pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17758 · v1 · pith:ZV6AMUGTnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· hep-lat· hep-ph· math-ph· math.MP

A Double--Scaling Large--\(d\) Saddle of BFSS/BMN Matrix Quantum Mechanics

Badis Ydri This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 00:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qchep-lathep-phmath-phmath.MP
keywords large-d limitBFSS matrix modeldouble-scalingholonomy effective actiongap equationYang-Mills observablemass deformationmatrix quantum mechanics
0
0 comments X

The pith

A double-scaling limit in large-d BFSS matrix quantum mechanics balances Yang-Mills and mass terms to produce BFSS2-like low-temperature dynamics and IKKT-like high-temperature behavior.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the large-d dynamics of the mass-deformed bosonic BFSS matrix quantum mechanics by applying a Hubbard-Stratonovich localization to the Yang-Mills interaction. After integrating out the matrix coordinates, the model reduces to a holonomy-dependent effective action for an auxiliary adjoint kernel, which is analyzed via a commuting-symmetric saddle that encodes the interaction through a single self-consistent mass shift k0 fixed by a gap equation. A correlated double-scaling limit is identified in which d and m both diverge while the ratio kappa equals m to the three-halves over d remains fixed, keeping the Yang-Mills and mass contributions parametrically balanced. In this limit the low-temperature regime features an enlarged uniform-holonomy sector whose bulk dynamics resemble weakly coupled BFSS2-type gauged oscillators, while the high-temperature branch admits a window of self-consistent Gaussian behavior with parametrically suppressed commutator contributions per matrix pair.

Core claim

In the double-scaling limit the theory interpolates between the commutator-dominated BFSS regime and the mass-dominated Gaussian regime, exhibiting two complementary large-d regimes: at low temperature the enhanced gap pushes the deconfinement scale upward and opens a parametrically large uniform-holonomy region where the bulk dynamics behave as weakly coupled BFSS2-type gauged harmonic-oscillator sectors, while at high temperature an overlap window appears in which the Gaussian description remains self-consistent and the commutator contribution per matrix pair is parametrically suppressed, yielding BFSS2-like dynamics in the enlarged uniform-holonomy sector and IKKT-like almost-commuting ma

What carries the argument

The commuting-symmetric saddle and its maximally symmetric specialization, which encode the Yang-Mills interaction in a single dynamically generated mass shift k0 fixed by a gap equation for the self-consistent frequency s squared equals m plus k0.

If this is right

  • The deconfinement scale is pushed upward, opening a parametrically large uniform-holonomy region at low temperature.
  • The low-temperature bulk dynamics behave as weakly coupled BFSS2-type gauged harmonic-oscillator sectors.
  • The high-temperature branch admits an overlap window where the Gaussian description remains self-consistent while commutator contributions are parametrically suppressed.
  • The Yang-Mills observable and the associated phase structure admit controlled analysis in the balanced double-scaling regime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The controlled interpolation between regimes may permit explicit calculations of thermodynamic observables that are otherwise inaccessible in either pure BFSS or pure Gaussian limits.
  • The enlarged uniform-holonomy sector could serve as a starting point for studying fluctuation corrections around the saddle in a parametrically extended window.
  • The same double-scaling construction might be applied to other mass deformations or to the supersymmetric BFSS case to test whether the BFSS2-like and IKKT-like features persist.

Load-bearing premise

The commuting-symmetric saddle and its maximally symmetric specialization accurately capture the large-d dynamics, with the gap equation self-consistently determining k0 without higher-order corrections dominating in the double-scaling limit.

What would settle it

A direct computation of the next-to-leading saddle-point corrections that shows they grow with the double-scaling parameter and spoil the self-consistent determination of k0, or a numerical simulation of the holonomy effective action that fails to reproduce the predicted enlargement of the uniform-holonomy region.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17758 by Badis Ydri.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The (N, a) = (8, 0.05) results for the bosonic BFSSd+1 with d = 9, 2, 1. 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 R 2 (E/N 2=m 2 R 2 ) T=1/β N=8, µ=6m (m=d1/3), a=0.05 (Λ=β/a), Nmd=10 (acceptance rate=0.7-0.9), sample=212 supersymmetric BFSS3 , d=2 bosonic BFSS3 , d=2 theory (large d expansion) supersymmetric BFSS2 , d=1 bosonic BFSS2 , d=1 BSSS2/3 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0 0… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The (N, a) = (8, 0.05) results for supersymmetric BFSS2 and BFSS3 models and the mid-way model BFSS2/3. 76 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p076_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The (N, a) = (8, 0.05) holonomic eigenvalue distributions of the bosonic BFSS10 model. 77 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p077_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The (N, a) = (8, 0.05) holonomic eigenvalue distribution of the BFSS3 model. 78 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p078_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The (N, a) = (8, 0.05) holonomic eigenvalue distribution of the BFSS2 model. 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 ρ(λ) λ d=2,N=8, µ=6m (m=d1/3), a=0.05 (Λ=β/a), Nmd=10 (acceptance rate=0.7-0.9), sample=213 T=2.0, eigenvalues of X1 eigenvalues of X2 Wigner semi-circle law (a=1.69) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 ρ(λ) λ d=2,N=8, µ=6m (m=d1/3), a=0.05 (Λ=β/a… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The (N, a) = (8, 0.05) eigenvalue distribution of the matrix coordinates Xa for the supersymmetric BFSS3 model. 79 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p079_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the large--\(d\) dynamics of the mass--deformed bosonic \(\mathrm{BFSS}_{d+1}\) matrix quantum mechanics using a Hubbard--Stratonovich localization of the Yang--Mills interaction. After integrating out the matrix coordinates, the theory reduces to a holonomy--dependent effective action for an auxiliary adjoint kernel. We introduce a commuting--symmetric saddle and its maximally symmetric specialization, in which the interaction is encoded in a single dynamically generated mass shift \(k_0\). The resulting large--\(d\) description is a gauged matrix harmonic oscillator with self--consistent frequency \(s^2=m+k_0\), fixed by a gap equation. We analyze the low--temperature \(X\)-space physics, the holonomy effective action, the Yang--Mills observable, and the associated phase structure. We then identify a correlated double--scaling limit in which \(d\to\infty\), \(m\to\infty\), and \(\kappa=m^{3/2}/d\) is held fixed. In this limit the Yang--Mills interaction and the explicit mass deformation remain parametrically balanced: the theory interpolates between the commutator--dominated BFSS regime and the mass--dominated Gaussian regime. The double--scaled theory exhibits two complementary large--\(d\) regimes. At low temperature, the enhanced gap pushes the deconfinement scale upward and opens a parametrically large uniform--holonomy region, where the bulk dynamics behaves as weakly coupled \(\mathrm{BFSS}_2\)--type gauged harmonic--oscillator sectors. At the same time, the high--temperature branch reveals an overlap window in which the Gaussian description remains self--consistent while the commutator contribution per matrix pair is parametrically suppressed. The resulting dynamics is therefore \(\mathrm{BFSS}_2\)--like in its enlarged uniform--holonomy sector and IKKT--like in its almost--commuting matrix behavior.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a Hubbard-Stratonovich localization of the Yang-Mills interaction in the large-d limit of mass-deformed bosonic BFSS_{d+1} matrix quantum mechanics reduces the theory to a holonomy-dependent effective action for an auxiliary adjoint kernel. A commuting-symmetric saddle and its maximally symmetric specialization encode the interaction via a single mass shift k_0, yielding a gauged matrix harmonic oscillator with self-consistent frequency s^2 = m + k_0 fixed by a gap equation. In the double-scaling limit (d → ∞, m → ∞, κ = m^{3/2}/d fixed) the model interpolates between regimes, exhibiting an enlarged uniform-holonomy region with BFSS_2-like weakly coupled sectors at low temperature and an overlap window with parametrically suppressed commutators (IKKT-like) at high temperature.

Significance. If the saddle dominance and gap-equation stability are established, the construction supplies a controlled large-d analytic framework for the parametric balance between commutator and mass terms, with potential implications for phase structure and observables in matrix models dual to string/M-theory. The reduction to a single auxiliary kernel via symmetry assumptions is a technically economical feature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract (saddle introduction paragraph)] Abstract (saddle introduction paragraph): the claim that the commuting-symmetric saddle and its maximally symmetric specialization dominate the large-d path integral is not supported by an explicit quadratic fluctuation operator, Hessian eigenvalue bounds, or demonstration that non-commuting fluctuations remain parametrically suppressed when κ is held fixed. This assumption is load-bearing for both the enlarged uniform-holonomy region and the suppressed commutator contribution.
  2. [Abstract (gap equation discussion)] Abstract (gap equation discussion): the frequency is defined as s^2 = m + k_0 with k_0 fixed internally by the gap equation, but no analysis shows that 1/d corrections to the gap equation remain o(1) throughout the double-scaling limit. Without this, the asserted parametric balance between Yang-Mills interaction and mass deformation, and the resulting BFSS_2-like / IKKT-like interpolation, lacks justification.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The notation for the auxiliary adjoint kernel and the transition to the holonomy effective action would benefit from an explicit definition or forward reference in the abstract for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract (saddle introduction paragraph)] Abstract (saddle introduction paragraph): the claim that the commuting-symmetric saddle and its maximally symmetric specialization dominate the large-d path integral is not supported by an explicit quadratic fluctuation operator, Hessian eigenvalue bounds, or demonstration that non-commuting fluctuations remain parametrically suppressed when κ is held fixed. This assumption is load-bearing for both the enlarged uniform-holonomy region and the suppressed commutator contribution.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not contain an explicit quadratic fluctuation analysis or Hessian eigenvalue bounds around the commuting-symmetric saddle. The saddle is introduced via symmetry reduction of the auxiliary kernel in the Hubbard-Stratonovich localization, which by construction eliminates many non-commuting modes at leading order in large d. However, to establish parametric suppression of remaining non-commuting fluctuations when κ is held fixed, we will add a dedicated subsection deriving the quadratic operator and providing bounds showing that the relevant eigenvalues remain positive and that non-commuting contributions are suppressed by 1/d factors throughout the double-scaling regime. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract (gap equation discussion)] Abstract (gap equation discussion): the frequency is defined as s^2 = m + k_0 with k_0 fixed internally by the gap equation, but no analysis shows that 1/d corrections to the gap equation remain o(1) throughout the double-scaling limit. Without this, the asserted parametric balance between Yang-Mills interaction and mass deformation, and the resulting BFSS_2-like / IKKT-like interpolation, lacks justification.

    Authors: The gap equation is obtained from the leading-order saddle of the large-d effective action. The double-scaling limit with fixed κ = m^{3/2}/d is constructed precisely so that the Yang-Mills and mass contributions remain balanced at this order. We acknowledge that the manuscript provides no explicit demonstration that 1/d corrections to the gap equation stay o(1). We will add an analysis of the next-to-leading 1/d terms in the revised version, confirming that they remain parametrically small under the stated scaling and thereby justifying the claimed interpolation between regimes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: gap equation is a standard self-consistent mean-field equation, not a definitional reduction

full rationale

The paper introduces a commuting-symmetric saddle for the auxiliary kernel after Hubbard-Stratonovich localization, leading to a gap equation that determines the mass shift k0 and thus the effective frequency s^2 = m + k0. This is an ordinary self-consistent equation solved for the saddle value; the subsequent double-scaling analysis (d → ∞, m → ∞, κ fixed) and regime identifications (uniform-holonomy BFSS2-like sectors, suppressed commutators) are derived from the resulting effective action without any quantity being redefined as its own input. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems from prior work, or fitted parameters relabeled as predictions appear in the provided text. The derivation remains self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Hubbard-Stratonovich localization being appropriate, the commuting-symmetric saddle dominating, and the gap equation providing a self-consistent closure; these are introduced without independent external validation in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • k0
    Dynamically generated mass shift determined self-consistently by the gap equation in the saddle-point description.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Hubbard-Stratonovich localization exactly captures the Yang-Mills interaction for the purpose of large-d reduction.
    Invoked to reduce the theory to a holonomy-dependent effective action for the auxiliary kernel.
  • ad hoc to paper The commuting-symmetric saddle and its maximally symmetric specialization dominate the large-d path integral.
    Introduced to encode the interaction in a single mass shift k0.
invented entities (2)
  • auxiliary adjoint kernel no independent evidence
    purpose: To localize the Yang-Mills interaction after the Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation.
    New auxiliary field introduced to obtain the effective action.
  • commuting-symmetric saddle no independent evidence
    purpose: To simplify the large-d dynamics to a gauged matrix harmonic oscillator with self-consistent frequency.
    Specialized saddle point assumed to capture the physics in the double-scaling limit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5904 in / 1729 out tokens · 65648 ms · 2026-06-27T00:01:20.187820+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theories,

    L. Brink, J. H. Schwarz and J. Scherk, “Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theories,” Nucl. Phys. B121, 77-92 (1977)

    1977

  2. [2]

    Fierz Identities for Real Clifford Algebras and the Number of Supercharges,

    M. Baake, M. Reinicke and V. Rittenberg, “Fierz Identities for Real Clifford Algebras and the Number of Supercharges,” J. Math. Phys.26, 1070 (1985)

    1985

  3. [3]

    ’t Hooft,A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft,A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl. Phys. B72, 461 (1974)

    1974

  4. [4]

    ’t Hooft,Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity, arXiv:gr-qc/9310026

    G. ’t Hooft,Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity, arXiv:gr-qc/9310026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    Susskind,The World as a Hologram, J

    L. Susskind,The World as a Hologram, J. Math. Phys.36, 6377 (1995)

    1995

  6. [6]

    M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture,

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker and L. Susskind, “M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture,” Phys. Rev. D55, 5112-5128 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9610043 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  7. [7]

    Witten,Bound States of Strings andp-Branes, Nucl

    E. Witten,Bound States of Strings andp-Branes, Nucl. Phys. B460, 335 (1996)

    1996

  8. [8]

    Itzhaki, J

    N. Itzhaki, J. M. Maldacena, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz,Supergravity and the LargeNLimit of Theories with Sixteen Supercharges, Phys. Rev. D58, 046004 (1998)

    1998

  9. [9]

    Polchinski,Dirichlet Branes and Ramond–Ramond Charges, Phys

    J. Polchinski,Dirichlet Branes and Ramond–Ramond Charges, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 4724 (1995)

    1995

  10. [10]

    Cremmer, B

    E. Cremmer, B. Julia, and J. Scherk,Supergravity Theory in Eleven Dimensions, Phys. Lett. B76, 409 (1978)

    1978

  11. [11]

    String theory dynamics in various dimensions,

    E. Witten, “String theory dynamics in various dimensions,”Nucl. Phys. B443, 85 (1995)

    1995

  12. [12]

    Quantum M-wave and Black 0-brane,

    Y. Hyakutake, “Quantum M-wave and Black 0-brane,” JHEP09, 075 (2014) [arXiv:1407.6023 [hep-th]]. 82

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  13. [13]

    Higher derivative corrections to eleven dimensional super- gravity via local supersymmetry,

    Y. Hyakutake and S. Ogushi, “Higher derivative corrections to eleven dimensional super- gravity via local supersymmetry,” JHEP02, 068 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0601092 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  14. [14]

    Hoppe,Quantum Theory of a Massless Relativistic Surface and a Two-Dimensional Bound State Problem, Ph.D

    J. Hoppe,Quantum Theory of a Massless Relativistic Surface and a Two-Dimensional Bound State Problem, Ph.D. Thesis, MIT (1982)

    1982

  15. [15]

    Diffeomorphism Groups, Quantization, andSU(∞),

    J. Hoppe, “Diffeomorphism Groups, Quantization, andSU(∞),” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A4, 5235 (1989)

    1989

  16. [16]

    de Wit, J

    B. de Wit, J. Hoppe and H. Nicolai,On the Quantum Mechanics of Supermembranes, Nucl. Phys. B305, 545 (1988)

    1988

  17. [17]

    Vacuum States in Supersymmetric Kaluza-Klein Theory,

    J. Kowalski-Glikman, “Vacuum States in Supersymmetric Kaluza-Klein Theory,” Phys. Lett. B134, 194-196 (1984)

    1984

  18. [18]

    A New maximally supersymmetric background of IIB superstring theory,

    M. Blau, J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, C. Hull and G. Papadopoulos, “A New maximally supersymmetric background of IIB superstring theory,” JHEP01, 047 (2002) [arXiv:hep- th/0110242 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2002

  19. [19]

    Azeyanagi, M

    T. Azeyanagi, M. Hanada, T. Hirata and H. Shimada,On the Shape of a D-Brane Bound State and Its Topology Change, J. High Energy Phys.0903, 121

  20. [20]

    Zwiebach,A First Course in String Theory, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    B. Zwiebach,A First Course in String Theory, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    2009

  21. [21]

    Becker, M

    K. Becker, M. Becker and J. H. Schwarz,String Theory and M-Theory: A Modern Intro- duction(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006)

    2006

  22. [22]

    J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNLimit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231 (1998) [Int. J. Theor. Phys.38, 1113 (1999)], arXiv:hep- th/9711200

    arXiv 1998

  23. [23]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov,Gauge Theory Correlators from Non- Critical String Theory, Phys. Lett. B428, 105 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802109

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  24. [24]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter Space and Holography, Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter Space and Holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 253 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9802150

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  25. [25]

    Confinement of Quarks,

    K. G. Wilson, “Confinement of Quarks,” Phys. Rev. D10, 2445-2459 (1974)

    1974

  26. [26]

    Black hole thermodynamics from simulations of lattice Yang–Mills theory,

    Catterall, S. and Wiseman, T., “Black hole thermodynamics from simulations of lattice Yang–Mills theory,”Phys. Rev. D78, 041502 (2008)

    2008

  27. [27]

    Monte Carlo stud- ies of supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics with sixteen supercharges at finite tem- perature,

    Anagnostopoulos, K. N., Hanada, M., Nishimura, J. and Takeuchi, S., “Monte Carlo stud- ies of supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics with sixteen supercharges at finite tem- perature,”Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 021601 (2008). 83

    2008

  28. [28]

    Holographic description of quantum black hole on a computer,

    Hanada, M., Hyakutake, Y., Ishiki, G. and Nishimura, J., “Holographic description of quantum black hole on a computer,”Science344, 882 (2014)

    2014

  29. [29]

    Numerical tests of the gauge/gravity duality conjecture for D0-branes at finite temperature and finiteN,

    Hanada, M., Hyakutake, Y., Ishiki, G. and Nishimura, J., “Numerical tests of the gauge/gravity duality conjecture for D0-branes at finite temperature and finiteN,”Phys. Rev. D94, 086010 (2016)

    2016

  30. [30]

    The BFSS model on the lattice,

    V. G. Filev and D. O’Connor, “The BFSS model on the lattice,” JHEP1605, 167 (2016) [arXiv:1506.01366 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    Black hole thermodynamics from calculations in strongly coupled gauge theory,

    Kabat, D. N., Lifschytz, G. and Lowe, D. A., “Black hole thermodynamics from calculations in strongly coupled gauge theory,”Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 1426 (2001)

    2001

  32. [32]

    Higher derivative corrections to black hole thermodynamics from supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics,

    Hanada, M., Hyakutake, Y., Nishimura, J. and Takeuchi, S., “Higher derivative corrections to black hole thermodynamics from supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics,”Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 191602 (2009)

    2009

  33. [33]

    Quantum near-horizon geometry of a black 0-brane,

    Y. Hyakutake, “Quantum near-horizon geometry of a black 0-brane,”Progr. Theor. Exp. Phys.2014, 033B04 (2014)

    2014

  34. [34]

    Hanada,What Lattice Theorists Can Do for Superstring/M-Theory, Int

    M. Hanada,What Lattice Theorists Can Do for Superstring/M-Theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A31, 1643006 (2016)

    2016

  35. [35]

    Strings in flat space and pp waves from N=4 superYang-Mills,

    D. E. Berenstein, J. M. Maldacena and H. S. Nastase, “Strings in flat space and pp waves from N=4 superYang-Mills,” JHEP04, 013 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0202021 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  36. [36]

    Massive super Yang-Mills quantum mechanics: Classification and the relation to supermembrane,

    N. Kim and J. H. Park, “Massive super Yang-Mills quantum mechanics: Classification and the relation to supermembrane,” Nucl. Phys. B759, 249–282 (2006) [arXiv:hep- th/0607005]

    arXiv 2006

  37. [37]

    Noncriticalosp(1|2,R) M-theory matrix model with an arbitrary time- dependent cosmological constant,

    J. H. Park, “Noncriticalosp(1|2,R) M-theory matrix model with an arbitrary time- dependent cosmological constant,” Nucl. Phys. B745, 123–141 (2006) [arXiv:hep- th/0510070]

    arXiv 2006

  38. [38]

    Dielectric-branes,

    R. C. Myers, “Dielectric-branes,” JHEP12, 022 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9910053 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  39. [39]

    Bubbling AdS space and 1/2 BPS geometries

    H. Lin, O. Lunin and J. M. Maldacena, “Bubbling AdS space and 1/2 BPS geome- tries,” JHEP10, 025 (2004) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/10/025 [arXiv:hep-th/0409174 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/10/025 2004

  40. [40]

    The non-perturbative phase diagram of the BMN matrix model,

    Y. Asano, V. G. Filev, S. Kov´ aˇ cik and D. O’Connor, “The non-perturbative phase diagram of the BMN matrix model,” JHEP07, 152 (2018) [arXiv:1805.05314 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    The Confining Transition in the Bosonic BMN Matrix Model,

    Y. Asano, S. Kov´ aˇ cik and D. O’Connor, “The Confining Transition in the Bosonic BMN Matrix Model,” JHEP06, 174 (2020) [arXiv:2001.03749 [hep-th]]. 84

    arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    Phases of one dimensional large N gauge theory in a 1/D expansion

    G. Mandal, M. Mahato and T. Morita, “Phases of one dimensional large N gauge theory in a 1/D expansion,” JHEP1002(2010) 034 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2010)034 [arXiv:0910.4526 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep02(2010)034 2010

  43. [43]

    Phases of a two dimensional large N gauge theory on a torus

    G. Mandal and T. Morita, “Phases of a two dimensional large N gauge theory on a torus,” Phys. Rev. D84, 085007 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.085007 [arXiv:1103.1558 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.085007 2011

  44. [44]

    Black hole thermodynamics from calculations in strongly coupled gauge theory,

    D. N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D. A. Lowe, “Black hole thermodynamics from calculations in strongly coupled gauge theory,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A16, 856 (2001) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1426 (2001)] [hep-th/0007051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  45. [45]

    Black hole entropy from nonperturbative gauge theory,

    D. N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D. A. Lowe, “Black hole entropy from nonperturbative gauge theory,” Phys. Rev. D64, 124015 (2001) [hep-th/0105171]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  46. [46]

    Five-brane thermodynamics from the matrix model,

    K. Furuuchi, E. Schreiber and G. W. Semenoff, “Five-brane thermodynamics from the matrix model,” hep-th/0310286

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    Possible Third Order Phase Transition in the Large N Lattice Gauge Theory,

    D. J. Gross and E. Witten, “Possible Third Order Phase Transition in the Large N Lattice Gauge Theory,” Phys. Rev. D21, 446 (1980)

    1980

  48. [48]

    N = Infinity Phase Transition in a Class of Exactly Soluble Model Lattice Gauge Theories,

    S. R. Wadia, “N = Infinity Phase Transition in a Class of Exactly Soluble Model Lattice Gauge Theories,” Phys. Lett.93B, 403 (1980)

    1980

  49. [49]

    A. M. Polyakov,Gauge Fields and Strings, Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur, Switzer- land (1987)

    1987

  50. [50]

    The Hagedorn/Deconfinement Phase Transition in Weakly Coupled Large N Gauge Theories

    O. Aharony, J. Marsano, S. Minwalla, K. Papadodimas and M. Van Raamsdonk, “The Hagedorn - deconfinement phase transition in weakly coupled large N gauge theories,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.8, 603 (2004) doi:10.4310/ATMP.2004.v8.n4.a1 [hep-th/0310285]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/atmp.2004.v8.n4.a1 2004

  51. [51]

    Black hole-black string phase transitions in thermal 1+1 dimensional supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory on a circle,

    O. Aharony, J. Marsano, S. Minwalla and T. Wiseman, “Black hole-black string phase transitions in thermal 1+1 dimensional supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory on a circle,” Class. Quant. Grav.21, 5169 (2004) [hep-th/0406210]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  52. [52]

    Finite temperature effective action, AdS(5) black holes, and 1/N expansion,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, C. Gomez, H. Liu and S. Wadia, “Finite temperature effective action, AdS(5) black holes, and 1/N expansion,” Phys. Rev. D71, 124023 (2005) [hep-th/0502227]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  53. [53]

    New phases of near-extremal branes on a circle,

    T. Harmark and N. A. Obers, “New phases of near-extremal branes on a circle,” JHEP 0409, 022 (2004) [hep-th/0407094]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  54. [54]

    Black strings and p-branes are unstable,

    R. Gregory and R. Laflamme, “Black strings and p-branes are unstable,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2837-2840 (1993) [arXiv:hep-th/9301052 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  55. [55]

    Gregory-Laflamme as the confinement/deconfinement transi- tion in holographic QCD,

    G. Mandal and T. Morita, “Gregory-Laflamme as the confinement/deconfinement transi- tion in holographic QCD,” JHEP09, 073 (2011) [arXiv:1107.4048 [hep-th]]. 85

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  56. [56]

    Matrix theory black holes and the Gross-Witten transition,

    L. Susskind, “Matrix theory black holes and the Gross-Witten transition,” hep-th/9805115

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    Phase structure of matrix quantum mechanics at finite temperature

    N. Kawahara, J. Nishimura and S. Takeuchi, “Phase structure of matrix quantum mechan- ics at finite temperature,” JHEP0710, 097 (2007) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/10/097 [arXiv:0706.3517 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/10/097 2007

  58. [58]

    J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale,Finite-Temperature Field Theory: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006)

    2006

  59. [59]

    Le Bellac,Thermal Field Theory(Cambridge Univ

    M. Le Bellac,Thermal Field Theory(Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996)

    1996

  60. [60]

    Gauged permutation invariant matrix quantum me- chanics: path integrals,

    D. O’Connor and S. Ramgoolam, “Gauged permutation invariant matrix quantum me- chanics: path integrals,” JHEP04, 080 (2024) [arXiv:2312.12397 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Permutation invariant matrix quantum thermody- namics and negative specific heat capacities in large N systems,

    D. O’Connor and S. Ramgoolam, “Permutation invariant matrix quantum thermody- namics and negative specific heat capacities in large N systems,” JHEP12, 161 (2024) [arXiv:2405.13150 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Quantized noncommutative geometry from multitrace matrix models,

    B. Ydri, R. Khaled and C. Soudani, “Quantized noncommutative geometry from multitrace matrix models,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A37, no.10, 2250052 (2022) [arXiv:2110.06677 [hep- th]]

    arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Phase diagrams of the multitrace quartic matrix models of noncommutative Φ 4 theory,

    B. Ydri, K. Ramda and A. Rouag, “Phase diagrams of the multitrace quartic matrix models of noncommutative Φ 4 theory,” Phys. Rev. D93, no.6, 065056 (2016) [arXiv:1509.03726 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    O’Connor, private communication

    D. O’Connor, private communication

  65. [65]

    Ydri,unpublished work/work in progress

    B. Ydri,unpublished work/work in progress. 86