pith. sign in

arxiv: 2603.17713 · v2 · pith:YJSTBRQLnew · submitted 2026-03-18 · ✦ hep-th · math.QA

Rational points in the 6d supergravity landscape and simple current extensions

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 10:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math.QA
keywords 6d supergravityBPS stringsrational SCFTelliptic genusglobal gauge groupsimple current extensionsKac-Moody-Virasoro algebrahigher-spin currents
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rationality of BPS string worldsheet theories uniquely fixes the elliptic genus and determines the global form of six-dimensional gauge groups in models without tensor multiplets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a class of six-dimensional supergravity theories without tensor multiplets where primitive BPS strings are governed by rational superconformal field theories. It shows that rationality constraints are nontrivially satisfied in each model and uniquely determine the elliptic genus of the strings, serving as a new consistency criterion for these candidate quantum gravity theories. The left-moving Kac-Moody-Virasoro algebra is extended by higher-spin currents from simple current extensions, corresponding to discrete symmetries of the 2d SCFT, which in turn fix the global structure of the six-dimensional gauge groups. A sympathetic reader would care because these models lack standard geometric realizations in F-theory yet this method offers an effective probe of their consistency through two-dimensional rationality constraints.

Core claim

In each model, the rationality constraints are nontrivially satisfied and uniquely determine the elliptic genus of the strings, providing a new consistency criterion satisfied by this exotic class of candidate quantum gravity theories. In all cases, the left-moving Kac-Moody-Virasoro algebra on the string worldsheet is extended by higher-spin currents, corresponding to discrete symmetries of the 2d SCFT. This allows determination of the global form of the six-dimensional gauge group for all the members of this class of models.

What carries the argument

Rationality constraints of the rational SCFT describing primitive BPS strings, which uniquely fix the elliptic genus and enable simple current extensions of the left-moving Kac-Moody-Virasoro algebra to determine the global form of the six-dimensional gauge group.

Load-bearing premise

The primitive BPS strings in these 6d supergravity models without tensor multiplets are described by a rational superconformal field theory whose rationality imposes severe constraints on the supersymmetric spectrum.

What would settle it

An independent computation of the elliptic genus for one of these models that fails to match the value fixed by the rationality constraints, or an independent determination of the global gauge group structure that conflicts with the one implied by the higher-spin currents.

read the original abstract

We investigate a recently identified class of six-dimensional supergravities without tensor multiplets whose primitive BPS strings are described by a rational superconformal field theory. Rationality imposes severe constraints on the supersymmetric spectrum of their BPS strings and provides an effective way to study this class of models, despite the absence of a conventional geometric realization within F-theory. We find that, in each model, the rationality constraints are nontrivially satisfied and uniquely determine the elliptic genus of the strings, providing a new consistency criterion satisfied by this exotic class of candidate quantum gravity theories. In all cases, the left-moving Kac-Moody-Virasoro algebra on the string worldsheet is extended by higher-spin currents, corresponding to discrete symmetries of the 2d SCFT. This allows us to determine the global form of the six-dimensional gauge group for all the members of this class of models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates a class of six-dimensional supergravities without tensor multiplets in which the primitive BPS strings are described by rational superconformal field theories. Rationality of these 2d SCFTs is shown to impose severe constraints on the supersymmetric spectrum; the authors report that these constraints are nontrivially satisfied in every model of the class and uniquely fix the elliptic genus, thereby supplying a new consistency criterion. The left-moving Kac-Moody-Virasoro algebra is extended by higher-spin currents associated with discrete symmetries of the SCFT; these extensions are used to determine the global form of the six-dimensional gauge group for all members of the class.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work supplies a concrete new consistency test for exotic 6d supergravity models that lack conventional F-theory realizations. By exploiting rationality of the BPS-string SCFTs the authors obtain strong, parameter-free constraints on the spectrum and a determination of the global gauge-group structure via simple-current extensions. The approach is technically economical and directly addresses the absence of geometric data, thereby enlarging the toolkit available for exploring the 6d landscape.

major comments (1)
  1. [§2] §2 and the abstract: the claim that the BPS strings are described by rational SCFTs is load-bearing for the entire consistency argument. An explicit, independent cross-check is needed that the central charge, KM levels, and anomaly polynomial computed directly from the 6d gauge data and spectrum match the corresponding invariants of the rational SCFT before the rationality constraints are imposed; without this matching the satisfaction of the constraints risks being tautological rather than a nontrivial test.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§3] The notation for the elliptic genus and its decomposition into characters should be introduced with a single, self-contained definition early in §3 rather than piecemeal.
  2. [Table 1] Table 1 would be clearer if the columns for the higher-spin current charges were labeled with the corresponding simple-current labels used in the text.
  3. A short paragraph comparing the obtained global gauge-group forms with any existing literature on discrete symmetries in 6d supergravity would help readers assess novelty.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment below and have revised the paper to incorporate an explicit cross-check as requested.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§2] §2 and the abstract: the claim that the BPS strings are described by rational SCFTs is load-bearing for the entire consistency argument. An explicit, independent cross-check is needed that the central charge, KM levels, and anomaly polynomial computed directly from the 6d gauge data and spectrum match the corresponding invariants of the rational SCFT before the rationality constraints are imposed; without this matching the satisfaction of the constraints risks being tautological rather than a nontrivial test.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit, independent cross-check strengthens the argument and removes any risk of tautology. While the manuscript derives the SCFT data (central charge, levels, and anomaly coefficients) from the 6d gauge group, matter spectrum, and anomaly cancellation conditions in §2, we acknowledge that a direct side-by-side comparison was not tabulated. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (2.1) that computes these invariants explicitly from the 6d data for each model in the class using the standard worldsheet formulas, then matches them to the known values for the corresponding rational SCFTs (including their simple-current extensions) prior to imposing rationality. This matching is shown in a new table and confirms consistency of the setup independently of the rationality constraints, which are applied only afterward. We have also updated the abstract to reference this matching. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies assumed rationality properties as consistency check

full rationale

The paper posits that a recently identified class of tensor-free 6d supergravities has primitive BPS strings described by rational SCFTs, then reports that rationality constraints are nontrivially satisfied and fix the elliptic genus for each model. This is framed as providing a new consistency criterion rather than deriving the rationality or the genus from 6d data fits. No quoted equations or self-citations reduce the central claim to a definition, a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The steps remain independent of the target result under the stated assumptions, making the analysis self-contained against external benchmarks of rationality in 2d SCFTs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that BPS strings in these models are described by rational SCFTs and that rationality imposes severe, uniquely determining constraints on the spectrum; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption BPS strings in the 6d supergravity models without tensor multiplets are described by rational superconformal field theories.
    Invoked in the second sentence of the abstract as the starting point for applying rationality constraints.
  • domain assumption Rationality imposes severe constraints on the supersymmetric spectrum of the BPS strings.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the mechanism that allows unique determination of the elliptic genus.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5677 in / 1432 out tokens · 40369 ms · 2026-05-21T10:54:27.931992+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Rationality imposes severe constraints on the supersymmetric spectrum of their BPS strings and provides an effective way to study this class of models... the rationality constraints are nontrivially satisfied and uniquely determine the elliptic genus

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. String probes, simple currents, and the no global symmetries conjecture

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Chiral simple current extensions on the worldsheet reproduce and generalize obstructions to gauging center one-form symmetries in 6d and 8d string compactifications while clarifying BPS particle requirements upon circ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 98 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 50 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Space-Time Supersymmetry in Compactified String Theory and Superconformal Models,

    D. Gepner, “Space-Time Supersymmetry in Compactified String Theory and Superconformal Models,”Nucl. Phys. B296(1988) 757

  2. [2]

    Duality in Calabi-Yau Moduli Space,

    B. R. Greene and M. R. Plesser, “Duality in Calabi-Yau Moduli Space,”Nucl. Phys. B338 (1990) 15–37

  3. [3]

    Infinite Additional Symmetries in Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Infinite Additional Symmetries in Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory,”Theor. Math. Phys.65(1985) 1205–1213

  4. [4]

    Rational Conformal Field Theories and Complex Multiplication

    S. Gukov and C. Vafa, “Rational conformal field theories and complex multiplication,” Commun. Math. Phys.246(2004) 181–210,arXiv:hep-th/0203213

  5. [5]

    N=2 Extremal Black Holes

    S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh, and A. Strominger, “N=2 extremal black holes,”Phys. Rev. D52(1995) R5412–R5416,arXiv:hep-th/9508072

  6. [6]

    Arithmetic and Attractors

    G. W. Moore, “Arithmetic and attractors,”arXiv:hep-th/9807087

  7. [7]

    Flux vacua and modularity forZ 2 symmetric Calabi-Yau manifolds,

    P. Candelas, X. de la Ossa, P. Kuusela, and J. McGovern, “Flux vacua and modularity forZ 2 symmetric Calabi-Yau manifolds,”SciPost Phys.15no. 4, (2023) 146,arXiv:2302.03047 [hep-th]

  8. [8]

    Exact flux vacua, symmetries, and the structure of the landscape,

    T. W. Grimm and D. van de Heisteeg, “Exact flux vacua, symmetries, and the structure of the landscape,”JHEP01(2025) 005,arXiv:2404.12422 [hep-th]

  9. [9]

    Hodge Structures of Complex Multiplication Type from Rational Conformal Field Theories,

    H. Jockers, P. Kuusela, and M. Sarve, “Hodge Structures of Complex Multiplication Type from Rational Conformal Field Theories,”arXiv:2510.25708 [hep-th]

  10. [10]

    Geometry and Arithmetic of Special Loci in the Moduli Spaces of Type II String Theory,

    P. Blesse, J. D¨ ucker, A. Klemm, and J. F. Piribauer, “Geometry and Arithmetic of Special Loci in the Moduli Spaces of Type II String Theory,”arXiv:2512.20444 [hep-th]

  11. [11]

    Branes and the Swampland,

    H.-C. Kim, G. Shiu, and C. Vafa, “Branes and the Swampland,”Phys. Rev. D100no. 6, (2019) 066006,arXiv:1905.08261 [hep-th]

  12. [12]

    Anomalies as obstructions: from dimensional lifts to swampland,

    P. Cheng, R. Minasian, and S. Theisen, “Anomalies as obstructions: from dimensional lifts to swampland,”JHEP01(2022) 068,arXiv:2106.14912 [hep-th]. – 51 –

  13. [13]

    Flavor symmetries and automatic enhancement in the 6D supergravity swampland,

    M. Cvetic, L. Lin, and A. P. Turner, “Flavor symmetries and automatic enhancement in the 6D supergravity swampland,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 4, (2022) 046005,arXiv:2110.00008 [hep-th]

  14. [14]

    The discrete Green-Schwarz mechanism in 6D F-theory and elliptic genera of non-critical strings,

    M. Dierigl, P.-K. Oehlmann, and T. Schimannek, “The discrete Green-Schwarz mechanism in 6D F-theory and elliptic genera of non-critical strings,”JHEP03(2023) 090, arXiv:2212.04503 [hep-th]

  15. [15]

    Spectra of BPS strings in 6d supergravity and the Swampland,

    H. Hayashi, H.-C. Kim, and M. Kim, “Spectra of BPS strings in 6d supergravity and the Swampland,”JHEP03(2025) 123,arXiv:2310.12219 [hep-th]

  16. [16]

    Anomaly constraints for heterotic strings and supergravity in six dimensions,

    I. Basile and G. Leone, “Anomaly constraints for heterotic strings and supergravity in six dimensions,”JHEP04(2024) 067,arXiv:2310.20480 [hep-th]

  17. [17]

    Exploring new constraints on K¨ ahler moduli space of 6dN= 1 supergravity,

    H.-C. Kim and C. Vafa, “Exploring new constraints on K¨ ahler moduli space of 6dN= 1 supergravity,”JHEP10(2024) 217,arXiv:2406.06704 [hep-th]

  18. [18]

    Explicit bounds on the spectrum of 6D N=(1,0) supergravity,

    C. Birkar and S.-J. Lee, “Explicit bounds on the spectrum of 6D N=(1,0) supergravity,”Phys. Rev. D113no. 2, (2026) 026006,arXiv:2507.06295 [hep-th]

  19. [19]

    Global anomalies in 6D gauged supergravities,

    K. Becker, E. Sezgin, D. Tennyson, and Y. Tachikawa, “Global anomalies in 6D gauged supergravities,”JHEP01(2026) 092,arXiv:2507.22127 [hep-th]

  20. [20]

    The twisted geometry of 6d F-theory vacua with discrete gauge symmetries,

    D. J. Duque, A.-K. Kashani-Poor, and T. Schimannek, “The twisted geometry of 6d F-theory vacua with discrete gauge symmetries,”arXiv:2508.16500 [hep-th]

  21. [21]

    Integral cubic form of 5D minimal supergravities and non-perturbative anomalies in 6D (1,0) theories,

    P. Cheng, M. N. Milam, and R. Minasian, “Integral cubic form of 5D minimal supergravities and non-perturbative anomalies in 6D (1,0) theories,”arXiv:2509.18042 [hep-th]

  22. [22]

    Bounds on Discrete Gauge Symmetries in Supergravity

    Z. K. Baykara, M. Dierigl, H.-C. Kim, C. Vafa, and K. Xu, “Bounds on Discrete Gauge Symmetries in Supergravity,”arXiv:2511.09613 [hep-th]

  23. [23]

    Swampland Bounds on the Abelian Gauge Sector,

    S.-J. Lee and T. Weigand, “Swampland Bounds on the Abelian Gauge Sector,”Phys. Rev. D 100no. 2, (2019) 026015,arXiv:1905.13213 [hep-th]

  24. [24]

    On The Finiteness of 6d Supergravity Landscape,

    H.-C. Tarazi and C. Vafa, “On The Finiteness of 6d Supergravity Landscape,” arXiv:2106.10839 [hep-th]

  25. [25]

    A finite 6d supergravity landscape from anomalies,

    Y. Hamada and G. J. Loges, “A finite 6d supergravity landscape from anomalies,” arXiv:2507.20949 [hep-th]

  26. [26]

    Towards a complete classification of 6D supergravities,

    Y. Hamada and G. J. Loges, “Towards a complete classification of 6D supergravities,”JHEP 02(2024) 095,arXiv:2311.00868 [hep-th]

  27. [27]

    Enumerating 6D supergravities with T≤1,

    Y. Hamada and G. J. Loges, “Enumerating 6D supergravities with T≤1,”JHEP12(2024) 167,arXiv:2404.08845 [hep-th]

  28. [28]

    Finite Landscape of 6d N=(1,0) Supergravity,

    H.-C. Kim, C. Vafa, and K. Xu, “Finite Landscape of 6d N=(1,0) Supergravity,”SciPost Phys. 20(2026) 016,arXiv:2411.19155 [hep-th]

  29. [29]

    F-Theory, Spinning Black Holes and Multi-string Branches

    B. Haghighat, S. Murthy, C. Vafa, and S. Vandoren, “F-Theory, Spinning Black Holes and Multi-string Branches,”JHEP01(2016) 009,arXiv:1509.00455 [hep-th]

  30. [30]

    Tensionless Strings and the Weak Gravity Conjecture

    S.-J. Lee, W. Lerche, and T. Weigand, “Tensionless Strings and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,” JHEP10(2018) 164,arXiv:1808.05958 [hep-th]. – 52 –

  31. [31]

    The hyperplane string, RCFTs, and the swampland,

    G. Lockhart and L. Novelli, “The hyperplane string, RCFTs, and the swampland,” arXiv:2506.05173 [hep-th]

  32. [32]

    Global aspects of the space of 6D N = 1 supergravities

    V. Kumar, D. R. Morrison, and W. Taylor, “Global aspects of the space of 6D N = 1 supergravities,”JHEP11(2010) 118,arXiv:1008.1062 [hep-th]

  33. [33]

    6D supergravity without tensor multiplets

    V. Kumar, D. S. Park, and W. Taylor, “6D supergravity without tensor multiplets,”JHEP04 (2011) 080,arXiv:1011.0726 [hep-th]

  34. [34]

    Constraints on 6D Supergravity Theories with Abelian Gauge Symmetry

    D. S. Park and W. Taylor, “Constraints on 6D Supergravity Theories with Abelian Gauge Symmetry,”JHEP01(2012) 141,arXiv:1110.5916 [hep-th]

  35. [35]

    Classifying bases for 6D F-theory models

    D. R. Morrison and W. Taylor, “Classifying bases for 6D F-theory models,”Central Eur. J. Phys.10(2012) 1072–1088,arXiv:1201.1943 [hep-th]

  36. [36]

    Toric bases for 6D F-theory models

    D. R. Morrison and W. Taylor, “Toric bases for 6D F-theory models,”Fortsch. Phys.60(2012) 1187–1216,arXiv:1204.0283 [hep-th]

  37. [37]

    Anomaly-Free Supersymmetric Models in Six Dimensions

    J. H. Schwarz, “Anomaly - free supersymmetric models in six-dimensions,”Phys. Lett. B371 (1996) 223–230,arXiv:hep-th/9512053

  38. [38]

    String Universality in Six Dimensions

    V. Kumar and W. Taylor, “String Universality in Six Dimensions,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.15 no. 2, (2011) 325–353,arXiv:0906.0987 [hep-th]

  39. [39]

    String universality in ten dimensions

    A. Adams, O. DeWolfe, and W. Taylor, “String universality in ten dimensions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 071601,arXiv:1006.1352 [hep-th]

  40. [40]

    Montero and C

    M. Montero and C. Vafa, “Cobordism Conjecture, Anomalies, and the String Lamppost Principle,”JHEP01(2021) 063,arXiv:2008.11729 [hep-th]

  41. [41]

    8d supergravity, reconstruction of internal geometry and the Swampland,

    Y. Hamada and C. Vafa, “8d supergravity, reconstruction of internal geometry and the Swampland,”JHEP06(2021) 178,arXiv:2104.05724 [hep-th]

  42. [42]

    Compactness of brane moduli and the String Lamppost Principle in d>6,

    A. Bedroya, Y. Hamada, M. Montero, and C. Vafa, “Compactness of brane moduli and the String Lamppost Principle in d>6,”JHEP02(2022) 082,arXiv:2110.10157 [hep-th]

  43. [43]

    String probes and the no global symmetries conjecture

    G. Lockhart, L. Novelli, and Y. Proto, “String probes and the no global symmetries conjecture.” To appear

  44. [44]

    Extended KMV algebras of rational BPS strings,

    Y. Proto, “Extended KMV algebras of rational BPS strings,” 2026. https://doi.org/10.60507/FK2/BELMCI

  45. [45]

    Charge Lattices and Consistency of 6D Supergravity

    N. Seiberg and W. Taylor, “Charge Lattices and Consistency of 6D Supergravity,”JHEP06 (2011) 001,arXiv:1103.0019 [hep-th]

  46. [46]

    Anomaly Cancellation in Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory,

    M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, “Anomaly Cancellation in Supersymmetric D=10 Gauge Theory and Superstring Theory,”Phys. Lett. B149(1984) 117–122

  47. [47]

    Anomaly Free Chiral Theories in Six-Dimensions,

    M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and P. C. West, “Anomaly Free Chiral Theories in Six-Dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B254(1985) 327–348

  48. [48]

    A Note on the Green - Schwarz Mechanism in Open - String Theories

    A. Sagnotti, “A Note on the Green-Schwarz mechanism in open string theories,”Phys. Lett. B 294(1992) 196–203,arXiv:hep-th/9210127

  49. [49]

    Compactifications of F-Theory on Calabi--Yau Threefolds -- I

    D. R. Morrison and C. Vafa, “Compactifications of F theory on Calabi-Yau threefolds. 1,”Nucl. Phys. B473(1996) 74–92,arXiv:hep-th/9602114. – 53 –

  50. [50]

    Compactifications of F-Theory on Calabi--Yau Threefolds -- II

    D. R. Morrison and C. Vafa, “Compactifications of F theory on Calabi-Yau threefolds. 2.,” Nucl. Phys. B476(1996) 437–469,arXiv:hep-th/9603161

  51. [51]

    Global Anomalies and Geometric Engineering of Critical Theories in Six Dimensions

    M. Bershadsky and C. Vafa, “Global anomalies and geometric engineering of critical theories in six-dimensions,”arXiv:hep-th/9703167

  52. [52]

    More anomaly-free models of six-dimensional gauged supergravity

    R. Suzuki and Y. Tachikawa, “More anomaly-free models of six-dimensional gauged supergravity,”J. Math. Phys.47(2006) 062302,arXiv:hep-th/0512019

  53. [53]

    Exotic matter on singular divisors in F-theory

    D. Klevers, D. R. Morrison, N. Raghuram, and W. Taylor, “Exotic matter on singular divisors in F-theory,”JHEP11(2017) 124,arXiv:1706.08194 [hep-th]

  54. [54]

    On the string landscape without hypermultiplets,

    Z. K. Baykara, Y. Hamada, H.-C. Tarazi, and C. Vafa, “On the string landscape without hypermultiplets,”JHEP04(2024) 121,arXiv:2309.15152 [hep-th]

  55. [55]

    Topological String on elliptic CY 3-folds and the ring of Jacobi forms

    M.-x. Huang, S. Katz, and A. Klemm, “Topological String on elliptic CY 3-folds and the ring of Jacobi forms,”JHEP10(2015) 125,arXiv:1501.04891 [hep-th]

  56. [56]

    Simple WZW currents,

    J. Fuchs, “Simple WZW currents,”Commun. Math. Phys.136(1991) 345–356

  57. [57]

    The resolution of field identification fixed points in diagonal coset theories

    J. Fuchs, B. Schellekens, and C. Schweigert, “The resolution of field identification fixed points in diagonal coset theories,”Nucl. Phys. B461(1996) 371–406,arXiv:hep-th/9509105

  58. [58]

    From Dynkin diagram symmetries to fixed point structures

    J. Fuchs, B. Schellekens, and C. Schweigert, “From Dynkin diagram symmetries to fixed point structures,”Commun. Math. Phys.180(1996) 39–98,arXiv:hep-th/9506135

  59. [59]

    Twining characters, orbit Lie algebras, and fixed point resolution

    J. Fuchs, B. Schellekens, and C. Schweigert, “Twining characters, orbit Lie algebras, and fixed point resolution,” in2nd Bulgarian Workshop on New Trends in Quantum Field Theory, pp. 120–141. 11, 1995.arXiv:q-alg/9511026

  60. [60]

    A matrix S for all simple current extensions

    J. Fuchs, A. N. Schellekens, and C. Schweigert, “A Matrix S for all simple current extensions,” Nucl. Phys. B473(1996) 323–366,arXiv:hep-th/9601078

  61. [61]

    Fixed point resolution in extended WZW-models

    A. N. Schellekens, “Fixed point resolution in extended WZW models,”Nucl. Phys. B558 (1999) 484–502,arXiv:math/9905153

  62. [62]

    Exactly Solvable String Compactifications on Manifolds of SU(N) Holonomy,

    D. Gepner, “Exactly Solvable String Compactifications on Manifolds of SU(N) Holonomy,” Phys. Lett. B199(1987) 380–388

  63. [63]

    New Modular Invariants forN= 2 Tensor Products and Four-dimensional Strings,

    A. N. Schellekens and S. Yankielowicz, “New Modular Invariants forN= 2 Tensor Products and Four-dimensional Strings,”Nucl. Phys. B330(1990) 103–123

  64. [64]

    Exactly Solvable (0,2) Supersymmetric String Vacua With GUT Gauge Groups

    R. Blumenhagen and A. Wisskirchen, “Exactly solvable (0,2) supersymmetric string vacua with GUT gauge groups,”Nucl. Phys. B454(1995) 561–586,arXiv:hep-th/9506104

  65. [65]

    Asymmetric Gepner Models (Revisited)

    B. Gato-Rivera and A. N. Schellekens, “Asymmetric Gepner Models: Revisited,”Nucl. Phys. B 841(2010) 100–129,arXiv:1003.6075 [hep-th]

  66. [66]

    Asymmetric Gepner models in type II

    D. Isra¨ el and V. Thi´ ery, “Asymmetric Gepner models in type II,”JHEP02(2014) 011, arXiv:1310.4116 [hep-th]

  67. [67]

    Non-geometric Calabi-Yau compactifications and fractional mirror symmetry

    D. Isra¨ el, “Nongeometric Calabi-Yau compactifications and fractional mirror symmetry,”Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 066005,arXiv:1503.01552 [hep-th]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 91, 129902 (2015)]

  68. [68]

    The Asymmetric CFT Landscape in D=4,6,8 with Extended Supersymmetry

    R. Blumenhagen, M. Fuchs, and E. Plauschinn, “The Asymmetric CFT Landscape in D=4,6,8 – 54 – with Extended Supersymmetry,”Fortsch. Phys.65no. 3-4, (2017) 1700006,arXiv:1611.04617 [hep-th]

  69. [69]

    Superconformal Algebras and String Compactification on Manifolds with SU(N) Holonomy,

    T. Eguchi, H. Ooguri, A. Taormina, and S.-K. Yang, “Superconformal Algebras and String Compactification on Manifolds with SU(N) Holonomy,”Nucl. Phys. B315(1989) 193–221

  70. [70]

    A Hiker's Guide to K3 - Aspects of N=(4,4) Superconformal Field Theory with central charge c=6

    W. Nahm and K. Wendland, “A Hiker’s guide to K3: Aspects of N=(4,4) superconformal field theory with central charge c = 6,”Commun. Math. Phys.216(2001) 85–138, arXiv:hep-th/9912067

  71. [71]

    Mirror Symmetry on Kummer Type K3 Surfaces

    W. Nahm and K. Wendland, “Mirror symmetry on Kummer type K3 surfaces,”Commun. Math. Phys.243(2003) 557–582,arXiv:hep-th/0106104

  72. [72]

    Notes on the K3 Surface and the Mathieu group M_24

    T. Eguchi, H. Ooguri, and Y. Tachikawa, “Notes on the K3 Surface and the Mathieu group M24,”Exper. Math.20(2011) 91–96,arXiv:1004.0956 [hep-th]

  73. [73]

    Two-dimensional supersymmetric nonlinear sigma models with torsion,

    P. S. Howe and G. Sierra, “Two-dimensional supersymmetric nonlinear sigma models with torsion,”Phys. Lett. B148(1984) 451–455

  74. [74]

    Twisted Multiplets and New Supersymmetric Nonlinear Sigma Models,

    S. J. Gates, Jr., C. M. Hull, and M. Rocek, “Twisted Multiplets and New Supersymmetric Nonlinear Sigma Models,”Nucl. Phys. B248(1984) 157–186

  75. [75]

    Compactifications of the Heterotic Superstring,

    C. M. Hull, “Compactifications of the Heterotic Superstring,”Phys. Lett. B178(1986) 357–364

  76. [76]

    Superstrings with Torsion,

    A. Strominger, “Superstrings with Torsion,”Nucl. Phys. B274(1986) 253

  77. [77]

    Scale and conformal invariance in 2dσ-models, with an application toN= 4 supersymmetry,

    G. Papadopoulos and E. Witten, “Scale and conformal invariance in 2dσ-models, with an application toN= 4 supersymmetry,”JHEP03(2025) 056,arXiv:2404.19526 [hep-th]

  78. [78]

    Heterotic Compactification, An Algorithmic Approach

    L. B. Anderson, Y.-H. He, and A. Lukas, “Heterotic Compactification, An Algorithmic Approach,”JHEP07(2007) 049,arXiv:hep-th/0702210

  79. [79]

    Monad Bundles in Heterotic String Compactifications

    L. B. Anderson, Y.-H. He, and A. Lukas, “Monad Bundles in Heterotic String Compactifications,”JHEP07(2008) 104,arXiv:0805.2875 [hep-th]

  80. [80]

    General aspects of heterotic string compactifications on stacks and gerbes

    L. B. Anderson, B. Jia, R. Manion, B. Ovrut, and E. Sharpe, “General aspects of heterotic string compactifications on stacks and gerbes,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.19(2015) 531–611, arXiv:1307.2269 [hep-th]

Showing first 80 references.