REVIEW 2 cited by
Enhancing Conversational Search: Large Language Model-Aided Informative Query Rewriting
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Enhancing Conversational Search: Large Language Model-Aided Informative Query Rewriting
read the original abstract
Query rewriting plays a vital role in enhancing conversational search by transforming context-dependent user queries into standalone forms. Existing approaches primarily leverage human-rewritten queries as labels to train query rewriting models. However, human rewrites may lack sufficient information for optimal retrieval performance. To overcome this limitation, we propose utilizing large language models (LLMs) as query rewriters, enabling the generation of informative query rewrites through well-designed instructions. We define four essential properties for well-formed rewrites and incorporate all of them into the instruction. In addition, we introduce the role of rewrite editors for LLMs when initial query rewrites are available, forming a "rewrite-then-edit" process. Furthermore, we propose distilling the rewriting capabilities of LLMs into smaller models to reduce rewriting latency. Our experimental evaluation on the QReCC dataset demonstrates that informative query rewrites can yield substantially improved retrieval performance compared to human rewrites, especially with sparse retrievers.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
NILC: Discovering New Intents with LLM-assisted Clustering
NILC combines LLM-generated semantic centroids with hard-sample rewriting to improve new-intent clustering, but its 'consistent' superiority claim is contradicted on DBPedia.
-
Can QPP Choose the Right Query Variant? Evaluating Query Variant Selection for RAG Pipelines
QPP methods can select query variants that boost end-to-end RAG quality over the original query, though retrieval-optimized variants often fail to produce the best generated answers, revealing a utility gap.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.