REVIEW 3 cited by
Say What You Mean: Natural Language Access Control with Large Language Models for Internet of Things
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Say What You Mean: Natural Language Access Control with Large Language Models for Internet of Things
read the original abstract
Access control in the Internet of Things (IoT) is becoming increasingly complex, as policies must account for dynamic and contextual factors such as time, location, user behavior, and environmental conditions. However, existing platforms either offer only coarse-grained controls or rely on rigid rule matching, making them ill-suited for semantically rich or ambiguous access scenarios. Moreover, the policy authoring process remains fragmented: domain experts describe requirements in natural language, but developers must manually translate them into code, introducing semantic gaps and potential misconfiguration. In this work, we present LACE, the Language-based Access Control Engine, a hybrid framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to bridge the gap between human intent and machine-enforceable logic. LACE combines prompt-guided policy generation, retrieval-augmented reasoning, and formal validation to support expressive, interpretable, and verifiable access control. It enables users to specify policies in natural language, automatically translates them into structured rules, validates semantic correctness, and makes access decisions using a hybrid LLM-rule-based engine. We evaluate LACE in smart home environments through extensive experiments. LACE achieves 100% correctness in verified policy generation and up to 88% decision accuracy with 0.79 F1-score using DeepSeek-V3, outperforming baselines such as GPT-3.5 and Gemini. The system also demonstrates strong scalability under increasing policy volume and request concurrency. Our results highlight LACE's potential to enable secure, flexible, and user-friendly access control across real-world IoT platforms.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Sketch-based Access Control: A Multimodal Interface for Translating User Preferences into Intent-Aligned Policies
SBAC uses sketching and multimodal LLMs to help users refine underspecified access control preferences into complete, validated policies through iterative human-AI collaboration.
-
Natural Language Access Control (NLAC): From Help Desk Requests to Structured Policies
NLAC architecture translates natural language requests to access policies via LLMs, with embedding-based subgraph selection enabling up to 98.7% accuracy on large networks per NLACBench evaluations.
-
Can LLMs Make (Personalized) Access Control Decisions?
LLMs reflect users' privacy preferences in access control decisions with up to 86% agreement and can promote safer behavior, but personalization trades off higher individual match for potentially less secure results w...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.