REVIEW 1 cited by
Give me a hint: Can LLMs take a hint to solve math problems?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While state-of-the-art LLMs have shown poor logical and basic mathematical reasoning, recent works try to improve their problem-solving abilities using prompting techniques. We propose giving "hints" to improve the language model's performance on advanced mathematical problems, taking inspiration from how humans approach math pedagogically. We also test robustness to adversarial hints and demonstrate their sensitivity to them. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by evaluating various diverse LLMs, presenting them with a broad set of problems of different difficulties and topics from the MATH dataset and comparing against techniques such as one-shot, few-shot, and chain of thought prompting.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Reason from Future: Reverse Thought Chain Enhances LLM Reasoning
A prompting method that alternates backward and forward reasoning improves small LLM accuracy on math and search tasks and reduces the number of visited search states.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.