pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.05549 · v3 · pith:YNRRAADMnew · submitted 2024-10-07 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· hep-ex· physics.atom-ph· quant-ph

Highly Excited Electron Cyclotron for QCD Axion and Dark-Photon Detection

Xing Fan , Gerald Gabrielse , Peter W. Graham , Harikrishnan Ramani , Samuel S. Y. Wong , Yawen Xiao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 19:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COhep-exphysics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords QCD axiondark photoncyclotron resonancetrapped electrondark matter detectionaxion mass range
0
0 comments X

The pith

Highly excited cyclotron states of a trapped electron enable probing QCD axion masses from 0.1 to 2.3 meV and dark photon kinetic mixing down to 2e-16.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes detecting meV-scale axion and dark photon dark matter by resonantly exciting highly excited cyclotron states of a trapped electron. The transition probability grows in proportion to the initial quantum number n_c of the state, so the approach uses n_c scaled up to around a million times a factor set by the target frequency. Key changes cut the time needed to read out the excited state to a microsecond, allow an open-endcap trap that admits signals from large focusing cavities, and add dielectric layers that boost the conversion rate coherently. These steps together reach sensitivity across the 0.1-2.3 meV axion mass window, covering much of the range expected after inflation, and the equivalent dark-photon mixing strength.

Core claim

When the axion mass equals the cyclotron frequency, the trapped electron in a state with quantum number n_c is resonantly excited with probability proportional to n_c; preparing n_c approximately 10^6 scaled by (0.1 meV over omega_c) squared, detecting the excitation in an averaging time of 10^{-6} seconds, and directing the signal into an open-endcap trap compatible with large cavities and dielectric enhancement layers together allow the QCD axion parameter space from 0.1 meV to 2.3 meV to be probed, corresponding to dark-photon kinetic mixing down to epsilon approximately 2 times 10^{-16}.

What carries the argument

The highly excited cyclotron state of the trapped electron, whose resonant excitation probability scales directly with the initial quantum number n_c.

Load-bearing premise

The averaging time can be reduced to 10^{-6} seconds while still detecting the highly excited cyclotron state before its natural decay and while keeping the open-endcap trap background-free.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the lifetime of a cyclotron state with n_c around 10^6 is shorter than 10^{-6} seconds would make the required averaging time impossible and thereby prevent the claimed sensitivity from being reached.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2410.05549 by Gerald Gabrielse, Harikrishnan Ramani, Peter W. Graham, Samuel S. Y. Wong, Xing Fan, Yawen Xiao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) A BREAD-like cylindrical barrel of radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Projected sensitivity to axion dark matter. The blue dash-dotted line represents the projected reach [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Projected sensitivity to dark photon dark matter. The three blue projection lines are based on the same [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) An infinite metal plate sources plane wave. (b) Cylindrical focusing provides a linear enhancement in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The cavity factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The first row describes the constraint that determines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (a) The shaded area of the ring is proportional to the incremental number of resonant frequencies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Transition rate vs polar angle of the Penning trap magnetic field. The purple curve corresponds to the fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose using highly excited cyclotron states of a trapped electron to detect meV axion and dark photon dark matter, marking a significant improvement over our previous proposal and demonstration [Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 261801]. When the axion mass matches the cyclotron frequency $\omega_c$, the cyclotron state is resonantly excited, with a transition probability proportional to its initial quantum number, $n_c$. The sensitivity is enhanced by taking $n_c \sim 10^6 \left( \frac{0.1~\text{meV}}{\omega_c} \right)^2$. By optimizing key experimental parameters, we minimize the required averaging time for cyclotron detection to $t_{\text{ave}} \sim 10^{-6} $ seconds, permitting detection of such a highly excited state before its decay. An open-endcap trap design enables the external photon signal to be directed into the trap, rendering our background-free detector compatible with large focusing cavities, such as the BREAD proposal, while capitalizing on their strong magnetic fields. Furthermore, the axion conversion rate can be coherently enhanced by incorporating layers of dielectrics with alternating refractive indices within the cavity. Collectively, these optimizations enable us to probe the QCD axion parameter space from 0.1 meV to 2.3 meV (25-560 GHz), covering a substantial portion of the predicted post-inflationary QCD axion mass range. This sensitivity corresponds to probing the kinetic mixing parameter of the dark photon down to $\epsilon \approx 2 \times 10^{-16}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes using highly excited cyclotron states (n_c ~ 10^6 scaled by (0.1 meV/ω_c)^2) of a trapped electron in an open-endcap Penning trap, combined with dielectric layers for coherent enhancement, to detect QCD axions and dark photons. By reducing averaging time to t_ave ~ 10^{-6} s, it claims to probe axion masses from 0.1 to 2.3 meV (25-560 GHz) and dark-photon kinetic mixing down to ε ≈ 2 × 10^{-16}, improving on prior work by the authors.

Significance. If the experimental assumptions on state preparation, short averaging times, and background-free operation in the open-endcap design hold, the proposal could cover a substantial fraction of the post-inflationary QCD axion mass range and extend dark-photon sensitivity, building on the authors' previous PRL demonstration with parameter optimizations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The headline sensitivity (0.1–2.3 meV axions, ε ≈ 2×10^{-16}) requires the n_c ~ 10^6 enhancement and t_ave ~ 10^{-6} s readout before decay; no derivation or experimental reference is given showing how the open-endcap geometry simultaneously admits the external signal, preserves background rejection, and achieves this averaging time without state loss.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The transition probability is stated to scale with initial n_c, yet the specific scaling factor (0.1 meV/ω_c)^2 and its dependence on trap geometry or dielectric layers lack an explicit equation or validation step, making the projected reach unsupported without further calculation.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract cites the prior PRL but does not quantify the sensitivity improvement factor from the new optimizations (n_c scaling, t_ave reduction, dielectrics).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised concern the level of detail provided in the abstract regarding key scalings and experimental assumptions. We address each comment below and have revised the abstract to include explicit references to the relevant sections and equations in the main text.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The headline sensitivity (0.1–2.3 meV axions, ε ≈ 2×10^{-16}) requires the n_c ~ 10^6 enhancement and t_ave ~ 10^{-6} s readout before decay; no derivation or experimental reference is given showing how the open-endcap geometry simultaneously admits the external signal, preserves background rejection, and achieves this averaging time without state loss.

    Authors: The required n_c scaling and t_ave minimization are derived in Section II (Eqs. 3–7) from the resonant transition probability and cyclotron decay rates, building directly on our prior experimental demonstration (Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 261801). The open-endcap geometry's compatibility with external signals and background rejection is analyzed in Section III, including explicit discussion of photon injection from large cavities (e.g., BREAD) and preservation of the background-free detection scheme. We have revised the abstract to reference these sections and the prior work. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The transition probability is stated to scale with initial n_c, yet the specific scaling factor (0.1 meV/ω_c)^2 and its dependence on trap geometry or dielectric layers lack an explicit equation or validation step, making the projected reach unsupported without further calculation.

    Authors: The factor n_c ∼ 10^6 (0.1 meV/ω_c)^2 is obtained by optimizing the n_c-dependent transition probability (Eq. 4) against frequency-dependent factors and cavity volume constraints, as shown in Section II. The dielectric-layer coherent enhancement is quantified separately in Section IV (Eq. 12). While the abstract states the optimized result, we agree it would benefit from a pointer to the derivation; the revised abstract now includes this reference. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; proposal adds independent optimizations to prior base concept

full rationale

The paper's claimed sensitivity derives from explicitly new elements (n_c scaling with (0.1 meV/ω_c)^2, t_ave minimization to 10^{-6}s, open-endcap trap, dielectric layers) presented as experimental optimizations, not reductions of the target reach or prior self-citations. The single reference to overlapping-author prior work [Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 261801] supplies only the base resonant excitation idea; the new reach (0.1-2.3 meV, ε≈2e-16) is supported by the added parameters whose feasibility is argued separately. No self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citation chains appear. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external experimental benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions from quantum mechanics and axion phenomenology, with the primary free parameter being the choice of excitation level optimized for the detection scheme.

free parameters (1)
  • initial cyclotron quantum number n_c = ~10^6 scaled by (0.1 meV / omega_c)^2
    Selected to balance sensitivity enhancement with the requirement that averaging time remains shorter than the state lifetime.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Resonant excitation occurs when axion mass matches cyclotron frequency omega_c
    Standard resonance condition in quantum mechanics for axion-electron interaction.
  • domain assumption Transition probability is proportional to initial quantum number n_c
    From the quantum mechanical matrix element for cyclotron transitions in the presence of axion field.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5851 in / 1577 out tokens · 54796 ms · 2026-05-23T19:29:50.168264+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The structure of multi-axion solutions to the strong CP problem

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Multi-axion theories solving the strong CP problem produce varied mass-coupling relations via a general sum rule that depends on the details of PQ symmetry breaking and anomaly alignments.

  2. INTEGRAL, eROSITA and Voyager Constraints on Light Bosonic Dark Matter: ALPs, Dark Photons, Scalars, $B-L$ and $L_{i}-L_{j}$ Vectors

    hep-ph 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    This work sets new upper limits on decay lifetimes and couplings for axion-like particles, dark photons, scalars, and B-L or L_i-L_j vector bosons using 511 keV line, X-ray continuum, and cosmic-ray flux observations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 125 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Working in the mass basis, the dark photon Lagrangian contains the term [97] L ⊃ − eJ µ EM(Aµ + ϵA′ µ)

    Perturbation Hamiltonian by Dark Photon The HamiltonianH0 gets altered by a perturbation due to dark photon dark matter (DPDM). Working in the mass basis, the dark photon Lagrangian contains the term [97] L ⊃ − eJ µ EM(Aµ + ϵA′ µ) . (A1) So, we simply need to replaceAµ → Aµ + ϵA′ µ in the unperturbed Hamiltonian, only keeping terms up to first order in ϵ:...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The corresponding Bohr frequency isωf i = ωc|∆c|, where ∆c ≡ fc − ic

    Rabi’s F ormula and Selection Rule Next, consider the cyclotron transition with the initial and final states,|i⟩ = |ic, im, iz⟩ and |f ⟩ = |fc, im, iz⟩. The corresponding Bohr frequency isωf i = ωc|∆c|, where ∆c ≡ fc − ic. If the perturbing frequency matches this Bohr frequency, mA′ ≈ ωf i, or, in other words, the detuning parameterD ≡ mA′ − ωf i is small...

    work page

  3. [3]

    distance

    Memory-Loss Model of F requency Width The Rabi’s formula, eq. (A15), with|Wf i|2 given by eq. (A18), is the expression for the transition probability of a monochromatic perturbation. We need to modify this result for two reasons: the dark photon has a frequency width ∆ωA′ = 10−6mA′, and the cyclotron also has a line width∆ωc. In particular, the monochroma...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Then, we haveN ≤ 1, which is no longer required to be an integer

    Sub-Coherence Time T ransition Rate We continue the calculation of the transition rate from above for the case oftave ≤ tcoherence. Then, we haveN ≤ 1, which is no longer required to be an integer. We can get the transition rate simply by differentiating the Rabi’s formula eq. (A15) Γc,free(t) = dPif(t) dt (A30) = |Wf i|2 |Wf i|2 + D2 sin q |Wf i|2 + D2 t...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Next, let the transition probability from the cyclotron initial state to the excited state at timet be P1(t)

    T ransition Probability Write the cyclotron transition rate as Γc,cavity = Γ0 sin2 θ(t) , (A36) where we have isolated the time-dependent polarization angle,θ(t), which is rapidly oscillating with a dark photon coherence time 2π ∆ωA′ ∼ 10−5 s. Next, let the transition probability from the cyclotron initial state to the excited state at timet be P1(t). Wit...

    work page

  6. [6]

    (A39) Imposing the initial conditionP1(0) = 0, the solution to the differential equation is P1(t) = (2/3)Γ0 γc (1 − exp(−γct))

    Then we can take the expected value under this distribution: ⟨sin2 θ⟩ = Z 1 −1 d(cos θ) sin2 θP (cos θ) = 2 3 . (A39) Imposing the initial conditionP1(0) = 0, the solution to the differential equation is P1(t) = (2/3)Γ0 γc (1 − exp(−γct)) . (A40) This formula only applies within one averaging time, after which the probability gets reset toP1 = 0. The obse...

    work page

  7. [7]

    (A46) To find the sensitivity to axion, we can just make the replacementϵA′ → Aa in the perturbation Hamiltonian eq

    T ransition Rate for Axion To detect axion, we need a strong external magnetic fieldBext, which generates an effective vector potential due to axion Aa = −gaγγ √2ρDM m2a eimatBext . (A46) To find the sensitivity to axion, we can just make the replacementϵA′ → Aa in the perturbation Hamiltonian eq. (A2). In the free cyclotron transition rate eq. (A28), we ...

    work page

  8. [8]

    However, there exists a minimum timetsignal for this change to be reflected in the signal

    Signal F ormation Time When the cyclotron state makes a transition|nc⟩ → | nc + 1⟩, the axial frequency shiftsωz → ωz + δ immediately. However, there exists a minimum timetsignal for this change to be reflected in the signal. We will show thattsignal = 1 δ. The electron’s classical axial motionz(t) is essentially a driven, damped harmonic oscillator. With...

    work page

  9. [9]

    Constraints on zmax Eq

    Minimum A veraging Time a. Constraints on zmax Eq. (40) suggests that we can lowertSNR by decreasing Rtrap and increasing zmax. However, a largerzmax corre- sponds to a larger wave function in the axial direction, and this exposes the electron wave function to the inevitable anharmonicity of the static potentialV0 [81]. The magnitude of this axial anharmo...

    work page

  10. [10]

    The electron’s radial wave function size is given by eq

    Consistency Checks We make some consistency checks to show that the large cyclotron number nc ∼ 106 does not violate other experimental constraints. The electron’s radial wave function size is given by eq. (63) rc ≈ r nc 2 meωc ≲ 0.04 mm . (C7) 12 The corresponding radial anharmonicity merely shifts the axial frequency, which can be easily taken into acco...

    work page

  11. [11]

    transverse electric

    Spherical Cavity We will calculateκ2 sphere for a spherical cavity of radiusR. For convenience, we temporarily set up a new set of coordinates, used only in this section. Let the original coordinate system beΣ, used everywhere else in this paper, in which the z-direction aligns with the magnetic field, and the dark photon’s component in thexy-plane points...

    work page

  12. [12]

    inverse local density of resonance

    Cylindrical Cavity We will calculateκ2 cylinder for a cylindrical cavity of radiusR and height d. We orient the cylinder’s central axis to be parallel to the magnetic field directionˆz, as was the case in the proof-of-principle experiment [23]. As before, the ˆx direction is taken to be the component of the dark photon field in the plane perpendicular to ...

    work page

  13. [13]

    T ransition Probability We first define a coordinate system with the center of Earth as the origin and the Earth rotation axis asˆz (leaving ˆx and ˆy arbitrary for now). At the location of the experiment, define the unit vector pointing in the direction of the magnetic field of the Penning trap to beˆB(t), which is changing due to the rotation of the Ear...

    work page

  14. [14]

    Therefore, we will discuss both the long and short observation time limits (defined relative to a Sidereal day) and show that they, in fact, share the same result

    Long Time Limit Althoughourcurrentproposedparametersandthepreviousproof-of-principleexperiment[23]bothhaveobservation times tobs of several days, it is easy to adjust our quality factorQc to achieve a much shortertobs. Therefore, we will discuss both the long and short observation time limits (defined relative to a Sidereal day) and show that they, in fac...

    work page

  15. [15]

    Short Time Limit For short observation time wheretobs ≪ 1 day, eq. (F15) can be simplified as, 1 − CL = P0(ζtobs, θ, t0) = Z 1 −1 d(cos θA) 2 Z 2π 0 dφ0 2π exp −ζΓ0,fixed Z t0+tobs t0 dt h 1 − [sin θ sin θA cos(ωLt + φ0) + cosθ cos θA]2 i (F25) ≈ Z 1 −1 d(cos θA) 2 Z 2π 0 dφ0 2π exp n −ζΓ0,fixedtobs h 1 − [sin θ sin θA cos(ωLt0 + φ0) + cosθ cos θA]2 io . ...

    work page

  16. [16]

    Zwicky, Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln, Helv

    F. Zwicky, Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln, Helv. Phys. Acta6, 110 (1933)

    work page 1933

  17. [17]

    V. C. Rubin, W. K. Ford Jr., and N. Thonnard, Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 (R=4kpc) to UGC 2885 (R=122kpc)., Astrophys. J.238, 471 (1980)

    work page 1980

  18. [18]

    Clowe, M

    D. Clowe, M. Bradač, A. H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S. W. Randall, C. Jones, and D. Zaritsky, A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter, Astrophys. J.648, L109 (2006)

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    D. N. Spergel and P. J. Steinhardt, Observational evidence for self-interacting cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 3760 (2000)

    work page 2000

  20. [20]

    Hooper, D

    D. Hooper, D. P. Finkbeiner, and G. Dobler, Possible evidence for dark matter annihilations from the excess microwave emission around the center of the galaxy seen by the wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe, Phys. Rev. D76, 083012 (2007). 45

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    overview and the cosmological legacy of planck, Astron

    Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results - i. overview and the cosmological legacy of planck, Astron. Astrophys.641, A1 (2020)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    W. Hu, R. Barkana, and A. Gruzinov, Fuzzy cold dark matter: The wave properties of ultralight particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1158 (2000)

    work page 2000

  23. [23]

    A. E. Nelson and J. Scholtz, Dark light, dark matter, and the misalignment mechanism, Phys. Rev. D84, 103501 (2011)

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    Arkani-Hamed, D

    N. Arkani-Hamed, D. P. Finkbeiner, T. R. Slatyer, and N. Weiner, A theory of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D79, 015014 (2009)

    work page 2009

  25. [25]

    Arias, D

    P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo, and A. Ringwald, WISPy cold dark matter, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. (06), 013

    work page

  26. [26]

    Magaña and T

    J. Magaña and T. Matos, A brief review of the scalar field dark matter model, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.378, 012012 (2012)

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    L. Hui, J. P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine, and E. Witten, Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter, Phys. Rev. D95, 043541 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Caputo, A

    A. Caputo, A. J. Millar, C. A. J. O’Hare, and E. Vitagliano, Dark photon limits: A handbook, Phys. Rev. D104, 095029 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Filippi and M

    A. Filippi and M. De Napoli, Searching in the dark: the hunt for the dark photon, Rev. Phys.5, 100042 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Boutan, M

    C. Boutan, M. Jones, B. H. LaRoque, N. S. Oblath, R. Cervantes, N. Du, N. Force, S. Kimes, R. Ottens, L. J. Rosenberg, G. Rybka, J. Yang, G. Carosi, N. Woollett, D. Bowring, A. S. Chou, R. Khatiwada, A. Sonnenschein, W. Wester, R. Bradley, E. J. Daw, A. Agrawal, A. V. Dixit, J. Clarke, S. R. O’Kelley, N. Crisosto, J. R. Gleason, S. Jois, P. Sikivie, I. St...

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Khatiwada, D

    R. Khatiwada, D. Bowring, A. S. Chou, A. Sonnenschein, W. Wester, D. V. Mitchell, T. Braine, C. Bartram, R. Cervantes, N. Crisosto, N. Du, L. J. Rosenberg, G. Rybka, J. Yang, D. Will, S. Kimes, G. Carosi, N. Woollett, S. Durham, L. D. Duffy, R. Bradley, C. Boutan, M. Jones, B. H. LaRoque, N. S. Oblath, M. S. Taubman, J. Tedeschi, J. Clarke, A. Dove, A. Ha...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0037857 2021

  32. [32]

    S. Lee, S. Ahn, J. Choi, B. R. Ko, and Y. K. Semertzidis, Axion dark matter search around6.7 µeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 101802 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Jeong, S

    J. Jeong, S. W. Youn, S. Bae, J. Kim, T. Seong, J. E. Kim, and Y. K. Semertzidis, Search for invisible axion dark matter with a multiple-cell haloscope, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 221302 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    O. Kwon, D. Lee, W. Chung, D. Ahn, H. Byun, F. Caspers, H. Choi, J. Choi, Y. Chong, H. Jeong, J. Jeong, J. E. Kim, J. Kim, i. m. c. b. u. Kutlu, J. Lee, M. Lee, S. Lee, A. Matlashov, S. Oh, S. Park, S. Uchaikin, S. Youn, and Y. K. Semertzidis, First results from an axion haloscope at capp around10.7 µeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 191802 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Chileset al., New Constraints on Dark Photon Dark Matter with Superconducting Nanowire Detectors in an Optical Haloscope, Phys

    J. Chileset al., New Constraints on Dark Photon Dark Matter with Superconducting Nanowire Detectors in an Optical Haloscope, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 231802 (2022), arXiv:2110.01582 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Hochberg, B

    Y. Hochberg, B. V. Lehmann, I. Charaev, J. Chiles, M. Colangelo, S. W. Nam, and K. K. Berggren, New Constraints on Dark Matter from Superconducting Nanowires, arXiv:2110.01586

    work page arXiv

  37. [37]

    M. D. Eisaman, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and S. V. Polyakov, Invited review article: Single-photon sources and detectors, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 071101 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3610677

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3610677 2011

  38. [38]

    X. Fan, G. Gabrielse, P. W. Graham, R. Harnik, T. G. Myers, H. Ramani, B. A. D. Sukra, S. S. Y. Wong, and Y. Xiao, One-electron quantum cyclotron as a milli-ev dark-photon detector, Physical Review Letters129, 10.1103/phys- revlett.129.261801 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2022

  39. [39]

    Budker, P

    D. Budker, P. W. Graham, H. Ramani, F. Schmidt-Kaler, C. Smorra, and S. Ulmer, Millicharged Dark Matter Detection with Ion Traps, PRX Quantum3, 010330 (2022), arXiv:2108.05283 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    S. Chen, H. Fukuda, T. Inada, T. Moroi, T. Nitta, and T. Sichanugrist, Detecting hidden photon dark matter using the direct excitation of transmon qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 211001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    S. Chen, H. Fukuda, T. Inada, T. Moroi, T. Nitta, and T. Sichanugrist, Search for QCD axion dark matter with transmon qubits and quantum circuit, (2024), arXiv:2407.19755 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    P. W. Graham, I. G. Irastorza, S. K. Lamoreaux, A. Lindner, and K. A. van Bibber, Experimental Searches for the Axion and Axion-Like Particles, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.65, 485 (2015), arXiv:1602.00039 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  43. [43]

    J. E. Kim and G. Carosi, Axions and the Strong CP Problem, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 557 (2010), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 91, 049902 (2019)], arXiv:0807.3125 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2010

  44. [44]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 1440 (1977)

    work page 1977

  45. [45]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D16, 1791 (1977)

    work page 1977

  46. [46]

    Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys

    S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 223 (1978)

    work page 1978

  47. [47]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki, A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B 104, 199 (1981)

    work page 1981

  48. [48]

    Brouweret al

    L. Brouweret al. (DMRadio), Proposal for a definitive search for GUT-scale QCD axions, Phys. Rev. D106, 112003 (2022), arXiv:2203.11246 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    J. E. Kim, Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 103 (1979)

    work page 1979

  50. [50]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interac- tions?, Nucl. Phys. B166, 493 (1980). 46

    work page 1980

  51. [51]

    A. R. Zhitnitsky, On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.31, 260 (1980)

    work page 1980

  52. [53]

    J. L. Hewett, H. Weerts, R. Brock, J. N. Butler, B. C. K. Casey, J. Collar, A. de Gouvêa, R. Essig, and etc., Fundamental Physics at the Intensity Frontier, (2012), arXiv:1205.2671 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  53. [54]

    Searching for axions and ALPs from string theory

    A. Ringwald, Searching for axions and ALPs from string theory, (2012), arXiv:1209.2299 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  54. [55]

    Exploring the Role of Axions and Other WISPs in the Dark Universe

    A. Ringwald, Exploring the Role of Axions and Other WISPs in the Dark Universe, (2012), arXiv:1210.5081 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  55. [56]

    O. K. Baker, M. Betz, F. Caspers, J. Jaeckel, A. Lindner, A. Ringwald, Y. K. Semertzidis, P. Sikivie, and etc., Prospects for Searching Axion-like Particle Dark Matter with Dipole, Toroidal and Wiggler Magnets, Phys. Rev. D85, 035018 (2012), arXiv:1110.2180 [physics.ins-det]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  56. [57]

    Optimizing Light-Shining-through-a-Wall Experiments for Axion and other WISP Searches

    P. Arias, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo, and A. Ringwald, Optimizing Light-Shining-through-a-Wall Experiments for Axion and other WISP Searches, Phys. Rev. D82, 115018 (2010), arXiv:1009.4875 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  57. [58]

    The Low-Energy Frontier of Particle Physics

    J. Jaeckel and A. Ringwald, The Low-Energy Frontier of Particle Physics, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60, 405 (2010), arXiv:1002.0329 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  58. [59]

    New ALPS Results on Hidden-Sector Lightweights

    K. Ehret, M. Frede, S. Ghazaryan, M. Hildebrandt, E.-A. Knabbe, D. Kracht, A. Lindner, J. List, and etc., New ALPS Results on Hidden-Sector Lightweights, Phys. Lett. B689, 149 (2010), arXiv:1004.1313 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  59. [60]

    First Results of the Full-Scale OSQAR Photon Regeneration Experiment

    M. Schottet al. (OSQAR), First Results of the Full-Scale OSQAR Photon Regeneration Experiment, inInternational Conference on the Structure and Interactions of the Photon and 19th International Workshop on Photon-Photon Collisions (2011) arXiv:1110.0774 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  60. [61]

    A Photon Regeneration Experiment for Axionlike Particle Search using X-rays

    R. Battesti, M. Fouché, C. Detlefs, T. Roth, P. Berceau, F. Duc, P. Frings, G. L. J. A. Rikken, and etc., A Photon RegenerationExperimentforAxionlikeParticleSearchusingX-rays,Phys.Rev.Lett. 105,250405(2010),arXiv:1008.2672 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  61. [62]

    J. P. Conlon, The QCD axion and moduli stabilisation, JHEP0605, 078, arXiv:hep-th/0602233

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [63]

    String Axiverse

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, String Axiverse, Phys. Rev. D81, 123530 (2010), arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  63. [64]

    B. S. Acharya, K. Bobkov, and P. Kumar, An M Theory Solution to the Strong CP Problem and Constraints on the Axiverse, JHEP 1011, 105, arXiv:1004.5138 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [65]

    How do you know if you ran through a wall?

    M. Pospelov, S. Pustelny, M. P. Ledbetter, D. F. Jackson Kimball, W. Gawlik, and D. Budker, Detecting Domain Walls of Axionlike Models Using Terrestrial Experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 021803 (2013), arXiv:1205.6260 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  65. [66]

    P. W. Graham and S. Rajendran, New Observables for Direct Detection of Axion Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D88, 035023 (2013), arXiv:1306.6088 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  66. [67]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the invisible axion, Physics Letters B120, 127 (1983)

    work page 1983

  67. [68]

    Abbott and P

    L. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A cosmological bound on the invisible axion, Physics Letters B120, 133 (1983)

    work page 1983

  68. [69]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler, The not-so-harmless axion, Physics Letters B120, 137 (1983)

    work page 1983

  69. [70]

    Buschmann, J

    M. Buschmann, J. W. Foster, A. Hook, A. Peterson, D. E. Willcox, W. Zhang, and B. R. Safdi, Dark matter from axion strings with adaptive mesh refinement, Nature Communications13, 10.1038/s41467-022-28669-y (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28669-y 2022

  70. [71]

    Holdom, Two u(1)’s andϵ charge shifts, Phys

    B. Holdom, Two u(1)’s andϵ charge shifts, Phys. Lett.166B, 196 (1986)

    work page 1986

  71. [72]

    L. B. Okun, LIMITS OF ELECTRODYNAMICS: PARAPHOTONS?, Sov. Phys. JETP56, 502 (1982)

    work page 1982

  72. [73]

    P. W. Graham, J. Mardon, and S. Rajendran, Vector Dark Matter from Inflationary Fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D93, 103520 (2016), arXiv:1504.02102 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  73. [74]

    J. A. Dror, K. Harigaya, and V. Narayan, Parametric Resonance Production of Ultralight Vector Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 99, 035036 (2019), arXiv:1810.07195 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  74. [75]

    Agrawal, N

    P. Agrawal, N. Kitajima, M. Reece, T. Sekiguchi, and F. Takahashi, Relic Abundance of Dark Photon Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B 801, 135136 (2020), arXiv:1810.07188 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  75. [76]

    Jaeckel and A

    J. Jaeckel and A. Ringwald, The low-energy frontier of particle physics, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60, 405 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nucl.012809.104433

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.012809.104433 2010

  76. [77]

    Ahmed, B

    A. Ahmed, B. Grzadkowski, and A. Socha, Gravitational production of vector dark matter, J. High Energy Phys.08, 059, arXiv:2005.01766 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2005

  77. [78]

    E. W. Kolb and A. J. Long, Completely dark photons from gravitational particle production during the inflationary era, J. High Energy Phys.03 (3), 283

    work page

  78. [79]

    R. T. Co, A. Pierce, Z. Zhang, and Y. Zhao, Dark photon dark matter produced by axion oscillations, Phys. Rev. D99, 075002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  79. [80]

    R. T. Co, K. Harigaya, and A. Pierce, Gravitational waves and dark photon dark matter from axion rotations, J. High Energy Phys. 12, 099

    work page

  80. [81]

    Peil and G

    S. Peil and G. Gabrielse, Observing the Quantum Limit of an Electron Cyclotron: QND Measurements of Quantum Jumps Between Fock States, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1287 (1999)

    work page 1999

Showing first 80 references.