Pith.

High Energy Physics - Theory · arXiv:hep-th/0606148 v1 · submitted 16 Jun 2006 · 35 references

Off-shell N=2 tensor supermultiplets

Bernard de Wit, Frank Saueressig

PDF · arXiv · The abstract, sentence by sentence · Cite

The paper says

“A multiplet calculus is presented for an arbitrary number n of N=2 tensor supermultiplets. For rigid supersymmetry the known couplings are reproduced.”

more of the abstract

In the superconformal case the target spaces parametrized by the scalar fields are cones over (3n-1)-dimensional spaces encoded in homogeneous SU(2) invariant potentials, subject to certain constraints. The coupling to conformal supergravity enables the derivation of a large class of supergravity Lagrangians with vector and tensor multiplets and hypermultiplets. Dualizing the tensor fields into scalars leads to hypermultiplets with hyperkahler or quaternion-Kahler target spaces with at least n abelian isometries. It is demonstrated how to use the calculus for the construction of Lagrangians containing higher-derivative couplings of tensor multiplets. For the application of the c-map between vector and tensor supermultiplets to Lagrangians with higher-order derivatives, an off-shell version of this map is proposed. Various other implications of the results are discussed. As an example an elegant derivation of the classification of 4-dimensional quaternion-Kahler manifolds with two commuting isometries is given.

from the abstract

Pith says

Machine review · deepseek-v4.1-flash · 13 Nov 2026 · what was read was not recorded · not checked by a person

Reviewed in 2026 with later literature in view.

It can be wrong. Challenge this review or reply to it.

Holds up, with conditions. A competent, self-contained extension of the de Wit tensor-multiplet program to arbitrary n; the soft spots are presentational, not structural. This line is wrong

2 major objections · 5 minor

How often objections from reviews like this one are right: not yet measured

Are you an author? What you can do.

Not checked: figures, code, what the 35 references say.

The paper says, at §5.3, Eq. (5.42)

The review did not quote this passage.

Pith says: Objection 1 of 2 · major

The text states that 'Upon a change of coordinates this line element coincides precisely with the expression derived by Calderbank and Pedersen' but does not exhibit the coordinate transformation. Because the abstract headlines this as a result ('an elegant derivation of the classification of 4-dimensional quaternion-Kahler manifolds with two commuting isometries is given'), the text should show the coordinate change, …

more of objection 1

… or at least the key intermediate steps, and should state explicitly how the matrices Q and N defined here relate to the matrices used by Calderbank and Pedersen (the text says they are 'related but not quite identical' without giving the relation). As written, the reader cannot verify the match from the manuscript alone.

The paper says, at §2.1, Eqs. (2.8)-(2.10); §4, paragraph after (4.8)

The review did not quote this passage.

Pith says: Objection 2 of 2 · major

The closure of the composite chiral multiplet at higher spinor order is asserted rather than exhibited. The text argues that (2.10) implies symmetry of F_{I,J,Kij,Lkl} in (jk), which kills the cubic spinor term (2.8), but the index algebra is not shown; similarly, the statement after (4.8) that 'there are no further restrictions' is not justified.

more of objection 2

Since the Lagrangians (2.21) and (4.14) rest on this closure, please add the explicit index contraction (or a worked single-multiplet example) so that the sufficiency of (2.10) and (2.32) can be checked directly.

5 minor objections

The paper says, at Eqs. (2.21) and (4.14)

Pith says: minor objection 1 of 5

The fermion kinetic terms appear duplicated: (2.21) has '−(bar phi^{iI} /partial phi^{iJ} + bar phi^{iI} /partial phi^{iJ})' and (4.14) has '− bar phi^{iI} /D phi^{iJ} − bar phi^{iI} /D phi^{iJ}'. Presumably the second term in each pair should carry bars on the opposite spinor; please check and correct.

The paper says, at Eq. (2.31)

Pith says: minor objection 2 of 5

In the second expression for F(x,v,bar v), the coefficient '12(1 − x^I)' should presumably read '½(1 − x^I)'. Please check the typesetting.

show 3 more

The paper says, at §2.3, Eq. (2.39)

Pith says: minor objection 3 of 5

The Legendre-transform relation between chi_tensor and the hyperkahler potential is stated, but the identification of the x^I with w^I + bar w^I of (2.29) is only mentioned in passing. A sentence making this explicit would help the reader connect (2.39) to the dualized hypermultiplet description.

The paper says, at §5.2

Pith says: minor objection 4 of 5

The text remarks that 'the case n=1 is special, and also the cases n=2 and 3 are rather specific', but does not say why. A brief justification (e.g., the rank of the matrix M in (5.18)) would orient the reader before the n=2 analysis of §5.3.

The paper says, at §3.2, Eq. (3.18)

Pith says: minor objection 5 of 5

The higher-derivative Lagrangian (3.18) is presented without derivation. A sentence explaining that it follows by substituting the composite components (2.5)-(2.12) into the free vector Lagrangian (3.16), and identifying H = F^2 subject to (3.17), would make the example self-contained.

What would settle it

Independently verify the closure of the composite chiral multiplet at cubic spinor order: take the explicit expressions (2.11) and (2.12) and check that the supersymmetry variation of Omega^i_I reproduces Y^{ij}_I and F_{mu nu I} without additional constraints beyond (2.10). Alternatively, compare the n=2 metric (5.42) to the Calderbank-Pedersen general metric by explicitly constructing the coordinate transformation; if no such transformation exists, the match claim fails.

from the skeptic's reading

How the review went

4 readings by deepseek-v4.1-flash · 13 Nov 2026

  1. Reader holds up, with conditions confidence high
  2. Skeptic agrees 7 min 9 s · 31,411 tokens read, 22,998 written
  3. Editor wrote the verdict above 20 s · 32,335 tokens read, 1,176 written
  4. Referee minor revision: 2 major objections, 5 minor 2 min 9 s · 31,694 tokens read, 7,167 written

Not run on this paper: the simulated authors' defence.

Pith did not check this review's objections against the paper.

The review in full

The review in brief, machine-written

This is the paper that turns the single-tensor-multiplet construction of de Wit–Philippe–Van Proeyen into a general-n calculus, and it does so cleanly. The core result is that the whole class of superconformal Lagrangians for n tensor multiplets is encoded in one real homogeneous SU(2)-invariant potential chi_tensor, subject to (2.37) and (2.38), and that substituting the composite chiral multiplet into the density formula gives the supergravity-coupled Lagrangian (4.14). The reduction of the constraints (2.10) to the transparent form (2.14)/(2.16), the Bianchi check via (2.17) and (2.28), and the n=2 collapse to the single PDE f_vv + 4u f_uu = 0 are all explicit and checkable. The rigid sector is honestly flagged as reproducing known results [abstract:s1]; the new content is the general-n superconformal case, the conformal-supergravity coupling, and the off-shell c-map of section 3.1. That last piece is the one I'd actually use — defining the c-map on multiplets rather than on actions is the right move for higher-derivative work, and the paper makes the case for it well. The stress-test's main worry — that closure of the composite chiral multiplet at higher spinor order is asserted rather than shown — is real but overstated. The paper does give the mechanism: the cubic spinor term (2.8) vanishes once FI,JKij,Lkl is symmetric in (jk), and that symmetry is exactly what (2.10) encodes. The index algebra is not exhibited, which is normal for this genre and not a load-bearing gap. The n=2 match to Calderbank–Pedersen is a genuine presentational soft spot: 'upon a change of coordinates' is asserted without the transformation. But the classification itself is quoted from a published source [9], and the paper's contribution is the derivation route, not the theorem. Minor. The higher-derivative action (3.18) and its supergravity coupling (3.22)–(3.24) are explicitly deferred to future work, which the authors state; that is an acknowledged limitation, not a hidden one. Who should read it: anyone working on N=2 tensor multiplets, the superconformal quotient, or the c-map, and string-compactification people who need the tensor-multiplet side of the hypermultiplet story. It is a methods paper and it earns its place. I'd send it to referees without hesitation; the two items worth flagging for the authors are the unexhibited coordinate change in 5.3 and a request to spell out at least one higher-spinor closure step.

The strongest objection

The paper's central claim is that the constraints (2.10) on F_{I,J}, together with the superconformal homogeneity condition (2.32), are sufficient for the composite object (2.5), (2.11), (2.12) to close into a genuine reduced chiral multiplet. The paper asserts this in the paragraph after (2.10) and again after (4.8) ('there are no further restrictions'), but the verification is by direct computation that is not shown in full. Specifically, the vanishing of the cubic spinor term (2.8) is asserted to follow from the symmetry of F_{I,JKij,Lkl} in (jk), but the index algebra is not exhibited. If the closure fails at higher spinor order, the Lagrangians (2.21) and (4.14) do not follow. A second, more specific gap is the n=2 match to Calderbank-Pedersen: the paper says 'Upon a change of coordinates this line element coincides precisely with the expression derived by Calderbank and Pedersen' but does not exhibit the transformation. If the match fails, the abstract's claim (s5) of 'an elegant derivation of the classification' is weakened. Both gaps are checkable, and neither is acknowledged as a limitation in the text.

