Pith. Sign in

RECORD

so(4) Plebanski Action and Relativistic Spin Foam Model

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 26 Apr 1998

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We argue that the $so(4)$ Plebanski model is the continuum analog of the relativistic spin foam model.

how it is stated · asserted 0.78 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv IDgr-qc/9804071 (version 2)
Pith IDWJKXOKME, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationL.Freidel, R. De Pietri. "so(4) Plebanski Action and Relativistic Spin Foam Model." arXiv:gr-qc/9804071 (1998). https://pith.science/paper/WJKXOKME
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,672 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.39 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.81 · compares with prior results 0.84 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this note we study the correspondence between the ``relativistic spin foam'' model introduced by Barrett, Crane and Baez and the so(4) Plebanski action. We argue that the $so(4)$ Plebanski model is the continuum analog of the relativistic spin foam model. We prove that the Plebanski action possess four phases, one of which is gravity and outline the discrepancy between this model and the model of Euclidean gravity. We also show that the Plebanski model possess another natural dicretisation and can be associate with another, new, spin foam model that appear to be the $so(4)$ counterpart of the spin foam model describing the self dual formulation of gravity.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this note we study the correspondence between the ``relativistic spin foam'' model introduced by Barrett, Crane and Baez and the so(4) Plebanski action. contribution 0.86 0.71 0.08 unclear 0.57
s1 We argue that the $so(4)$ Plebanski model is the continuum analog of the relativistic spin foam model. interpretation 0.63 0.71 0.72 asserted 0.78
s2 We prove that the Plebanski action possess four phases, one of which is gravity and outline the discrepancy between this model and the model of Euclidean gravity. result 0.94 0.93 0.23 asserted 1.00
s3 We also show that the Plebanski model possess another natural dicretisation and can be associate with another, new, spin foam model that appear to be the $so(4)$ counterpart of the spin foam model describing the self dual formulation of gravity. result 0.64 0.92 0.14 hedged possibility 0.59

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.95.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this note we study the correspondence between the ``relativistic spin foam'' model introduced by Barrett, Crane and Baez and the so(4) Plebanski action. We argue that the $so(4)$ Plebanski model is the continuum analog of the relativistic spin foam model. We prove that the Plebanski action possess four phases, one of which is gravity and outline the discrepancy between this model and the model of Euclidean gravity. We also show that the Plebanski model possess another natural dicretisation and can be associate with another, new, spin foam model that appear to be the $so(4)$ counterpart of the spin foam model describing the self dual formulation of gravity.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

54 arXiv papers cite this in 82 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 55 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 20 papers
  • In Plebanski (or BF, as it was subsequently called) formulation of gravitational theory [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] one starts by the $SO(4)$ (or $SO(3,1)$ in the Lorentzian case) BF theory ∫B^IJ F(A)_IJ where $F(A)$ is the curvature of an $SO(4)$ connection and $B$ is a Lie-algebra valued two-form field.

    A New Spin Foam Model for 4d Gravity · BF formulation of gravity and path integral quantization · 0.99

  • The developments in spin foam models of the last few years [ref] are based on a new way to implement the simplicity constraints which reduce BF theory to general relativity [ref] .

    Holomorphic Lorentzian Simplicity Constraints · Introduction · 0.99

  • The traditional way to enforce the restriction ([ref]), the one matching the original classical Plebanski formulation of gravity, was to add quadratic simplicity constraints[“Simplicity” because a two-form that can be written as a wedge product of one-forms is called simple.] to the action [ref] , ϵ_ABCDΣ^AB_abΣ^CD_cd=Vϵ_abcd,

    Classical general relativity as BF-Plebanski theory with linear constraints · Introduction · 0.92

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.