pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18351 · v1 · pith:ZKZUK6ECnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.stat-mech· cond-mat.str-el· quant-ph

Probing weak chaos in mathcal N=4 super Yang-Mills and long-range spin chains

Pawel Caputa , Brian Creed , Rathindra Nath Das , Saskia Demulder , Tristan McLoughlin This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 23:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords quantum chaosintegrability breakingN=4 SYMdilatation operatorspin chainslevel statisticsspread complexitymultifractality
0
0 comments X

The pith

Finite-loop truncations of the N=4 super Yang-Mills dilatation operator exhibit weak chaos at large coupling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates the emergence of quantum chaos in finite-loop truncations of the dilatation operator in N=4 super Yang-Mills, which interpolate between integrable one-loop and all-loop regimes via long-range spin chain deformations. The authors use spectral statistics, eigenvector properties, and spread complexity to diagnose chaos. They report that the two- and four-loop truncations develop GOE-like level statistics at high enough coupling, but with characteristics of only weak integrability breaking, whereas the three-loop case does not exhibit this in the couplings examined. The eigenstates show less randomness and multifractal features. These observations suggest the finite truncations already encode the restoration of integrability in the full theory.

Core claim

The paper claims that two- and four-loop truncations develop GOE-like level statistics at sufficiently large coupling but with features of weak integrability breaking, the four-loop case being weaker with larger critical coupling for long chains. The three-loop truncation shows no such onset. Eigenvector diagnostics indicate weak ergodicity and multifractality. Signatures appear in Krylov space data through correlations with spread complexity and disorder. The results indicate that these operators are not generic long-range Hamiltonians but display patterns of integrability restoration.

What carries the argument

Finite-loop truncations of the planar dilatation operator acting as long-range spin chain Hamiltonians, analyzed via level spacing statistics and Krylov complexity.

If this is right

  • Two- and four-loop truncations develop GOE-like statistics at large coupling with weak breaking features.
  • Four-loop breaking is weaker than two-loop with higher critical coupling for long chains.
  • Three-loop truncation lacks onset of chaos in studied range.
  • Eigenstates exhibit multifractality and weak ergodicity rather than full randomness.
  • Level spacing chaos correlates with peaks in spread complexity and Krylov disorder.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The distinction by loop order may point to a specific pattern in how integrability is broken and restored as loop order increases.
  • Similar weak chaos might be probed in other sectors of the theory or different deformations.
  • Extending the analysis to higher loops could test if the critical coupling continues to increase.
  • The correlation with spread complexity suggests a general diagnostic for weak chaos in long-range models.

Load-bearing premise

The finite-loop truncations of the dilatation operator provide an accurate model for the transition to chaos without significant artifacts from the truncation itself.

What would settle it

A calculation showing that the three-loop truncation develops GOE statistics at couplings beyond those studied, or that higher loops show stronger rather than weaker breaking, would challenge the reported pattern.

read the original abstract

We study signatures of quantum chaos in finite-loop truncations of the planar dilatation operator in the $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ sector of $\mathcal N=4$ super Yang-Mills and its $\beta$-deformation. These truncations define holographically motivated long-range deformations of the nearest-neighbour XXX spin chain. At one-loop the model is integrable, while the all-loop planar theory is expected to again be integrable. Finite-loop truncations therefore provide a natural setting for investigating how chaotic behaviour emerges between these two integrable limits. We analyse this question using spectral statistics, eigenvector diagnostics and spread complexity. We find that the two- and four-loop truncations develop GOE-like level statistics at sufficiently large coupling but with features characteristic of weak integrability breaking. The integrability breaking at four-loops is weaker than at two-loops and the critical coupling at which chaos occurs is larger, at least for long spin chains. The three-loop truncation does not show the same onset of chaos in the range studied. Eigenvector diagnostics show that the corresponding eigenstates remain less random than GOE vectors, indicating weak ergodicity and multifractality. Finally, we can identify signatures of the eigenvalue and eigenvector chaos in the Krylov-space data. Namely, we demonstrate a correlation of the level spacing statistics with the peak of spread complexity and disorder on the Krylov chain. The delocalisation of the initial state in the Hamiltonian eigenbasis is shown to strongly affect the saturation of complexity. Our results suggest that finite-loop dilatation operators are not generic long-range spin chain Hamiltonians, but already display patterns consistent with the restoration of integrability in the all-loop planar theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines signatures of quantum chaos in finite-loop truncations of the planar dilatation operator in the su(2) sector of N=4 SYM and its beta-deformation. These truncations yield long-range deformations of the XXX spin chain that are integrable at one loop and expected to be integrable at all loops. Using spectral statistics, eigenvector diagnostics, and spread complexity on finite chains, the authors report that the two- and four-loop truncations develop GOE-like level statistics at sufficiently large coupling (with features of weak integrability breaking), while the three-loop truncation does not in the range studied; eigenvector properties indicate weak ergodicity and multifractality; and Krylov-space measures correlate with the spectral diagnostics. The work concludes that these truncations are not generic long-range Hamiltonians but already exhibit patterns consistent with restoration of integrability at all loops.

Significance. If the numerical results hold after addressing robustness concerns, the paper offers a concrete holographic-motivated example of how weak chaos can emerge between two integrable limits, with the weakening of breaking as loop order increases. The multi-diagnostic approach (level statistics plus eigenvector properties plus spread complexity) and the explicit correlation between spectral features and Krylov-chain disorder constitute strengths. The finding that finite truncations already encode hints of all-loop integrability is potentially useful for understanding the planar theory.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical setup and results sections (level statistics and eigenvector diagnostics)] The central claim that differences between the n=2,3,4 truncations reflect a universal weak integrability-breaking mechanism (rather than truncation-specific artifacts from the range-n interactions) is load-bearing for the interpretation. The skeptic's concern is valid on the provided evidence: because each n-loop term introduces interactions whose range and coefficient patterns are specific to that order, the models are not controlled deformations of a single chain. Explicit checks that small variations in the truncation coefficients (while preserving the overall long-range structure) leave the qualitative onset of GOE statistics and the relative weakness at four loops unchanged are needed to rule out sensitivity to the particular beta-deformed or undeformed coefficient choices.
  2. [Results on level statistics] The abstract and results state that the three-loop truncation shows no onset of chaos in the range studied, while two- and four-loop do. To make this comparative claim robust, the manuscript should report the precise system sizes, Hilbert-space dimensions, number of disorder realizations (if any), fitting windows for level-spacing ratios, and any data-exclusion criteria used for each loop order; without these, it is difficult to assess whether the absence at three loops is a genuine feature or a finite-size or fitting artifact.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the loop-order truncations and the 't Hooft coupling scaling should be made uniform across figures and text to avoid reader confusion.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a short table summarizing the critical coupling values (or ranges) at which GOE-like statistics appear for each loop order and chain length.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the presentation and robustness of the results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical setup and results sections (level statistics and eigenvector diagnostics)] The central claim that differences between the n=2,3,4 truncations reflect a universal weak integrability-breaking mechanism (rather than truncation-specific artifacts from the range-n interactions) is load-bearing for the interpretation. The skeptic's concern is valid on the provided evidence: because each n-loop term introduces interactions whose range and coefficient patterns are specific to that order, the models are not controlled deformations of a single chain. Explicit checks that small variations in the truncation coefficients (while preserving the overall long-range structure) leave the qualitative onset of GOE statistics and the relative weakness at four loops unchanged are needed to rule out sensitivity to the particular beta-deformed or undeformed coefficient choices.

    Authors: We agree that demonstrating robustness to small coefficient variations would strengthen the interpretation that the observed differences reflect a pattern consistent with all-loop integrability restoration rather than truncation-specific artifacts. Although the coefficients are fixed by the N=4 SYM dilatation operator (and its beta-deformation), we will add explicit checks in the revised manuscript: for each loop order we introduce small (5-10%) random perturbations to the n-loop coefficients while preserving the long-range interaction structure and overall scaling with coupling. We will show that the onset of GOE-like statistics, the relative weakness at four loops, and the absence at three loops remain qualitatively unchanged. These checks will be reported in an expanded numerical robustness subsection. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on level statistics] The abstract and results state that the three-loop truncation shows no onset of chaos in the range studied, while two- and four-loop do. To make this comparative claim robust, the manuscript should report the precise system sizes, Hilbert-space dimensions, number of disorder realizations (if any), fitting windows for level-spacing ratios, and any data-exclusion criteria used for each loop order; without these, it is difficult to assess whether the absence at three loops is a genuine feature or a finite-size or fitting artifact.

    Authors: We agree that these technical details are necessary for assessing finite-size and fitting effects. In the revised manuscript we will add a new table (or dedicated paragraph in the numerical setup section) that, for each loop order separately, lists: the chain lengths L and corresponding Hilbert-space dimensions; the number of independent realizations (zero for the undeformed case, and the number used for the beta-deformed ensemble); the precise fitting windows employed for the level-spacing ratio; and any data-exclusion criteria (e.g., discarding the lowest and highest 5% of eigenvalues or discarding runs with numerical instability). We will also state the coupling ranges explicitly explored for each truncation to confirm that the three-loop result is not an artifact of insufficient range. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results derive from direct numerical analysis of truncations against external GOE benchmarks

full rationale

The paper computes spectral statistics, eigenvector properties, and spread complexity directly on the finite-loop truncations of the dilatation operator, which are defined independently as long-range spin-chain Hamiltonians. These are compared to standard GOE level statistics and random-matrix eigenvector diagnostics, which are external references not derived from the paper's own data or self-citations. The all-loop integrability is invoked as prior expectation rather than a load-bearing self-citation that forces the truncation results. No parameters are fitted to a subset of the data and then relabeled as predictions, nor are any ansatze or uniqueness theorems smuggled in via self-reference. The observed differences between loop orders are presented as numerical findings, not tautological by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities beyond standard assumptions of random matrix theory for GOE statistics and spin-chain integrability.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Level spacing statistics follow GOE distribution for chaotic systems
    Invoked for interpreting spectral statistics as chaos signatures

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5866 in / 1482 out tokens · 40538 ms · 2026-06-26T23:16:05.393910+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Controlled Chaos in 4D SCFTs

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Orbifolds of N=4 SYM produce SCFTs whose dilatation operator in a subsector is realized by a tunable spin chain whose eigenvalue statistics exhibit chaos for specific marginal couplings.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 32 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Sekino and L

    Y. Sekino and L. Susskind,Fast Scramblers,JHEP10(2008) 065, [arXiv:0808.2096]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  2. [2]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,Black holes and the butterfly effect,JHEP03(2014) 067, [arXiv:1306.0622]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    Maldacena, S

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford,A bound on chaos,JHEP08(2016) 106, [arXiv:1503.01409]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    J. S. Cotler, G. Gur-Ari, M. Hanada, J. Polchinski, P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, A. Streicher, and M. Tezuka,Black Holes and Random Matrices,JHEP05(2017) 118, [arXiv:1611.04650]. [Erratum: JHEP 09, 002 (2018)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Altland and J

    A. Altland and J. Sonner,Quantum chaos and the holographic principle,arXiv:2604.12784

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Y. Chen, H. W. Lin, and S. H. Shenker,BPS chaos,SciPost Phys.18(2025), no. 2 072, [arXiv:2407.19387]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Y. Chen, S. Colin-Ellerin, O. Mamroud, and K. Papadodimas,Chaos of Berry curvature for BPS microstates,arXiv:2604.23287. – 44 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Benjamin, S

    N. Benjamin, S. Collier, A. L. Fitzpatrick, A. Maloney, and E. Perlmutter,Harmonic analysis of 2d CFT partition functions,JHEP09(2021) 174, [arXiv:2107.10744]

    arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    F. M. Haehl, C. Marteau, W. Reeves, and M. Rozali,Symmetries and spectral statistics in chaotic conformal field theories,JHEP07(2023) 196, [arXiv:2302.14482]

    arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    De Clerck, S

    M. De Clerck, S. A. Hartnoll, and J. E. Santos,Mixmaster chaos in an AdS black hole interior,JHEP07(2024) 202, [arXiv:2312.11622]

    arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    R. G. Leigh and M. J. Strassler,Exactly marginal operators and duality in four-dimensional N=1 supersymmetric gauge theory,Nucl. Phys. B447(1995) 95–136, [hep-th/9503121]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  12. [12]

    J. A. Minahan and K. Zarembo,The Bethe ansatz for N=4 superYang-Mills,JHEP03 (2003) 013, [hep-th/0212208]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  13. [13]

    Beisert, C

    N. Beisert, C. Kristjansen, and M. Staudacher,The Dilatation operator of conformal N=4 superYang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B664(2003) 131–184, [hep-th/0303060]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  14. [14]

    Beisert and M

    N. Beisert and M. Staudacher,The N=4 SYM integrable super spin chain,Nucl. Phys. B 670(2003) 439–463, [hep-th/0307042]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  15. [15]

    Gromov, V

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, S. Leurent, and D. Volin,Quantum spectral curve for arbitrary state/operator in AdS5/CFT4,JHEP09(2015) 187, [arXiv:1405.4857]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  16. [16]

    Beisert et al.,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview,Lett

    N. Beisert et al.,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview,Lett. Math. Phys.99 (2012) 3–32, [arXiv:1012.3982]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  17. [17]

    Arutyunov and S

    G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov,Foundations of the AdS 5 ×S 5 Superstring. Part I,J. Phys. A 42(2009) 254003, [arXiv:0901.4937]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  18. [18]

    Bombardelli, A

    D. Bombardelli, A. Cagnazzo, R. Frassek, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk, F. Loebbert, S. Negro, I. M. Sz´ ecs´ enyi, A. Sfondrini, S. J. van Tongeren, and A. Torrielli,An integrability primer for the gauge-gravity correspondence: An introduction,J. Phys. A49(2016), no. 32 320301, [arXiv:1606.02945]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    Gromov,Introduction to the Spectrum ofN= 4SYM and the Quantum Spectral Curve, arXiv:1708.03648

    N. Gromov,Introduction to the Spectrum ofN= 4SYM and the Quantum Spectral Curve, arXiv:1708.03648

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Basu and L

    P. Basu and L. A. Pando Zayas,Analytic Non-integrability in String Theory,Phys. Rev. D 84(2011) 046006, [arXiv:1105.2540]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  21. [21]

    Stepanchuk and A

    A. Stepanchuk and A. A. Tseytlin,On (non)integrability of classical strings in p-brane backgrounds,J. Phys. A46(2013) 125401, [arXiv:1211.3727]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  22. [22]

    Bargheer, N

    T. Bargheer, N. Beisert, and F. Loebbert,Boosting Nearest-Neighbour to Long-Range Integrable Spin Chains,J. Stat. Mech.0811(2008) L11001, [arXiv:0807.5081]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  23. [23]

    Bargheer, N

    T. Bargheer, N. Beisert, and F. Loebbert,Long-Range Deformations for Integrable Spin Chains,J. Phys. A42(2009) 285205, [arXiv:0902.0956]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  24. [24]

    Pozsgay, Y

    B. Pozsgay, Y. Jiang, and G. Tak´ acs,T ¯T-deformation and long range spin chains,JHEP03 (2020) 092, [arXiv:1911.11118]

    arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Marchetto, A

    E. Marchetto, A. Sfondrini, and Z. Yang,T ¯TDeformations and Integrable Spin Chains, Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020), no. 10 100601, [arXiv:1911.12315]

    arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Pozsgay,Current operators in integrable spin chains: lessons from long range deformations,SciPost Phys.8(2020) 016, [arXiv:1910.12833]

    B. Pozsgay,Current operators in integrable spin chains: lessons from long range deformations,SciPost Phys.8(2020) 016, [arXiv:1910.12833]. – 45 –

    arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    D. V. Kurlov, S. Malikis, and V. Gritsev,Quasi-conserved charges in the perturbed spin-1/2 xxx model,Physical Review B105(Mar., 2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    F. M. Surace and O. Motrunich,Weak integrability breaking perturbations of integrable models,Phys. Rev. Res.5(2023), no. 4 043019, [arXiv:2302.12804]

    arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Vanovac, F

    S. Vanovac, F. M. Surace, and O. I. Motrunich,Finite-size generators for weak integrability breaking perturbations in the Heisenberg chain,Phys. Rev. B110(2024), no. 14 144309, [arXiv:2406.08730]

    arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Y. F. Adans, M. de Leeuw, and T. McLoughlin,On deforming and breaking integrability, arXiv:2603.17018

    arXiv

  31. [31]

    Modak and S

    R. Modak and S. Mukerjee,Finite size scaling in crossover among different random matrix ensembles in microscopic lattice models,New Journal of Physics16(2014), no. 9 093016

    2014

  32. [32]

    Modak, S

    R. Modak, S. Mukerjee, and S. Ramaswamy,Universal power law in crossover from integrability to quantum chaos,Physical Review B90(2014), no. 7 075152

    2014

  33. [33]

    Sz´ asz-Schagrin, B

    D. Sz´ asz-Schagrin, B. Pozsgay, and G. Tak´ acs,Weak integrability breaking and level spacing distribution,SciPost Phys.11(2021) 037, [arXiv:2103.06308]

    arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    McLoughlin and A

    T. McLoughlin and A. Spiering,Chaotic spin chains in AdS/CFT,JHEP09(2022) 240, [arXiv:2202.12075]

    arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    M. V. Berry,Regular and irregular semiclassical wavefunctions,Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General10(1977), no. 12 2083–2091

    1977

  36. [36]

    Viswanath and G

    V. Viswanath and G. Mueller,The recursion method. Application to many-body dynamics. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1994

    1994

  37. [37]

    D. E. Parker, X. Cao, A. Avdoshkin, T. Scaffidi, and E. Altman,A universal operator growth hypothesis,Physical Review X9(Oct., 2019)

    2019

  38. [38]

    Balasubramanian, P

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Caputa, J. M. Magan, and Q. Wu,Quantum chaos and the complexity of spread of states,Physical Review D106(Aug., 2022)

    2022

  39. [39]

    Nandy, A

    P. Nandy, A. S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, P. Mart´ ınez-Azcona, A. Dymarsky, and A. del Campo, Quantum dynamics in krylov space: Methods and applications,Physics Reports1125–1128 (June, 2025) 1–82

    2025

  40. [40]

    Baiguera, V

    S. Baiguera, V. Balasubramanian, P. Caputa, S. Chapman, J. Haferkamp, M. P. Heller, and N. Y. Halpern,Quantum complexity in gravity, quantum field theory, and quantum information science,Physics Reports1159(Feb., 2026) 1–77

    2026

  41. [41]

    Rabinovici, A

    E. Rabinovici, A. S´ anchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Sonner,Krylov Complexity, arXiv:2507.06286

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Rabinovici, A

    E. Rabinovici, A. S´ anchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Sonner,Krylov complexity from integrability to chaos,JHEP07(2022) 151, [arXiv:2207.07701]

    arXiv 2022

  43. [43]

    Erdmenger, S.-K

    J. Erdmenger, S.-K. Jian, and Z.-Y. Xian,Universal chaotic dynamics from krylov space, Journal of High Energy Physics2023(Aug., 2023)

    2023

  44. [44]

    Balasubramanian, J

    V. Balasubramanian, J. M. Magan, and Q. Wu,Quantum chaos, integrability, and late times in the Krylov basis,Phys. Rev. E111(2025), no. 1 014218, [arXiv:2312.03848]

    arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Balasubramanian, R

    V. Balasubramanian, R. N. Das, J. Erdmenger, and Z.-Y. Xian,Chaos and integrability in triangular billiards,J. Stat. Mech.2025(2025), no. 3 033202, [arXiv:2407.11114]. – 46 –

    arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Kristjansen and K

    C. Kristjansen and K. Zarembo,Black hole states in quantum spin chains, 2026

    2026

  47. [47]

    R. N. Das and S. Demulder,Integrability breaking in semiclassical strings in Koopman-Krylov space,arXiv:2602.23421

    arXiv

  48. [48]

    Bhattacharjee, X

    B. Bhattacharjee, X. Cao, P. Nandy, and T. Pathak,Krylov complexity in saddle-dominated scrambling,JHEP05(2022) 174, [arXiv:2203.03534]

    arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Huh, H.-S

    K.-B. Huh, H.-S. Jeong, and J. F. Pedraza,Spread complexity in saddle-dominated scrambling,JHEP05(2024) 137, [arXiv:2312.12593]

    arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    H. A. Camargo, Y. Fu, K.-Y. Kim, and Y. H. Park,Towards a Refinement of Krylov Complexity: Scrambling, Classical Operator Growth and Replicas,arXiv:2603.19359

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    R. N. Das, S. Demulder, J. Erdmenger, and C. Northe,Spread complexity for the planar limit of holography,JHEP06(2025) 166, [arXiv:2412.09673]

    arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    J. A. Minahan,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability, Chapter I.1: Spin Chains in N=4 Super Yang-Mills,Lett. Math. Phys.99(2012) 33–58, [arXiv:1012.3983]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  53. [53]

    Beisert, T

    N. Beisert, T. McLoughlin, and R. Roiban,The Four-loop dressing phase of N=4 SYM, Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 046002, [arXiv:0705.0321]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  54. [54]

    Beisert, B

    N. Beisert, B. Eden, and M. Staudacher,Transcendentality and Crossing,J. Stat. Mech. 0701(2007) P01021, [hep-th/0610251]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  55. [55]

    Beisert and R

    N. Beisert and R. Roiban,Beauty and the twist: The Bethe ansatz for twisted N=4 SYM, JHEP08(2005) 039, [hep-th/0505187]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  56. [56]

    Bohigas, M

    O. Bohigas, M. J. Giannoni, and C. Schmit,Characterization of chaotic quantum spectra and universality of level fluctuation laws,Phys. Rev. Lett.52(1984) 1–4

    1984

  57. [57]

    T. Guhr, A. Muller-Groeling, and H. A. Weidenmuller,Random matrix theories in quantum physics: Common concepts,Phys. Rept.299(1998) 189–425, [cond-mat/9707301]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  58. [58]

    M. L. Mehta,Random matrices, vol. 142. Elsevier, 2004

    2004

  59. [59]

    Lunin and J

    O. Lunin and J. Maldacena,Deforming field theories with u(1)×u(1) global symmetry and their gravity duals,Journal of High Energy Physics2005(May, 2005) 033–033

    2005

  60. [60]

    Oganesyan and D

    V. Oganesyan and D. A. Huse,Localization of interacting fermions at high temperature, Physical Review B75(Apr., 2007)

    2007

  61. [61]

    Y. Y. Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, and G. Roux,Distribution of the ratio of consecutive level spacings in random matrix ensembles,Physical Review Letters110(Feb., 2013)

    2013

  62. [62]

    M. V. Berry,Semiclassical theory of spectral rigidity,Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences400(1985), no. 1819 229–251

    1985

  63. [63]

    Sieber and K

    M. Sieber and K. Richter,Correlations between periodic orbits and their rˆ ole in spectral statistics,Physica Scripta2001(2001), no. T90 128–133

    2001

  64. [64]

    M¨ uller, S

    S. M¨ uller, S. Heusler, A. Altland, P. Braun, and F. Haake,Periodic-orbit theory of universal level correlations in quantum chaos,New Journal of Physics11(2009), no. 10 103025

    2009

  65. [65]

    Papadodimas and S

    K. Papadodimas and S. Raju,Local Operators in the Eternal Black Hole,Phys. Rev. Lett. 115(2015), no. 21 211601, [arXiv:1502.06692]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    Gharibyan, M

    H. Gharibyan, M. Hanada, S. H. Shenker, and M. Tezuka,Onset of Random Matrix Behavior in Scrambling Systems,JHEP07(2018) 124, [arXiv:1803.08050]. [Erratum: JHEP 02, 197 (2019)]. – 47 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  67. [67]

    P. Kos, M. Ljubotina, and T. Prosen,Many-body quantum chaos: Analytic connection to random matrix theory,Phys. Rev. X8(2018), no. 2 021062, [arXiv:1712.02665]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  68. [68]

    J. M. Deutsch,Quantum statistical mechanics in a closed system,Phys. Rev. A43(1991), no. 4 2046

    1991

  69. [69]

    Srednicki,Chaos and Quantum Thermalization,Phys

    M. Srednicki,Chaos and Quantum Thermalization,Phys. Rev. E50(3, 1994) [cond-mat/9403051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  70. [70]

    B¨ acker, M

    A. B¨ acker, M. Haque, and I. M. Khaymovich,Multifractal dimensions for random matrices, chaotic quantum maps, and many-body systems,Phys. Rev. E100(2019) 032117, [arXiv:1905.03099]

    arXiv 2019

  71. [71]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin,Anderson transitions,Reviews of Modern Physics80(2008), no. 4 1355–1417

    2008

  72. [72]

    Pipek and I

    J. Pipek and I. Varga,Universal classification scheme for the spatial-localization properties of one-particle states in finite, d-dimensional systems,Physical Review A46(1992), no. 6 3148

    1992

  73. [73]

    L. F. Santos and M. Rigol,Localization and the effects of symmetries in the thermalization properties of one-dimensional quantum systems,Phys. Rev. E82(2010), no. 3 031130, [arXiv:1006.0729]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  74. [74]

    Carabba, N

    N. Carabba, N. H¨ ornedal, and A. d. Campo,Quantum speed limits on operator flows and correlation functions,Quantum6(Dec., 2022) 884

    2022

  75. [75]

    M¨ uck,Black holes and Marchenko-Pastur distribution,Phys

    W. M¨ uck,Black holes and Marchenko-Pastur distribution,Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 12 126001, [arXiv:2403.05241]

    arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    S´ anchez-Garrido,On krylov complexity, 2024

    A. S´ anchez-Garrido,On krylov complexity, 2024

    2024

  77. [77]

    H. A. Camargo, K.-B. Huh, V. Jahnke, H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim, and M. Nishida,Spread and spectral complexity in quantum spin chains: from integrability to chaos,Journal of High Energy Physics2024(Aug., 2024)

    2024

  78. [78]

    Balasubramanian, J

    V. Balasubramanian, J. M. Magan, and Q. Wu,Tridiagonalizing random matrices,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 12 126001, [arXiv:2208.08452]

    arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    Erdmenger, S.-K

    J. Erdmenger, S.-K. Jian, and Z.-Y. Xian,Universal chaotic dynamics from Krylov space, JHEP08(2023) 176, [arXiv:2303.12151]

    arXiv 2023

  80. [80]

    Rabinovici, A

    E. Rabinovici, A. S´ anchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Sonner,Krylov localization and suppression of complexity,Journal of High Energy Physics2022(Mar., 2022)

    2022

Showing first 80 references.