Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

List Items One by One: A New Data Source and Learning Paradigm for Multimodal LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.16375 v2 pith:Z3EMPY3W submitted 2024-04-25 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL

List Items One by One: A New Data Source and Learning Paradigm for Multimodal LLMs

classification cs.CV cs.AIcs.CL
keywords tagsvisualmllmsmodelsitemslearninglistparadigm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Set-of-Mark (SoM) Prompting unleashes the visual grounding capability of GPT-4V, by enabling the model to associate visual objects with tags inserted on the image. These tags, marked with alphanumerics, can be indexed via text tokens for easy reference. Despite the extraordinary performance from GPT-4V, we observe that other Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) struggle to understand these visual tags. To promote the learning of SoM prompting for open-source models, we propose a new learning paradigm: "list items one by one," which asks the model to enumerate and describe all visual tags placed on the image following the alphanumeric orders of tags. By integrating our curated dataset with other visual instruction tuning datasets, we are able to equip existing MLLMs with the SoM prompting ability. Furthermore, we evaluate our finetuned SoM models on five MLLM benchmarks. We find that this new dataset, even in a relatively small size (10k-30k images with tags), significantly enhances visual reasoning capabilities and reduces hallucinations for MLLMs. Perhaps surprisingly, these improvements persist even when the visual tags are omitted from input images during inference. This suggests the potential of "list items one by one" as a new paradigm for training MLLMs, which strengthens the object-text alignment through the use of visual tags in the training stage. Finally, we conduct analyses by probing trained models to understand the working mechanism of SoM. Our code and data are available at \url{https://github.com/zzxslp/SoM-LLaVA}.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. See What I Mean: Aligning Vision and Language Representations for Video Fine-grained Object Understanding

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SWIM aligns cross-attention maps from object nouns to ground-truth masks during training on the new NL-Refer dataset to enable text-only fine-grained video object understanding in MLLMs.

  2. Strefer: Empowering Video LLMs with Space-Time Referring and Reasoning via Synthetic Instruction Data

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    Adding Strefer's synthetic space-time reference questions to video instruction tuning improves mask-referred description/QA, timestamp QA, and temporal reasoning over a video-LLM baseline.

  3. BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive

    cs.CV 2024-04 accept novelty 6.0

    BLINK benchmark shows multimodal LLMs reach only 45-51 percent accuracy on core visual perception tasks where humans achieve 95 percent, indicating these abilities have not emerged.

  4. Beyond Emotion Recognition: A Multi-Turn Multimodal Emotion Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark

    cs.CV 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0

    MTMEUR is a new multimodal emotion reasoning benchmark where the best single model scores 71.19% and a four-agent reasoning framework tops 72.93%.

  5. Hallucination of Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey

    cs.CV 2024-04 accept novelty 5.0

    The survey organizes causes of hallucinations in MLLMs, reviews evaluation benchmarks and metrics, and outlines mitigation approaches plus open questions.