Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Free Probability in a Minimal Quantum Circuit Model

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In a minimal circuit model of a system coupled to a Haar-random bath, every higher-order out-of-time-order correlator decays with the same exponential rate as the ordinary OTOC, and its late-time value is a sum of free cumulants.

desk verdict Solid, carefully worked derivation of higher-order OTOC dynamics in a minimal random-bath circuit; the headline rate claim is an upper bound, not a fully proven generic rate. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.11197 v2 pith:ZWTJIHVV submitted 2025-06-12 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thmath-phmath.MP

Felix Fritzsch , Pieter W. Claeys This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.stat-mechhep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords out-of-time-ordercorrelatorsfreeprobabilitycumulantsnoncrossingpartitionsinfluencematrixquantumthermalizationrandomcircuitsdual-unitary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the dynamics of higher-order out-of-time-order correlators (OTOCs), multi-time correlation functions that diagnose quantum information scrambling, in a minimal random circuit: a small local system coupled through an intermediate site to an environment refreshed by independent Haar-random unitaries at every time step. In the thermodynamic limit of an infinitely large environment, the paper proves that every $k$-point OTOC between traceless local observables decays exponentially with the same rate $\lambda^{2t}$ for all $k \geq 2$, up to polynomial prefactors, where $\lambda$ is the subleading eigenvalue of a single-particle quantum channel describing two-point functions. It also derives the exact late-time value for general observables as a sum over noncrossing partitions of free cumulants of the static observables times generalized moments of the evolved ones, matching the full eigenstate thermalization hypothesis. The proof works by rewriting the averaged OTOC as a Markov process on the noncrossing partition lattice, encoded in a higher-order influence matrix with bond dimension given by the Catalan number $C_k$. If correct, this gives an analytical bridge between the free-cumulant structure of full ETH and a purely dynamical, bath-mediated picture, and it shows that higher-order OTOCs cannot be decomposed into products of two-point functions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the noncrossing partition lattice $\mathrm{NC}(k)$: partitions of $k$ elements whose blocks do not cross when drawn on a circle, ordered by block refinement. Averaging the random bath maps the $k$-OTOC to a weighted sum over multichains $\circ = \sigma_1 \subseteq \nu_1 \subseteq \sigma_2 \subseteq \cdots \subseteq \nu_t = \square$ of noncrossing partitions, with weights built from Möbius functions of the lattice and transfer matrices $M_{\nu\sigma} = d_C^{-k}\left(1_A^{\otimes 2k} \otimes {}_C(\nu|\right)(U \otimes U^*)^{\otimes k}\left(1_A^{\otimes 2k} \otimes |\sigma)_C\right)$. Diagonal blocks $M_{\sigma\sigma}$ factor into copies of the unital quantum channel $M(a) = \frac{1}{d_C}\operatorname{Tr}_C\left[U(a \otimes 1_C)U^\dagger\right]$, whose subleading eigenvalue $\lambda$ sets the OTOC decay rate. Collecting the multichain weights into an auxiliary partition index yields a Markovian transfer matrix $T$ with upper-triangular structure, so the spectrum of $T$ is the union of the spectra of its diagonal blocks. The leading right and left eigenvectors are generalized moments and free cumulants related by Möbius inversion, which is what turns a sum over random-circuit histories into free probability.

What would settle it

Take the same three-site geometry but keep the bath unitaries fixed across time, or use a structured dual-unitary environment, and compute the averaged $k=3$ OTOC; if the decay rate then depends on $k$ or the stationary value differs from the free-cumulant sum of Eq. (75), the Markovian-random-bath assumption is doing the work. A more targeted check: for a generic ergodic unitary $U$ with known channel eigenvalue $\lambda$, evaluate Eq. (32) for $k=3$ numerically; the bound (67) fails if $|C^{(3)}(t)|$ exceeds $K_3 t^2 \lambda^{2t}$ at any time.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

After Haar-averaging the environment and taking $d_E \to \infty$ before the late-time limit, the $k$-OTOC is expressed as a sum over multichains on the noncrossing partition lattice [Eq. (32)]. For traceless observables the paper proves $|C^{(k)}_{ab}(t)| \leq K_k t^{k-1} \lambda^{2t}$ for $k \geq 2$ (Eq. 67), so all higher-order OTOCs share the exponential rate of the ordinary OTOC, twice as fast as two-point functions; for a qubit subsystem the decay sharpens to $\lambda^{kt}$. For observables with nonzero trace, the stationary value is $\lim_{t\to\infty} C^{(k)}_{ab}(t) = \sum_{\sigma \in \mathrm{NC}(k)} \kappa_\sigma(a)\, \varphi_{\sigma^*}(b)$ (Eq. 75), the free-cumulant decomposition predicted by full ETH. The whole dynamics is recast as a Markovian transfer matrix $T$ acting on replicas plus an auxiliary noncrossing partition; its leading eigenvectors are exactly moments and free cumulants, and its subleading eigenvectors are mixed free cumulants that decay as $\lambda^t$. The single-particle channel $M$, defined by tracing the folded gate over the intermediate site, carries all dependence on the local unitary and gives a classification of ergodic, mixing, and dual-unitary (maximally ergodic) cases.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes the environment is reset by a new independent Haar-random unitary at every time step, so the bath is perfectly Markovian; if a realistic finite bath retains memory between steps, the $\lambda^{2t}$ rate and the free-cumulant steady state need not survive.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $k \geq 2$ all higher-order OTOCs share the decay rate $\lambda^{2t}$, so measuring any higher OTOC gives the same scrambling time scale set by the two-point-function channel.
  • Late-time asymptotic freeness holds: in the thermodynamic limit, time-evolved and static local observables become freely independent, so their multi-time correlations factorize only in the way allowed by free probability.
  • The stationary value of every $k$-OTOC is determined by the free-cumulant expansion of Eq. (75), providing a dynamical, circuit-level derivation of the full-ETH prediction.
  • The influence matrix for $k$-OTOCs is low-entangled in time with bond dimension $C_k$, so higher-order OTOC dynamics can be simulated as a Markov process on the Catalan-sized noncrossing lattice.
  • Dual-unitary gates give maximally ergodic dynamics: correlation functions vanish after one step and traceless OTOCs after two steps, with the ergodic point stable under perturbations quantified by operator entanglement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: replace the Haar-random bath unitaries by a finite structured Floquet bath and check whether the decay rate remains $\lambda^{2t}$ independent of $k$; if the rate changes with $k$, the Markovian-random-bath idealization is doing the work.
  • The Jordan-block structure behind the $t^{k-1}$ prefactors implies that at intermediate times polynomial growth in $t$ can dominate, so numerical or experimental data should show $|C^{(k)}(t)|/\lambda^{2t}$ growing before the exponential tail sets in.
  • Since adding a tiny identity component to a traceless observable switches the late-time decay from $\lambda^{2t}$ to $\lambda^t$, the time of that crossover could serve as a sensitive probe of the trace structure of prepared operators.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies higher-order out-of-time-order correlators (k-OTOCs) in a minimal three-site quantum circuit: a structured subsystem A is coupled through an intermediate site C to an environment E that is refreshed by independent Haar-random unitaries at every time step. After averaging and taking the bath dimension d_E to infinity at fixed time, the k-OTOC is expressed as a sum over multichains on the noncrossing partition lattice, Eq. (32). The authors introduce an influence-matrix representation with an auxiliary noncrossing-partition degree of freedom, turning the dynamics into a Markovian transfer-matrix problem, and analyze the spectrum of the transfer matrix. The paper's central analytic claims are: (i) for traceless observables and k≥2, the k-OTOC decays at most as K_k t^{k-1} λ^{2t}, Eq. (67), with λ the subleading eigenvalue of the single-particle channel M; (ii) the stationary value for general observables is the free-cumulant decomposition Σ_{σ∈NC(k)} κ_σ(a) φ_{σ*}(b), Eq. (75); and (iii) subleading eigenmodes of the transfer matrix correspond to mixed free cumulants, reproducing the structure predicted by full ETH. The manuscript includes detailed appendices on Weingarten calculus, concentration bounds, properties of the channel M, and the eigenstate construction.

