Kaluza-Klein Holography

Kostas Skenderis; Marika Taylor

REVIEW

Kaluza-Klein Holography

Kostas Skenderis, Marika Taylor

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 2 Mar 2006 · 37 references

Pith's verdict: A genuinely new holographic map for KK operator vevs, with a flagship O4 test that is a consistency check rather than a parameter-free prediction because the extremal boundary coefficient is fitted to free-field theory, as the paper openly states.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on August 28, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 3 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv IDhep-th/0603016 (version 2)

Pith IDB5Y4MP4J, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationKostas Skenderis, Marika Taylor. "Kaluza-Klein Holography." arXiv:hep-th/0603016 (2006). https://pith.science/paper/B5Y4MP4J

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

This is a real piece of work, and the core of it holds up. The gauge-invariant non-linear KK reduction at quadratic order, combined with holographic renormalization for massive KK modes, is genuinely new. Prior work either stayed at linearized level or only handled gauged supergravity fields. The paper works out the map explicitly, shows that generic 10d solutions are not in the de Donder gauge, and constructs the gauge-invariant combinations needed to lift results from that gauge. The table of coefficients and the 5d action are concrete and checkable. The Coulomb branch demonstration is also well done: the vanishing of the spurious fields T0, T2, T4, Φ2(t), S4 comes out of non-trivial cancellations, and the O2 vev matches cleanly.

The soft spot is exactly what the stress-test note identifies. The 1-point functions for extremal operators, (5.12)-(5.13), contain boundary terms whose coefficients a422 and a6222 are fixed by matching free-field extremal correlators, not derived from the 10d action. The paper says this in Section 5.3: 'We leave a detailed derivation for future work.' In the Coulomb branch solution S4 = 0, so the entire O4 vev in (6.31) comes from the a422 term. If that coefficient or the boundary structure is wrong, the match fails. The O6 analysis is similar: the cubic term only gives one fifth of the field-theory vev, with the rest deferred to a future quartic computation. So the central claim that the map 'allows one to reliably compute vevs of operators dual to any KK fields' is not yet fully supported for extremal operators. This is a genuine limitation, but it is not a hidden flaw: the paper flags it clearly, and the structure is a well-motivated conjecture based on the D'Hoker-Freedman-Mathur-Matusis-Rastelli boundary-term mechanism and supersymmetry. The O4 test is therefore best described as a consistency check between protected quantities in the same theory, not an independent parameter-free prediction.

I do not think the central argument collapses. For non-extremal cases, where the bulk cubic couplings are nonzero, the method is on solid ground and the paper's derivation of the KK map and holographic renormalization is careful. The extremal case needs a derivation from the 10d action, and the authors know this.

Who gets value from this paper: anyone working on AdS/CFT away from the conformal point, on KK reduction of IIB supergravity, or on holographic renormalization. It deserves a serious referee. The referee should insist on the extremal boundary term derivation being supplied eventually, but the paper is not a desk-reject. I would cite it for the gauge-invariant KK map and the non-linear reduction method.

Referee report

Significance

If fully established, the proposed map would be a significant technical advance: it would provide a systematic, gauge-invariant way to extract QFT vevs from arbitrary asymptotically AdS5 × S5 solutions, including vevs of operators dual to massive KK fields, and would constitute the first quantitative test of AdS/CFT away from the conformal point for a KK-mode operator. The paper contains substantial genuine technical contributions: the explicit construction of gauge-invariant variables to quadratic order, the validation of the KK map against the known results of [26,27,28], the demonstration that spurious non-zero field values in the Coulomb-branch expansion cancel after applying the map, and the correct vanishing of the dual stress tensor. The main limitation is that the extremal boundary contributions to the one-point functions are not derived from the ten-dimensional action; their coefficients are fixed by matching protected free-field correlators. Consequently, the flagship O4 test is a consistency check with an independently known protected quantity rather than a parameter-free prediction from the ten-dimensional bulk action.

Major objections (3)

[§5.3, Eqs. (5.12)–(5.13)] The one-point functions for the KK operators O4 and O6 are asserted to contain additional boundary terms of the form a422(π2(2))^2 and a6222(π2(2))^3, with the paper explicitly stating 'We leave a detailed derivation for future work.' The coefficients a422 and a6222 are fixed in §5.4 by matching the free-field extremal three- and four-point functions. This is a load-bearing input for the paper's central claim: in the Coulomb-branch computation of §6.2 the normalizable mode of S4 vanishes (S4 = 0), so the entire O4 vev in Eq. (6.31) comes from the a422 term. Thus the much-emphasized agreement with the field-theory value for ⟨O4⟩ is not an independent prediction from the 10d action; it is a consistency check with a protected correlator whose structure was put in by hand. If a full derivation from holographic renormalization of the 10d action produced a different boundary structure or a different coefficient, the O4 match would fail. The authors should either provide the derivation of these boundary terms or explicitly qualify the abstract's claim that the map allows one to 'reliably compute vevs of operators dual to any KK fields.'
[§6.3, Eqs. (6.32)–(6.33)] For the dimension-6 operator, the term involving the fitted coefficient a6222 contributes only one fifth of the expected field-theory vev, and the remaining four fifths is left to a future quartic-order computation. This is an acknowledged limitation, but it means that the general statement that the map allows reliable computation of vevs for any KK field is not yet demonstrated even for the next operator in the same protected sector. The central claim should be scoped to 'up to dimension 4', or the quartic-order contribution should be computed, before the general 'any KK field' claim can be regarded as established.
[§5.4.1 and §5.3] The justification of the one-point function structure relies on the conjectured factorization of near-extremal correlators from [33], and on the assumption that the bulk extremal couplings vanish to all orders, a property so far checked only to low order. This is an assumption about the theory, not a consequence of the KK map or of holographic renormalization as presented. The manuscript should state this dependence explicitly in the summary of the method, since a future counterexample to the conjectured structure would affect the general validity of the proposed one-point functions for extremal KK operators.

Minor objections (3)

[§7] The text contains the typo 'consistent truncuation' in the paragraph contrasting the authors' procedure with consistent truncation; it should read 'consistent truncation'.
[§5.4, Eq. (5.22)] The notation for the normalization factors Nk is somewhat compressed; in particular the ratio N4/N2^2 in Eq. (5.22) is used without explicitly displaying the N-dependence of the normalization factors from Eq. (5.21). Adding one line with the explicit N dependence would make the large-N counting in Eq. (5.27) easier to verify.
[§6.2, Eq. (6.20)] The result S4 = 0 is central to the later O4 computation but is presented as the outcome of 'non-trivial cancellations' without an explicit intermediate expression. A brief indication of the cancellations, or a reference to the appendix where the relevant terms are collected, would improve transparency.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

A new holographic map reads quantum field theory expectation values directly from the asymptotic shape of ten-dimensional supergravity solutions, and it passes its first precision test on the Coulomb branch.

The reading

The paper constructs a procedure that turns any solution of ten-dimensional supergravity asymptotic to $\mathrm{AdS}_5 \times S^5$ into a complete list of vacuum expectation values of the gauge-invariant operators of the dual four-dimensional quantum field theory. The procedure combines gauge-invariant Kaluza-Klein variables, a non-linear map from ten-dimensional fields to five-dimensional fields, and holographic renormalization, with special care for extremal couplings that produce boundary contributions absent from the bulk action. The authors apply the map to the Coulomb branch solution dual to a uniform distribution of D3-branes, and reproduce the field-theory values of the dimension-2 and dimension-4 operator vevs exactly. This is the first quantitative test of the gravity/gauge duality away from the conformal fixed point involving an operator dual to a massive KK mode rather than a gauged supergravity field.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are: (i) gauge-invariant combinations of the ten-dimensional metric and five-form fluctuations (constructed to quadratic order in fields), which let one lift results from the de Donder gauge to any gauge; (ii) the non-linear KK map, the field redefinition that removes higher-derivative interaction terms from the five-dimensional equations and produces the five-dimensional action; and (iii) holographically renormalized one-point functions, which relate vevs to particular coefficients in the radial momentum expansion, supplemented by boundary terms for extremal couplings. The identity that carries the argument is the corrected one-point function $\langle O_4\rangle = \pi^{(4)}_4 + a_{422}(\pi^{(2)}_2)^2$, where the second term encodes the extremal boundary contribution and is fixed by matching the free-field three-point function.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the holographic dictionary can be extended beyond the fields of five-dimensional gauged supergravity to the full tower of Kaluza-Klein modes, and that the extra nonlinear terms in the map are essential: quadratic (and higher) contributions involving lower-dimension fields enter at exactly the same radial order as the linear normalizable mode of the higher-dimension field. Concretely, the one-point function of the dimension-4 operator is not just the momentum coefficient $\pi^{(4)}_4$ but $\langle O_4\rangle = \pi^{(4)}_4 + a_{422}(\pi^{(2)}_2)^2$, with $a_{422}$ fixed by the free-field extremal three-point function; the boundary term, not the bulk coupling, reproduces the field-theory vev. Applied to the Coulomb branch solution, the dimension-2 and dimension-4 vevs match the weakly coupled field theory values exactly, as required by non-renormalization theorems.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes that the one-point functions of extremal KK operators take the form (5.12)-(5.13), with the coefficients $a_{422}$ and $a_{6222}$ fixed by matching to free field theory rather than derived from the ten-dimensional variational principle; the paper states that a detailed derivation is left for future work.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The asymptotics of any asymptotically $\mathrm{AdS}_5 \times S^5$ solution determine all operator vevs, not just those of gauged supergravity fields; non-linear terms of the KK map must be kept because they contribute at the same radial order as linear terms.
The dimension-4 vev of the Coulomb branch solution receives its entire contribution from the boundary term $a_{422}(\pi^{(2)}_2)^2$, since the normalizable mode of $S_4$ vanishes; the exact field-theory value emerges from the boundary term alone.
The dimension-6 vev prediction is partially tested: the non-linear term accounts for exactly one fifth of the field theory result, requiring a non-zero normalizable mode of $S_6$ that remains to be extracted from higher-order (quartic) couplings.
The method is algorithmic and generalizes to any compactification $\mathrm{AdS}_m \times X$, so the same procedure can be applied to other supergravity solutions to identify or verify their QFT duals.
Since the map is invertible (field-theory vevs are the radial canonical momenta), QFT data uniquely determine the asymptotic bulk solution; this may allow 'holographic engineering' of dual geometries from field theory data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The structure of the corrected one-point functions suggests that extremal and near-extremal correlators of all chiral primary operators factorize into products of two-point functions, giving a uniform explanation of the non-renormalization of these correlators from the boundary-term mechanism.
The same boundary-term mechanism should apply to the full tower of KK modes, implying that the naive 'normalizable mode equals vev' rule fails precisely in extremal channels; tests on non-supersymmetric vev flows could distinguish bulk and boundary contributions.
One could test the map on a different Coulomb branch distribution (e.g., a non-uniform density), where the dimension-4 vev would be a different combination; the formula $\langle O_4\rangle = \pi^{(4)}_4 + a_{422}(\pi^{(2)}_2)^2$ predicts it purely from the dimension-2 vev, a check not yet in the paper.
Completing the derivation of the boundary-term coefficients from a full ten-dimensional variational principle may reveal a general principle: boundary terms in the reduced action are fixed by requiring that extremal correlators factorize, which could be proven directly from the holographic Ward identities.

Original abstract

We construct a holographic map between asymptotically AdS_5 x S^5 solutions of 10d supergravity and vacuum expectation values of gauge invariant operators of the dual QFT. The ingredients that enter in the construction are (i) gauge invariant variables so that the KK reduction is independent of any choice of gauge fixing; (ii) the non-linear KK reduction map from 10 to 5 dimensions (constructed perturbatively in the number of fields); (iii) application of holographic renormalization. A non-trivial role in the last step is played by extremal couplings. This map allows one to reliably compute vevs of operators dual to any KK fields. As an application we consider a Coulomb branch solution and compute the first two non-trivial vevs, involving operators of dimension 2 and 4, and reproduce the field theory result, in agreement with non-renormalization theorems. This constitutes the first quantitative test of the gravity/gauge theory duality away from the conformal point involving a vev of an operator dual to a KK field (which is not one of the gauged supergravity fields).

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,120 input tokens, $0.0002 reported.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.91 · states limitation 0.21 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.31 · compares with prior results 0.80 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We construct a holographic map between asymptotically AdS_5 x S^5 solutions of 10d supergravity and vacuum expectation values of gauge invariant operators of the dual QFT. The ingredients that enter in the construction are (i) gauge invariant variables so that the KK reduction is independent of any choice of gauge fixing; (ii) the non-linear KK reduction map from 10 to 5 dimensions (constructed perturbatively in the number of fields); (iii) application of holographic renormalization. A non-trivial role in the last step is played by extremal couplings. This map allows one to reliably compute vevs of operators dual to any KK fields. As an application we consider a Coulomb branch solution and compute the first two non-trivial vevs, involving operators of dimension 2 and 4, and reproduce the field theory result, in agreement with non-renormalization theorems. This constitutes the first quantitative test of the gravity/gauge theory duality away from the conformal point involving a vev of an operator dual to a KK field (which is not one of the gauged supergravity fields).

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We construct a holographic map between asymptotically AdS_5 x S^5 solutions of 10d supergravity and vacuum expectation values of gauge invariant operators of the dual QFT.	contribution 1.00	0.95	0.48	asserted 1.00
s1	The ingredients that enter in the construction are (i) gauge invariant variables so that the KK reduction is independent of any choice of gauge fixing; (ii) the non-linear KK reduction map from 10 to 5 dimensions (constructed perturbatively in the number of fields); (iii) application of holographic renormalization.	method 0.98	0.76	0.05	asserted 0.96
s2	A non-trivial role in the last step is played by extremal couplings.	method 0.90	0.60	0.04	asserted 1.00
s3	This map allows one to reliably compute vevs of operators dual to any KK fields.	contribution 0.40	0.75	0.28	asserted 0.91
s4	As an application we consider a Coulomb branch solution and compute the first two non-trivial vevs, involving operators of dimension 2 and 4, and reproduce the field theory result, in agreement with non-renormalization theorems.	result 0.89	0.95	0.17	asserted 1.00
s5	This constitutes the first quantitative test of the gravity/gauge theory duality away from the conformal point involving a vev of an operator dual to a KK field (which is not one of the gauged supergravity fields).	interpretation 0.94	0.89	0.53	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.79 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (37)

[33]

E. D’Hoker, J. Erdmenger, D. Z. Freedman and M. Perez-Vi ctoria, “Near-extremal correlators and vanishing supergravity couplings in AdS/C FT,” Nucl. Phys. B 589 (2000) 3 [arXiv:hep-th/0003218]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[1]

J. M. Maldacena, “The large N limit of superconformal ﬁel d theories and supergrav- ity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998) [Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999)] [arXiv:hep-th/9711200]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[2]

S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge the ory correlators from non-critical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B 428, 105 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9802109]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[3]

E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. T heor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9802150]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[4]

P. Kraus, F. Larsen and S. P. Trivedi, “The Coulomb branch of gauge theory from rotating branes,” JHEP 9903, 003 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9811120]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[5]

I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten, “AdS/CFT correspondence an d symmetry breaking,” Nucl. Phys. B 556, 89 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9905104]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[6]

K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, “Holographic Coulomb branch vevs”, [arXiv:hep- th/0604169]. 44

View on Pith arXiv
[7]

S. de Haro, S. N. Solodukhin and K. Skenderis, “Holograph ic reconstruction of space- time and renormalization in the AdS/CFT correspondence,” C ommun. Math. Phys. 217, 595 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0002230]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[8]

M. Bianchi, D. Z. Freedman and K. Skenderis, “How to go wit h an RG ﬂow,” JHEP 0108, 041 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0105276]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[9]

M. Bianchi, D. Z. Freedman and K. Skenderis, “Holographi c renormalization,” Nucl. Phys. B 631, 159 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0112119]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[10]

I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, “Correlation funct ions in holographic RG ﬂows,” JHEP 0410, 075 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0407071]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[11]

M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, “The holographic Weyl a nomaly,” JHEP 9807, 023 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9806087]; “Holography and the Weyl a nomaly,” Fortsch. Phys. 48, 125 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9812032]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[12]

V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, “A stress tensor for an ti-de Sitter gravity,” Com- mun. Math. Phys. 208, 413 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9902121]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[13]

P. Kraus, F. Larsen and R. Siebelink, “The gravitationa l action in asymptotically AdS and ﬂat spacetimes,” Nucl. Phys. B 563, 259 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9906127]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[14]

J. de Boer, E. P. Verlinde and H. L. Verlinde, “On the holo graphic renormalization group,” JHEP 0008, 003 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9912012]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[15]

D. Martelli and W. Muck, “Holographic renormalization and Ward identities with the Hamilton-Jacobi method,” Nucl. Phys. B 654, 248 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0205061]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003
[16]

I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, “AdS / CFT correspon dence and geometry,” arXiv:hep-th/0404176

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[17]

K. Skenderis, “Lecture notes on holographic renormali zation,” Class. Quant. Grav. 19, 5849 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0209067]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002
[18]

M. Taylor-Robinson, “Anomalies, counterterms and the N = 0 Polchinski-Strassler solutions,” arXiv:hep-th/0103162

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[19]

M. Taylor-Robinson, “Higher-dimensional formulatio n of counterterms,” arXiv:hep- th/0110142. 45

View on Pith arXiv
[20]

A. Karch, A. O’Bannon and K. Skenderis, “Holographic re normalization of probe D- branes in AdS/CFT,” arXiv:hep-th/0512125

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[21]

H. J. Kim, L. J. Romans and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “The Mas s Spectrum Of Chiral N=2 D = 10 Supergravity On S5,” Phys. Rev. D 32, 389 (1985)

View on Pith 1985
[22]

E. D’Hoker, D. Z. Freedman, S. D. Mathur, A. Matusis and L . Rastelli, “Extremal correlators in the AdS/CFT correspondence,” [arXiv:hep-t h/9908160]

View on Pith arXiv
[23]

N. Seiberg, “Supersymmetry And Nonperturbative Beta F unctions,” Phys. Lett. B 206, 75 (1988)

View on Pith 1988
[24]

N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and conﬁnement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,” Nucl . Phys. B 426, 19 (1994) [Erratum-ibid. B 430, 485 (1994)] [arXiv:hep-th/9407087]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994
[25]

J. Polchinski, “String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring the ory and beyond.”

View on Pith
[26]

S. M. Lee, S. Minwalla, M. Rangamani and N. Seiberg, “Thr ee-point functions of chiral operators in D = 4, N = 4 SYM at large N,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 697 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9806074]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[27]

G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov, “Some cubic couplings in typ e IIB supergravity on AdS(5) x S(5) and three-point functions in SYM(4) at large N,” Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 064009 [arXiv:hep-th/9907085]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[28]

S. M. Lee, “AdS(5)/CFT(4) four-point functions of chir al primary operators: Cubic Nucl. Phys. B 563 (1999) 349 [arXiv:hep-th/9907108]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[29]

G. E. Arutyunov and S. A. Frolov, “Quadratic action for t ype IIB supergravity on AdS(5) x S(5),” JHEP 9908 (1999) 024 [arXiv:hep-th/9811106]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[30]

E. D’Hoker and D. Z. Freedman, “Supersymmetric gauge th eories and the AdS/CFT correspondence,” arXiv:hep-th/0201253

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[31]

I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, “Thermodynamics of asymptotically locally AdS spacetimes,” JHEP 0508, 004 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0505190]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[32]

G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov, “Scalar quartic couplings i n type IIB supergravity on AdS(5) x S(5),” Nucl. Phys. B 579 (2000) 117 [arXiv:hep-th/9912210]. 46

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[34]

D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, K. Pilch and N. P. Warner, “C ontinuous distributions of D3-branes and gauged supergravity,” JHEP 0007, 038 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9906194]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000
[35]

A. Brandhuber and K. Sfetsos, “Wilson loops from multic entre and rotating branes, mass gaps and phase structure in gauge theories,” Adv. Theor . Math. Phys. 3, 851 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9906201]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[36]

M. Cvetic, H. Lu, C. N. Pope, A. Sadrzadeh and T. A. Tran, “ Consistent SO(6) reduction of type IIB supergravity on S(5),” Nucl. Phys. B 586 (2000) 275 [arXiv:hep- th/0003103]

View on Pith arXiv 2000
[37]

A. Petkou and K. Skenderis, “A non-renormalization the orem for conformal anomalies,” Nucl. Phys. B 561, 100 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9906030]. 47

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

Forward citations

Cited by 26 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Holographic two-point functions of heavy operators revisited
hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

Holographic two-point functions of heavy operators are reproduced by adding boundary terms to the D3-brane action and by the Gibbons-Hawking-York term in LLM backgrounds, but only in coordinate dependence and without ...
Holography of quarter-BPS AdS bubbles
hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

The CFT state dual to quarter-BPS AdS bubbles is determined to quadratic order, explicitly containing the lightest quarter-BPS operator O1/4 with its subleading 1/N mixing.
Homotopy transfer for massive Kaluza-Klein modes
hep-th 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

An algorithm based on homotopy transfer in L∞ algebras produces gauge-invariant fields for massive Kaluza-Klein modes that remain covariant under unbroken zero-mode gauge transformations.
AdS$_2$ Holography: Mind the Cap
hep-th 2018-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Explicit asymptotically AdS2 supergravity solutions with smooth infrared caps support infinite towers of normalizable bound-state scalar excitations, suggesting the dual CFT1 is dynamical.
Real-time gauge/gravity duality: Prescription, Renormalization and Examples
hep-th 2008-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Real-time correlators in a holographic background follow from gluing Lorentzian and Euclidean bulk segments along the field theory's time contour, with radial counterterms unchanged and i-epsilon factors fixed by the ...

Show 21 more citing papers

Holographic Coulomb branch vevs
hep-th 2006-04 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A holographic computation of all chiral primary operator vevs on the Coulomb branch of N=4 SYM agrees with field theory, conditional on a conjectured cancellation of non-linear terms.
Boundary-Value Problem in Type IIB Supergravity and Holography
hep-th 2026-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A variational boundary-term prescription for type IIB supergravity actions reproduces known holographic free energies in fixed-charge ensembles and rederives a recent topological correction.
(Un)solvable Matrix Models for BPS Correlators
hep-th 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

Proposes complex matrix models for BPS correlators in N=4 SYM, relating eigenvalue distributions to LLM droplet shapes and enabling computations of one-point functions and three-point correlators via reductions to kno...
AdS$_3$ Holography at Dimension Two
hep-th 2019-04 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

A complete holographic dictionary for dimension (1,1) chiral primaries in the D1-D5 system is derived, calibrated on known two-charge geometries, and confirmed exactly on independent two-charge states and on several s...
On the Dynamics of Near-Extremal Black Holes
hep-th 2018-02 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

An explicit four-dimensional calculation shows that near-extremal Reissner-Nordstrom black holes in AdS4 reduce, at low energies and to leading order, to Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity with a Schwarzian action.
AdS3 Holography for 1/4 and 1/8 BPS geometries
hep-th 2015-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

The paper proposes and tests a CFT dictionary for 1/8-BPS superstrata geometries, showing that holographic one-point functions and small-interval entanglement entropy match orbifold-CFT calculations, including a twist...
Holographic Heat Engines
hep-th 2014-04 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Treating the cosmological constant as pressure turns static AdS black holes into heat engines whose Carnot cycle is also a Stirling cycle, with a proposed dual description in terms of renormalization group flow.
Holography for Schrodinger backgrounds
hep-th 2010-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Schrödinger holography is recast as a CFT deformed by an exactly marginal non-relativistic operator, and two-point functions computed holographically and in conformal perturbation theory agree at leading order in the ...
Holographic renormalization as a canonical transformation
hep-th 2010-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Holographic renormalization is shown to be a canonical transformation that repairs ill-defined variational problems at infinity, and the same construction is carried out for point particles, flat-space scalars, gravit...
Precision holography for non-conformal branes
hep-th 2008-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Holographic renormalization is worked out in full generality for non-conformal p-branes and fundamental strings, yielding finite one-point functions, Ward identities and two-point functions consistent with the general...
Comments on string theory backgrounds with non-relativistic conformal symmetry
hep-th 2008-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

The Schroedinger-symmetry gravity backgrounds are shown to arise from a TsT transformation of AdS5 x Y, their finite-temperature thermodynamics is computed, and consistent KK truncations with massive vector fields are...
Probing N=4 SYM With Surface Operators
hep-th 2008-05 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Three independent calculations (weak-coupling gauge theory, probe D3-branes, and bubbling supergravity) give matching answers for surface-operator observables in N=4 super Yang-Mills.
Fuzzballs with internal excitations
hep-th 2007-04 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

General two-charge D1-D5 fuzzball geometries with internal excitations are constructed and shown to encode, through vevs of chiral primaries, a specific superposition of Ramond ground states.
Thermodynamics of the brane
hep-th 2007-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

For probe D7 and D6 branes in black D3 and D4 backgrounds, the authors compute the fundamental matter's free energy, entropy, energy density and speed of sound, and find tachyonic brane modes exactly where the thermod...
Holographic anatomy of fuzzballs
hep-th 2006-11 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

A closed curve on R^4 defining a two-charge fuzzball maps to a specific superposition of D1-D5 R ground states, and the holographic one-point functions extracted from the geometry match the superposition's kinematical...
Critical Lin-Lunin-Maldacena geometries
hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Near a cusp in the LLM droplet, the geometry acquires a universal ISO(1,3)×SO(5) symmetric form with a naked singularity that traps both massless and massive particles, admitting analytic massless trajectories and hin...
Wilson loops on the Coulomb branch of $N=4$ super-Yang-Mills
hep-th 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Holographic minimal-surface calculation maps the Gross-Ooguri phase transition for circular Wilson loops on the Coulomb branch and indicates tree-level exactness for the straight line.
Holographic thermal field theory on curved spacetimes
hep-th 2013-12 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

The droplet phase of a holographic CFT on a black hole background is confinement in disguise: a conformal transformation turns the near-horizon neck into a confining circle, explaining suppressed heat transport.
The fuzzball proposal for black holes
hep-th 2008-04 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

Explicit two-charge fuzzball geometries and holographic vev matches support the proposal that black hole microstates are horizon-free, but a complete stringy definition remains open.
Mesons in Gauge/Gravity Duals - A Review
hep-th 2007-11 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

Probe flavour branes in deformed, non-supersymmetric gravity duals reproduce confinement, a quark condensate, a Goldstone pion-like mode, and meson masses that track quenched lattice data at the ten-percent level.
Fuzzballs and Microstate Geometries: Black-Hole Structure in String Theory
hep-th 2022-04 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

String theory replaces black holes with horizonless fuzzballs, and this, the authors argue, resolves the black-hole information paradox.

How the literature uses it

42 arXiv papers cite this in 103 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 57 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper

This can be done using precision holography, by extending and refining the analysis of [ref] , taking into account the observations of [ref] , analogously to the recent developments in precision holography in AdS$_3×$S$^3$ [ref] .

Four-point correlators in N=4 SYM from AdS$_5$ bubbling geometries · Discussion · 0.93

Uses its method or tool 13 papers

We then apply the Kaluza-Klein holography machinery [ref] to this geometry and extract from the asymptotic expansion of the supergravity fields the correlation functions with chiral primary operators and the stress tensor (see also [ref] ).

Wilson loop correlators at strong coupling: from matrices to bubbling geometries · Outline of the paper · 0.99
Using the techniques of homotopy transfer[See [ref] for introductions and applications of homotopy transfer.] and the perturbation lemma and employing the results of [ref] , we will give an algorithm to compute the gauge invariant field variables to any order in perturbation theory: Φ = p_1(Φ) + 1/2 p_2(Φ, Φ) +1/3! p_3(Φ, Φ,Φ) + ⋯ . which generalizes the first order and second order results of [ref] .

Homotopy transfer for massive Kaluza-Klein modes · Introduction · 0.88
Here we follow instead the gauge-invariant KK reduction method developed in [ref] .

Supercharged AdS${}_3$ Holography · Gauge-invariant combinations of supergravity fields · 1.00

Uses its data or values 2 papers

The black hole is defined by the mass parameter $m$ and the angular momentum parameter $a$ with the ADM mass and 2 equal angular momenta given by [ref] M=M_C+2π^2 m(3+a^2/l^2)/Ξ^3, J=8π^2 m a/Ξ^3, M_C=3π^2l^2/4

JT gravity and near-extremal thermodynamics for Kerr black holes in $AdS_{4,5}$ for rotating perturbations · Kerr in AdS$_5$ with $J_ϕ_1=J_ϕ_2$ · 0.80
The ADM mass and 2 equal angular momenta are [ref] M=M_C+2π^2 m(3+a^2/l^2)/Ξ^2, J=8π^2 m a/Ξ^2, M_C=3π^2l^2/4 Here $M_C$ is the Casimir energy associated with $S^3$ and is independent of the black hole parameters.

Fast Scrambling of mutual information in Kerr-AdS$_{\textbf{5}}$ · Kerr in AdS$_5$ with $J_ϕ_1=J_ϕ_2$ · 0.85

Compares with it 1 paper

Notice that the definition of the field $b̅^ℓ$ in Table [ref] includes a factor $1/4$ which is not present in [ref] .

Critical lumpy black holes in AdS${}_p\times S^q$ · Gauge invariance and equations at leading order · 0.84

Cites it as support 1 paper

The quadratic terms were added in order to ensure consistency with the fact that in the trace basis, extremal three-point correlators are non-zero, and they factorize into a product of two-point functions [ref] .

Precision holography of AdS$_5$ bubbling geometries · Holographic dictionary in the single-trace basis · 0.97

Cites it as background 12 papers

The holographic analysis of black hole microstates based on the expectation values $⟨H | O_i | H ⟩$ was pioneered in [ref] , building on the results of [ref] .

AdS$_3$ Holography at Dimension Two · Introduction · 0.93
More details about the expansion in fluctuations and about general properties of spherical harmonics are given in [ref] .

Wilson loop correlators at strong coupling: from matrices to bubbling geometries · Kaluza-Klein holography · 0.95
We now review part of the Kaluza-Klein reduction of type IIB supergravity on S$^5$ and its application to holography [ref] .

Precision holography of AdS$_5$ bubbling geometries · Kaluza-Klein reduction to five dimensions · 0.97

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [33]

E. D’Hoker, J. Erdmenger, D. Z. Freedman and M. Perez-Vi ctoria, “Near-extremal correlators and vanishing supergravity couplings in AdS/C FT,” Nucl. Phys. B 589 (2000) 3 [arXiv:hep-th/0003218]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[2] [1]

J. M. Maldacena, “The large N limit of superconformal ﬁel d theories and supergrav- ity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998) [Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999)] [arXiv:hep-th/9711200]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[3] [2]

S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge the ory correlators from non-critical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B 428, 105 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9802109]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[4] [3]

E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. T heor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9802150]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[5] [4]

P. Kraus, F. Larsen and S. P. Trivedi, “The Coulomb branch of gauge theory from rotating branes,” JHEP 9903, 003 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9811120]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[6] [5]

I. R. Klebanov and E. Witten, “AdS/CFT correspondence an d symmetry breaking,” Nucl. Phys. B 556, 89 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9905104]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[7] [6]

K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, “Holographic Coulomb branch vevs”, [arXiv:hep- th/0604169]. 44

View on Pith arXiv

[8] [7]

S. de Haro, S. N. Solodukhin and K. Skenderis, “Holograph ic reconstruction of space- time and renormalization in the AdS/CFT correspondence,” C ommun. Math. Phys. 217, 595 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0002230]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[9] [8]

M. Bianchi, D. Z. Freedman and K. Skenderis, “How to go wit h an RG ﬂow,” JHEP 0108, 041 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0105276]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[10] [9]

M. Bianchi, D. Z. Freedman and K. Skenderis, “Holographi c renormalization,” Nucl. Phys. B 631, 159 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0112119]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[11] [10]

I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, “Correlation funct ions in holographic RG ﬂows,” JHEP 0410, 075 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0407071]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[12] [11]

M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, “The holographic Weyl a nomaly,” JHEP 9807, 023 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9806087]; “Holography and the Weyl a nomaly,” Fortsch. Phys. 48, 125 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9812032]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[13] [12]

V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, “A stress tensor for an ti-de Sitter gravity,” Com- mun. Math. Phys. 208, 413 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9902121]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[14] [13]

P. Kraus, F. Larsen and R. Siebelink, “The gravitationa l action in asymptotically AdS and ﬂat spacetimes,” Nucl. Phys. B 563, 259 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9906127]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[15] [14]

J. de Boer, E. P. Verlinde and H. L. Verlinde, “On the holo graphic renormalization group,” JHEP 0008, 003 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9912012]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[16] [15]

D. Martelli and W. Muck, “Holographic renormalization and Ward identities with the Hamilton-Jacobi method,” Nucl. Phys. B 654, 248 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0205061]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2003

[17] [16]

I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, “AdS / CFT correspon dence and geometry,” arXiv:hep-th/0404176

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[18] [17]

K. Skenderis, “Lecture notes on holographic renormali zation,” Class. Quant. Grav. 19, 5849 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0209067]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2002

[19] [18]

M. Taylor-Robinson, “Anomalies, counterterms and the N = 0 Polchinski-Strassler solutions,” arXiv:hep-th/0103162

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[20] [19]

M. Taylor-Robinson, “Higher-dimensional formulatio n of counterterms,” arXiv:hep- th/0110142. 45

View on Pith arXiv

[21] [20]

A. Karch, A. O’Bannon and K. Skenderis, “Holographic re normalization of probe D- branes in AdS/CFT,” arXiv:hep-th/0512125

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[22] [21]

H. J. Kim, L. J. Romans and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, “The Mas s Spectrum Of Chiral N=2 D = 10 Supergravity On S5,” Phys. Rev. D 32, 389 (1985)

View on Pith 1985

[23] [22]

E. D’Hoker, D. Z. Freedman, S. D. Mathur, A. Matusis and L . Rastelli, “Extremal correlators in the AdS/CFT correspondence,” [arXiv:hep-t h/9908160]

View on Pith arXiv

[24] [23]

N. Seiberg, “Supersymmetry And Nonperturbative Beta F unctions,” Phys. Lett. B 206, 75 (1988)

View on Pith 1988

[25] [24]

N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and conﬁnement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,” Nucl . Phys. B 426, 19 (1994) [Erratum-ibid. B 430, 485 (1994)] [arXiv:hep-th/9407087]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994

[26] [25]

J. Polchinski, “String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring the ory and beyond.”

View on Pith

[27] [26]

S. M. Lee, S. Minwalla, M. Rangamani and N. Seiberg, “Thr ee-point functions of chiral operators in D = 4, N = 4 SYM at large N,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 697 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9806074]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[28] [27]

G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov, “Some cubic couplings in typ e IIB supergravity on AdS(5) x S(5) and three-point functions in SYM(4) at large N,” Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 064009 [arXiv:hep-th/9907085]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[29] [28]

S. M. Lee, “AdS(5)/CFT(4) four-point functions of chir al primary operators: Cubic Nucl. Phys. B 563 (1999) 349 [arXiv:hep-th/9907108]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[30] [29]

G. E. Arutyunov and S. A. Frolov, “Quadratic action for t ype IIB supergravity on AdS(5) x S(5),” JHEP 9908 (1999) 024 [arXiv:hep-th/9811106]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[31] [30]

E. D’Hoker and D. Z. Freedman, “Supersymmetric gauge th eories and the AdS/CFT correspondence,” arXiv:hep-th/0201253

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[32] [31]

I. Papadimitriou and K. Skenderis, “Thermodynamics of asymptotically locally AdS spacetimes,” JHEP 0508, 004 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0505190]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[33] [32]

G. Arutyunov and S. Frolov, “Scalar quartic couplings i n type IIB supergravity on AdS(5) x S(5),” Nucl. Phys. B 579 (2000) 117 [arXiv:hep-th/9912210]. 46

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[34] [34]

D. Z. Freedman, S. S. Gubser, K. Pilch and N. P. Warner, “C ontinuous distributions of D3-branes and gauged supergravity,” JHEP 0007, 038 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/9906194]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

[35] [35]

A. Brandhuber and K. Sfetsos, “Wilson loops from multic entre and rotating branes, mass gaps and phase structure in gauge theories,” Adv. Theor . Math. Phys. 3, 851 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9906201]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[36] [36]

M. Cvetic, H. Lu, C. N. Pope, A. Sadrzadeh and T. A. Tran, “ Consistent SO(6) reduction of type IIB supergravity on S(5),” Nucl. Phys. B 586 (2000) 275 [arXiv:hep- th/0003103]

View on Pith arXiv 2000

[37] [37]

A. Petkou and K. Skenderis, “A non-renormalization the orem for conformal anomalies,” Nucl. Phys. B 561, 100 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9906030]. 47

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999