Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Crosslingual Reasoning through Test-Time Scaling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.05408 v1 pith:ZWYXJMNC submitted 2025-05-08 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords reasoninglanguagesenglishmodelsenglish-centriclanguagereasonscaling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reasoning capabilities of large language models are primarily studied for English, even when pretrained models are multilingual. In this work, we investigate to what extent English reasoning finetuning with long chain-of-thoughts (CoTs) can generalize across languages. First, we find that scaling up inference compute for English-centric reasoning language models (RLMs) improves multilingual mathematical reasoning across many languages including low-resource languages, to an extent where they outperform models twice their size. Second, we reveal that while English-centric RLM's CoTs are naturally predominantly English, they consistently follow a quote-and-think pattern to reason about quoted non-English inputs. Third, we discover an effective strategy to control the language of long CoT reasoning, and we observe that models reason better and more efficiently in high-resource languages. Finally, we observe poor out-of-domain reasoning generalization, in particular from STEM to cultural commonsense knowledge, even for English. Overall, we demonstrate the potentials, study the mechanisms and outline the limitations of crosslingual generalization of English reasoning test-time scaling. We conclude that practitioners should let English-centric RLMs reason in high-resource languages, while further work is needed to improve reasoning in low-resource languages and out-of-domain contexts.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The State of Multilingual LLM Safety Research: From Measuring the Language Gap to Mitigating It

    cs.CL 2025-05 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM safety research at ACL venues from 2020 to 2024 is predominantly English-only, and the language gap is growing over time.

  2. ARB: A Comprehensive Arabic Multimodal Reasoning Benchmark

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ARB provides 1,356 Arabic multimodal questions with 5,119 human-reviewed reasoning steps and shows leading models score much higher on reasoning fluency than on correct answers.

  3. Cost of Reasoning in non-English Languages: A Case Study on Japanese

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Japanese reasoning-language control is feasible with CPT plus GRPO, but incurs a capability cost and does not free-improve cultural Japanese performance.

Pith tools