Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Performance in the Courtroom: Automated Processing and Visualization of Appeal Court Decisions in France

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.06251 v3 pith:ZIMZXFLX submitted 2020-06-11 cs.CL cs.AIcs.IRcs.LG

Performance in the Courtroom: Automated Processing and Visualization of Appeal Court Decisions in France

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.IRcs.LG
keywords judgmentslawyerslegalextractmetricsnetworkproposeaccess-to-justice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence techniques are already popular and important in the legal domain. We extract legal indicators from judicial judgment to decrease the asymmetry of information of the legal system and the access-to-justice gap. We use NLP methods to extract interesting entities/data from judgments to construct networks of lawyers and judgments. We propose metrics to rank lawyers based on their experience, wins/loss ratio and their importance in the network of lawyers. We also perform community detection in the network of judgments and propose metrics to represent the difficulty of cases capitalising on communities features.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.