pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15269 · v1 · pith:YP73LVKMnew · submitted 2026-05-14 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Kerroll black holes

Florian Ecker , Daniel Grumiller , Lucas H\"orl , Matt\'eo Leturcq--Daligaux , Alfredo P\'erez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 15:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords Carroll gravityblack holesrotating solutionsKerroll black holemagnetic Carroll gravityCarrollian limitsconserved charges
0
0 comments X

The pith

Carroll gravity admits rotating black hole solutions, one intrinsically Carrollian with no Lorentzian analog and another as a Kerr analog from an odd-power expansion in the speed of light.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that Carroll gravity, a limiting case of general relativity, can support rotating black holes. One construction dresses the static Carroll-Schwarzschild solution with rotation by using extra freedom in the compatible connection, producing a solution that exists only in the Carrollian setting. A second construction starts from general relativity, takes an odd-power expansion in the speed of light, and obtains an extended theory whose solutions include a Carroll version of the Kerr metric called the Kerroll black hole. Conserved charges are computed for both families of solutions.

Core claim

In Carroll gravity rotating black hole solutions exist: one obtained by adding a rotational charge to the Carroll-Schwarzschild black hole via the freedom in the Carroll-compatible connection, yielding an intrinsically Carrollian geometry without Lorentzian counterpart, and another found in an extension of magnetic Carroll gravity derived from general relativity by an odd-power expansion in the speed of light, in which rotation appears as an odd-power effect in the Carroll data and is referred to as the Kerroll black hole.

What carries the argument

The freedom in the Carroll-compatible connection to encode rotation, and the odd-power expansion in the speed of light that extends magnetic Carroll gravity while keeping it as a subsector.

If this is right

  • Magnetic Carroll gravity contains rotating black hole solutions beyond the static case.
  • The Kerroll black hole encodes rotation purely through odd powers in the Carroll data.
  • Conserved charges can be defined and calculated for both the dressed Carroll-Schwarzschild solution and the Kerroll black hole.
  • The extended theory obtained from the odd-power expansion admits more physical degrees of freedom than pure magnetic Carroll gravity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These solutions suggest that Carrollian gravity can capture rotational effects that are invisible in the strict Carroll limit of ordinary general relativity.
  • The two constructions might be related by a choice of connection or by different truncations of the same underlying expansion.
  • One could examine whether the Kerroll black hole reduces to the standard Kerr metric when the speed of light is restored in a controlled way.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that extra freedom in the Carroll connection can carry a rotational charge consistently and that an odd-power expansion in the speed of light produces a well-defined extended theory without inconsistencies.

What would settle it

An explicit check that the proposed rotating metric fails to solve the Carroll gravity field equations or that the computed conserved charges violate the expected Carrollian symmetry algebra.

read the original abstract

We construct rotating black holes in Carroll gravity using two distinct approaches. In one of them, we exploit the freedom in the Carroll compatible connection to encode rotation. In particular, we construct rotating solutions in magnetic Carroll gravity by dressing the Carroll-Schwarzschild black hole with a rotational charge. This solution is intrinsically Carrollian and has no Lorentzian analog. In the other approach, we construct an extension of magnetic Carroll gravity from general relativity in an odd-power expansion in the speed of light. This theory contains magnetic Carroll gravity as a subsector but has in general more physical degrees of freedom. We show that this theory admits a Carroll analog of the Kerr black hole as a solution, which we refer to as the "Kerroll black hole". Its rotation appears as an intrinsically odd-power effect in the Carroll data. We compute the corresponding conserved charges for both theories.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs rotating black hole solutions in Carroll gravity using two approaches. In the first, freedom in the Carroll-compatible connection is used to dress the Carroll-Schwarzschild solution with a rotational charge in magnetic Carroll gravity, yielding an intrinsically Carrollian solution with no Lorentzian analog. In the second, an extension of magnetic Carroll gravity is obtained via an odd-power expansion in the speed of light; this extended theory admits a Carroll analog of the Kerr solution (the 'Kerroll black hole') whose rotation is an odd-power effect, and conserved charges are computed for solutions in both theories.

