D=4 Chiral String Compactifications from Intersecting Branes

A. M. Uranga; G. Aldazabal; L. E. Ibanez; R. Rabadan; S. Franco

REVIEW

D=4 Chiral String Compactifications from Intersecting Branes

G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L. E. Ibanez, R. Rabadan, A. M. Uranga

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 9 Nov 2000 · 38 references

Pith's verdict: A founding paper of the intersecting-brane program: the tadpole/anomaly analysis is solid and checkable, and the three-generation examples work, but the low-string-scale claim is asserted rather than built.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (selfhosted/deepseek-v4.1-flash) read the paper on October 29, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 8 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-th/0011073 (version 3)

Pith IDXYBUEV5Y, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationA. M. Uranga, G. Aldazabal, L. E. Ibanez, R. Rabadan, S. Franco. "D=4 Chiral String Compactifications from Intersecting Branes." arXiv:hep-th/0011073 (2000). https://pith.science/paper/XYBUEV5Y

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

This is one of the papers that got the intersecting-brane program off the ground, and the technical core holds up. The tadpole conditions (eq. 3.1) come from standard one-loop factorization and get a clean homology reading (eq. 3.3); the non-abelian anomaly condition (eq. 3.8) follows from them by a linear-combination argument; and the residual mixed U(1) anomaly (eq. 3.9) is matched exactly by a Green-Schwarz amplitude (eq. 3.13, 3.15) computed independently from the brane couplings. That last piece is the genuinely new bit: for D6-branes on T6 the mediating fields are untwisted RR fields, which is not what people were used to from type IIB orientifolds. The same matching is repeated in the T-dual flux picture and in the orbifold cases (eq. 4.13, 5.9), which is reassuring rather than redundant. I checked the D6 model (3.17) against all eight tadpole conditions and the D4 model (4.23) against (4.8); both go through, and the intersection numbers (3.18) follow from (3.5). The three-generation spectra are real, not hand-waved, and getting them without the orientifold projection of ref. [13] is the point of the exercise. Credit where due: the paper is also honest about what it does not have. It says outright that the D6 case cannot solve the hierarchy problem by large volume (Section 3.3), and that the tachyon-free configuration in Section 3.5 is a single point in moduli space and uses the orientifold projection it otherwise drops. The classifier found no stated limitations; that is wrong, the authors flag both. Where I would press is the abstract's line that the string scale may be lowered to the weak scale. That is true in principle for D4/D5, but the transverse space is non-compact in the local model, and the untwisted k=0 tadpole is explicitly set aside because it can escape (Section 4.2.1). In a compact embedding that tadpole must be cancelled, and no such embedding is built here. The authors call this a local description; fine, but the phenomenological sentence leans on it. This does not touch the anomaly analysis, which is the load-bearing result. Read it if you work on brane constructions or string model building; the anomaly section is worth knowing in detail. Send it to referees.

Referee report

Significance

This is an early systematic treatment of intersecting-brane model building and remains a standard reference in that programme. The observation that for D6-branes on T6 the Green-Schwarz mechanism is mediated by untwisted RR fields, in contrast with the twisted fields familiar from type IIB orientifolds, is a genuinely new and useful result, and the matching of Eq. (3.13)/(3.15) against the anomaly coefficient (3.9) is a clean, checkable derivation. The explicit models are a real strength: I verified that Eq. (3.17) satisfies all eight conditions of Eq. (3.1) and reproduces the intersection numbers (3.18), and that Eq. (4.23) satisfies Eq. (4.8) for k = 1, 2. The paper is also candid about its limitations, flagging the local-model nature of the construction and the tachyon instabilities.

Major objections (3)

[Abstract; Section 1; Section 3.3; Section 4.2.1] The abstract states that 'the string scale may be lowered close to the weak scale so that the standard hierarchy problem is avoided', and Section 1 repeats this for D4- and D5-brane models. No compact model in the paper demonstrates it. For n = 3 the paper itself concedes (Section 3.3) that large-volume compactification is not possible because the six-torus must stay small to avoid light KK resonances of gauge bosons. For n = 1, 2 the transverse space is non-compact in the local model, and Section 4.2.1 explicitly discards the untwisted (k = 0) tadpole on the grounds that it 'can escape along the non-compact dimensions of C2/ZN'. In a compact embedding that tadpole must be cancelled, and the large transverse volume invoked to solve the hierarchy problem is precisely the direction that is non-compact here. The hierarchy claim is therefore not supported by any construction in the paper. Either a compact embedding should be exhibited, or the abstract and Section 1 should state that the hierarchy solution is contingent on such an embedding and is not demonstrated here.
[Section 3.3, Eq. (3.22); Section 4.3, Eq. (4.26)] Section 3.3 describes Eq. (3.22) as 'the chiral fermion content of a three-generation standard model (up to charges under additional U(1) symmetries)', and Section 4.3 makes the analogous statement for Eq. (4.26). The quark sector does have three generations, but the lepton sector does not: Eq. (3.22) contains 6(1,2)_{-1/2} + 3(1,2)_{1/2}, i.e. nine SU(2) doublets rather than three, together with 6(1,1)_1 + 3(1,1)_{-1} and further singlets, and Eq. (4.26) contains 15(1,2)_{-1/2} + 12(1,2)_{1/2}. These multiplicities are not a matter of charges under additional U(1) symmetries; they are extra chiral matter under SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1)_Y. The text should say explicitly that the models reproduce the three-generation quark content together with additional exotic lepton-like states, rather than describing the full spectrum as a three-generation Standard Model.
[Section 1; Section 3.5, Eq. (3.23)] Section 1 states that the orientifold projection 'is not a necessary ingredient, and it does not improve the phenomenological or theoretical features of the model, hence we choose not to include it.' Section 3.5 then states that 'it turns out that it is easier to build such models if the construction includes an orientifold projection', and the only explicit tachyon-free configuration (Eq. 3.23) uses it. The projection does improve a theoretical feature, namely tachyon elimination, and the paper's only demonstration of the (meta)stable configurations advertised in the abstract relies on it. The two statements should be reconciled, and the abstract should make clear that the explicit tachyon-free example is an orientifold model.

Minor objections (8)

[Section 5.1, Eq. (5.4)] The first factor of the intersection number is printed as (n1a m1b - m1a n2b); the second term should presumably read m1a n1b, since the factor should be antisymmetric in the (n, m) pairs of the two branes.
[Section 5.2, Eq. (5.6)] The fourth condition contains the string 'm1a m a2', which appears to be a garbled version of m1a m2a; please correct.
[Section 4.3, Eq. (4.24)] The notation in the spectrum is hard to parse: the underlining convention is not defined in the text, and entries such as (0^3) and the repeated index structure of the U(1) charges need a sentence of explanation. A short legend would make the result checkable.
[Section 3.2.2] The statement that 'it is straightforward to check that these theories do not produce mixed U(1) gravitational anomalies' is asserted without the corresponding computation. Since the mixed U(1)-SU(N) case is worked out explicitly in Eqs. (3.9)-(3.15), the gravitational case deserves at least the analogous one-line demonstration.
[Section 4.3] The claim that 'it is not possible to get rid of all the tachyons while maintaining a chiral fermion spectrum' is argued for the specific Chan-Paton embedding (4.21) with K = N at a supersymmetric singularity, and the text says only that 'more general choices can be treated analogously'. The scope of the no-go should be stated in the sentence itself, so that it is not read as a general statement about all D4-brane models.
[Section 3.5, Eq. (3.23)] The text states that the orientifold tadpole condition becomes sum_a N_a n1_a n2_a n3_a = 16 (not counting images). For the table as printed the sum is 3 + 3 + 1 + 10 = 17. Please check whether one wrapping number or the normalization constant is misprinted; the point does not affect the tachyon analysis, but the model is presented as satisfying the condition.
[Section 3.2.2] The statement that 'at most eight U(1) linear combinations can gain mass' should be clarified as a bound following from the number of mediating fields, and the text should note whether all eight are actually used in generic models or whether the rank of the intersection matrix is typically smaller.
[Section 2; Section 3.1; Section 4.1; Section 6] Several typographical and grammatical slips should be corrected: 'wrapped on d-cycles T^{2d}' (missing 'on'), 'In next section we center of robust aspects', 'it gives rise to an D = 4 N = 4 ... gauge multiplet', 'studied there general features', and 'We expect it have relevant phenomenological applications'.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

Stacked D-branes wrapped on cycles of a torus produce four-dimensional chiral gauge theories, and the string consistency conditions that keep the construction alive turn out to also cancel the gauge anomalies that would otherwise spoil it.

The reading

The paper asks whether one can build a four-dimensional chiral gauge theory — matter that distinguishes left from right — out of D-branes that wrap cycles of an internal torus and intersect one another at points. The authors argue yes, for three families of construction: D6-branes on 3-cycles of $T^6$, D5-branes on 2-cycles of $T^4$ times a singular transverse space, and D4-branes on 1-cycles of $T^2$ times a two-dimensional singularity. The reason a sympathetic reader should care is that chirality here comes from the intersections themselves rather than from the curvature of the internal space, so the internal geometry can stay nearly flat and the model-building rules stay simple. The paper then shows that the same homology condition which cancels the Ramond-Ramond tadpoles — the total wrapped cycle, counted with multiplicity, must be trivial — also implies cancellation of the non-abelian triangle anomalies, while the leftover mixed $U(1)$ anomalies are absorbed by a Green-Schwarz mechanism. To show the framework is not empty, the authors write down explicit $SU(3) times SU(2) times U(1)$ spectra with three generations, and they discuss when the inevitable scalar tachyons at intersections can be removed by choosing the torus moduli.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the intersection number of two wrapped cycles, $I_{ab} = prod_{I=1}^{3} (n^I_a m^I_b - m^I_a n^I_b)$, which counts how many times the stacks meet and therefore how many copies of each chiral bifundamental fermion appear. Two facts make the paper work. The first is that $I_{ab}$ is multilinear in the wrapping numbers, so the homology tadpole condition $sum_a N_a [Pi_a] = 0$ contracts against it to give $sum_b I_{ab} N_b = 0$ — exactly the non-abelian anomaly cancellation condition. The second is that the same intersection number appears in the Green-Schwarz amplitude: the coupling of the $a$-th $U(1)$ to a Ramond-Ramond field is weighted by the expansion coefficients of $[Pi_a]$ in a basis of dual 3-cycles, and the coupling of that field to two $SU(N_b)$ bosons is weighted by the dual expansion of $[Pi_b]$; contracting the two bases gives $N_a I_{ab}$, matching the anomaly coefficient. The whole anomaly story is thus one geometric quantity appearing twice, once as a multiplicity and once as a coupling.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that configurations of $D(3+n)$-branes wrapped on $n$-cycles in $T^{2n} times mathbb{R}^{6-2n}/mathbb{Z}_N$, for $n=1,2,3$, give four-dimensional gauge theories that are generically chiral and non-supersymmetric, and that these theories are consistent. Consistency has two layers. First, the Ramond-Ramond tadpole conditions require the wrapped cycles, weighted by the number of branes on each stack, to sum to zero in homology: $sum_a N_a [Pi_a] = 0$. Second, the chiral fermions living at each intersection would produce gauge anomalies; the authors show that the cubic non-abelian anomaly for $SU(N_a)$ is proportional to $sum_b I_{ab} N_b$, which vanishes once the tadpole conditions hold, and that the residual mixed $U(1)_a$-$SU(N_b)^2$ anomaly, proportional to $N_a I_{ab}$, is cancelled by exchange of closed-string Ramond-Ramond fields. For D6-branes on $T^6$ those mediating fields are untwisted, which the authors note is unusual compared with orientifold and heterotic constructions; for $n=1,2$ they are twisted-sector fields reduced on the torus. The paper closes the loop with two worked examples, one for D6-branes and one for D4-branes at a $mathbb{C}^2/mathbb{Z}_3$ singularity, each satisfying the tadpole conditions and each reproducing the chiral matter content of a three-generation Standard Model up to extra $U(1)$ charges.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis is carried out on a non-compact transverse space, and the authors say explicitly that they treat this as a local description of the geometry near the branes and concentrate on local features; nothing in the paper shows that a globally compact embedding exists which keeps the computed chiral spectrum intact without adding new light states or new tadpoles.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Any brane configuration whose wrapped cycles sum to zero in homology automatically has anomaly-free non-abelian gauge groups, so tadpole cancellation can be used as a sufficient model-building filter without separately checking triangle anomalies.
Anomalous $U(1)$ factors become massive at the string scale through their linear couplings to Ramond-Ramond fields, so the massless gauge group of such a model is smaller than the naive stack-by-stack gauge group and must be read off as the zero modes of the intersection matrix.
Because chirality comes from intersections rather than from special holonomy, three-generation spectra are easy to obtain: the paper exhibits them for both D6-branes on $T^6$ and D4-branes at a $\mathbb{Z}_3$ singularity.
For the D4 and D5 cases the string scale can be lowered towards the weak scale by enlarging the transverse volume while keeping the wrapped torus small, which removes the hierarchy problem at the cost of a non-supersymmetric spectrum.
Whether a given intersection is tachyonic is a question about the torus moduli, not about the discrete wrapping data, so stability can be decided region by region in moduli space; the paper gives a D6 example where all intersection masses are positive for one choice of radii.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the anomaly-tadpole link is as tight as the paper argues, it suggests a practical search strategy: enumerate integer wrapping vectors satisfying the eight tadpole equations, and the anomaly structure comes for free, leaving only chirality, tachyon-freedom and hypercharge as filters.
The tachyon-condensation-as-Higgs idea sketched in sections 3.6 and 4.3 is the most testable part of the phenomenology: in the D4 example the tachyons carry precisely the quantum numbers of electroweak doublets, so a follow-up computation of the tachyon potential would decide whether the electroweak scale can come out of brane recombination rather than a fundamental scalar.
The claim that untwisted Ramond-Ramond fields mediate the Green-Schwarz mechanism for D6-branes on $T^6$ is a sharp structural difference from orientifold models; a useful cross-check would be to see whether the same eight-field counting bounds the number of massive $U(1)$s in any compact model of this type.
The metastable tachyon-free configurations described in section 3.5 would be non-BPS states whose decay is classically forbidden by a volume barrier; estimating the tunnelling rate would tell us whether such vacua could survive cosmologically, which the paper asserts but does not compute.

Original abstract

Intersecting Dp-branes often give rise to chiral fermions living on their intersections. We study the construction of four-dimensional chiral gauge theories by considering configurations of type II D(3+n)-branes wrapped on non-trivial n-cycles on T^{2n} x(R^{2(3-n)}/Z_N), for n=1,2,3. The gauge theories on the four non-compact dimensions of the brane world-volume are generically chiral and non-supersymmetric. We analyze consistency conditions (RR tadpole cancellation) for these models, and their relation to four-dimensional anomaly cancellation. Cancellation of U(1) gauge anomalies involves a Green-Schwarz mechanism mediated by RR partners of untwisted and/or twisted moduli. This class of models is of potential phenomenological interest, and we construct explicit examples of SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) three-generation models. The models are non-supersymmetric, but the string scale may be lowered close to the weak scale so that the standard hierarchy problem is avoided. We also comment on the presence of scalar tachyons and possible ways to avoid the associated instabilities. We discuss the existence of (meta)stable configurations of D-branes on 3-cycles in (T^2)^3, free of tachyons for certain ranges of the six-torus moduli.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,992 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.90 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.41 · compares with prior results 0.09 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

