Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 4 cited by

The paper claims that hotspot flares from plasma plunging inside the ISCO of a Kerr black hole fade gradually, while circular-orbit flares stay nearly steady, and that the first flare signalling Penrose-process energy extraction is weaker—a

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

In Kerr black hole hotspot simulations, plasma plunging inside the ISCO produces progressively weaker flares and a fainter energy-extraction signal than plasma on circular orbits.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-02 challenge →

load-bearing objection Plausible extension to plunging orbits, but the circular-orbit comparator is run inside the ISCO, and the flare-decay headline is mostly baked into the input kinematics. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2602.21836 v2 pith:ZNN2FL3F submitted 2026-02-25 gr-qc

Hotspot Images from Magnetic Reconnection Processes in the plunging Region of a Kerr Black Hole

Xiao-Xiong Zeng , Yun Hong , Ke Wang This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords hotspot imagingKerr black holeplunging regionmagnetic reconnectionComisso-Asenjo mechanismPenrose processenergy extractionflare light curves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends hotspot imaging—a technique for modelling the near-infrared flares of bright blobs orbiting a black hole—to plasma that has crossed the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) and is plunging into a Kerr black hole. It claims that, without magnetic reconnection, a plunging hotspot emits a sequence of flares whose peak intensities gradually decline, whereas a hotspot on a circular orbit emits flares of nearly constant intensity. It further claims that after a magnetic reconnection event (the Comisso–Asenjo mechanism), the first flare from decelerated plasma, interpreted as a signature of Penrose-process energy extraction, is fainter in the plunging region than in the circular-orbit region and can disappear entirely for certain magnetic-field orientations even though the energy-extraction conditions still hold. If correct, this provides observers with a way to tell whether a flaring blob has crossed the ISCO, and indicates that the circular-orbit region is the better place to look for the energy-extraction signal.

Core claim

The central discovery is that a hotspot's light curve encodes its orbital character: a current sheet plunging from the ISCO, with energy and angular momentum frozen at ISCO values on the analytic infall, produces Keplerian-like flares whose peaks weaken as the radius shrinks, while a circular-orbit hotspot repeats flares of nearly equal brightness. After reconnection, both regions show a first flare from the decelerated (ε−) plasma followed by flares from the accelerated (ε+) plasma, but the ε− flare is weaker in the plunging region; at ξ=π/20 it vanishes there even though ε+>0 and ε−<0, while persisting for circular orbits. When the escape condition fails, no flares appear. The authors conc

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the hotspot-imaging model: a Gaussian-emissivity blob whose trajectory follows geodesic motion and whose images are produced by backward ray tracing with a fisheye camera, from which total flux and centroid position are tracked over time. Into this is inserted the Comisso–Asenjo magnetic-reconnection prescription. For the plunging region, the current sheet before reconnection is taken to conserve its ISCO energy and angular momentum and to follow the universal analytic infall U_r^K, which fixes the initial four-velocities of the accelerated (ε+) and decelerated (ε−) outflows. The energy-at-infinity formula ε±, together with an effective-potential escape condition, determ

Load-bearing premise

The central results assume that the current sheet inside the ISCO conserves its ISCO energy and angular momentum and follows the universal analytic infall, and that the ε− first flare is a signature of Penrose-process energy extraction; if real plunging plasma deviates from this geodesic inspiral or the identification is wrong, the predicted flare decay and the relative weakness of the ε− flare would change.