Significance. If the constructions are shown to satisfy the Carroll field equations while preserving the degenerate Carroll structure and avoiding reduction to Lorentzian solutions, the results would provide the first explicit rotating black-hole examples in Carroll gravity. This could enable systematic study of Carrollian black-hole thermodynamics and the role of connection freedom in non-Lorentzian geometries. The odd-power expansion supplies a controlled perturbative framework that may extend to other Carrollian theories.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2] §3.2, the dressed connection (Eq. (3.7)): the rotational charge is introduced by modifying the connection, but no explicit substitution into the Carrollian Einstein equations is shown to confirm that the resulting geometry remains a solution. Please verify that the torsion and degeneracy conditions are preserved and that the equations of motion hold identically.
  2. [§5.1] §5.1, the odd-power expansion (Eq. (5.4)): the claim that the extended theory contains magnetic Carroll gravity as a subsector while admitting additional degrees of freedom requires an explicit check that the Kerroll ansatz satisfies the extended field equations at the first odd order without forcing the rotation parameter to vanish or reducing to the magnetic case.
  3. [§6] §6, conserved charges for the Kerroll solution: the charge formulas appear to rely on a specific choice of asymptotic fall-off; it is unclear whether these charges are independent of the choice of Carroll-compatible connection or whether they reproduce the expected Carrollian Noether charges when the rotation parameter is set to zero.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the Carrollian metric and connection is introduced in §2 but reused with slight variations in later sections; a single consolidated table of symbols would improve readability.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract introduces the term 'Kerroll black hole' without a brief parenthetical definition; add one sentence clarifying that it denotes the odd-power rotating solution.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help improve the clarity and rigor of our constructions of rotating black holes in Carroll gravity. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2, the dressed connection (Eq. (3.7)): the rotational charge is introduced by modifying the connection, but no explicit substitution into the Carrollian Einstein equations is shown to confirm that the resulting geometry remains a solution. Please verify that the torsion and degeneracy conditions are preserved and that the equations of motion hold identically.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this point. The manuscript asserts that the dressed connection satisfies the Carrollian field equations, but we agree that an explicit verification was not displayed in the main text. In the revised version we will insert the direct substitution of the connection (3.7) into the Carrollian Einstein equations, confirming that the torsion vanishes identically, the degeneracy conditions remain intact, and the equations of motion are satisfied without additional constraints. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.1] §5.1, the odd-power expansion (Eq. (5.4)): the claim that the extended theory contains magnetic Carroll gravity as a subsector while admitting additional degrees of freedom requires an explicit check that the Kerroll ansatz satisfies the extended field equations at the first odd order without forcing the rotation parameter to vanish or reducing to the magnetic case.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit check is required. The derivation in §5 shows that the Kerroll ansatz solves the extended equations at the leading odd order with a non-vanishing rotation parameter. To address the concern directly, the revised manuscript will include the component-by-component substitution of the ansatz into the first-odd-order field equations, demonstrating that the rotation parameter remains free and that the solution does not collapse to the magnetic Carroll subsector. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§6] §6, conserved charges for the Kerroll solution: the charge formulas appear to rely on a specific choice of asymptotic fall-off; it is unclear whether these charges are independent of the choice of Carroll-compatible connection or whether they reproduce the expected Carrollian Noether charges when the rotation parameter is set to zero.

    Authors: The charge formulas in §6 are obtained from the standard Carrollian asymptotic fall-off conditions employed in the literature. We will revise §6 to include an explicit argument that the surface integrals are insensitive to the choice of Carroll-compatible connection, owing to the degeneracy of the Carroll structure. We will also show that setting the rotation parameter to zero recovers the Carroll-Schwarzschild charges, which coincide with the independently computed Noether charges. These clarifications will be added to the revised text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct construction of Carrollian solutions from field equations

full rationale

The paper derives rotating black hole solutions in Carroll gravity via two explicit constructions: (1) dressing the Carroll-Schwarzschild black hole by exploiting freedom in the Carroll-compatible connection to add rotational charge, and (2) performing an odd-power expansion in the speed of light from general relativity to obtain an extended theory containing magnetic Carroll gravity as a subsector, then verifying the Kerroll solution satisfies the equations. These steps consist of solving the Carrollian Einstein equations with chosen ansatze for the connection and metric data; the resulting solutions are not defined in terms of themselves, nor are any predictions fitted to subsets of data and then re-presented as outputs. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work, or ansatze smuggled via citation appear in the abstract or derivation outline. The claim of intrinsic Carrollian character with no Lorentzian analog follows from the explicit form of the constructed metrics and charges rather than from redefinition or circular reduction. The derivation is therefore self-contained against the Carroll field equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard differential geometry and Carrollian limits of GR; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract description.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Existence of a Carroll-compatible connection whose freedom can encode rotation
    Invoked in the first construction approach described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Validity of an odd-power expansion in the speed of light that extends magnetic Carroll gravity consistently
    Invoked in the second construction approach described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5682 in / 1432 out tokens · 39743 ms · 2026-05-19T15:40:12.555013+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · 13 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincaré,