Significance. If the main claims hold, this is a valuable contribution: it provides the first exact analytical treatment of higher-order OTOC dynamics in a solvable circuit model, and it explicitly connects the influence-matrix formalism to the free-probability/full-ETH decomposition. The derivation of Eq. (32), the influence-matrix recasting in Sec. IV, and the stationary-state result Eq. (75) are careful and largely rigorous, with the details in Appendices B and D giving the argument real substance. The paper is also commendably non-circular: the rate λ is the subleading eigenvalue of a defined channel, not an output of fitting, and the free-cumulant structure is derived from Möbius inversion rather than assumed. The numerical data and code are provided. However, the headline claim that all higher-order OTOCs decay at the same exponential rate λ^{2t}, and that the relevant time scales are fully characterized, is stronger than what is proven: Eq. (67) is an upper bound, and the saturation argument applies to specially chosen observables. This is a load-bearing gap that should be fixed before the central claim is stated as a theorem.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.C, Eq. (67); Abstract; Sec. V] The central claim that all k-OTOCs decay exponentially with the same rate λ^{2t} is not established by Eq. (67). That equation is a one-sided upper bound, |C_ab^{(k)}(t)| ≤ K_k t^{k-1} λ^{2t}; it does not determine the asymptotic rate because the averaged k-OTOC is a signed sum over O(t^{k-1}) multichains and cancellations could make the true decay faster for generic observables. The saturation statement following Eq. (67) uses specially chosen channel eigenoperators a_λ and b_λ, and Sec. IV.F shows that the eigenvalue-λ eigenstates of the transfer matrix are annihilated by traceless boundary conditions. Thus the λ^{2t} rate for generic traceless observables is inferred from the spectrum and the triangular structure, not proven by a matching lower bound or by a nonvanishing-overlap argument for the λ^2 sector. Please add such an argument, or revise the abstract, Sec. I.A, and Sec. V to state explicitly that the proven result is an upper bound with saturation by special observables.
  2. [Sec. III.C, Eq. (68); d_A=2 case] The claimed sharpening for a single qubit, C_ab^{(k)}(t) ∝ λ^{kt} for k≥3, is presented as following from a^2∝1, but no analogue of the bound (67) is derived for this case. Given that this is an explicit exception to the universal λ^{2t} statement, the argument should be written out at least as a rigorous upper bound with the stated exponent, and preferably with an indication of when the bound is saturated. As written, this branch of the main result relies on an informal 'propagating boundaries' argument.
  3. [Sec. V; Sec. IV.F] The statement in Sec. V that 'all decay time scales were exactly characterized' overstates what is shown. What is exactly characterized is the spectrum of the transfer matrix T, via its triangular block structure. But an individual k-OTOC only probes an eigenmode if the corresponding boundary states have nonzero overlap with it, and the paper explicitly shows that the slowest (eigenvalue-λ) modes are invisible to traceless boundary conditions. The observability of the next-slowest λ^2 sector for generic observables is not proven. The authors should either provide the missing overlap analysis or restrict the 'full characterization' claim to the transfer-matrix spectrum and to the specific observables for which saturation is demonstrated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption reads 'asymptotic decay ∝ λ^{2t} (k = 1) and ∝ λ^{2t} (k ≥ 2)'; the first of these appears to be a typo and should presumably read ∝ λ^t.
  2. [Appendix B and Sec. IV.C] There are several typographical errors, including 'argumenus' in Appendix B, 'probabilitity' in Appendix A, and 'influeence' in Sec. IV.C; these should be corrected.
  3. [Eq. (32) and Appendix B] The notation for multichains, Σ = (σ1 ⊆ ν1 ⊆ ... ⊆ σt ⊆ νt), is used in Eq. (32) before it is formally introduced; a brief definition or pointer at the first occurrence would improve readability.
  4. [Sec. I.A and Sec. V] The claim that this work constitutes 'the first analytical result on full ETH in ergodic many-body dynamics' is framed too strongly given that the model has no eigenstates and relies on a Haar-random bath; I suggest softening the wording to 'first analytical derivation of the full-ETH free-cumulant decomposition in a solvable dynamical model'.
  5. [Sec. IV.A, Eqs. (82)-(83)] The contraction identity below Eq. (82) is stated compactly; for the reader it would help to spell out that the sum over σ uses the zeta-function constraint σ⊆ν and the Möbius identity, since this is one of the key steps connecting the tensor network to the multichain expansion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: λ is a spectral parameter of the channel M, the free-cumulant decomposition follows directly from Möbius inversion of the derived multichain sum, and the self-citations are contextual rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is self-contained. The starting expression (32) is obtained by Haar-averaging the circuit via Weingarten calculus, and the decay rate λ^{2t} enters through the subleading eigenvalue of the single-particle quantum channel M (Eq. 42), which is defined from the gate U and not extracted from OTOC data. The bound (67) is an honest upper bound; the further claim that generic traceless observables decay at rate λ^{2t} relies on an overlap/heuristic argument and is a rigor gap about lower bounds, not a circular reuse of the conclusion. The steady-state formula (75) is derived by summing over multichains using the defining Möbius-function identity (36), which is the same identity that defines free cumulants via (13); the paper derives the free-cumulant structure of the stationary value rather than assuming it. Self-citations such as Refs. [33, 60, 83, 95] are contextual and support surrounding literature; no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-cited unverified result. The paper explicitly acknowledges in Sec. V that generalization to fully structured Floquet or spin-chain baths remains open, treating the independent Haar-random environment as a modeling axiom rather than as a derived consequence. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation. Thus there is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Haar-random environment and the ergodic-mixing spectral assumption on the fixed gate U. The noncrossing partition combinatorics and Weingarten calculus are standard tools, not new postulates. The single 'free parameter' λ is a derived spectral quantity, not a fit parameter.

