High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · arXiv:hep-ph/9301212 v1 · submitted 6 Jan 1993
D\barD$ Mixing in Heavy Quark Effective Field Theory: The Sequel
The paper says
“We find an enhancement of the short-distance contribution by a factor of two or three.”
from the abstract · picked out as the main claim by a classifier
Reviews
Reviews by people
No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.
The paper
Abstract
We perform a quantitative analysis of DD̄ mixing in Heavy Quark Effective Field Theory (HqEFT) including leading order QCD corrections. We find an enhancement of the short-distance contribution by a factor of two or three.
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00
What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.09 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.97 · compares with prior results 0.46 · mentions code or data availability 0.02
The abstract, sentence by sentence
This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.
| Sentence | Role | The authors' own work | States the main conclusion | Strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| We perform a quantitative analysis of $D\bar{D}$ mixing in Heavy Quark Effective Field Theory (HqEFT) including leading order QCD corrections. | contribution 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.09 | asserted 0.98 |
| We find an enhancement of the short-distance contribution by a factor of two or three. | result 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.73 | asserted 1.00 |
What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.63
What was examined, and what was not
Sources read
- arXiv listing abstract v1
Not examined
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
Levels run
- P abstract
Not run
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
How the labels were made
Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,241 input tokens, $0.0001 reported.
Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON
Cited by 12 Pith papers
Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record
- Nonperturbative Dynamics in D-meson Mixing hep-ph · Aug 2025
- Dimension-six matrix elements for meson mixing and lifetimes from sum rules hep-ph · Nov 2017
- How large can the SM contribution to CP violation in $D^0-\bar D^0$ mixing be? hep-ph · Feb 2010
- The $D^0 - \bar D^0$ mass difference from a dispersion relation hep-ph · Feb 2004
- On the ultimate precision of meson mixing observables hep-ph · Mar 2016
- Relating D0-anti-D0 Mixing and D0 -> l+l- with New Physics hep-ph · Mar 2009
- CP violation studies at Super Tau-Charm Facility hep-ex · Feb 2025
- $\Delta A_{CP}$ within the Standard Model and beyond hep-ph · Mar 2019
- Measurements of indirect CP asymmetries in $D^0\to K^-K^+$ and $D^0\to\pi^-\pi^+$ decays hep-ex · Oct 2013
- Opportunities in Flavour Physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC hep-ph · Dec 2018
- Lifetimes and HQE hep-ph · May 2014
- Mixing and $CP$ violation in the charm system hep-ph · Nov 2020
How the literature uses it
18 arXiv papers cite this in 23 sentences
Papers citing it · 16 sentences without a confident label
Contests it 1 paper
-
While this technique provides an excellent tool to study $B$ mixing [ref] , the $D^0$ system predictions [ref] differ from experiment by up to a factor $10^3$.
How large can the SM contribution to CP violation in $D^0-\bar D^0$ mixing be? · Introduction · contest 0.80
Uses its method or tool 1 paper
-
While such decompositions can be performed reliably with the aid of computers (e.g. [ref] ), one must verify that the tensors constructed this way are linearly independent and that their set is complete, as required for a systematic bottom-up exploration of BSM physics, in particular if the renormalization of these interactions is taken into account (see, e.g., [ref] for examples of nontrivial relations among $SU(3)$ tensors in such calculations).
Birdtracks of Exotic SU(N) Color Structures · Introduction · 0.87
Cites it as background 5 papers
-
This leads to a combination of GIM cancellation [ref] and CKM suppression [ref] , which results in a strongly suppressed mixing process [ref] .
Brief Review of Charm Physics · Charm mixing · 0.80
-
In [ref] higher order terms in the HQE of $D^0$ mixing were discussed.
How large can the SM contribution to CP violation in $D^0-\bar D^0$ mixing be? · Higher HQE predictions · 0.96
-
As for the inclusive approach[See earlier discussions based on box diagrams in Refs. [ref] and the ones in heavy quark effective theory (HQET) in Refs. [ref] .
$D^0-\bar{D}^0$ mixing in the Dyson-Schwinger approach · Introduction · 0.94
Challenges and discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment.
Come back by email
A short list of the week's newly reviewed papers. Nothing is sent until you confirm from your inbox, and every email has a link that stops it. No account.
No comments yet.
Sign in to comment