What would settle it

A concrete test is to monitor a hotspot that crosses the ISCO and plunges toward the horizon: if successive flare peaks remain roughly equal in brightness rather than declining, the predicted plunging-orbit signature is falsified. A second check is the ξ=π/20 orientation: observing a first flare from ε− in the plunging region at that angle, despite the paper's prediction that it vanishes, would also falsify the claim.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A sequence of progressively fainter flares from a compact source near a black hole is a practical indicator that the source has crossed the ISCO and is on a plunging orbit.
  • A roughly constant sequence of flares suggests the source is on a circular orbit near the reconnection radius rather than inside the ISCO.
  • The first weak flare from decelerated plasma is a less reliable marker of Penrose-process energy extraction inside the plunging region; the circular-orbit region offers a stronger signal.
  • In the plunging region, the energy-extraction signature can disappear entirely at magnetic-field azimuthal angle ξ=π/20 even when ε+>0 and ε−<0 still hold.
  • For near-extremal spins (a=0.99), the ε− flare in the plunging region is too faint to count as a flare, making the energy-extraction signature even harder to identify.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the predicted flare decay is tied to the radial infall timescale, the same technique could be used to estimate how deep inside the ISCO a hotspot has plunged, effectively turning a flare train into a radial clock.
  • The parameter caveat implies that a missing first flare in the plunging region should not be read as evidence against the reconnection-driven energy-extraction process; a search over the magnetic-field orientation angle would be needed before drawing that conclusion.
  • The same imaging machinery could be applied to other energy-extraction mechanisms (e.g., superradiance) to see whether they also produce an asymmetric first-flare pattern that distinguishes plunging from circular sources.
  • Since the infall is fast, the decline in flare amplitude could be mixed with intrinsic source fading; comparing the flux decay with the centroid-path curvature would separate the two.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper extends the hotspot imaging method of Ref. [32] to the plunging region of a Kerr black hole. It assumes a current sheet that begins at the ISCO with the ISCO energy/angular momentum and follows the universal radial infall U_r^K (Eq. 13); after magnetic reconnection, the ejected plasma four-velocities are computed with the Comisso-Asenjo formalism. Using backward ray tracing, the authors produce images and light curves for two spins (a=0.94, r_X=1.6 and a=0.99, r_X=1.3), both with and without reconnection, and compare them with what they call the 'circular orbit region' at r=r_X. The main claims are: (i) without reconnection, plunging orbits produce gradually declining flares, while circular orbits give nearly constant flare strength; (ii) the energy-extraction signal (the first flare from ε−<0 plasma) is weaker and more fragile in the plunging region than in the circular-orbit case, and can even vanish when ξ is changed to π/20. A key issue is that the 'circular orbit region' is actually below the ISCO, so it consists of unstable circular geodesics rather than the stable circular orbits of a standard accretion disk.

Significance. If the numerical results are correct and the comparison were made with stable circular orbits, the declining-versus-constant flare pattern would be a useful discriminator between inspiralling and circular hotspots, and the parameter sensitivity of the ε− first flare would be an important caveat for Penrose-process searches. Strengths of the paper: the computation follows standard formulas from Refs. [18,25,38]; the circular-orbit case reproduces Ref. [32]; no free parameters are fitted; and the authors honestly report the failure of the first-flare signature at ξ=π/20. However, the current evidence is limited by the unstable-orbit comparator and by missing numerical resolution/time-step details, which prevents a full assessment of the quantitative light-curve claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IVA/IVB, Figs. 4 and 7] The 'circular orbit region' is not the stable circular-orbit region. For a=0.94, r_ISCO=2.02 while r_X=1.6; for a=0.99, r_ISCO=1.45 while r_X=1.3. Both r_X values are below the ISCO, where circular timelike geodesics exist but are unstable. The abstract and conclusion claim that the energy-extraction signal is 'less conspicuous in the plunging region compared to the circular orbit region' is therefore not established for the stable circular-orbit region; it compares two plunging-region trajectories. Please either simulate a stable circular orbit (r>r_I) or explicitly relabel the comparator as an 'unstable circular geodesic' and soften the conclusion accordingly.
  2. [Sec. IVA, after Fig. 3] The claimed Penrose-process signature is explicitly parameter-sensitive. The paper states that for ξ=π/20, the energy-extraction conditions ε+>0 and ε−<0 still hold but the ε− first flare disappears in the plunging region (while it is still produced in the circular-orbit case). This is an honest caveat, but it significantly limits the robustness of the first flare as an observational signature of energy extraction. The conclusion should state clearly that the signature is present only for a subset of magnetic-field orientations and that its absence does not rule out energy extraction.
  3. [Sec. III and Sec. IV] The numerical results are not reproducible from the manuscript as written. No pixel resolution n, camera field of view α_fov, integration error tolerances, time-step, or convergence tests are reported. The number of flares and their relative intensities (e.g., four versus three flares at a=0.99, and the faint first flare) are likely sensitive to time sampling and camera resolution. Please provide these technical parameters, add convergence tests, or make the code and initial conditions available.
  4. [Sec. IVA, Fig. 1] The gradual decline of flare intensity in the plunging case is a direct consequence of the assumed radial infall U_r^K (Eq. 13) and the decreasing Boyer-Lindquist radius. In that sense it is not an independent prediction but a consistency check of the model. The paper should state this limitation explicitly and, if the claim is to be an observational discriminator, test whether the decline persists under plausible non-geodesic effects (e.g., magnetic stresses or radiation drag). Otherwise the discriminator is only as strong as the geodesic-plunge assumption.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 6] The horizontal axis label reads 'Tine(min)' in both rows; it should be 'Time(min)'.
  2. [Eq. (21)] The final term in Eq. (21), '−α(4ˆγKγout (1±ˆvKvout cosξ)) −1', is unclear in its parentheses and dimensions. Please check and clarify.
  3. [Sec. IVA] Time values such as 'proper time 1.06' and 'azimuthal angle 1.87' are given without units. Specify whether times are in units of M or GM/c^3 and how the conversion to minutes is made.
  4. [Fig. 2] The snapshot panels lack coordinate axes and a common scale bar. Adding axes and a consistent color bar would make the image evolution easier to follow.
  5. [Sec. IVA, footnote 2] The text says three flares are observed, but footnote 2 notes that ε− actually produces two bumps with the second fainter than the first. Please define 'flare' precisely and state whether the second bump is included in the total light curve as a flare.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the light curves and energy-extraction comparisons are computed from stated geodesic and reconnection inputs; self-citations are corroborative, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: the Kerr metric (Eq. 1), ISCO constants (Eq. 12), the plunging radial flow (Eq. 13, from independent Refs. [25,38]), reconnection boost kinematics (Eqs. 16-20), energy-extraction conditions (Eqs. 21-22), and escape condition (Eq. 25) are all fixed inputs. The hotspot light curves are then produced by backward ray tracing and radiative transfer (Eqs. 26-30) with no parameter fitted to any target data. The headline result that plunging flares decline while circular flares stay constant is explicitly traced by the authors to the input shrinking radius (Sec. IVA: 'as the Keplerian orbital radius decreases, the flares become progressively weaker'), but this is an internally derived entailment of the model, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The ε− first-flare asymmetry is checked against external Ref. [32] and against the paper's own ξ=π/20 variation, so it is not imposed by construction. Self-citations (Refs. [33-35]) report analogous phenomena but do not carry the numerical derivation. The reviewer concern that the 'circular orbit region' is placed at r_X < ISCO is a physical validity/scope issue: the comparison is to an unstable circular geodesic rather than the stable disk region. That affects the observational force of the comparison, but it is not a circular step, because the equations still determine the outcomes from the stated inputs. Accordingly no circular step is exhibited and the score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no invented entities and fits no parameters to data; all free parameters are scenario/model inputs inherited from Refs [18,25,32]. The central results rest on two borrowed dynamical assumptions — conservation of ISCO energy/angular momentum and the Mummery-Balbus analytic inflow for the plunging current sheet (Eqs. 12-13) — plus a transparency/Gaussian emissivity hotspot model and the fisheye-camera ray-tracing pipeline of Ref [41].

free parameters (4)
  • black hole spin a = 0.94; 0.99
    Two scenario spins chosen by hand; the paper states that per-spin X-point radii were required to satisfy the energy-extraction conditions (Sec. IV), so the {a, rX} pairs are jointly selected.
  • dominant X-point radius rX = 1.6 (a=0.94); 1.3 (a=0.99)
    Chosen so that ε+>0, ε−<0 and the escape condition hold; this selection defines the regime in which the central comparison is made.
  • magnetization σ and magnetic-field angle ξ = σ=20, ξ=π/12 (also π/20 in robustness checks)
    Input parameters of the Comisso-Asenjo outflow model inherited from Ref [18]; the paper shows the ε− first flare is sensitive to ξ, so the headline signature is parameter-region dependent.
  • hotspot width s and observer geometry = s=0.2, observer at r=200, θ0=π/10, φ0=π/2
    Standard hotspot-imaging setup in the authors' program; affects image morphology but not the qualitative conclusions.
axioms (7)
  • standard math Kerr metric in Boyer-Lindquist coordinates (Eq. 1) and photon geodesics in this spacetime
    Background geometry for all ray-tracing and dynamics; no modification proposed.
  • domain assumption ISCO energy/angular momentum values (Eq. 12) are conserved by the plunging current sheet
    Taken from Ref [25]; determines ε± and the escape-condition analysis in Sec. II. If E and L evolve during the plunge, the results change.
  • domain assumption Universal radial inflow U_r^K = −sqrt(2/(3r_I))(r_I/r − 1)^{3/2} (Eq. 13) from Mummery & Balbus
    Drives the pre-reconnection trajectories; the decaying-flare result is a direct consequence of this shrinking orbit.
  • domain assumption Comisso-Asenjo outflow kinematics with v_out = sqrt(σ/(1+σ)) and the energy-extraction criteria ε+>0, ε−<0 plus the escape condition (Eqs. 16-22, 25)
    Reconnection-layer model from Refs [18,25]; used as stated without modification.
  • domain assumption Hotspot emission is isotropic, frequency-independent, transparent, with Gaussian emissivity (Eq. 26)
    Modeling choice inherited from Ref [32]; the paper states it does not include detailed emission spectra.
  • domain assumption Equatorial-plane confinement of the current sheet and reconnection layer
    Invoked from Ref [18] in Sec. II; all trajectories are equatorial.
  • domain assumption Fisheye-camera backward ray-tracing model of Ref [41] (Appendix B) and the radiative-transfer equation (Eq. 28) with zero absorption
    The entire imaging pipeline is imported from prior literature; no code or numerical details are given here.

reviewed 2026-08-02 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hotspot Images from Magnetic Reconnection Processes in the plunging Region of a Kerr Black Hole." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZNN2FL3F

@misc{pith2026260221836,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hotspot Images from Magnetic Reconnection Processes in the plunging Region of a Kerr Black Hole},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZNN2FL3F}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.21836}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Employing the hotspot imaging technique, this work investigates the plasma motion trajectories prior to and following the Comisso-Asenjo mechanism within the plunging region. After a concise overview of the magnetic reconnection process in the plunging region of a Kerr black hole, we present the hotspot model and the associated imaging methodology. Through numerical simulations, we separately examine the hotspot images in the plunging region under three conditions: no magnetic reconnection, with magnetic reconnection, and when the escape condition fails. These outcomes are also contrasted with hotspot images in the circular orbit zone. Our findings reveal that for hotspot images without magnetic reconnection, when the plasma follows plunging orbits, the flare strength gradually declines; conversely, for circular orbits, the flare strength remains approximately constant. Additionally, we observe that the signal indicative of energy extraction is less conspicuous in the plunging region compared to the circular orbit region.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.21836 by Ke Wang, Xiao-Xiong Zeng, Yun Hong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: In the plunging region with spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Temporal evolution of the plasma hotspot distribution in the plunging region. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: In the plunging region: (a) Motion trajectories of the plasma in a two-dimensional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: In the circular orbit region: (a) Motion trajectories of the plasma in a two-dimensional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Under conditions where the escape condition is not satisfied in the plunging region: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: For [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: For [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Extracting Energy from a Non-Kerr Rotating Spacetime with an Anomalous Quadrupole Moment via Magnetic Reconnection

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    In the Quevedo-Mashhoon spacetime, magnetic reconnection can extract rotational energy, with small positive anomalous quadrupole moments yielding the highest power and efficiency.

  2. Photon Spheres and shadow of modified black-hole entropies

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Modified black hole entropies alter photon sphere radii and shadow sizes, with parameters constrained by Event Horizon Telescope observations of Sgr A*.

  3. Photon Spheres and shadow of modified black-hole entropies

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Corrected black hole entropies produce distinct shifts in photon sphere radius and shadow size that are constrained by Event Horizon Telescope data on Sagittarius A*.

  4. Photon Spheres and shadow of modified black-hole entropies

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Entropy corrections to black holes produce modified metrics whose photon-sphere and shadow sizes can be constrained by Sgr A* observations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,” Astrophys. J. Lett.875(2019), L1

    2019

  2. [2]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,

    K. Akiyamaet al.[Event Horizon Telescope], “First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 930(2022) no.2, L12

    2022

  3. [3]

    Polarimetry and astrometry of NIR flares as event horizon scale, dy- namical probes for the mass of Sgr A*,

    R. Abuteret al.[GRAVITY], “Polarimetry and astrometry of NIR flares as event horizon scale, dy- namical probes for the mass of Sgr A*,” Astron. Astrophys.677(2023), L10

    2023

  4. [4]

    Black Hole Flares: Ejection of Accreted Magnetic Flux through 3D Plasmoid-mediated Reconnection,

    B. Ripperda, M. Liska, K. Chatterjee, G. Musoke, A. A. Philippov, S. B. Markoff, A. Tchekhovskoy and Z. Younsi, “Black Hole Flares: Ejection of Accreted Magnetic Flux through 3D Plasmoid-mediated Reconnection,” Astrophys. J. Lett.924(2022) no.2, L32

    2022

  5. [5]

    Prospects for testing the nature of Sgr A*’s NIR flares on the basis of current VLT- and future VLTI-observations,

    N. Hamaus, T. Paumard, T. Muller, S. Gillessen, F. Eisenhauer, S. Trippe and R. Genzel, “Prospects for testing the nature of Sgr A*’s NIR flares on the basis of current VLT- and future VLTI-observations,” Astrophys. J.692(2009), 902-916

    2009

  6. [6]

    Near infrared flares of Sagittarius A*: Im- portance of near infrared polarimetry,

    M. Zamaninasab, A. Eckart, G. Witzel, M. Dovciak, V. Karas, R. S. R. Giessuebel, M. Bremer, M. Garcia-Marin, D. Kunneriath and K. Muzic,et al.“Near infrared flares of Sagittarius A*: Im- portance of near infrared polarimetry,” Astron. Astrophys.510(2010), A3

    2010

  7. [7]

    Imaging compact boson stars with hot spots and thin accretion disks,

    J. L. Rosa, C. F. B. Macedo and D. Rubiera-Garcia, “Imaging compact boson stars with hot spots and thin accretion disks,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.4, 044021

    2023

  8. [8]

    Modeling the orbital motion of Sgr A*’s near-infrared flares,

    M. Bauböcket al.[GRAVITY], “Modeling the orbital motion of Sgr A*’s near-infrared flares,” Astron. Astrophys.635(2020), A143

    2020

  9. [9]

    A polarised infrared flare from Sagittarius A* and the signatures of orbiting plasma hotspots,

    S. Trippe, T. Paumard, T. Ott, S. Gillessen, F. Eisenhauer, F. Martins and R. Genzel, “A polarised infrared flare from Sagittarius A* and the signatures of orbiting plasma hotspots,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.375(2007), 764-772

    2007

  10. [10]

    Interferometricsignaturesofblackholeswithmultiplephotonspheres,

    Y.Chen, P.WangandH.Yang, “Interferometricsignaturesofblackholeswithmultiplephotonspheres,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.4, 044020

    2024

  11. [11]

    Modeling the motion of a bright spot in jets from black holes M87* and SgrA*,

    V. I. Dokuchaev and N. O. Nazarova, “Modeling the motion of a bright spot in jets from black holes M87* and SgrA*,” Gen. Rel. Grav.53(2021) no.8, 83 18

    2021

  12. [12]

    Relativistic Magnetic Reconnection in Kerr Spacetime,

    F. A. Asenjo and L. Comisso, “Relativistic Magnetic Reconnection in Kerr Spacetime,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(2017) no.5, 055101

    2017

  13. [13]

    Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection in Curved Spacetime and the Effect of Black Hole Rotation,

    L. Comisso and F. A. Asenjo, “Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection in Curved Spacetime and the Effect of Black Hole Rotation,” Phys. Rev. D97(2018) no.4, 043007

    2018

  14. [14]

    Fast magnetic reconnection in Kerr spacetime,

    Z. Y. Fan, Y. Li, F. Zhou and M. Guo, “Fast magnetic reconnection in Kerr spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D 110(2024) no.10, 104044

    2024

  15. [15]

    Magnetic reconnection under centrifugal and gravi- tational electromotive forces,

    Z. Y. Fan, F. Zhou, Y. Li, M. Guo and B. Chen, “Magnetic reconnection under centrifugal and gravi- tational electromotive forces,” Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.6, 064067

    2025

  16. [16]

    Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas,

    D. Biskamp, “Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas,” Cambridge University Press (2000)

    2000

  17. [17]

    Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity,

    R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity,” Riv. Nuovo Cim.1(1969), 252-276

    1969

  18. [18]

    Magnetic Reconnection as a Mechanism for Energy Extraction from Rotating Black Holes,

    L. Comisso and F. A. Asenjo, “Magnetic Reconnection as a Mechanism for Energy Extraction from Rotating Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D103(2021) no.2, 023014

    2021

  19. [19]

    Extracting spinning wormhole energy via Comisso-Asenjo process,

    X. Ye, C. H. Wang and S. W. Wei, “Extracting spinning wormhole energy via Comisso-Asenjo process,” JCAP12(2023), 030

    2023

  20. [20]

    Energy extraction via Comisso-Asenjo mechanism from rotating hairy black hole,

    Z. Li and F. Yuan, “Energy extraction via Comisso-Asenjo mechanism from rotating hairy black hole,” Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.2, 024039

    2023

  21. [21]

    Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in Konoplya-Rezzolla-Zhidenko parametrized black holes,

    S. J. Zhang, “Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in Konoplya-Rezzolla-Zhidenko parametrized black holes,” Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.8, 084066

    2024

  22. [22]

    Harvesting energy driven by Comisso-Asenjo process from Kerr-MOG black holes,

    M. Khodadi, D. F. Mota and A. Sheykhi, “Harvesting energy driven by Comisso-Asenjo process from Kerr-MOG black holes,” JCAP10(2023), 034

    2023

  23. [23]

    Kerr-Newman-modified-gravity black hole’s impact on the magnetic reconnection,

    S. Shaymatov, M. Alloqulov, B. Ahmedov and A. Wang, “Kerr-Newman-modified-gravity black hole’s impact on the magnetic reconnection,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.4, 044005

    2024

  24. [24]

    Energy extraction through magnetic reconnection from a Kerr–Newman black hole in perfect fluid dark matter,

    S. Rodriguez, A. Sidler, L. Rodriguez and L. R. Ram-Mohan, “Energy extraction through magnetic reconnection from a Kerr–Newman black hole in perfect fluid dark matter,” Phys. Dark Univ.48 (2025), 101961

    2025

  25. [25]

    EnergyextractionfromaKerrblackholeviamagneticreconnection within the plunging region,

    B.Chen, Y.Hou, J.LiandY.Shen, “EnergyextractionfromaKerrblackholeviamagneticreconnection within the plunging region,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.6, 063003

    2024

  26. [26]

    Energy extraction from a rotating black hole via magnetic reconnection: The plunging bulk plasma and orientation angle,

    Y. Shen, H. Y. YuChih and B. Chen, “Energy extraction from a rotating black hole via magnetic reconnection: The plunging bulk plasma and orientation angle,” Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.12, 123010

    2024

  27. [27]

    Energy extraction from the Kerr-Bertotti-Robinson black hole via magnetic reconnection in a circular and a plunging plasma,

    X. X. Zeng and K. Wang, “Energy extraction from the Kerr-Bertotti-Robinson black hole via magnetic reconnection in a circular and a plunging plasma,” Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no.6, 064032

    2025

  28. [28]

    Energy extraction from the accelerating Kerr black hole via magnetic reconnection in the plunging region and circular orbit region,

    K. Wang and X. X. Zeng, “Energy extraction from the accelerating Kerr black hole via magnetic reconnection in the plunging region and circular orbit region,” JCAP11(2025), 026

    2025

  29. [29]

    Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in Kerr-Sen-AdS4 black hole: Circular plasma and plunging plasma,

    X. X. Zeng and K. Wang, “Energy extraction via magnetic reconnection in Kerr-Sen-AdS4 black hole: Circular plasma and plunging plasma,” Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no.6, 064080

    2025

  30. [30]

    Extracting energy from plunging region of a Kerr-Taub-NUT black 19 hole by magnetic reconnection,

    Z. Cheng, S. Chen and J. Jing, “Extracting energy from plunging region of a Kerr-Taub-NUT black 19 hole by magnetic reconnection,” Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no.10, 1130

    2025

  31. [31]

    However, there is relatively little research on hotspot imaging related to the Penrose process driven by the Comisso-Asenjo mechanism

    proved that this plasma-driven Penrose process is energetically feasible under realistic astro- physical conditions, enhancing its plausibility for actual occurrence. However, there is relatively little research on hotspot imaging related to the Penrose process driven by the Comisso-Asenjo mechanism. Reference [32] studied the hotspot imaging of this proc...

  32. [32]

    Self-consistent Multidimensional Penrose Process Driven by Magnetic Reconnection,

    F. Camilloni and L. Rezzolla, “Self-consistent Multidimensional Penrose Process Driven by Magnetic Reconnection,” Astrophys. J. Lett.982(2025) no.1, L31

    2025

  33. [33]

    Probing the Penrose Process: Images of Split Hotspots and Their Observational Signatures,

    Z. Zhao, Z. Y. Fan, X. Wang, M. Guo and B. Chen, “Probing the Penrose Process: Images of Split Hotspots and Their Observational Signatures,” Phys. Rev. D113(2026) no.4, 044019

    2026

  34. [34]

    Hotspot Images Driven by Magnetic Reconnection in Kerr-Sen black hole,

    K. Wang and X. X. Zeng, “Hotspot Images Driven by Magnetic Reconnection in Kerr-Sen black hole,” Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) no.1, 41

    2026

  35. [35]

    Hotspot Image Driven by Magnetic Reconnection in Kerr-anti-de Sitter Black Holes,

    X. X. Zeng and K. Wang, “Hotspot Image Driven by Magnetic Reconnection in Kerr-anti-de Sitter Black Holes,” [arXiv:2511.22077 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  36. [36]

    Hotspot Image Driven by Magnetic Reconnection in a Rotating Noncommutative Black Hole,

    W. Q. Wang, K. Wang and X. X. Zeng, “Hotspot Image Driven by Magnetic Reconnection in a Rotating Noncommutative Black Hole,” to be appeared

  37. [37]

    Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics,

    R. P. Kerr, “Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.11(1963), 237-238

    1963

  38. [38]

    Rotating black holes: Locally nonrotating frames, energy extraction, and scalar synchrotron radiation,

    J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky, “Rotating black holes: Locally nonrotating frames, energy extraction, and scalar synchrotron radiation,” Astrophys. J.178(1972), 347

    1972

  39. [39]

    Inspirals from the Innermost Stable Circular Orbit of Kerr Black Holes: Exact Solutions and Universal Radial Flow,

    A. Mummery and S. Balbus, “Inspirals from the Innermost Stable Circular Orbit of Kerr Black Holes: Exact Solutions and Universal Radial Flow,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) no.16, 161101

    2022

  40. [40]

    General Theory of the Plasmoid Insta- bility,

    L. Comisso, M. Lingam, Y. M. Huang and A. Bhattacharjee, “General Theory of the Plasmoid Insta- bility,” Phys. Plasmas23(2016), 100702

    2016

  41. [41]

    Plasmoid Instability in Forming Current Sheets,

    L. Comisso, M. Lingam, Y. M. Huang and A. Bhattacharjee, “Plasmoid Instability in Forming Current Sheets,” Astrophys. J.850(2017) no.2, 142

    2017

  42. [42]

    QED effect on a black hole shadow,

    Z. Hu, Z. Zhong, P. C. Li, M. Guo and B. Chen, “QED effect on a black hole shadow,” Phys. Rev. D 103(2021) no.4, 044057

    2021

  43. [43]

    Image of a Kerr-Melvin black hole with a thin accretion disk,

    Y. Hou, Z. Zhang, H. Yan, M. Guo and B. Chen, “Image of a Kerr-Melvin black hole with a thin accretion disk,” Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.6, 064058

    2022

  44. [44]

    Kerr-like black hole surrounded by cold dark matter halo: the shadow images and EHT constraints,

    X. X. Zeng, C. Y. Yang, M. I. Aslam, R. Saleem and S. Aslam, “Kerr-like black hole surrounded by cold dark matter halo: the shadow images and EHT constraints,” JCAP08(2025), 066

    2025

  45. [45]

    The shadows and observational appearance of a noncommutative black hole surrounded by various profiles of accretions,

    X. X. Zeng, G. P. Li and K. J. He, “The shadows and observational appearance of a noncommutative black hole surrounded by various profiles of accretions,” Nucl. Phys. B974(2022), 115639

    2022

  46. [46]

    Effects of dark matter on shadows and rings of Brane-World black holes illuminated by various accretions,

    X. X. Zeng, K. J. He and G. P. Li, “Effects of dark matter on shadows and rings of Brane-World black holes illuminated by various accretions,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.65(2022) no.9, 290411

    2022

  47. [47]

    Images and flares of geodesic hot spots around a Kerr black hole,

    J. Huang, Z. Zhang, M. Guo and B. Chen, “Images and flares of geodesic hot spots around a Kerr black hole,” Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.12, 124062

    2024

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 2, 2026.