RECORD
so(4) Plebanski Action and Relativistic Spin Foam Model
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 26 Apr 1998
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim We argue that the $so(4)$ Plebanski model is the continuum analog of the relativistic spin foam model.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
In this note we study the correspondence between the ``relativistic spin foam'' model introduced by Barrett, Crane and Baez and the so(4) Plebanski action. We argue that the $so(4)$ Plebanski model is the continuum analog of the relativistic spin foam model. We prove that the Plebanski action possess four phases, one of which is gravity and outline the discrepancy between this model and the model of Euclidean gravity. We also show that the Plebanski model possess another natural dicretisation and can be associate with another, new, spin foam model that appear to be the $so(4)$ counterpart of the spin foam model describing the self dual formulation of gravity.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | In this note we study the correspondence between the ``relativistic spin foam'' model introduced by Barrett, Crane and Baez and the so(4) Plebanski action. | contribution 0.86 | 0.71 | 0.08 | unclear 0.57 |
| s1 | We argue that the $so(4)$ Plebanski model is the continuum analog of the relativistic spin foam model. | interpretation 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.72 | asserted 0.78 |
| s2 | We prove that the Plebanski action possess four phases, one of which is gravity and outline the discrepancy between this model and the model of Euclidean gravity. | result 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.23 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | We also show that the Plebanski model possess another natural dicretisation and can be associate with another, new, spin foam model that appear to be the $so(4)$ counterpart of the spin foam model describing the self dual formulation of gravity. | result 0.64 | 0.92 | 0.14 | hedged possibility 0.59 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
In this note we study the correspondence between the ``relativistic spin foam'' model introduced by Barrett, Crane and Baez and the so(4) Plebanski action. We argue that the $so(4)$ Plebanski model is the continuum analog of the relativistic spin foam model. We prove that the Plebanski action possess four phases, one of which is gravity and outline the discrepancy between this model and the model of Euclidean gravity. We also show that the Plebanski model possess another natural dicretisation and can be associate with another, new, spin foam model that appear to be the $so(4)$ counterpart of the spin foam model describing the self dual formulation of gravity.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
54 arXiv papers cite this in 82 sentences
Papers citing it · 55 sentences without a confident label
Cites it as background 20 papers
-
In Plebanski (or BF, as it was subsequently called) formulation of gravitational theory [ref] , [ref] , [ref] , [ref] one starts by the $SO(4)$ (or $SO(3,1)$ in the Lorentzian case) BF theory ∫B^IJ F(A)_IJ where $F(A)$ is the curvature of an $SO(4)$ connection and $B$ is a Lie-algebra valued two-form field.
A New Spin Foam Model for 4d Gravity · BF formulation of gravity and path integral quantization · 0.99
-
The developments in spin foam models of the last few years [ref] are based on a new way to implement the simplicity constraints which reduce BF theory to general relativity [ref] .
Holomorphic Lorentzian Simplicity Constraints · Introduction · 0.99
-
The traditional way to enforce the restriction ([ref]), the one matching the original classical Plebanski formulation of gravity, was to add quadratic simplicity constraints[“Simplicity” because a two-form that can be written as a wedge product of one-forms is called simple.] to the action [ref] , ϵ_ABCDΣ^AB_abΣ^CD_cd=Vϵ_abcd,
Classical general relativity as BF-Plebanski theory with linear constraints · Introduction · 0.92
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.