Intersecting Dp-branes often give rise to chiral fermions living on their intersections. We study the construction of four-dimensional chiral gauge theories by considering configurations of type II D(3+n)-branes wrapped on non-trivial n-cycles on T^{2n} x(R^{2(3-n)}/Z_N), for n=1,2,3. The gauge theories on the four non-compact dimensions of the brane world-volume are generically chiral and non-supersymmetric. We analyze consistency conditions (RR tadpole cancellation) for these models, and their relation to four-dimensional anomaly cancellation. Cancellation of U(1) gauge anomalies involves a Green-Schwarz mechanism mediated by RR partners of untwisted and/or twisted moduli. This class of models is of potential phenomenological interest, and we construct explicit examples of SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) three-generation models. The models are non-supersymmetric, but the string scale may be lowered close to the weak scale so that the standard hierarchy problem is avoided. We also comment on the presence of scalar tachyons and possible ways to avoid the associated instabilities. We discuss the existence of (meta)stable configurations of D-branes on 3-cycles in (T^2)^3, free of tachyons for certain ranges of the six-torus moduli.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	Intersecting Dp-branes often give rise to chiral fermions living on their intersections.	background 1.00	0.06	0.04	hedged possibility 0.53
s1	We study the construction of four-dimensional chiral gauge theories by considering configurations of type II D(3+n)-branes wrapped on non-trivial n-cycles on T^{2n} x(R^{2(3-n)}/Z_N), for n=1,2,3.	contribution 0.83	0.91	0.09	asserted 0.97
s2	The gauge theories on the four non-compact dimensions of the brane world-volume are generically chiral and non-supersymmetric.	result 0.96	0.62	0.16	asserted 0.86
s3	We analyze consistency conditions (RR tadpole cancellation) for these models, and their relation to four-dimensional anomaly cancellation.	contribution 0.94	0.91	0.07	asserted 0.90
s4	Cancellation of U(1) gauge anomalies involves a Green-Schwarz mechanism mediated by RR partners of untwisted and/or twisted moduli.	result 0.93	0.70	0.11	asserted 1.00
s5	This class of models is of potential phenomenological interest, and we construct explicit examples of SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) three-generation models.	contribution 0.57	0.95	0.26	asserted 0.57
s6	The models are non-supersymmetric, but the string scale may be lowered close to the weak scale so that the standard hierarchy problem is avoided.	interpretation 0.87	0.60	0.12	hedged possibility 0.99
s7	We also comment on the presence of scalar tachyons and possible ways to avoid the associated instabilities.	contribution 0.62	0.68	0.04	hedged possibility 0.47
s8	We discuss the existence of (meta)stable configurations of D-branes on 3-cycles in (T^2)^3, free of tachyons for certain ranges of the six-torus moduli.	result 0.65	0.84	0.11	asserted 0.76

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v3

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (38)

[13]

R. Blumenhagen, L. G¨ orlich, B. Kors, D. L¨ ust, JHEP 0010 (20 00) 006, hep- th/0007024

View on Pith
[1]

J. D. Lykken, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 3693, hep-th/9603133

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[2]

N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B429 (1 998) 263, hep- ph/9803315; I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali Phys. Lett . B436 (1999) 257, hep-ph/9804398

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[3]

K. Dienes, E. Dudas and T. Gherghetta, Phys. Lett. B436 (199 8) 55, hep- ph/9803466; R. Sundrum, Phys.Rev. D59 (1999) 085009, hep-ph/9805471; Ph ys. Rev. D59 (1999) 085010, hep-ph/9807348; G. Shiu, S.H. Tye, Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 106007, hep-th/980515 7; Z. Kakushadze, Phys. Lett. B434 (1998) 269, hep-th/9804110 ; Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 101901, hep-th/9806...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[4]

G. Aldazabal, L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, F. Quevedo, JHEP 0001 (2000) 031, hep-th/9909172; JHEP02 (2000) 015, hep-ph/0001083. M. Cvetic, M. Plumacher, J. Wang, JHEP 0004 (2000) 004, hep-th/ 9911021; M. Cvetic, A. M. Uranga, J. Wang, hep-th/0010091. 31

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[5]

G. Aldazabal, L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, F. Quevedo, A. M. Uranga, JHEP 0 008:002,2000. [hep-th/0005067]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[6]

M. Berkooz, M. R. Douglas, R. G. Leigh, Nucl.Phys. B480(1996)2 65, hep- th/9606139

View on Pith 1996
[7]

A. Sagnotti, in Cargese 87, Strings on Orbifolds , ed. G. Mack et al. (Pergamon Press, 1988) p. 521; P. Horava, Nucl. Phys. B327 (1989) 461; J. Dai, R. Leigh and J. Polchinski, Mod.Phys.Lett. A4 (1989) 2073; G. Pradisi and A. Sag notti, Phys. Lett. B216 (1989) 59 ; M. Bianchi and A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. B2 47 (1990) 517 ; Nucl. Phys. B361 (1991) 519

View on Pith 1989
[8]

E. Gimon and J. Polchinski, Phys.Rev. D54 (1996) 1667, hep-th/9 601038; E. Gi- mon and C. Johnson, Nucl. Phys. B477 (1996) 715, hep-th/96041 29; A. Dabholkar and J. Park, Nucl. Phys. B477 (1996) 701, hep-th/9604178

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[9]

M. Berkooz and R. G. Leigh, Nucl. Phys. B483 (1997) 187, hep-t h/9605049; C. An- gelantonj, M. Bianchi, G. Pradisi, A. Sagnotti and Ya.S. Stanev, Ph ys. Lett. B385 (1996) 96, hep-th/9606169; G. Aldazabal, A. Font, L.E. Ib´ a˜ ne z and G. Violero, Nucl. Phys. B536 (1998) 29, hep-th/9804026, and references t herein

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[10]

P. Candelas, G. T. Horowitz, A. Strominger, E. Witten, Nucl. Ph ys. B258 (1985) 46

View on Pith 1985
[11]

For a recent approach to Calabi-Yau heterotic (M-theory) co mpactiﬁcation, see B. A. Ovrut, hep-th/9905115 and references therein

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[12]

M. R. Douglas, B. R. Greene, D. R. Morrison, Nucl. Phys. B506 ( 1997) 84, hep-th/9704151; S. Kachru, E. Silverstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4855, hep- th/9802183; A. Lawrence, N. Nekrasov, C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B5 33 (1998) 199, hep- th/9803015; A. Hanany, A. M. Uranga, JHEP 9805 (1998) 013, he p-th/9805139

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[14]

R. Blumenhagen, L. G¨ orlich, B. K¨ ors, Nucl. Phys. B569 (2000 ) 209, hep- th/9908130; JHEP 0001(2000) 040, hep-th/9912204

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[15]

G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, R. Rabad´ an, A. M. Uranga, ‘Intersecting brane worlds’, hep-ph/0011132. 32

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[16]

A. Sen, ‘Non-BPS states and Branes in string theory’, hep-th/ 9904207

View on Pith
[17]

H. Arfaei, M.M. Sheikh Jabbari, Phys. Lett. B394 (1997) 288-2 96, hep-th/9608167

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[18]

S. Kachru, J. McGreevy, Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 026001, hep -th/9908135; S. Kachru, S. Katz, A. Lawrence, J. McGreevy, Phys. Rev. D62 ( 2000) 026001, hep-th/9912151; hep-th/0006047; S. Kachru, ‘Lectures on wa rped compactiﬁca- tions and stringy brane constructions’, hep-th/0009247

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[19]

C. Angelantonj, I. Antoniadis, E. Dudas, A. Sagnotti, hep-th /0007090

View on Pith
[20]

M. Li, Nucl. Phys. B460 (1996) 351, hep-th/9510161, M. R. Do uglas, hep- th/9512077

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996
[21]

M. R. Douglas, hep-th/9910170

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[22]

M. B. Green, J. A. Harvey, G. Moore, Class.Quant.Grav. 14(19 97)47, hep- th/9605033

View on Pith
[23]

J. F. Morales, C. A. Scrucca, M. Serone, ‘Anomalous couplings f or D-branes and O-planes’, Nucl. Phys. B552 (1999) 291, hep-th/9812088; B. Ste fanski, jr, ‘Gravi- tational Couplings of D-branes and O-planes’, Nucl. Phys. B548 (19 99) 275

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[24]

A. Hanany, A. Zaﬀaroni, Nucl.Phys. B509(1998)145, hep-th/ 9706047

View on Pith 1998
[25]

A. M. Uranga, hep-th/0011048

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[26]

G. Aldazabal, D. Badagnani, L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, A. M. Uranga, JHEP 9906 (1999) 031, hep-th/9904071

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[27]

M. Bianchi, J. F. Morales, JHEP 0003 (2000) 030, hep-th/0002 149

View on Pith 2000
[28]

J. M. Izquierdo, P. K. Townsend, Nucl. Phys. B414 (1994) 93, hep-th/9307050

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994
[29]

L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, R. Rabad´ an, A. M. Uranga, Nucl. Phys. B542 (1999) 112, hep- th/9808139

View on Pith 1999
[30]

A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. B294 (1992) 196, hep-th/9210127

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1992
[31]

I. Antoniadis, C. Bachas, E. Dudas, Nucl. Phys. B560 (1999) 9 3, hep-th/9906039

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[32]

C. A. Scrucca, M. Serone, JHEP 9912 (1999) 024, hep-th/99 12108. 33

View on Pith 1999
[33]

M. Dine, N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B289 (1987) 589; J. Atick, L. Dixon and A. Sen, Nucl. Phys. B292 (1987) 109; M. Dine, I. Ichinose and N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B293 (1987) 253

View on Pith 1987
[34]

A. Sen, JHEP 9912 (1999) 027, hep-th/9911116. A.Sen, B. Zwiebach, JHEP 0003 (2000) 002, hep-th/9912249; N. B erkovits, A. Sen, B. Zwiebach, Nucl. Phys. B587 (2000) 147, hep-th/0002211, J. A. Harvey, P. Kraus, F. Larsen, E. J. Martinec JHEP 0007 (200 0) 042 B. Zwiebach. JHEP 0009 (2000) 028, hep-th/0008227; J. A. Minahan, B. Zwiebach, JHEP 0009 (2000) 029,...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[35]

C.Bachas, hep-th/9503030

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[36]

M. R. Douglas, G. Moore, hep-th/9603167

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[37]

M. R. Douglas, JHEP 9707 (1997) 004, hep-th/9612126

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997
[38]

R. G. Leigh, M. Rozali, ‘Brane boxes, anomalies, bending and tadp oles’, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 026004, hep-th/9807082. 34

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

Forward citations

Cited by 20 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Quantum corrections to DGKT and the Weak Gravity Conjecture
hep-th 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Quantum corrections from gaugino condensation and D2 instantons lift the DGKT D4-brane moduli space, making the branes self-attractive and putting the vacuum in tension with the membrane WGC.
Neutrino Majorana Masses from String Theory Instanton Effects
hep-th 2006-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Right-handed neutrino Majorana masses arise non-perturbatively from D-brane instantons in string compactifications where the anomaly-free U(1)_{B-L} gauge boson acquires a Stückelberg mass.
Spacetime Instanton Corrections in 4D String Vacua - The Seesaw Mechanism for D-Brane Models
hep-th 2006-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Wrapped Euclidean D-branes in intersecting D6-brane models generate charged matter superpotential couplings, including right-handed neutrino Majorana masses that realize the seesaw mechanism.
Yukawa couplings in intersecting D-brane models
hep-th 2003-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Yukawa couplings in intersecting D6-brane models arise from worldsheet disc instantons and evaluate to products of complex Jacobi theta functions with characteristics, depending on Kahler and open string moduli but no...
Chiral Four-Dimensional N=1 Supersymmetric Type IIA Orientifolds from Intersecting D6-Branes
hep-th 2001-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

A configuration of D6-branes at angles in a T^6/(Z2 x Z2) type IIA orientifold yields N=1 supersymmetry with SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1) gauge group and three chiral quark-lepton families.

Show 15 more citing papers

The first-order phase transitions and gravitational waves from an effective theory inspired by four-stack intersecting D6-brane models
hep-ph 2026-11 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

A four-stack intersecting D6-brane Pati-Salam model can host a strongly supercooled first-order phase transition at the TeV scale, generating a stochastic gravitational-wave background peaked at 0.611 Hz with amplitud...
Testing F-theory GUTs with the Axiverse
hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

In F-theory GUTs, non-universal ALPs induced by hypercharge flux satisfy g_aγ/m_a well below the QCD axion prediction when gauge couplings unify near the string scale.
Classical Black Hole Probes of UV Scales
hep-th 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Minimal classical BPS black holes in string compactifications track the species or KK scale in infinite-distance limits, and violations may signal inconsistent EFTs.
The Standard Model Quiver in de Sitter String Compactifications
hep-th 2021-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

An explicit type IIB Calabi-Yau compactification is constructed in which D3-branes at a dP5 singularity give a three-family left-right symmetric model, with closed-string moduli stabilised in a de Sitter minimum.
Discrete Symmetries, Weak Coupling Conjecture and Scale Separation in AdS Vacua
hep-th 2020-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A new swampland conjecture ties the order of a discrete gauge symmetry to the weakness of continuous gauge couplings, and a refined AdS distance conjecture accounts for parametric scale separation in type IIA flux vacua.
RR photons
hep-th 2011-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Ramond-Ramond U(1) gauge bosons in type II compactifications mix with D-brane U(1)'s through torsion cycles, producing massless gauge bosons that are linear combinations of open and closed string states.
Instanton Induced Neutrino Majorana Masses in CFT Orientifolds with MSSM-like spectra
hep-th 2007-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Among 391 MSSM-like Gepner orientifolds with massive B-L, 32 admit Sp(2) instantons with the correct charged zero-mode content for neutrino Majorana masses, though all carry extra uncharged zero modes.
Intersecting D-Branes on Shift Z2 x Z2 Orientifolds
hep-th 2006-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A systematic classification of shift Z2×Z2 orientifolds is given, and rigid fractional D-branes with a two-generation Pati-Salam spectrum are explicitly constructed.
Computing Yukawa Couplings from Magnetized Extra Dimensions
hep-th 2004-04 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Yukawa couplings in magnetized toroidal compactifications are computed exactly as overlap integrals of theta-function wavefunctions, giving a closed-form answer controlled by complex structure and Wilson lines.
Discrete gauge symmetries in D-brane models
hep-th 2011-06 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

Discrete gauge symmetries including R-parity and baryon triality emerge generically in D-brane models as Z_N remnants of U(1) gauge symmetries with Stückelberg B∧F couplings.
Three generation magnetized orbifold models
hep-th 2008-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

Magnetized orbifold compactifications of ten-dimensional super Yang-Mills yield 20 distinct three-generation flavor patterns whose Yukawa matrices are computed explicitly from theta functions.
Magnetized orbifold models
hep-th 2008-06 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

Orbifolding a magnetized torus projects the torus zero modes into even and odd combinations, and the odd combinations can be zero modes, which changes the family number and the allowed Yukawa couplings relative to the...
Toward Realistic Intersecting D-Brane Models
hep-th 2005-01 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

A structured survey of intersecting D-brane model building: how gauge groups, chiral families, Yukawa couplings and soft terms arise from D-branes wrapping intersecting cycles, and why no fully realistic model exists yet.
Open Strings
hep-th 2002-04 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

A review showing how the torus, Klein bottle, annulus and Möbius amplitudes plus tadpole cancellation determine open-string spectra and gauge groups, bridging world-sheet orientifolds to D-brane and O-plane geometry.
Four-dimensional String Compactifications with D-Branes, Orientifolds and Fluxes
hep-th 2006-10 unverdicted

A comprehensive pedagogical review of four-dimensional orientifold and flux compactifications with D-branes, assembling model-building rules, effective-action methods, and statistical vacuum counts.

How the literature uses it

72 arXiv papers cite this in 96 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 48 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper

In this appendix we describe the mass spectrum of open string states between two intersecting D6-branes, following [ref] .

Yukawa Couplings at Infinite Distance and Swampland Towers in Chiral Theories · Gonion spectrum for D6-branes at angles · 0.80

Compares with it 1 paper

These four tadpole conditions are the same as in the T-dual model of [ref] with D6-branes at angles [ref] .

Flux vacua in type IIB compactifications on orbifolds: their finiteness and minimal string coupling · Magnetised D7-branes · 0.98

Cites it as background 41 papers

In this context, the Standard Model particles correspond to the lightest fluctuations of open strings stretched between the stacks of D-branes [ref] [And the review [ref] .].

Light stringy states and the $g-2$ of the muon · Intersecting D-branes and light stringy states · 0.97
Furthermore, it is known how to deal with anomalies via the generalized Green–Schwarz mechanism [ref] and by imposing K-theory constraints [ref] .

The Generalized Green-Schwarz Mechanism for Type IIB Orientifolds with D3- and D7-Branes · Introduction · 0.95
This interplay between D6-brane tadpole cancellation and constraints on the chiral spectrum has been discussed extensively in the type IIa literature; see [ref] for critical early works.

Anomaly Nucleation Constrains SU(2) Gauge Theories · Introduction · 0.98

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [13]

R. Blumenhagen, L. G¨ orlich, B. Kors, D. L¨ ust, JHEP 0010 (20 00) 006, hep- th/0007024

View on Pith

[2] [1]

J. D. Lykken, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 3693, hep-th/9603133

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[3] [2]

N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B429 (1 998) 263, hep- ph/9803315; I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali Phys. Lett . B436 (1999) 257, hep-ph/9804398

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[4] [3]

K. Dienes, E. Dudas and T. Gherghetta, Phys. Lett. B436 (199 8) 55, hep- ph/9803466; R. Sundrum, Phys.Rev. D59 (1999) 085009, hep-ph/9805471; Ph ys. Rev. D59 (1999) 085010, hep-ph/9807348; G. Shiu, S.H. Tye, Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 106007, hep-th/980515 7; Z. Kakushadze, Phys. Lett. B434 (1998) 269, hep-th/9804110 ; Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 101901, hep-th/9806...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[5] [4]

G. Aldazabal, L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, F. Quevedo, JHEP 0001 (2000) 031, hep-th/9909172; JHEP02 (2000) 015, hep-ph/0001083. M. Cvetic, M. Plumacher, J. Wang, JHEP 0004 (2000) 004, hep-th/ 9911021; M. Cvetic, A. M. Uranga, J. Wang, hep-th/0010091. 31

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[6] [5]

G. Aldazabal, L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, F. Quevedo, A. M. Uranga, JHEP 0 008:002,2000. [hep-th/0005067]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[7] [6]

M. Berkooz, M. R. Douglas, R. G. Leigh, Nucl.Phys. B480(1996)2 65, hep- th/9606139

View on Pith 1996

[8] [7]

A. Sagnotti, in Cargese 87, Strings on Orbifolds , ed. G. Mack et al. (Pergamon Press, 1988) p. 521; P. Horava, Nucl. Phys. B327 (1989) 461; J. Dai, R. Leigh and J. Polchinski, Mod.Phys.Lett. A4 (1989) 2073; G. Pradisi and A. Sag notti, Phys. Lett. B216 (1989) 59 ; M. Bianchi and A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. B2 47 (1990) 517 ; Nucl. Phys. B361 (1991) 519

View on Pith 1989

[9] [8]

E. Gimon and J. Polchinski, Phys.Rev. D54 (1996) 1667, hep-th/9 601038; E. Gi- mon and C. Johnson, Nucl. Phys. B477 (1996) 715, hep-th/96041 29; A. Dabholkar and J. Park, Nucl. Phys. B477 (1996) 701, hep-th/9604178

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[10] [9]

M. Berkooz and R. G. Leigh, Nucl. Phys. B483 (1997) 187, hep-t h/9605049; C. An- gelantonj, M. Bianchi, G. Pradisi, A. Sagnotti and Ya.S. Stanev, Ph ys. Lett. B385 (1996) 96, hep-th/9606169; G. Aldazabal, A. Font, L.E. Ib´ a˜ ne z and G. Violero, Nucl. Phys. B536 (1998) 29, hep-th/9804026, and references t herein

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[11] [10]

P. Candelas, G. T. Horowitz, A. Strominger, E. Witten, Nucl. Ph ys. B258 (1985) 46

View on Pith 1985

[12] [11]

For a recent approach to Calabi-Yau heterotic (M-theory) co mpactiﬁcation, see B. A. Ovrut, hep-th/9905115 and references therein

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[13] [12]

M. R. Douglas, B. R. Greene, D. R. Morrison, Nucl. Phys. B506 ( 1997) 84, hep-th/9704151; S. Kachru, E. Silverstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4855, hep- th/9802183; A. Lawrence, N. Nekrasov, C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B5 33 (1998) 199, hep- th/9803015; A. Hanany, A. M. Uranga, JHEP 9805 (1998) 013, he p-th/9805139

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[14] [14]

R. Blumenhagen, L. G¨ orlich, B. K¨ ors, Nucl. Phys. B569 (2000 ) 209, hep- th/9908130; JHEP 0001(2000) 040, hep-th/9912204

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[15] [15]

G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, R. Rabad´ an, A. M. Uranga, ‘Intersecting brane worlds’, hep-ph/0011132. 32

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[16] [16]

A. Sen, ‘Non-BPS states and Branes in string theory’, hep-th/ 9904207

View on Pith

[17] [17]

H. Arfaei, M.M. Sheikh Jabbari, Phys. Lett. B394 (1997) 288-2 96, hep-th/9608167

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[18] [18]

S. Kachru, J. McGreevy, Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 026001, hep -th/9908135; S. Kachru, S. Katz, A. Lawrence, J. McGreevy, Phys. Rev. D62 ( 2000) 026001, hep-th/9912151; hep-th/0006047; S. Kachru, ‘Lectures on wa rped compactiﬁca- tions and stringy brane constructions’, hep-th/0009247

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[19] [19]

C. Angelantonj, I. Antoniadis, E. Dudas, A. Sagnotti, hep-th /0007090

View on Pith

[20] [20]

M. Li, Nucl. Phys. B460 (1996) 351, hep-th/9510161, M. R. Do uglas, hep- th/9512077

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1996

[21] [21]

M. R. Douglas, hep-th/9910170

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[22] [22]

M. B. Green, J. A. Harvey, G. Moore, Class.Quant.Grav. 14(19 97)47, hep- th/9605033

View on Pith

[23] [23]

J. F. Morales, C. A. Scrucca, M. Serone, ‘Anomalous couplings f or D-branes and O-planes’, Nucl. Phys. B552 (1999) 291, hep-th/9812088; B. Ste fanski, jr, ‘Gravi- tational Couplings of D-branes and O-planes’, Nucl. Phys. B548 (19 99) 275

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[24] [24]

A. Hanany, A. Zaﬀaroni, Nucl.Phys. B509(1998)145, hep-th/ 9706047

View on Pith 1998

[25] [25]

A. M. Uranga, hep-th/0011048

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[26] [26]

G. Aldazabal, D. Badagnani, L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, A. M. Uranga, JHEP 9906 (1999) 031, hep-th/9904071

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[27] [27]

M. Bianchi, J. F. Morales, JHEP 0003 (2000) 030, hep-th/0002 149

View on Pith 2000

[28] [28]

J. M. Izquierdo, P. K. Townsend, Nucl. Phys. B414 (1994) 93, hep-th/9307050

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994

[29] [29]

L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, R. Rabad´ an, A. M. Uranga, Nucl. Phys. B542 (1999) 112, hep- th/9808139

View on Pith 1999

[30] [30]

A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. B294 (1992) 196, hep-th/9210127

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1992

[31] [31]

I. Antoniadis, C. Bachas, E. Dudas, Nucl. Phys. B560 (1999) 9 3, hep-th/9906039

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[32] [32]

C. A. Scrucca, M. Serone, JHEP 9912 (1999) 024, hep-th/99 12108. 33

View on Pith 1999

[33] [33]

M. Dine, N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B289 (1987) 589; J. Atick, L. Dixon and A. Sen, Nucl. Phys. B292 (1987) 109; M. Dine, I. Ichinose and N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B293 (1987) 253

View on Pith 1987

[34] [34]

A. Sen, JHEP 9912 (1999) 027, hep-th/9911116. A.Sen, B. Zwiebach, JHEP 0003 (2000) 002, hep-th/9912249; N. B erkovits, A. Sen, B. Zwiebach, Nucl. Phys. B587 (2000) 147, hep-th/0002211, J. A. Harvey, P. Kraus, F. Larsen, E. J. Martinec JHEP 0007 (200 0) 042 B. Zwiebach. JHEP 0009 (2000) 028, hep-th/0008227; J. A. Minahan, B. Zwiebach, JHEP 0009 (2000) 029,...

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[35] [35]

C.Bachas, hep-th/9503030

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[36] [36]

M. R. Douglas, G. Moore, hep-th/9603167

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[37] [37]

M. R. Douglas, JHEP 9707 (1997) 004, hep-th/9612126

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1997

[38] [38]

R. G. Leigh, M. Rozali, ‘Brane boxes, anomalies, bending and tadp oles’, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 026004, hep-th/9807082. 34

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999