RECORD
Dark Matter and the Baryon Asymmetry
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 6 Oct 2005
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim If $m_X \lsi 4.5 B_X $GeV and the annihilation cross sections differ by $\mathcal{O}$(10%) or more, this type of scenario naturally explains the observed $\Omega_{DM} \approx 5 \Omega_b$.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We present a mechanism to generate the baryon asymmetry of the Universe which preserves the net baryon number created in the Big Bang. If dark matter particles carry baryon number $B_X$, and $\sigma^{\rm annih}_{\bar{X}} < \sigma^{\rm annih}_{X} $, the $\bar{X}$'s freeze out at a higher temperature and have a larger relic density than $X$'s. If $m_X \lsi 4.5 B_X $GeV and the annihilation cross sections differ by $\mathcal{O}$(10%) or more, this type of scenario naturally explains the observed $\Omega_{DM} \approx 5 \Omega_b$. Two concrete examples are given, one of which can be excluded on observational grounds.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We present a mechanism to generate the baryon asymmetry of the Universe which preserves the net baryon number created in the Big Bang. | contribution 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.41 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | If dark matter particles carry baryon number $B_X$, and $\sigma^{\rm annih}_{\bar{X}} < \sigma^{\rm annih}_{X} $, the $\bar{X}$'s freeze out at a higher temperature and have a larger relic density than $X$'s. | method 0.45 | 0.32 | 0.09 | asserted 0.83 |
| s2 | If $m_X \lsi 4.5 B_X $GeV and the annihilation cross sections differ by $\mathcal{O}$(10%) or more, this type of scenario naturally explains the observed $\Omega_{DM} \approx 5 \Omega_b$. | result 0.71 | 0.55 | 0.45 | asserted 0.62 |
| s3 | Two concrete examples are given, one of which can be excluded on observational grounds. | contribution 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.05 | asserted 0.99 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
We present a mechanism to generate the baryon asymmetry of the Universe which preserves the net baryon number created in the Big Bang. If dark matter particles carry baryon number $B_X$, and $\sigma^{\rm annih}_{\bar{X}} < \sigma^{\rm annih}_{X} $, the $\bar{X}$'s freeze out at a higher temperature and have a larger relic density than $X$'s. If $m_X \lsi 4.5 B_X $GeV and the annihilation cross sections differ by $\mathcal{O}$(10%) or more, this type of scenario naturally explains the observed $\Omega_{DM} \approx 5 \Omega_b$. Two concrete examples are given, one of which can be excluded on observational grounds.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
40 arXiv papers cite this in 50 sentences
Papers whose main result relates to this one's
States the same result 1 paper
-
If $m_X \lsi 4.5 B_X $GeV and the annihilation cross sections differ by $\gsi 10%$, this type of scenario naturally explains the observed $\Omega_{DM} \approx 5 \Omega_b$.
Papers citing it · 22 sentences without a confident label
Contests it 1 paper
-
However, it may be possible to construct an ADM model in which such annihilations play a role: this paper is a first step towards such a goal.[Such a model was constructed previously, however we find the unitarity constraint was not properly taken into account [ref] .]$^,$[Asymmetry creation during freeze-in has also been considered [ref] .
Particle-antiparticle asymmetries from annihilations · Introduction · contest 0.81
Compares with it 2 papers
-
The DM will be stabilised using a $Z_2$ symmetry rather than couplings with a strong temperature dependence as in [ref] .
Asymmetric Dark Matter and CP Violating Scatterings in a UV Complete Model · Introduction · 0.91
-
Some of the other works that have substantial overlap with our work generate the baryon asymmetry as follows: Ref. [ref] in decays with the SS interaction in a GUT framework with the $(Χ) (Χ)$ and the $(Χ) ()$ operators present; Ref. [ref] in decays with the $(Χ) (_1 _2)$ and $(Χ) (Χ)$ SS interactions necessarily involving two different $_1,2$ flavors; Ref. [ref] in decay and scattering processes involving the $(Χ) ()$ and $(Χ) (Χ)$ SS interactions with a single $$ flavor; Ref. [ref] in $Χ$ scattering on SM quarks with a specific SS operator with two SU(2) doublet quarks and one singlet; and, Ref. [ref] in scattering channels with a general set of SS operators.
Effective Theory for Baryogenesis with a Majorana Fermion Pair Coupled to Quarks · Introduction · 0.85
Cites it as background 22 papers
-
Various mechanisms for linking the dark matter asymmetry to the baryon asymmetry of the universe have been proposed in the literature [ref] , usually involving equilibrium processes that transfer any particle asymmetry from the Standard Model (SM) to the dark sector (DS) and vice versa.
Discovering Asymmetric Dark Matter with Anti-Neutrinos · Asymmetric Dark Matter · 0.97
-
The possibility of using CP violating scatterings or coannihilations to generate ADM was first proposed in [ref] , the idea of using asymmetric freeze-out was introduced in [ref] and baryogenesis via annihilating particles was also studied in [ref] .
Asymmetric Dark Matter and CP Violating Scatterings in a UV Complete Model · Introduction · 0.94
-
In this case, the relic abundance depends on the amount of CP-violation in the theory, in a similar way to the baryogenesis mechanism [ref] .
Co-genesis of Matter and Dark Matter with Vector-like Fourth Generation Leptons · Introduction · 0.84
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.