Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Rethinking Semi-Supervised Federated Learning: How to co-train fully-labeled and fully-unlabeled client imaging data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.18815 v1 pith:ZVKWBYAE submitted 2023-10-28 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

Rethinking Semi-Supervised Federated Learning: How to co-train fully-labeled and fully-unlabeled client imaging data

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV
keywords clientslabeledfederatedlearningunlabeledclientdataisolated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The most challenging, yet practical, setting of semi-supervised federated learning (SSFL) is where a few clients have fully labeled data whereas the other clients have fully unlabeled data. This is particularly common in healthcare settings where collaborating partners (typically hospitals) may have images but not annotations. The bottleneck in this setting is the joint training of labeled and unlabeled clients as the objective function for each client varies based on the availability of labels. This paper investigates an alternative way for effective training with labeled and unlabeled clients in a federated setting. We propose a novel learning scheme specifically designed for SSFL which we call Isolated Federated Learning (IsoFed) that circumvents the problem by avoiding simple averaging of supervised and semi-supervised models together. In particular, our training approach consists of two parts - (a) isolated aggregation of labeled and unlabeled client models, and (b) local self-supervised pretraining of isolated global models in all clients. We evaluate our model performance on medical image datasets of four different modalities publicly available within the biomedical image classification benchmark MedMNIST. We further vary the proportion of labeled clients and the degree of heterogeneity to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method under varied experimental settings.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.