Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

An Audit on the Perspectives and Challenges of Hallucinations in NLP

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.07461 v2 pith:YGB73RAW submitted 2024-04-11 cs.CL cs.AI

An Audit on the Perspectives and Challenges of Hallucinations in NLP

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords hallucinationauditchallengesexaminationfieldliteratureperspectivessurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We audit how hallucination in large language models (LLMs) is characterized in peer-reviewed literature, using a critical examination of 103 publications across NLP research. Through the examination of the literature, we identify a lack of agreement with the term `hallucination' in the field of NLP. Additionally, to compliment our audit, we conduct a survey with 171 practitioners from the field of NLP and AI to capture varying perspectives on hallucination. Our analysis calls for the necessity of explicit definitions and frameworks outlining hallucination within NLP, highlighting potential challenges, and our survey inputs provide a thematic understanding of the influence and ramifications of hallucination in society.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Synthetic Sources?: Auditing Generative Search Engine Citations for Evidence of AI-Generated Sources

    cs.IR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Audit of ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini and Perplexity finds ~16% of cited sources are AI-generated across 712 queries on politics, health and environment.

  2. Attribution Gradients: Incrementally Unfolding Citations for Critical Examination of Attributed AI Answers

    cs.HC 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Attribution gradients consolidate citation evidence and enable incremental unfolding of secondary sources, leading to deeper engagement in a lab study of critical reading tasks for AI answers.