Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Distinguishing Ignorance from Error in LLM Hallucinations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.22071 v2 pith:ZP2AFLSP submitted 2024-10-29 cs.CL

Distinguishing Ignorance from Error in LLM Hallucinations

classification cs.CL
keywords hallucinationsmodelscasesdatasetsdifferentdistinguishinglargemitigating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are susceptible to hallucinations -- factually incorrect outputs -- leading to a large body of work on detecting and mitigating such cases. We argue that it is important to distinguish between two types of hallucinations: ones where the model does not hold the correct answer in its parameters, which we term HK-, and ones where the model answers incorrectly despite having the required knowledge, termed HK+. We first find that HK+ hallucinations are prevalent and occur across models and datasets. Then, we demonstrate that distinguishing between these two cases is beneficial for mitigating hallucinations. Importantly, we show that different models hallucinate on different examples, which motivates constructing model-specific hallucination datasets for training detectors. Overall, our findings draw attention to classifying types of hallucinations and provide means to handle them more effectively. The code is available at https://github.com/technion-cs-nlp/hallucination-mitigation .

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LA-RL: Label-Aware Self-Reflection for Reinforcement Learning in Information Extraction

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Label-aware diagnostic reflection plus two-stage outcome GRPO improves same-backbone IE F1 over SFT, with larger gains under relation-extraction domain shift.

  2. LC-ICL: Label-Guided Contrastive In-Context Learning for Robust Information Extraction

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LC-ICL improves few-shot NER and RE by using label-guided contrastive demonstrations that pair positive samples with error-annotated negative samples.