Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/0307375 v1 · submitted 31 Jul 2003

Graviton Cosmology in Universal Extra Dimensions

Jonathan L. Feng, Arvind Rajaraman, Fumihiro Takayama

The paper says

“At the same time, there is a window of reheat temperatures low enough to avoid these constraints and high enough to generate the desired thermal relic density for KK WIMP and superWIMP dark matter.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

In models of universal extra dimensions, gravity and all standard model fields propagate in the extra dimensions. Previous studies of such models have concentrated on the Kaluza-Klein (KK) partners of standard model particles. Here we determine the properties of the KK gravitons and explore their cosmological implications. We find the lifetimes of decays to KK gravitons, of relevance for the viability of KK gravitons as dark matter. We then discuss the primordial production of KK gravitons after reheating. The existence of a tower of KK graviton states makes such production extremely efficient: for reheat temperature T_RH and d extra dimensions, the energy density stored in gravitons scales as T_RH^2+3d/2. Overclosure and Big Bang nucleosynthesis therefore stringently constrain T_RH in all universal extra dimension scenarios. At the same time, there is a window of reheat temperatures low enough to avoid these constraints and high enough to generate the desired thermal relic density for KK WIMP and superWIMP dark matter.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: asserted 0.96

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.10 · states limitation 0.25 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.74 · compares with prior results 0.31 · mentions code or data availability 0.01

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
In models of universal extra dimensions, gravity and all standard model fields propagate in the extra dimensions. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
Previous studies of such models have concentrated on the Kaluza-Klein (KK) partners of standard model particles. background 0.86 0.03 0.02 asserted 1.00
Here we determine the properties of the KK gravitons and explore their cosmological implications. contribution 1.00 0.89 0.06 asserted 0.84
We find the lifetimes of decays to KK gravitons, of relevance for the viability of KK gravitons as dark matter. contribution 0.57 0.95 0.07 asserted 0.99
We then discuss the primordial production of KK gravitons after reheating. contribution 0.98 0.73 0.04 asserted 0.58
The existence of a tower of KK graviton states makes such production extremely efficient: for reheat temperature T_RH and d extra dimensions, the energy density stored in gravitons scales as T_RH^{2+3d/2}. result 1.00 0.79 0.38 asserted 1.00
Overclosure and Big Bang nucleosynthesis therefore stringently constrain T_RH in all universal extra dimension scenarios. interpretation 0.82 0.49 0.40 asserted 1.00
At the same time, there is a window of reheat temperatures low enough to avoid these constraints and high enough to generate the desired thermal relic density for KK WIMP and superWIMP dark matter. interpretation 0.52 0.66 0.34 asserted 0.96

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,183 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 16 Pith papers
How the literature uses it

9 arXiv papers cite this in 11 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 7 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 4 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment