Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Multifield Cosmology with Artificial Intelligence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.09747 v1 pith:YKNSYLU6 submitted 2021-09-20 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IMcs.CVcs.LG

Multifield Cosmology with Artificial Intelligence

classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GAastro-ph.IMcs.CVcs.LG
keywords mapsastrophysicalfieldscosmologicaldifferentnetworkseffectsinformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Astrophysical processes such as feedback from supernovae and active galactic nuclei modify the properties and spatial distribution of dark matter, gas, and galaxies in a poorly understood way. This uncertainty is one of the main theoretical obstacles to extract information from cosmological surveys. We use 2,000 state-of-the-art hydrodynamic simulations from the CAMELS project spanning a wide variety of cosmological and astrophysical models and generate hundreds of thousands of 2-dimensional maps for 13 different fields: from dark matter to gas and stellar properties. We use these maps to train convolutional neural networks to extract the maximum amount of cosmological information while marginalizing over astrophysical effects at the field level. Although our maps only cover a small area of $(25~h^{-1}{\rm Mpc})^2$, and the different fields are contaminated by astrophysical effects in very different ways, our networks can infer the values of $\Omega_{\rm m}$ and $\sigma_8$ with a few percent level precision for most of the fields. We find that the marginalization performed by the network retains a wealth of cosmological information compared to a model trained on maps from gravity-only N-body simulations that are not contaminated by astrophysical effects. Finally, we train our networks on multifields -- 2D maps that contain several fields as different colors or channels -- and find that not only they can infer the value of all parameters with higher accuracy than networks trained on individual fields, but they can constrain the value of $\Omega_{\rm m}$ with higher accuracy than the maps from the N-body simulations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Field-level multi-tracers simulation-based inference of cosmological parameters from 3D maps

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The work demonstrates that multi-tracer field-level SBI on galaxy and HI maps yields 2-7 times better constraints on Omega_m and sigma_8 than single-tracer or summary-statistic approaches, with 3D maps performing best.

  2. FAIR Universe Weak Lensing ML Uncertainty Challenge: Handling Uncertainties and Distribution Shifts for Precision Cosmology

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A standardized weak lensing benchmark dataset with realistic systematics is released alongside a two-phase ML uncertainty challenge to advance data-efficient and robust cosmological analysis.