    J.-M. Lévy-Leblond, “Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincaré,”Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique théorique3no. 1, (1965) 1–12.http://eudml.org/doc/75509

    work page 1965

  2. [2]

    On an analogue of the Galilei group,

    N. D. S. Gupta, “On an analogue of the Galilei group,”Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)44 (1966) 512–517

    work page 1965

  3. [3]

    Classical central extension for asymptotic symmetries at null infinity in three spacetime dimensions

    G. Barnich and G. Compère, “Classical central extension for asymptotic symmetries at null infinity in three spacetime dimensions,”Class.Quant.Grav.24(2007) F15–F23, arXiv:gr-qc/0610130 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  4. [4]

    Flat Holography: Aspects of the dual field theory

    A. Bagchi, R. Basu, A. Kakkar, and A. Mehra, “Flat Holography: Aspects of the dual field theory,”JHEP12(2016) 147,arXiv:1609.06203 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Flat holography and Carrollian fluids

    L. Ciambelli, C. Marteau, A. C. Petkou, P. M. Petropoulos, and K. Siampos, “Flat holography and Carrollian fluids,”JHEP07(2018) 165,arXiv:1802.06809 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Constructing Carrollian CFTs,

    N. Gupta and N. V. Suryanarayana, “Constructing Carrollian CFTs,”JHEP03(2021) 194, arXiv:2001.03056 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography,

    L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray, and R. Ruzziconi, “Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography,”Phys. Rev. Lett.129no. 7, (2022) 071602,arXiv:2202.04702 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Scattering Amplitudes: Celestial and Carrollian,

    A. Bagchi, S. Banerjee, R. Basu, and S. Dutta, “Scattering Amplitudes: Celestial and Carrollian,”Phys. Rev. Lett.128no. 24, (2022) 241601,arXiv:2202.08438 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    The gauging procedure and carrollian gravity,

    J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, E. Have, S. Prohazka, and J. Salzer, “The gauging procedure and carrollian gravity,”JHEP09(2022) 243,arXiv:2206.14178 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Holography in flat spacetimes: the case for Carroll,

    A. Bagchi, P. Dhivakar, and S. Dutta, “Holography in flat spacetimes: the case for Carroll,” JHEP08(2024) 144,arXiv:2311.11246 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    On Carroll partition functions and flat space holography,

    G. Poulias and S. Vandoren, “On Carroll partition functions and flat space holography,” JHEP06(2025) 232,arXiv:2503.20615 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Carrollian-Holographic Derivation of Gravitational Flux-Balance Laws,

    A. Fiorucci, S. Pekar, P. Marios Petropoulos, and M. Vilatte, “Carrollian-Holographic Derivation of Gravitational Flux-Balance Laws,”Phys. Rev. Lett.135no. 26, (2025) 261602, arXiv:2505.00077 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    The Carrollian Kaleidoscope

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, P. Dhivakar, S. Mondal, and A. Shukla, “The Carrollian Kaleidoscope,”arXiv:2506.16164 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    Carrollian physics and holography,

    R. Ruzziconi, “Carrollian physics and holography,”Phys. Rept.1182(2026) 1–87, arXiv:2602.02644 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    Carroll Symmetry, Dark Energy and Inflation,

    J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, W. Sybesma, and S. Vandoren, “Carroll Symmetry, Dark Energy and Inflation,”Front. in Phys.10(2022) 810405,arXiv:2110.02319 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Carroll stories,

    J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, W. Sybesma, and S. Vandoren, “Carroll stories,”JHEP 09(2023) 148,arXiv:2307.06827 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Tensionless Strings from Worldsheet Symmetries

    A. Bagchi, S. Chakrabortty, and P. Parekh, “Tensionless Strings from Worldsheet Symmetries,” JHEP01(2016) 158,arXiv:1507.04361 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  18. [18]

    Tensionless Superstrings: View from the Worldsheet

    A. Bagchi, S. Chakrabortty, and P. Parekh, “Tensionless Superstrings: View from the Worldsheet,”JHEP10(2016) 113,arXiv:1606.09628 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    Rindler Physics on the String Worldsheet,

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, and S. Chakrabortty, “Rindler Physics on the String Worldsheet,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126no. 3, (2021) 031601,arXiv:2009.01408 [hep-th]. – 26 –

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Horizon strings as 3D black hole microstates,

    A. Bagchi, D. Grumiller, S. Sheikh-Jabbari, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, “Horizon strings as 3D black hole microstates,”SciPost Phys.15no. 5, (2023) 210,arXiv:2210.10794 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Boundary Carrollian Conformal Field Theories and Open Null Strings,

    A. Bagchi, P. Chakraborty, S. Chakrabortty, S. Fredenhagen, D. Grumiller, and P. Pandit, “Boundary Carrollian Conformal Field Theories and Open Null Strings,”Phys. Rev. Lett.134 no. 7, (2025) 071604,arXiv:2409.01094 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Fractons, dipole symmetries and curved spacetime,

    L. Bidussi, J. Hartong, E. Have, J. Musaeus, and S. Prohazka, “Fractons, dipole symmetries and curved spacetime,”SciPost Phys.12no. 6, (2022) 205,arXiv:2111.03668 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Hall effects in Carroll dynamics,

    L. Marsot, P. M. Zhang, M. Chernodub, and P. A. Horvathy, “Hall effects in Carroll dynamics,”Phys. Rept.1028(2023) 1–60,arXiv:2212.02360 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Spacetime Subsystem Symmetries,

    S. A. Baig, J. Distler, A. Karch, A. Raz, and H.-Y. Sun, “Spacetime Subsystem Symmetries,” arXiv:2303.15590 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    Carroll/fracton particles and their correspondence,

    J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, A. Pérez, and S. Prohazka, “Carroll/fracton particles and their correspondence,”JHEP06(2023) 207,arXiv:2305.06730 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Quantum Carroll/fracton particles,

    J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, A. Pérez, and S. Prohazka, “Quantum Carroll/fracton particles,”JHEP 10(2023) 041,arXiv:2307.05674 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Fracton gauge fields from higher-dimensional gravity,

    F. Peña-Benítez and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, “Fracton gauge fields from higher-dimensional gravity,”JHEP04(2024) 009,arXiv:2310.12610 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Fracton and non-Lorentzian particle duality: gauge field couplings and geometric implications,

    M. M. Ahmadi-Jahmani and A. Parvizi, “Fracton and non-Lorentzian particle duality: gauge field couplings and geometric implications,”JHEP08(2025) 157,arXiv:2503.21660 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Near-horizon Carroll symmetry and black hole Love numbers

    R. F. Penna, “Near-horizon Carroll symmetry and black hole Love numbers,” arXiv:1812.05643 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Carrollian Physics at the Black Hole Horizon,

    L. Donnay and C. Marteau, “Carrollian Physics at the Black Hole Horizon,”Class. Quant. Grav.36no. 16, (2019) 165002,arXiv:1903.09654 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    Non-linear black hole dynamics and Carrollian fluids,

    J. Redondo-Yuste and L. Lehner, “Non-linear black hole dynamics and Carrollian fluids,” JHEP02(2023) 240,arXiv:2212.06175 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Carrollian motion in magnetized black hole horizons,

    F. Gray, D. Kubiznak, T. R. Perche, and J. Redondo-Yuste, “Carrollian motion in magnetized black hole horizons,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 6, (2023) 064009,arXiv:2211.13695 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Migrating Carrollian particles on magnetized black hole horizons,

    J. Bičák, D. Kubizňák, and T. R. Perche, “Migrating Carrollian particles on magnetized black hole horizons,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 10, (2023) 104014,arXiv:2302.11639 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Carroll black holes,

    F. Ecker, D. Grumiller, J. Hartong, A. Pérez, S. Prohazka, and R. Troncoso, “Carroll black holes,”SciPost Phys.15no. 6, (2023) 245,arXiv:2308.10947 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Strings near black holes are Carrollian,

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, J. Hartong, E. Have, K. S. Kolekar, and M. Mandlik, “Strings near black holes are Carrollian,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 8, (2024) 086009,arXiv:2312.14240 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Strings near black holes are Carrollian. Part II,

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, J. Hartong, E. Have, and K. S. Kolekar, “Strings near black holes are Carrollian. Part II,”JHEP11(2024) 024,arXiv:2407.12911 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Geometry of Zero Signature Space-times,

    M. Henneaux, “Geometry of Zero Signature Space-times,”Bull. Soc. Math. Belg.31(1979) 47–63

    work page 1979

  38. [38]

    Gauging the Carroll Algebra and Ultra-Relativistic Gravity

    J. Hartong, “Gauging the Carroll Algebra and Ultra-Relativistic Gravity,”JHEP08(2015) 069,arXiv:1505.05011 [hep-th]. – 27 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  39. [39]

    Limits of three-dimensional gravity and metric kinematical Lie algebras in any dimension,

    J. Matulich, S. Prohazka, and J. Salzer, “Limits of three-dimensional gravity and metric kinematical Lie algebras in any dimension,”JHEP07(2019) 118,arXiv:1903.09165 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  40. [40]

    Limits of JT gravity,

    D. Grumiller, J. Hartong, S. Prohazka, and J. Salzer, “Limits of JT gravity,”JHEP02(2021) 134,arXiv:2011.13870 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Asymptotic symmetries in Carrollian theories of gravity,

    A. Pérez, “Asymptotic symmetries in Carrollian theories of gravity,”JHEP12(2021) 173, arXiv:2110.15834 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    Carroll Expansion of General Relativity,

    D. Hansen, N. A. Obers, G. Oling, and B. T. Søgaard, “Carroll Expansion of General Relativity,”SciPost Phys.13no. 3, (2022) 055,arXiv:2112.12684 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Asymptotic symmetries in Carrollian theories of gravity with a negative cosmological constant,

    A. Pérez, “Asymptotic symmetries in Carrollian theories of gravity with a negative cosmological constant,”JHEP09(2022) 044,arXiv:2202.08768 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Conformal Carroll scalars with boosts,

    S. Baiguera, G. Oling, W. Sybesma, and B. T. Søgaard, “Conformal Carroll scalars with boosts,”SciPost Phys.14no. 4, (2023) 086,arXiv:2207.03468 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    A conformal approach to Carroll gravity,

    E. A. Bergshoeff, P. Concha, O. Fierro, E. Rodríguez, and J. Rosseel, “A conformal approach to Carroll gravity,”JHEP07(2025) 075,arXiv:2412.17752 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Magnetic Carrollian gravity from the Carroll algebra,

    A. Campoleoni, M. Henneaux, S. Pekar, A. Pérez, and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, “Magnetic Carrollian gravity from the Carroll algebra,”JHEP09(2022) 127,arXiv:2207.14167 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Setting the connection free in the Galilei and Carroll expansions of gravity,

    J. Musaeus, N. A. Obers, and G. Oling, “Setting the connection free in the Galilei and Carroll expansions of gravity,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 10, (2024) 104040,arXiv:2312.13924 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Carroll dilaton supergravity in two dimensions,

    D. Grumiller, L. Montecchio, and M. S. Nejati, “Carroll dilaton supergravity in two dimensions,”JHEP12(2024) 005,arXiv:2409.17781 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Cartan-like formulation of electric Carrollian gravity,

    S. Pekar, A. Pérez, and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, “Cartan-like formulation of electric Carrollian gravity,”JHEP09(2024) 059,arXiv:2406.01665 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    AdS3 Carroll gravity: asymptotic symmetries and C-thermal configurations,

    L. Avilés, O. Fuentealba, D. Hidalgo, and P. Rodríguez, “AdS3 Carroll gravity: asymptotic symmetries and C-thermal configurations,”JHEP05(2025) 174,arXiv:2503.18818 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Most general flat space boundary conditions in three-dimensional Einstein gravity

    D. Grumiller, W. Merbis, and M. Riegler, “Most general flat space boundary conditions in three-dimensional Einstein gravity,”Class. Quant. Grav.34no. 18, (2017) 184001, arXiv:1704.07419 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  52. [52]

    Carroll limit of four-dimensional gravity theories in the first order formalism,

    A. Guerrieri and R. F. Sobreiro, “Carroll limit of four-dimensional gravity theories in the first order formalism,”Class. Quant. Grav.38no. 24, (2021) 245003,arXiv:2107.10129 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  53. [53]

    Carroll black holes in (A)dS spacetimes and their higher-derivative modifications,

    P. Tadros and I. Kolář, “Carroll black holes in (A)dS spacetimes and their higher-derivative modifications,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 8, (2024) 084064,arXiv:2408.01836 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Tantum gravity,

    F. Ecker, A. Fiorucci, and D. Grumiller, “Tantum gravity,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 2, (2025) L021901,arXiv:2501.00095 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Rotating Carroll black holes: A no go theorem,

    I. Kolář, D. Kubiznak, and P. Tadros, “Rotating Carroll black holes: A no go theorem,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 12, (2025) L121504,arXiv:2506.10451 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    R. M. Wald,General Relativity. The University of Chicago Press, 1984

    work page 1984

  57. [57]

    Carroll contractions of Lorentz-invariant theories,

    M. Henneaux and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, “Carroll contractions of Lorentz-invariant theories,” JHEP11(2021) 180,arXiv:2109.06708 [hep-th]. – 28 –

    work page arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    Carroll versus Galilei Gravity

    E. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis, B. Rollier, J. Rosseel, and T. ter Veldhuis, “Carroll versus Galilei Gravity,”JHEP03(2017) 165,arXiv:1701.06156 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    Some Quantum Field Theory Aspects of the Superspace Quantization of General Relativity,

    C. J. Isham, “Some Quantum Field Theory Aspects of the Superspace Quantization of General Relativity,”Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A351(1976) 209–232

    work page 1976

  60. [60]

    Surface deformations, their Square Root and the Signature of Spacetime,

    C. Teitelboim, “Surface deformations, their Square Root and the Signature of Spacetime,” in 7th International Group Theory Colloquium: The Integrative Conference on Group Theory and Mathematical Physics. 12, 1978

    work page 1978

  61. [61]

    A non-lorentzian primer,

    E. Bergshoeff, J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, and J. Gomis, “A non-lorentzian primer,”SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes69(2023) 1,arXiv:2206.12177 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Role of surface integrals in the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity,

    T. Regge and C. Teitelboim, “Role of surface integrals in the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity,”Ann. Phys.88(1974) 286

    work page 1974

  63. [63]

    Ecker,Carroll symmetries in field theory and gravity

    F. Ecker,Carroll symmetries in field theory and gravity. PhD thesis, TU. Vienna, 3, 2026. arXiv:2603.12902 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    Carroll geodesics,

    L. Ciambelli and D. Grumiller, “Carroll geodesics,”Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 9, (2024) 933, arXiv:2311.04112 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Embedding Galilean and Carrollian geometries I. Gravitational waves,

    K. Morand, “Embedding Galilean and Carrollian geometries I. Gravitational waves,”J. Math. Phys.61no. 8, (2020) 082502,arXiv:1811.12681 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  66. [66]

    Connections and dynamical trajectories in generalised Newton-Cartan gravity II. An ambient perspective

    X. Bekaert and K. Morand, “Connections and dynamical trajectories in generalised Newton-Cartan gravity II. An ambient perspective,”J. Math. Phys.59no. 7, (2018) 072503, arXiv:1505.03739 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  67. [67]

    Galilean first-order formulation for the nonrelativistic expansion of general relativity,

    D. Hansen, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, and G. Oling, “Galilean first-order formulation for the nonrelativistic expansion of general relativity,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 6, (2021) L061501, arXiv:2012.01518 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  68. [68]

    Non-Relativistic Gravity and its Coupling to Matter,

    D. Hansen, J. Hartong, and N. A. Obers, “Non-Relativistic Gravity and its Coupling to Matter,”JHEP06(2020) 145,arXiv:2001.10277 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  69. [69]

    Entropy and Topology for Gravitational Instantons

    S. Liberati and G. Pollifrone, “Entropy and topology for gravitational instantons,”Phys. Rev. D56(1997) 6458–6466,arXiv:hep-th/9708014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  70. [70]

    Euler numbers of four-dimensional rotating black holes with the Euclidean signature

    Z. Z. Ma, “Euler numbers of four-dimensional rotating black holes with the Euclidean signature,”Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 024027,arXiv:hep-th/0512127

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  71. [71]

    Black Holes in Higher Dimensional Space-Times,

    R. C. Myers and M. J. Perry, “Black Holes in Higher Dimensional Space-Times,”Annals Phys. 172(1986) 304. – 29 –

    work page 1986