Pith.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/0504197 v1 · submitted 21 Apr 2005

The c̄c purity of ψ(3770) and ψ′ challenged

M.B. Voloshin

The paper says

“It is suggested that the resonance ψ(3770) may contain a sizeable ($O(10%)$ in terms of the probability weight factor) four-quark component with the up- and down- quarks and antiquarks in addition to the cc̄ pair, which component in itself has a substantial part with the isospin I=1.”

from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier

Pith says

Pith has not reviewed this paper.

Get a Pith Review, $5

Reviews

Reviews by people

No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

It is suggested that the resonance ψ(3770) may contain a sizeable ($O(10%)$ in terms of the probability weight factor) four-quark component with the up- and down- quarks and antiquarks in addition to the cc̄ pair, which component in itself has a substantial part with the isospin I=1. Furthermore such four-quark part of the wave function should also affect the properties of the ψ′ charmonium resonance through the ψ(3770)−ψ′ mixing previously considered in the literature. It is argued that an admixture of extra light quark pairs can explain a possible discrepancy between the theoretical expectations and the recent data on the non-DD̄ decay width of the ψ(3770) and the ratio of the yield of charged and neutral D meson pairs in its decays, as well as on the extra rate of the ψ′ direct decay into light hadrons and the rate of the decay ψ′ → π0J/ψ. It is further argued that the suggested four-quark component of the wave function of the ψ(3770) should give rise to a measurable rate of the decays ψ(3770) → ηJ/ψ and ψ(3770) → π0J/ψ.

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

How the main claim is stated: hedged possibility 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.72 · compares with prior results 0.59 · mentions code or data availability 0.01

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
It is suggested that the resonance $\psi(3770)$ may contain a sizeable ($O(10%)$ in terms of the probability weight factor) four-quark component with the up- and down- quarks and antiquarks in addition to the $c {\bar c}$ pair, which component in itself has a substantial part with the isospin I=1. contribution 0.83 0.19 0.63 hedged possibility 1.00
Furthermore such four-quark part of the wave function should also affect the properties of the $\psi'$ charmonium resonance through the $\psi(3770) - \psi'$ mixing previously considered in the literature. interpretation 0.78 0.13 0.10 hedged possibility 0.50
It is argued that an admixture of extra light quark pairs can explain a possible discrepancy between the theoretical expectations and the recent data on the non-$D {\bar D}$ decay width of the $\psi(3770)$ and the ratio of the yield of charged and neutral $D$ meson pairs in its decays, as well as on the extra rate of the $\psi'$ direct decay into light hadrons and the rate of the decay $\psi' \to \pi^0 J/\psi$. interpretation 0.92 0.17 0.35 hedged possibility 0.90
It is further argued that the suggested four-quark component of the wave function of the $\psi(3770)$ should give rise to a measurable rate of the decays $\psi(3770) \to \eta J/\psi$ and $\psi(3770) \to \pi^0 J/\psi$. interpretation 0.64 0.34 0.24 hedged possibility 0.50

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 0.81 · evidence from argument 0.94

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,079 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record

  1. Coupled-channel model for charmonium levels and an option for X(3872) hep-ph · Jun 2005
How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 5 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 3 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 2 papers

Challenges and discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment