012001 (2019)

    2019

  38. [40]

    Bukov, L

    M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Universal high-frequency behavior of periodically driven systems: from dynamical stabilization to Floquet engineering, Ad- vances in Physics64, 139 (2015)

    2015

  39. [41]

    Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Rev

    A. Eckardt, Colloquium: Atomic quantum gases in pe- riodically driven optical lattices, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 011004 (2017)

    2017

  40. [42]

    Oka and H

    T. Oka and H. Aoki, Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B79, 081406(R) (2009)

    2009

  41. [43]

    Kitagawa, E

    T. Kitagawa, E. Berg, M. Rudner, and E. Demler, Topo- logical characterization of periodically driven quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B82, 235114 (2010)

    2010

  42. [44]

    M. S. Rudner, N. H. Lindner, E. Berg, and M. Levin, Anomalous edge states and the bulk-edge correspondence for periodically driven two-dimensional systems, Phys. Rev. X3, 031005 (2013)

    2013

  43. [45]

    Grifoni and P

    M. Grifoni and P. Hänggi, Driven quantum tunneling, Physics Reports304, 229 (1998)

    1998

  44. [46]

    Platero and R

    G. Platero and R. Aguado, Photon-assisted transport in semiconductor nanostructures, Physics Reports395, 1 (2004)

    2004

  45. [47]

    Triscone, Tunable Rashba spin-orbit interaction at oxide interfaces, Phys

    A.D.Caviglia, M.Gabay, S.Gariglio, N.Reyren, C.Can- cellieri, and J.-M. Triscone, Tunable Rashba spin-orbit interaction at oxide interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 126803 (2010)

    2010

  46. [48]

    J. B. Miller, D. M. Zumbühl, C. M. Marcus, Y. B. Lyanda-Geller, D.Goldhaber-Gordon, K.Campman,and 7 A. C. Gossard, Gate-controlled spin-orbit quantum inter- ference effects in lateral transport, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 076807 (2003)

    2003

  47. [49]

    S. D. Ganichev, V. V. Bel’kov, L. E. Golub, E. L. Ivchenko, P. Schneider, S. Giglberger, J. Eroms, J. De Boeck, G. Borghs, W. Wegscheider, D. Weiss, and W. Prettl, Experimental separation of Rashba and Dres- selhaus spin splittings in semiconductor quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 256601 (2004)

    2004

  48. [50]

    Meier, G

    L. Meier, G. Salis, I. Shorubalko, E. Gini, S. Schön, and K. Ensslin, Measurement of Rashba and Dresselhaus spin–orbit magnetic fields, Nature Physics3, 650 (2007)

    2007

  49. [51]

    J. D. Koralek, C. P. Weber, J. Orenstein, B. A. Bernevig, S.-C. Zhang, S. Mack, and D. D. Awschalom, Emergence of the persistent spin helix in semiconductor quantum wells, Nature458, 610 (2009)

    2009

  50. [52]

    Y. K. Kato, R. C. Myers, A. C. Gossard, and D. D. Awschalom, Observation of the spin Hall effect in semi- conductors, Science306, 1910 (2004)

    1910

  51. [53]

    X. Lou, C. Adelmann, S. A. Crooker, E. S. Garlid, J. Zhang, K. S. M. Reddy, S. D. Flexner, C. J. Palm- strøm, and P. A. Crowell, Electrical detection of spin transport in lateral ferromagnet–semiconductor devices, Nature Physics3, 197 (2007)

    2007

  52. [54]

    J. C. R. Sánchez, L. Vila, G. Desfonds, S. Gambarelli, J. P. Attané, J. M. De Teresa, C. Magén, and A. Fert, Spin-to-charge conversion using Rashba coupling at the interface between non-magnetic materials, Nature Com- munications4, 2944 (2013)

    2013

  53. [55]

    Yarmohammadi, P

    M. Yarmohammadi, P. M. Gunnink, J. Sinova, and J. K. Freericks, Floquet-induced anisotropic magnetore- sistance and anomalous Hall effect in 2Dd-wave al- termagnets with Rashba spin-orbit coupling, (2026), arXiv:2606.21281

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  54. [56]

    Yarmohammadi, D

    M. Yarmohammadi, D. Jo, M. Berritta, L. Šmejkal, J. K. Freericks, and P. M. Oppeneer, Giant perpendicular edel- steinpolarizationin2Dcompensatedmagnetsviabichro- matic Floquet driving, (2026), arXiv:2606.31867

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  55. [57]

    Šmejkal, R

    L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneousHalleffectincollinearantiferromagnets,Sci- ence Advances6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  56. [58]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan88, 123702 (2019)

    2019

  57. [59]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  58. [60]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  59. [61]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. Šmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y.Yao,Altermagnetism: Exploringnewfrontiersinmag- netism and spintronics, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 2409327 (2024)

    2024

  60. [62]

    Q. Liu, X. Dai, and S. Blügel, Different facets of uncon- ventional magnetism, Nature Physics21, 329 (2025)

    2025

  61. [63]

    Krempaský, L

    J. Krempaský, L. Šmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhlířová, F. Alarab, P. C. Constanti- nou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov,et al., Altermagnetic lifting of Kramers spin degeneracy, Nature626, 517 (2024)

    2024

  62. [64]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. Šmejkal, C.-J. Kang, and C. Kim, Broken Kramers degeneracy in altermag- netic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036702 (2024)

    2024

  63. [65]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in alter- magnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. B109, 115102 (2024)

    2024

  64. [66]

    Yarmohammadi, P.-H

    M. Yarmohammadi, P.-H. Fu, and J. K. Freericks, Effi- cient two-color Floquet control of the RKKY interaction in altermagnets, (2026), arXiv:2602.20862. 8 Supplemental Materials for “Chirped Floquet linear drives activate forbidden charge-to-spin conversions in Rashba two-dimensional electron gases’ Mohsen Yarmohammadi1 1Department of Physics, Georgetown ...

    arXiv 2026