Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Gravitational interaction to one loop in effective quantum gravity

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 7 Nov 1996

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim These contributions are finite and independent from the finite value of the renormalization counter terms of the effective lagrangian.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDgr-qc/9611018 (version 2)
Pith IDTKEGEPGD, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. Akhundov, A. Shiekh, S. Bellucci. "Gravitational interaction to one loop in effective quantum gravity." arXiv:gr-qc/9611018 (1996). https://pith.science/paper/TKEGEPGD
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,967 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.55 · states limitation 0.93 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.95 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We carry out the first step of a program conceived, in order to build a realistic model, having the particle spectrum of the standard model and renormalized masses, interaction terms and couplings, etc. which include the class of quantum gravity corrections, obtained by handling gravity as an effective theory. This provides an adequate picture at low energies, i.e. much less than the scale of strong gravity (the Planck mass). Hence our results are valid, irrespectively of any proposal for the full quantum gravity as a fundamental theory. We consider only non-analytic contributions to the one-loop scattering matrix elements, which provide the dominant quantum effect at long distance. These contributions are finite and independent from the finite value of the renormalization counter terms of the effective lagrangian. We calculate the interaction of two heavy scalar particles, i.e. close to rest, due to the effective quantum gravity to the one loop order and compare with similar results in the literature.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We carry out the first step of a program conceived, in order to build a realistic model, having the particle spectrum of the standard model and renormalized masses, interaction terms and couplings, etc. which include the class of quantum gravity corrections, obtained by handling gravity as an effective theory. contribution 0.64 0.76 0.10 asserted 0.96
s1 This provides an adequate picture at low energies, i.e. much less than the scale of strong gravity (the Planck mass). limitation 0.76 0.16 0.07 asserted 0.96
s2 Hence our results are valid, irrespectively of any proposal for the full quantum gravity as a fundamental theory. interpretation 0.75 0.17 0.15 asserted 1.00
s3 We consider only non-analytic contributions to the one-loop scattering matrix elements, which provide the dominant quantum effect at long distance. method 0.69 0.71 0.11 asserted 1.00
s4 These contributions are finite and independent from the finite value of the renormalization counter terms of the effective lagrangian. result 0.87 0.76 0.16 asserted 1.00
s5 We calculate the interaction of two heavy scalar particles, i.e. close to rest, due to the effective quantum gravity to the one loop order and compare with similar results in the literature. contribution 0.97 0.95 0.17 asserted 0.98

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.94.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We carry out the first step of a program conceived, in order to build a realistic model, having the particle spectrum of the standard model and renormalized masses, interaction terms and couplings, etc. which include the class of quantum gravity corrections, obtained by handling gravity as an effective theory. This provides an adequate picture at low energies, i.e. much less than the scale of strong gravity (the Planck mass). Hence our results are valid, irrespectively of any proposal for the full quantum gravity as a fundamental theory. We consider only non-analytic contributions to the one-loop scattering matrix elements, which provide the dominant quantum effect at long distance. These contributions are finite and independent from the finite value of the renormalization counter terms of the effective lagrangian. We calculate the interaction of two heavy scalar particles, i.e. close to rest, due to the effective quantum gravity to the one loop order and compare with similar results in the literature.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

23 arXiv papers cite this in 33 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 19 sentences without a confident label

Compares with it 3 papers
Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 10 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.