free parameters (1)
  • λ (subleading eigenvalue of channel M) = λ=0.398 (Fig. 1); λ=0.358 (Fig. 2)
    Controls all OTOC decay rates. Not fitted to OTOC data; it is computed from the gate U via Eq. (42). It is a model parameter, not an ad hoc constant introduced to make the derivation work.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Independent Haar-random unitaries V_t at each time step (Eq. 1).
    The entire calculation averages over these unitaries; this is the maximally-random-environment assumption that makes the bath perfectly dephasing. Introduced in Sec. II.A.
  • domain assumption Thermodynamic limit d_E→∞ is taken at fixed t, before the late-time limit.
    Stated as crucial in Sec. II.B; all results concern this averaged thermodynamic-limit quantity, not finite-size single realizations at late times.
  • domain assumption The channel M is ergodic and mixing, with a unique subleading eigenvalue λ satisfying |λ| < 1.
    Sec. III.A defines the ergodic and mixing case; the main theorems assume this regime, and non-ergodic cases are only classified, not treated.
  • standard math Standard Weingarten calculus and properties of the noncrossing partition lattice (Möbius function, Kreweras complement).
    Used throughout Appendices B-D; these are established results in random matrix theory and free probability, cited to Refs. [67,68,69,110,111].
  • standard math For d_A=2, Hermitian traceless operators satisfy a^2 ∝ 1_A.
    Used in Sec. III.C to sharpen the decay to λ^{kt} for a single qubit; follows from the Pauli algebra.
invented entities (1)
  • Auxiliary noncrossing-partition degree of freedom (bond index of the influence matrix)
    purpose: Bookkeeping device that turns the sum over partition multichains into a Markovian transfer-matrix dynamics T on the noncrossing partition lattice (Sec. IV.D).
    Mathematical construction, not a physical entity; it carries no falsifiable prediction of its own, but it is not a physical postulate.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Free Probability in a Minimal Quantum Circuit Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZWTJIHVV

@misc{pith2026250611197,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Free Probability in a Minimal Quantum Circuit Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZWTJIHVV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.11197}
}
read the original abstract

Recent experimental and theoretical developments in many-body quantum systems motivate the study of their out-of-equilibrium properties through multi-time correlation functions. We consider the dynamics of higher-order out-of-time-order correlators (OTOCs) in a minimal circuit model for quantum dynamics. This model mimics the dynamics of a structured subsystem locally coupled to a maximally random environment. We prove the exponential decay of all higher-order OTOCs and fully characterize the relevant time scales, showing how local operators approach free independence at late times. We show that the effects of the environment on the local subsystem can be captured in a higher-order influence matrix, which allows for a Markovian description of the dynamics provided an auxiliary degree of freedom is introduced. This degree of freedom directly yields a dynamical picture for the OTOCs in terms of free cumulants from free probability, consistent with recent predictions from the full eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH). This approach and the relevant influence matrix are expected to be applicable in more general settings and present a first step to characterizing quantum memory in higher-order OTOCs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.11197 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Graphical illustration of the terms determining the steady-state value of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Irreducible Geometry of Higher-Order Correlator Families

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Higher-order correlator families are recast as operator-space geometries that, when conditioned on a chosen subspace, reveal irreducible structures distinguishing free, integrable, chaotic, localized, and Floquet dynamics.

  2. Free Cumulants and Full Eigenstate Thermalization from Boundary Scrambling

    quant-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A deterministic Floquet circuit with a dual-unitary bulk exactly reproduces random-circuit higher-order OTOC dynamics, yielding analytic free cumulants that match full eigenstate thermalization hypothesis predictions.

  3. Refinements of the Eigenstate Thermalization Hypothesis under Local Rotational Invariance via Free Probability

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Under local rotational invariance, the leading factorization of ETH matrix-element correlations is refined by local free cumulants attached to neighboring non-crossing partitions, confirmed numerically in a Floquet sp...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    products

    Concentration Bounds and Typicality In the following we discuss fluctuations of the finite size k-OTOC c(k) ab (t, dE) around its average and around C (k) ab (t) . We show that fluctuations are strongly sup- pressed in dE and single realizations are close to the averaged result C (k) ab (t) with high probability by deriv- ing concentration bounds for the ...

  2. [2]

    Srednicki, The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic systems, J

    M. Srednicki, The approach to thermal equilibrium in quantized chaotic systems, J. Phys. A 32, 1163 (1999)

    1999

  3. [3]

    J. M. Deutsch, Eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 082001 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, From quantum chaos and eigenstate thermalization to statistical mechanics and thermodynamics, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    M. C. Ba˜ nuls, M. B. Hastings, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product states for dynamical simulation of infinite chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 240603 (2009)

    2009

  6. [6]

    Lerose, M

    A. Lerose, M. Sonner, and D. A. Abanin, Influence Ma- trix Approach to Many-Body Floquet Dynamics, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021040 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Sonner, A

    M. Sonner, A. Lerose, and D. A. Abanin, Influence func- tional of many-body systems: Temporal entanglement and matrix-product state representation, Ann. Phys. 435, 168677 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Feynman and F

    R. Feynman and F. Vernon, The theory of a general quantum system interacting with a linear dissipative system, Ann. Phys 24, 118 (1963)

    1963

Show all 113 references
  1. [9]

    M¨ uller-Hermes, J

    A. M¨ uller-Hermes, J. Ignacio Cirac, and M. C. Ba˜ nuls, Tensor network techniques for the computation of dy- namical observables in one-dimensional quantum spin systems, New J. Phys. 14, 075003 (2012)

    2012

  2. [10]

    M. B. Hastings and R. Mahajan, Connecting entangle- ment in time and space: Improving the folding algo- rithm, Phys. Rev. A 91, 032306 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    M. R. Jørgensen and F. A. Pollock, Exploiting the Causal Tensor Network Structure of Quantum Processes 32 to Efficiently Simulate Non-Markovian Path Integrals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 240602 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Cygorek, M

    M. Cygorek, M. Cosacchi, A. Vagov, V. M. Axt, B. W. Lovett, J. Keeling, and E. M. Gauger, Simulation of open quantum systems by automated compression of arbitrary environments, Nat. Phys. 18, 662 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    Fr ´ ıas-P´ erez and M

    M. Fr ´ ıas-P´ erez and M. C. Ba˜ nuls, Light cone tensor network and time evolution, Phys. Rev. B 106, 115117 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Giudice, G

    G. Giudice, G. Giudici, M. Sonner, J. Thoenniss, A. Lerose, D. A. Abanin, and L. Piroli, Temporal en- tanglement, quasiparticles, and the role of interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 220401 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Thoenniss, M

    J. Thoenniss, M. Sonner, A. Lerose, and D. A. Abanin, Efficient method for quantum impurity problems out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. B 107, L201115 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Foligno, T

    A. Foligno, T. Zhou, and B. Bertini, Temporal entan- glement in chaotic quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041008 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    Thoenniss, A

    J. Thoenniss, A. Lerose, and D. A. Abanin, Nonequilib- rium quantum impurity problems via matrix-product states in the temporal domain, Phys. Rev. B 107, 195101 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    N. Ng, G. Park, A. J. Millis, G. K.-L. Chan, and D. R. Reichman, Real-time evolution of Anderson impurity models via tensor network influence functionals, Phys. Rev. B 107, 125103 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    R. Chen, X. Xu, and C. Guo, Grassmann time-evolving matrix product operators for quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. B 109, 045140 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Nayak, J

    M. Nayak, J. Thoenniss, M. Sonner, D. A. Abanin, and P. Werner, Steady-state dynamical mean field the- ory based on influence functional matrix product states, arXiv:2503.02848 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Klobas and B

    K. Klobas and B. Bertini, Entanglement dynamics in Rule 54: Exact results and quasiparticle picture, SciPost Phys. 11, 107 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Bertini, K

    B. Bertini, K. Klobas, V. Alba, G. Lagnese, and P. Cal- abrese, Growth of R´ enyi Entropies in Interacting Inte- grable Models and the Breakdown of the Quasiparticle Picture, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031016 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Bertini, K

    B. Bertini, K. Klobas, and T.-C. Lu, Entanglement neg- ativity and mutual information after a quantum quench: Exact link from space-time duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 140503 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    M. A. Rampp, S. A. Rather, and P. W. Claeys, Entan- glement membrane in exactly solvable lattice models, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033271 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Calabrese, M. Collura, K. Klobas, and C. Rylands, Nonequilibrium full counting statistics and symmetry-resolved entanglement from space-time dual- ity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 140401 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Yao and P

    J. Yao and P. W. Claeys, Temporal entanglement barri- ers in dual-unitary Clifford circuits with measurements, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043077 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Bertini, K

    B. Bertini, K. Klobas, M. Collura, P. Calabrese, and C. Rylands, Dynamics of charge fluctuations from asym- metric initial states, Phys. Rev. B 109, 184312 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Link, H.-H

    V. Link, H.-H. Tu, and W. T. Strunz, Open Quantum System Dynamics from Infinite Tensor Network Con- traction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 200403 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Sonner, V

    M. Sonner, V. Link, and D. A. Abanin, Semi-group in- fluence matrices for non-equilibrium quantum impurity models, arXiv:2502.00109 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y. Huang, F. Hern´ andez, J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, M. Endres, and S. Choi, Emer- gent Quantum State Designs from Individual Many- Body Wave Functions, PRX Quantum4, 010311 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, I. S. Madjarov, X. Xie, R. Finkel- stein, J. P. Covey, J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y. Huang, A. Kale, H. Pichler, F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, S. Choi, and M. Endres, Preparing random states and benchmarking with many-body quantum chaos, Nature 613, 468 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Ippoliti and W

    M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, Solvable model of deep ther- malization with distinct design times, Quantum 6, 886 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    W. W. Ho and S. Choi, Exact Emergent Quantum State Designs from Quantum Chaotic Dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 060601 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    P. W. Claeys and A. Lamacraft, Emergent quantum state designs and biunitarity in dual-unitary circuit dy- namics, Quantum 6, 738 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Wilming and I

    H. Wilming and I. Roth, High-temperature thermaliza- tion implies the emergence of quantum state designs, arXiv:2202.01669 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Ippoliti and W

    M. Ippoliti and W. W. Ho, Dynamical Purification and the Emergence of Quantum State Designs from the Pro- jected Ensemble, PRX Quantum 4, 030322 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Bhore, J.-Y

    T. Bhore, J.-Y. Desaules, and Z. Papi´ c, Deep thermal- ization in constrained quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 108, 104317 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    C. Liu, Q. C. Huang, and W. W. Ho, Deep thermaliza- tion in Gaussian continuous-variable quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 260401 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Chang, H

    R.-A. Chang, H. Shrotriya, W. W. Ho, and M. Ippoliti, Deep thermalization under charge-conserving quantum dynamics, arXiv:2408.15325 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Lucas, L

    M. Lucas, L. Piroli, J. De Nardis, and A. De Luca, Generalized deep thermalization for free fermions, Phys. Rev. A 107, 032215 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    D. K. Mark, F. Surace, A. Elben, A. L. Shaw, J. Choi, G. Refael, M. Endres, and S. Choi, Maximum Entropy Principle in Deep Thermalization and in Hilbert-Space Ergodicity, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041051 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Manna, S

    S. Manna, S. Roy, and G. J. Sreejith, Projected ensem- ble in a system with conserved charges with local sup- port, arXiv:2501.01823 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Chan and A

    A. Chan and A. De Luca, Projected state ensemble of a generic model of many-body quantum chaos, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57, 405001 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    N. D. Varikuti and S. Bandyopadhyay, Unraveling the emergence of quantum state designs in systems with symmetry, Quantum 8, 1456 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Shrotriya and W

    H. Shrotriya and W. W. Ho, Nonlocality of deep ther- malization, SciPost Phys. 18, 107 (2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    W.-K. Mok, T. Haug, A. L. Shaw, M. Endres, and J. Preskill, Optimal Conversion from Classi- cal to Quantum Randomness via Quantum Chaos, arXiv:2410.05181 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  39. [47]

    X.-H. Yu, W. W. Ho, and P. Kos, Mixed state deep thermalization, arXiv:2505.07795 (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    G. Lami, A. De Luca, X. Turkeshi, and J. De Nardis, Quantum state design and emergent confinement mechanism in mea- sured tensor network states, arXiv:2504.16995 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.16995 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

  41. [49]

    Maldacena, S

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, A bound 33 on chaos, J. High Energy Phys. 2016 (8)

    2016

  42. [50]

    Swingle, Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time- order correlators, Nat

    B. Swingle, Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time- order correlators, Nat. Phys. 14, 988 (2018)

    2018

  43. [51]

    M. Fava, S. Biswas, S. Gopalakrishnan, R. Vasseur, and S. Parameswaran, Hydrodynamic nonlinear response of interacting integrable systems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2106945118 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    Doyon and J

    B. Doyon and J. Myers, Fluctuations in ballistic trans- port from euler hydrodynamics, in Annales Henri Poincar´ e, Vol. 21 (Springer, 2020) pp. 255–302

    2020

  45. [53]

    Myers, J

    J. Myers, J. Bhaseen, R. J. Harris, and B. Doyon, Trans- port fluctuations in integrable models out of equilib- rium, SciPost Phys. 8, 007 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    Foini and J

    L. Foini and J. Kurchan, Eigenstate thermalization hy- pothesis and out of time order correlators, Phys. Rev. E 99, 042139 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    Brenes, S

    M. Brenes, S. Pappalardi, M. T. Mitchison, J. Goold, and A. Silva, Out-of-time-order correlations and the fine structure of eigenstate thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 104, 034120 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    Pappalardi, L

    S. Pappalardi, L. Foini, and J. Kurchan, Eigenstate Thermalization Hypothesis and Free Probability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 170603 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    Jindal and P

    S. Jindal and P. Hosur, Generalized Free Cumulants for Quantum Chaotic Systems, arXiv:2401.13829 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Vallini and S

    E. Vallini and S. Pappalardi, Long-time Freeness in the Kicked Top, arXiv:2411.12050 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Pappalardi, F

    S. Pappalardi, F. Fritzsch, and T. Prosen, Full Eigen- state Thermalization via Free Cumulants in Quantum Lattice Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 140404 (2025)

    2025

  52. [60]

    M. Fava, J. Kurchan, and S. Pappalardi, Designs via Free Probability, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011031 (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    G. O. Alves, F. Fritzsch, and P. W. Claeys, Probes of Full Eigenstate Thermalization in Ergodicity-Breaking Quantum Circuits, arXiv:2504.08517 (2025)

    2025

  54. [62]

    Fritzsch, T

    F. Fritzsch, T. Prosen, and S. Pappalardi, Microcanoni- cal free cumulants in lattice systems, Phys. Rev. B 111, 054303 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    A. Chan, A. De Luca, and J. Chalker, Eigenstate corre- lations, thermalization, and the butterfly effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 220601 (2019)

    2019

  56. [64]

    D. Hahn, D. J. Luitz, and J. Chalker, Eigenstate cor- relations, the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, and quantum information dynamics in chaotic many-body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031029 (2024)

    2024

  57. [65]

    D. L. Jafferis, D. K. Kolchmeyer, B. Mukhametzhanov, and J. Sonner, Matrix models for eigenstate thermaliza- tion, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031033 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    D. L. Jafferis, D. K. Kolchmeyer, B. Mukhametzhanov, and J. Sonner, Jackiw-teitelboim gravity with matter, generalized eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, and random matrices, Phys. Rev. D 108, 066015 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    Voiculescu, Free Noncommutative Random Vari- ables, Random Matrices and the II 1 Factors of Free Groups, in Quantum Probability and Related Topics , Vol

    D. Voiculescu, Free Noncommutative Random Vari- ables, Random Matrices and the II 1 Factors of Free Groups, in Quantum Probability and Related Topics , Vol. Volume 6 (World Scientific, 1991) pp. 473–487

    1991

  60. [68]

    Speicher, Free Probability Theory and Random Ma- trices, in Asymptotic Combinatorics with Applications to Mathematical Physics , Vol

    R. Speicher, Free Probability Theory and Random Ma- trices, in Asymptotic Combinatorics with Applications to Mathematical Physics , Vol. 1815 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003) pp. 53–73

    2003

  61. [69]

    J. A. Mingo and R. Speicher, Free Probability and Ran- dom Matrices , Fields Institute Monographs, Vol. 35 (Springer New York, New York, NY, 2017)

    2017

  62. [70]

    Nica and R

    A. Nica and R. Speicher, Lectures on the combinatorics of free probability, Vol. 13 (Cambridge University Press, 2006)

    2006

  63. [71]

    Novak and M

    J. Novak and M. LaCroix, Three lectures on free prob- ability, arXiv:1205.2097 (2012)

    2012 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Speicher, Free Probability Theory, Jahresber

    R. Speicher, Free Probability Theory, Jahresber. Deutsch. Math.-Verein. 119, 3 (2017)

    2017

  65. [73]

    Hruza and D

    L. Hruza and D. Bernard, Coherent fluctuations in noisy mesoscopic systems, the open quantum ssep, and free probability, Physical Review X 13, 011045 (2023)

    2023

  66. [74]

    H. J. Chen and J. Kudler-Flam, Free independence and the noncrossing partition lattice in dual-unitary quan- tum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 111, 014311 (2025)

    2025

  67. [75]

    H. A. Camargo, Y. Fu, V. Jahnke, K. Pal, and K.-Y. Kim, Quantum signatures of chaos from free probability, arXiv:2503.20338 (2025)

    2025

  68. [76]

    Jahnke, P

    V. Jahnke, P. Nandy, K. Pal, H. A. Camargo, and K.-Y. Kim, Free probability approach to spectral and operator statistics in rosenzweig- porter random matrix ensembles, arXiv:2506.04520 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.04520 (2025)

    2025 doi

  69. [77]

    D. A. Roberts and D. Stanford, Diagnosing chaos using four-point functions in two-dimensional conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett 115, 131603 (2015)

    2015

  70. [78]

    D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford, and L. Susskind, Localized shocks, JHEP 2015 (3), 1

    2015

  71. [79]

    R. N. Das, S. Dutta, and A. Maji, Late time dynamics in susy saddle-dominated scrambling through higher-point otoc, Phys. Scr. 99, 085246 (2024)

    2024

  72. [80]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the sachdev- ye-kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D 94, 106002 (2016)

    2016

  73. [81]

    Nahum, S

    A. Nahum, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Operator Spreading in Random Unitary Circuits, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021014 (2018)

    2018

  74. [82]

    A. Chan, A. De Luca, and J. T. Chalker, Solution of a minimal model for many-body quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041019 (2018)

    2018

  75. [83]

    Yoshimura, S

    T. Yoshimura, S. J. Garratt, and J. T. Chalker, Op- erator dynamics in Floquet many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B 111, 094316 (2025)

    2025

  76. [84]

    P. W. Claeys and A. Lamacraft, Maximum velocity quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033032 (2020)

    2020

  77. [85]

    Bertini and L

    B. Bertini and L. Piroli, Scrambling in random uni- tary circuits: Exact results, Phys. Rev. B 102, 064305 (2020)

    2020

  78. [86]

    Note that the order of limits matters, since for finite systems there is no expected convergence in time due to revivals

  79. [87]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. W. Claeys, and T. Prosen, Exactly solvable many-body dynamics from space-time duality, arXiv:2505.11489 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Due to unitarity of Vt or, equivalently, the strict causal- ity in the brickwork circuit, the above k-OTOC does not depend on Vt

  81. [89]

    Nielsen and I

    M. Nielsen and I. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  82. [90]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Exact Correlation Functions for Dual-Unitary Lattice Models in 1 + 1 Di- mensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 210601 (2019)

    2019

  83. [91]

    S. A. Rather, S. Aravinda, and A. Lakshminarayan, Cre- ating Ensembles of Dual Unitary and Maximally En- tangling Quantum Evolutions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 070501 (2020)

    2020

  84. [92]

    Aravinda, S

    S. Aravinda, S. A. Rather, and A. Lakshminarayan, 34 From dual-unitary to quantum Bernoulli circuits: Role of the entangling power in constructing a quantum er- godic hierarchy, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 043034 (2021)

    2021

  85. [93]

    S. A. Rather, S. Aravinda, and A. Lakshminarayan, Construction and Local Equivalence of Dual-Unitary Operators: From Dynamical Maps to Quantum Com- binatorial Designs, PRX Quantum 3, 040331 (2022)

    2022

  86. [94]

    Aravinda, S

    S. Aravinda, S. Banerjee, and R. Modak, Ergodic and mixing quantum channels: From two-qubit to many- body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 110, 042607 (2024)

    2024

  87. [95]

    Gopalakrishnan and A

    S. Gopalakrishnan and A. Lamacraft, Unitary circuits of finite depth and infinite width from quantum channels, Phys. Rev. B 100, 064309 (2019)

    2019

  88. [96]

    M. A. Rampp, R. Moessner, and P. W. Claeys, From Dual Unitarity to Generic Quantum Operator Spread- ing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 130402 (2023)

    2023

  89. [97]

    Zhou and A

    T. Zhou and A. W. Harrow, Maximal entanglement ve- locity implies dual unitarity, Phys. Rev. B106, L201104 (2022)

    2022

  90. [98]

    P. Kos, B. Bertini, and T. Prosen, Correlations in Per- turbed Dual-Unitary Circuits: Efficient Path-Integral Formula, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011022 (2021)

    2021

  91. [99]

    Riddell, C

    J. Riddell, C. von Keyserlingk, T. Prosen, and B. Bertini, Structural stability hypothesis of dual uni- tary quantum chaos, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033226 (2024)

    2024

  92. [100]

    C. W. von Keyserlingk, T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann, and S. L. Sondhi, Operator Hydrodynamics, OTOCs, and Entanglement Growth in Systems without Conservation Laws, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021013 (2018)

    2018

  93. [101]

    M. P. Fisher, V. Khemani, A. Nahum, and S. Vijay, Random Quantum Circuits, Annu. Rev. Conden. Ma. P. 14, 335–79 (2023)

    2023

  94. [102]

    Bensa and M

    J. Bensa and M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Two-step phantom relaxation of out-of-time-ordered correlations in random circuits, Phys. Rev. Research 4, 013228 (2022)

    2022

  95. [103]

    ˇZnidariˇ c, Two-step relaxation in local many-body Floquet systems, J

    M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Two-step relaxation in local many-body Floquet systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56, 434001 (2023)

    2023

  96. [104]

    Jonay and T

    C. Jonay and T. Zhou, Physical theory of two-stage thermalization, Phys. Rev. B 110, L020306 (2024)

    2024

  97. [105]

    Jonay, C

    C. Jonay, C. Li, and T. Zhou, Two-stage relaxation of operators through domain wall and magnon dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 111, 224304 (2025)

    2025

  98. [106]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Kos, and T. Prosen, Operator Entan- glement in Local Quantum Circuits I: Chaotic Dual- Unitary Circuits, SciPost Phys. 8, 067 (2020)

    2020

  99. [107]

    Huang, X

    K. Huang, X. Li, D. A. Huse, and A. Chan, Out-of- time-order correlator, many-body quantum chaos, light- like generators, and singular values, arXiv:2308.16179 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Fritzsch and P

    F. Fritzsch and P. W. Claeys, Data and numerical code for ”Free probability in a minimal quantum cir- cuit model” (2025), [Data Set], Zenodo

    2025

  101. [109]

    Kreweras, Sur les partitions non crois´ ees d’un cycle, Discrete Math

    G. Kreweras, Sur les partitions non crois´ ees d’un cycle, Discrete Math. 1, 333 (1972)

    1972

  102. [110]

    Biane, Some properties of crossings and partitions, Discrete Math

    P. Biane, Some properties of crossings and partitions, Discrete Math. 175, 41 (1997)

    1997

  103. [111]

    Collins, Moments and cumulants of polynomial ran- dom variables on unitary groups, the Itzykson-Zuber in- tegral, and free probability, Int

    B. Collins, Moments and cumulants of polynomial ran- dom variables on unitary groups, the Itzykson-Zuber in- tegral, and free probability, Int. Math. Res. 2003, 953 (2003)

    2003

  104. [112]

    Collins and P

    B. Collins and P. ´Sniady, Integration with Respect to the Haar Measure on Unitary, Orthogonal and Sym- plectic Group, Commun. Math. Phys. 264, 773 (2006)

    2006

  105. [113]

    Weingarten, Asymptotic behavior of group integrals in the limit of infinite rank, J

    D. Weingarten, Asymptotic behavior of group integrals in the limit of infinite rank, J. Math. Phys. 19, 999 (1978)

    1978

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.