Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Leveraging Vision Capabilities of Multimodal LLMs for Automated Data Extraction from Plots

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.12326 v1 pith:ZB3LTU4H submitted 2025-03-16 cs.CV cond-mat.mtrl-scics.AI

Leveraging Vision Capabilities of Multimodal LLMs for Automated Data Extraction from Plots

classification cs.CV cond-mat.mtrl-scics.AI
keywords dataplotsextractionbeenllmsmodelsmultimodalplotextract
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Automated data extraction from research texts has been steadily improving, with the emergence of large language models (LLMs) accelerating progress even further. Extracting data from plots in research papers, however, has been such a complex task that it has predominantly been confined to manual data extraction. We show that current multimodal large language models, with proper instructions and engineered workflows, are capable of accurately extracting data from plots. This capability is inherent to the pretrained models and can be achieved with a chain-of-thought sequence of zero-shot engineered prompts we call PlotExtract, without the need to fine-tune. We demonstrate PlotExtract here and assess its performance on synthetic and published plots. We consider only plots with two axes in this analysis. For plots identified as extractable, PlotExtract finds points with over 90% precision (and around 90% recall) and errors in x and y position of around 5% or lower. These results prove that multimodal LLMs are a viable path for high-throughput data extraction for plots and in many circumstances can replace the current manual methods of data extraction.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Large language model-enabled automated data extraction for concrete materials informatics

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLM pipeline extracts nearly 9,000 high-quality blended-cement concrete records from over 27,000 publications with F1 scores up to 0.97 and enables ML analyses showing benefits of large diverse datasets.

  2. SlideAgent: Hierarchical Agentic Framework for Multi-Page Visual Document Understanding

    cs.CL 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SARA combines natural-language snippets with semantic compression vectors in RAG to improve answer relevance, correctness, and similarity on 9 datasets across 5 LLMs.

  3. SlideAgent: Hierarchical Agentic Framework for Multi-Page Visual Document Understanding

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    A three-level hierarchical agent framework for slide QA improves accuracy by 7.9–9.8 points over its base LLM across multiple slide benchmarks.

  4. Large language model-enabled automated data extraction for concrete materials informatics

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    An LLM-powered agent pipeline extracts ~9,000 structured concrete materials records from 278 publications with F1 scores up to 0.97, creating the largest open blended cement concrete database and demonstrating that la...