Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Enhancing Conversational Search: Large Language Model-Aided Informative Query Rewriting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.09716 v2 pith:YWIYUQ6R submitted 2023-10-15 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CLcs.IR

Enhancing Conversational Search: Large Language Model-Aided Informative Query Rewriting

classification cs.HC cs.AIcs.CLcs.IR
keywords queryrewritesrewritinginformativellmsmodelsconversationalenhancing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Query rewriting plays a vital role in enhancing conversational search by transforming context-dependent user queries into standalone forms. Existing approaches primarily leverage human-rewritten queries as labels to train query rewriting models. However, human rewrites may lack sufficient information for optimal retrieval performance. To overcome this limitation, we propose utilizing large language models (LLMs) as query rewriters, enabling the generation of informative query rewrites through well-designed instructions. We define four essential properties for well-formed rewrites and incorporate all of them into the instruction. In addition, we introduce the role of rewrite editors for LLMs when initial query rewrites are available, forming a "rewrite-then-edit" process. Furthermore, we propose distilling the rewriting capabilities of LLMs into smaller models to reduce rewriting latency. Our experimental evaluation on the QReCC dataset demonstrates that informative query rewrites can yield substantially improved retrieval performance compared to human rewrites, especially with sparse retrievers.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. NILC: Discovering New Intents with LLM-assisted Clustering

    cs.CL 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0

    NILC combines LLM-generated semantic centroids with hard-sample rewriting to improve new-intent clustering, but its 'consistent' superiority claim is contradicted on DBPedia.

  2. Can QPP Choose the Right Query Variant? Evaluating Query Variant Selection for RAG Pipelines

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    QPP methods can select query variants that boost end-to-end RAG quality over the original query, though retrieval-optimized variants often fail to produce the best generated answers, revealing a utility gap.