The paper is a solid technical contribution by authors working squarely within their established program. The central calculus claims, the constraints (2.10) and (2.32), the Lagrangians (2.21) and (4.14), and the n=2 reduction to the PDE (5.32), are explicit and checkable, and the n=2 result is validated against an external published classification. The paper is honest that the rigid sector reproduces known results. The reader's weakest_assumption correctly identifies the closure of the composite chiral multiplet as the load-bearing premise: if the constraints (2.10) plus (2.32) do not suffice at higher spinor order, the Lagrangians (2.21) and (4.14) do not follow. This is a legitimate 'details not shown' concern, not a specific error; given the authors' track record and the n=1 case in [3], the closure is likely correct. The n=2 match to Calderbank-Pedersen is a more specific gap: the paper says 'coincides precisely' without exhibiting the coordinate transformation, and this is a checkable claim. The higher-derivative action (3.18) and its supergravity coupling (3.22)-(3.24) are explicitly deferred to future work, so they are not load-bearing for the central claim. The paper ships no code, which is expected for its era. I would keep the verdict CONDITIONAL: the calculus is likely correct, but the two gaps (closure verification and n=2 match) are worth flagging for the authors to complete.

The referee's report

The calculus is a useful and reusable tool. The reduction of the superconformal tensor sector to a single potential chi_tensor subject to (2.37)-(2.38) is a clean organizing principle, and the explicit Lagrangians (2.21) and (4.14) are valuable for string-compactification applications such as the loop-corrected hypermultiplet metrics of [11]. The off-shell c-map (3.15) is a genuinely useful conceptual point for higher-derivative applications, where an action-level definition would be awkward. The n=2 reduction to the single PDE (5.32) is a clean, checkable computation. This is a methods paper; its value lies in the explicit formulae and in reducing a large class of theories to a small set of differential equations.

Pith's reading of the paper (a machine's summary, not the authors')

In four-dimensional N=2 supersymmetry, the tensor multiplet is an off-shell building block containing an antisymmetric tensor gauge field, an SU(2) triplet of scalars, a doublet of spinors, and an auxiliary scalar. Earlier work handled one such multiplet. This paper handles any number n of them at once, and shows how to build supersymmetric Lagrangians from them by constructing composite chiral multiplets. The key structural result is that the whole class of superconformal Lagrangians is encoded in a single real function of the scalar triplets, homogeneous of degree one and invariant under SU(2), which must satisfy a set of second-order differential equations. From that function one reads off the target-space metric, and the target space is a cone over a (3n-1)-dimensional space. The authors then couple the multiplets to conformal supergravity, work out the superconformal quotient that produces Poincare supergravity, and show that dualizing the tensor fields into scalars gives hypermultiplets with at least n abelian isometries. As a worked example, two tensor multiplets reduce to a single partial differential equation for a function of two variables, and solving it reproduces a known classification of four-dimensional quaternion-Kahler manifolds with two commuting isometries. The paper also sketches an off-shell version of the c-map between vector and tensor multiplets, and gives one example of a higher-derivative tensor-multiplet action.

Core claim. The claim is that the entire class of superconformal Lagrangians for n N=2 tensor supermultiplets is encoded in a single real homogeneous SU(2)-invariant potential chi_tensor(L) = 2 F_{IJ} L^{ij I} L^{ij J}, subject to the constraints (2.37) and (2.38), and that substituting the composite chiral multiplet built from F_{I,J} into the density formula (4.7) yields the complete supergravity-coupled Lagrangian (4.14). If correct, every such theory is reduced to solving a stated set of differential equations for one function, and the target space is a cone over a (3n-1)-dimensional space.

The premise it rests on. The load-bearing premise is that the constraints (2.10) on F_{I,J}, together with the superconformal homogeneity condition (2.32), are sufficient for the composite object (2.5), (2.11), (2.12) to close into a genuine reduced chiral multiplet in a superconformal background. The paper asserts this in the paragraph after (2.10) and again after (4.8) ('there are no further restrictions'), but the verification is by direct computation that is not shown in full. If the closure fails at higher spinor order, the Lagrangians (2.21) and (4.14) do not follow.

Check this review

Pith stored no record of this review's passes and took no fingerprint of it. Reviews made by code from 13 Nov 2026 on carry both.

How often reviews like this one are right

Reviews like this one: written by deepseek-v4.1-flash, where what was read was not recorded.

How often objections from reviews like this one are right: not yet measured

Every value above, in the review's public record (JSON)

Reviews by people

This review was written by a machine. No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

A multiplet calculus is presented for an arbitrary number n of N=2 tensor supermultiplets. For rigid supersymmetry the known couplings are reproduced. In the superconformal case the target spaces parametrized by the scalar fields are cones over (3n-1)-dimensional spaces encoded in homogeneous SU(2) invariant potentials, subject to certain constraints. The coupling to conformal supergravity enables the derivation of a large class of supergravity Lagrangians with vector and tensor multiplets and hypermultiplets. Dualizing the tensor fields into scalars leads to hypermultiplets with hyperkahler or quaternion-Kahler target spaces with at least n abelian isometries. It is demonstrated how to use the calculus for the construction of Lagrangians containing higher-derivative couplings of tensor multiplets. For the application of the c-map between vector and tensor supermultiplets to Lagrangians with higher-order derivatives, an off-shell version of this map is proposed. Various other implications of the results are discussed. As an example an elegant derivation of the classification of 4-dimensional quaternion-Kahler manifolds with two commuting isometries is given.

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23

The authors' main claim, as the classifier picked it out 0.71

“A multiplet calculus is presented for an arbitrary number n of N=2 tensor supermultiplets.”

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.17 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.30 · compares with prior results 0.77 · mentions code or data availability 0.01

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
A multiplet calculus is presented for an arbitrary number n of N=2 tensor supermultiplets. contribution 1.00 0.94 0.32 asserted 1.00
For rigid supersymmetry the known couplings are reproduced. result 0.95 0.54 0.06 asserted 1.00
In the superconformal case the target spaces parametrized by the scalar fields are cones over (3n-1)-dimensional spaces encoded in homogeneous SU(2) invariant potentials, subject to certain constraints. result 0.85 0.81 0.16 asserted 1.00
The coupling to conformal supergravity enables the derivation of a large class of supergravity Lagrangians with vector and tensor multiplets and hypermultiplets. result 0.66 0.90 0.21 asserted 0.99
Dualizing the tensor fields into scalars leads to hypermultiplets with hyperkahler or quaternion-Kahler target spaces with at least n abelian isometries. result 0.93 0.77 0.13 asserted 1.00
It is demonstrated how to use the calculus for the construction of Lagrangians containing higher-derivative couplings of tensor multiplets. contribution 0.89 0.92 0.11 asserted 1.00
For the application of the c-map between vector and tensor supermultiplets to Lagrangians with higher-order derivatives, an off-shell version of this map is proposed. contribution 0.97 0.90 0.11 asserted 0.78
Various other implications of the results are discussed. interpretation 0.72 0.66 0.03 asserted 0.58
As an example an elegant derivation of the classification of 4-dimensional quaternion-Kahler manifolds with two commuting isometries is given. result 0.49 0.91 0.06 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.94 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13-20260917 via OpenRouter, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,896 input tokens, $0.0003 reported.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

References (35)
  1. [9] D.M.J. Calderbank and H. Pedersen, Selfdual Einstein metrics with torus symmetry , J. Diff. Geom. 60 (2002) 485, math.DG/0105263 on PitharXiv
  2. [11] D. Robles-Llana, F. Saueressig and S. Vandoren, String loop corrected hypermultiplet moduli spaces, JHEP 0603 (2006) 81, hep-th/0602164 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  3. [1] B. de Wit and J. W. van Holten, Multiplets of linearized SO(2) supergravity , Nucl. Phys. B 155 (1979) 530 on Pith
  4. [2] B. de Wit, J. W. van Holten and A. Van Proeyen, Structure of N=2 supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 184 (1981) 77 [Erratum-ibid. B 222 (1983) 516] on Pith
  5. [3] B. de Wit, R. Philippe and A. Van Proeyen, The improved tensor multiplet in N=2 super- gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 219 (1983) 143 on Pith
  6. [4] U. Lindstr¨ om and M. Roˇ cek,Scalar tensor duality and N=1, N=2 nonlinear sigma models. Nucl. Phys. B 222 (1983) 285 on Pith
  7. [5] N. J. Hitchin, A. Karlhede, U. Lindstr¨ om and M. Roˇ cek,Hyperk¨ ahler metrics and supersym- metry, Commun. Math. Phys. 108 (1987) 535 on Pith
  8. [6] A. Karlhede, U. Lindstr¨ om and M. Roˇ cek, Selfinteracting tensor multiplets in N=2 super- space, Phys. Lett. B 147 (1984) 297 on Pith
  9. [7] B. de Wit, B. Kleijn and S. Vandoren, Superconformal hypermultiplets, Nucl. Phys. B 568 (2000) 475, hep-th/9909228 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  10. [8] B. de Wit, M. Roˇ cek and S. Vandoren, Hypermultiplets, hyperk¨ ahler cones and quaternion- K¨ ahler geometry, JHEP 0102 (2001) 039, hep-th/0101161 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  11. [10] U. Theis and S. Vandoren, N = 2 supersymmetric scalar-tensor couplings , JHEP 0304 (2003) 042, hep-th/0303048 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  12. [12] M. G¨ unaydin, S. McReynolds and M. Zagermann, Unified N = 2 Maxwell-Einstein and Yang-Mills-Einstein supergravity theories in four dimens ions, JHEP 0509 (2005) 026, hep-th/0507227; The R-map and the coupling of N = 2 tensor multiplets in 5 and 4 di men- sions, JHEP 0601 (2006... on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  13. [13] J. Louis and A. Micu, Type II theories compactified on Calabi-Yau threefolds in the p resence of background fluxes , Nucl. Phys. B 635 (2002) 395, hep-th/0202168 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  14. [14] G. Dall’Agata, R. D’Auria, L. Sommovigo and S. Vaula, D = 4, N = 2 gauged supergrav- ity in the presence of tensor multiplets , Nucl. Phys. B 682 (2004) 243, hep-th/0312210. R. D’Auria, L. Sommovigo and S. Vaula, N = 2 supergravity Lagrangian coupled to tensor multiplets with ... on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  15. [15] B. de Wit, H. Samtleben and M. Trigiante, Magnetic charges in local field theory , JHEP 0509 (2005) 016, hep-th/0507289 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  16. [16] B. de Wit, N=2 Electric-magnetic duality in a chiral background , Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 49 (1996) 191, hep-th/9602060 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  17. [17] M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Holomorphic anomalies in topological field theories , Nucl. Phys. B 405 (1993) 279, hep-th/9302103; Kodaira-Spencer theory of gravity and exact results for quantum string amplitudes , Commun. Math. Phys. 165 (1994) 311, hep-th/9309140 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  18. [18] G. L. Cardoso, B. de Wit and T. Mohaupt, Corrections to macroscopic supersymmetric black-hole entropy, Phys. Lett. B 451 (1999) 309, hep-th/9812082 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  19. [19] B. de Wit, M. T. Grisaru and M. Roˇ cek, Nonholomorphic corrections to the one-loop N=2 super-Yang-Mills action, Phys. Lett. B 374 (1996) 297, hep-th/9601115 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  20. [20] R. M. Wald, Black hole entropy entropy is Noether charge , Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 3427, gr-qc/9307038 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
show 15 more
  1. [21] S. Cecotti, S. Ferrara and L. Girardello, Geometry of type II superstrings and the moduli of superconformal field theories, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 4 (1989) 2475 on Pith
  2. [22] S. Ferrara and S. Sabharwal, Quaternionic manifolds for type II superstring vacua of Calab i- Yau spaces, Nucl. Phys. B 332 (1990) 317 on Pith
  3. [23] B. de Wit and A. Van Proeyen, Symmetries of dual quaternionic manifolds , Phys. Lett. B 252 (1990) 221; B. de Wit, F. Vanderseypen and A. Van Proeyen, Symmetry structure of special geometries, Nucl. Phys. B 400 (1993) 463, hep-th/9210068 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  4. [24] M. Roˇ cek, C. Vafa and S. Vandoren, Hypermultiplets and topological strings , JHEP 0602 (2006) 62, hep-th/0512206 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  5. [25] V. Cort´ es, C. Mayer, T. Mohaupt and F. Saueressig, Special geometry of Euclidean super- symmetry. II: Hypermultiplets and the c-map , JHEP 0506 (2005) 025, hep-th/0503094 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  6. [26] I. Antoniadis, E. Gava, K.S. Narain and T.R. Taylor, Topological amplitudes in string theory , Nucl. Phys. B 413 (1994) 162, hep-th/9307158 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  7. [27] N. Berkovits and W. Siegel, Superspace effective actions for 4D compactifications of het erotic and type II superstrings , Nucl. Phys. B 462 (1996) 213, hep-th/9510106 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  8. [28] B. de Wit and M. Roˇ cek, Improved Tensor Multiplets , Phys. Lett. B 109 (1982) 439 on Pith
  9. [29] J. De Jaegher, B. de Wit, B. Kleijn and S. Vandoren, Special geometry in hypermultiplets , Nucl. Phys. B 514 (1998) 553, hep-th/9707262. 34 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  10. [30] B. de Wit and A. Van Proeyen, Potentials and symmetries of general gauged N=2 supergravity-Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B245 (1984) 89 on Pith
  11. [31] B. de Wit, P. G. Lauwers and A. Van Proeyen, Lagrangians of N=2 supergravity-matter systems, Nucl. Phys. B 255 (1985) 569 on Pith
  12. [32] A. Swann, Hyperk¨ ahler and quaternionic K¨ ahler geometry, Math. Ann. 289 (1991) 421 on Pith
  13. [33] I. Antoniadis, R. Minasian, S. Theisen and P. Vanhove, String loop corrections to the uni- versal hypermultiplet, Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003) 5079, hep-th/0307268 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  14. [34] L. Anguelova, M. Roˇ cek and S. Vandoren, Quantum corrections to the universal hypermul- tiplet and superspace , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 066001, hep-th/0402132 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  15. [35] G. Lopes Cardoso, B. de Wit, J. K¨ appeli and T. Mohaupt, Stationary BPS solutions in N = 2 supergravity with R2 interactions. JHEP 0012 (2000) 019, hep-th/0009234. 35 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
Cited by 21 Pith papers

Reviewed papers on Pith that cite this one. The full citation record

  1. Higher-Derivative Supergravity, AdS$_4$ Holography, and Black Holes hep-th · Jun 2021
  2. Euclidean Supergravity hep-th · Jun 2017
  3. New higher-derivative invariants in N=2 supergravity and the Gauss-Bonnet term hep-th · Jul 2013
  4. Nonperturbative corrections to 4D string theory effective actions from SL(2,Z) duality and supersymmetry hep-th · Dec 2006
  5. Only Flat Spacetime is Full BPS in Four Dimensional N=3 and N=4 Supergravity hep-th · May 2025
  6. Stringy Evidence for a Universal Pattern at Infinite Distance hep-th · Nov 2023
  7. 4d N=2 supergravity observables from Nekrasov-like partition functions hep-th · Nov 2021
  8. Instantons and infinite distances hep-th · Apr 2019
  9. Conformal supergravity in five dimensions: New approach and applications hep-th · Oct 2014
  10. All Off-Shell R^2 Invariants in Five Dimensional N=2 Supergravity hep-th · Jun 2013
  11. Electric and magnetic charges in N=2 conformal supergravity theories hep-th · Jul 2011
  12. N=2 Conformal Superspace in Four Dimensions hep-th · Mar 2011
  13. New higher-derivative couplings in 4D N = 2 supergravity hep-th · Dec 2010
  14. Near-horizon analysis of D=5 BPS black holes and rings hep-th · Oct 2009
  15. Linear perturbations of quaternionic metrics hep-th · Oct 2008
  16. On superconformal projective hypermultiplets hep-th · Oct 2007
  17. Twistors and Black Holes hep-th · Jan 2007
  18. Instanton Corrections and Emergent Strings hep-th · Dec 2019
  19. $L_\infty$-Algebras of Classical Field Theories and the Batalin-Vilkovisky Formalism hep-th · Sep 2018
  20. Membrane instantons from mirror symmetry hep-th · Jul 2007
  21. ${\cal N}=2$ Supergravity in $D=4,5,6$ Dimensions hep-th · Apr 2020
How the literature uses it

33 arXiv papers cite this in 63 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 48 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
  • We consider next a more general projective Lagrangian constructed out of a set of $(2n_A)$ multiplets $_A^(2n_A)$ and at least one tensor multiplet $G^++$, specifically [equation] The function $$ is required to be a homogeneous function of degree zero in $v^i$; this implies [equation] This construction is a generalization of that presented in Section [ref], which involved only $(2)$ multiplets.[In Section [ref], an index $A$ was placed on the function $$ and the tensor multiplet $G^++$ in the corresponding construction [ref] to match the notation in [ref] .

    New higher-derivative couplings in 4D N = 2 supergravity · Generalization to several $(2n)$ multiplets · 0.98

Uses its method or tool 3 papers
Uses its data or values 1 paper
Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 8 papers

Challenges and discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, or challenge this review formally: a challenge becomes a permanent entry in this paper's record, and its decision is published here.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment