High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/0402241 v1 · submitted 23 Feb 2004
Loop corrections to sub-leading heavy quark currents in SCET
The paper says
“We compute the one-loop (hard) matching correction to heavy-to-light transition currents in soft-collinear effective theory (SCET) to sub-leading power in the SCET expansion parameter for an arbitrary Dirac structure of the QCD weak current.”
from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier
Reviews
Reviews by people
No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.
The paper
Abstract
We compute the one-loop (hard) matching correction to heavy-to-light transition currents in soft-collinear effective theory (SCET) to sub-leading power in the SCET expansion parameter for an arbitrary Dirac structure of the QCD weak current.
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00
What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.20 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.05 · mentions code or data availability 0.02
The abstract, sentence by sentence
This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.
| Sentence | Role | The authors' own work | States the main conclusion | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| We compute the one-loop (hard) matching correction to heavy-to-light transition currents in soft-collinear effective theory (SCET) to sub-leading power in the SCET expansion parameter for an arbitrary Dirac structure of the QCD weak current. | contribution 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.62 | asserted 1.00 |
What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.80
What was examined, and what was not
Sources read
- arXiv listing abstract v1
Not examined
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
Levels run
- P abstract
Not run
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
How the labels were made
Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 1,659 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.
Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON
Cited by 31 Pith papers
Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record
- Enhanced Three-Particle Contribution to Electroweak Penguin $B$-Meson Decays hep-ph · Aug 2026
- The Simplest B Decay, Precisely hep-ph · Jan 2026
- One-loop matching of QCD currents to power-suppressed two-jet operators hep-ph · Jul 2026
- Towards $B \to V \gamma$ Decays at NNLO in SCET hep-ph · Sep 2007
- Soft Collinear Effective Theory for Heavy QCD Axions hep-ph · Aug 2026
- Precision calculations of $B\to K^*$ form factors from SCET sum rules beyond leading-power contributions hep-ph · Dec 2024
- Precision calculations of $B_{d, s} \to \pi, K$ decay form factors in soft-collinear effective theory hep-ph · Dec 2022
- Violation of the Kluberg-Stern--Zuber theorem in SCET hep-ph · Jul 2019
- A Subleading Operator Basis and Matching for $gg \to H$ hep-ph · Mar 2017
- Subleading Power Corrections for N-Jettiness Subtractions hep-ph · Dec 2016
- Factorization and dispersion relations for radiative leptonic $B$ decay hep-ph · Jun 2016
- Perturbative Corrections to $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda$ Form Factors from QCD Light-Cone Sum Rules hep-ph · Nov 2015
- QCD corrections to $B \to \pi$ form factors from light-cone sum rules hep-ph · Jun 2015
- The leading twist light-cone distribution amplitudes for the S-wave and P-wave quarkonia and their applications in single quarkonium exclusive productions hep-ph · Dec 2013
- On B -> V l l at small dilepton invariant mass, power corrections, and new physics hep-ph · Dec 2012
- Heavy-to-light currents at NNLO in SCET and semi-inclusive anti-B ---> X(s) l+ l- decay hep-ph · Jul 2010
- Two-loop QCD correction to differential semi-leptonic b --> u decays in the shape-function region hep-ph · Oct 2008
- Two body B decays with isosinglet final states in SCET hep-ph · Jan 2006
- Spectator scattering at NLO in non-leptonic B decays: Tree amplitudes hep-ph · Dec 2005
- Model-Independent Properties of the B-Meson Distribution Amplitude hep-ph · Sep 2005
- Power corrections to B\to X_u l \nu (X_s\gamma) decay spectra in the "shape-function" region hep-ph · Nov 2004
- Sudakov Resummation for Subleading SCET Currents and Heavy-to-Light Form Factors hep-ph · Apr 2004
- Subleading power corrections to the pion-photon transition form factor in QCD hep-ph · Jun 2017
- Precision calculations of $B \to V$ form factors in QCD hep-ph · Jul 2019
- QCD calculations of $B \to \pi, K$ form factors with higher-twist corrections hep-ph · Oct 2018
- A Subleading Power Operator Basis for the Scalar Quark Current hep-ph · Dec 2017
- Generalized Heavy-to-Light Form Factors in Light-Cone Sum Rules hep-ph · Dec 2013
- Factorization of Heavy-to-Light Baryonic Transitions in SCET hep-ph · Dec 2011
- NNLO vertex corrections to non-leptonic B decays: Tree amplitudes hep-ph · Nov 2009
- Radiative B to tensor meson decays at NLO in SCET hep-ph · May 2025
- Subleading-power corrections to the radiative leptonic $B \to \gamma \ell \nu$ decay in QCD hep-ph · Mar 2018
How the literature uses it
17 arXiv papers cite this in 27 sentences
Papers citing it · 17 sentences without a confident label
Uses its method or tool 2 papers
-
In order to facilitate the derivation of the soft-collinear factorization formulae for the three emerged invariant functions $Π$, $Π̃$ and $Π_T$, we adopt the following power counting scheme for the interpolating-current momentum and the light-quark masses [equation] Performing the two-step matching program $QCD →SCET_I →SCET_II$ for the correlation function ([ref]) in sequence leads to the familiar factorization formulae at leading power in the heavy quark expansion [ref] [equation] Including the light spectator-quark mass corrections in the factorized expressions apparently cannot affect the hard coefficients from the first-step matching $QCD →SCET_I$ in the leading-power approximation, which can be actually determined from the perturbative matching of the heavy-to-light current by integrating out the hard fluctuation modes with virtualities of order $m_b^2$ [ref] .
Precision calculations of $B_{d, s} \to \pi, K$ decay form factors in soft-collinear effective theory · The NLL LCSR for the exclusive $B_d, s →π, K$ form factors at leading power · 0.89
-
[ref] , a method was proposed to separate the “local” terms, which contribute to the short-distance coefficients at $𝒪(λ)$, from the non-local terms, which are reproduced by time-ordered products of $(An)$-type operators with leading-power SCET Lagrangian insertions.
One-loop matching of QCD currents to power-suppressed two-jet operators · Coefficients of $B$-type operators · 0.99
Uses its data or values 2 papers
-
Using the tree-level matching coefficients of QCD currents onto the $B$-type currents from the literature [ref] , we obtain [equation] Since the NR axion momentum scales as $q^μ∼(1,1,λ^2)$, the last operator term is subleading and ignored in the following.
Soft Collinear Effective Theory for Heavy QCD Axions · Spectator contribution · 0.93
-
The analytic expressions for the short-distance coefficients $C_i^(A0)$ and $C_i^(B1)$ (determined from [ref] ) as well as $C_i^(A1, m_c)$ are collected in (2) of the Supplemental Material.
Shedding New Light on ${\cal R} (D_{(s)}^{(\ast)} )$ and $|V_{cb}|$ from Semileptonic $\bar B_{(s)} \to D_{(s)}^{(\ast)} \ell \bar {\nu}_{\ell}$ Decays · General analysis · 0.81
Compares with it 1 paper
-
The hard coefficient functions are consistent with results obtained by soft-collinear effective theory from matching QCD$→$SCET$_I$ [ref] .
Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to the form factors of $B$ to scalar meson decays · The hard-scattering kernel at O(as) · 0.97
Cites it as support 1 paper
-
The one-loop corrections to $C^(B1)_i$ [ref] and $J$ [ref] have both been calculated, and the explicit results confirm the general factorization formula, including the arguments supporting the convergence of the convolution integrals.
Soft-collinear factorization in B decays · Heavy-to-light form factors · 0.98
Cites it as background 4 papers
-
Details have been worked out for $B→Vγ$ in [ref] , for heavy-to-light form factors in [ref] , and for $B→PP$ in [ref] .
Towards $B \to V \gamma$ Decays at NNLO in SCET · Introduction · 0.92
-
While the study of power corrections in the context of flavor physics has a long history [ref] , the first resummation using SCET for event shape-type observables was achieved relatively recently for thrust distribution [ref] .
Snowmass 2021 White Paper: Resummation for future colliders · Effective field theory approach for cross-sections · 0.96
-
SCET has been used to study power corrections at the level of the amplitude [ref] and to derive factorization theorems at subleading power for $B$ decays [ref] .
A Subleading Operator Basis and Matching for $gg \to H$ · Introduction · 0.91
Challenges and discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.
Come back by email
A short list of the week's newly reviewed papers. Nothing is sent until you confirm from your inbox, and every email has a link that stops it. No account.
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment