Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fast Convergence of Regularized Learning in Games

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1507.00407 v5 pith:EE6DTBFP submitted 2015-07-02 cs.GT cs.AIcs.LG

Fast Convergence of Regularized Learning in Games

classification cs.GT cs.AIcs.LG
keywords ratesalgorithmsclassgamesachievealgorithmapproximateconvergence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We show that natural classes of regularized learning algorithms with a form of recency bias achieve faster convergence rates to approximate efficiency and to coarse correlated equilibria in multiplayer normal form games. When each player in a game uses an algorithm from our class, their individual regret decays at $O(T^{-3/4})$, while the sum of utilities converges to an approximate optimum at $O(T^{-1})$--an improvement upon the worst case $O(T^{-1/2})$ rates. We show a black-box reduction for any algorithm in the class to achieve $\tilde{O}(T^{-1/2})$ rates against an adversary, while maintaining the faster rates against algorithms in the class. Our results extend those of [Rakhlin and Shridharan 2013] and [Daskalakis et al. 2014], who only analyzed two-player zero-sum games for specific algorithms.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Provably Efficient Regularized Online RLHF with Generalized Bilinear Preferences

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0

    Under a low-rank bilinear preference model, any strongly convex regularizer—not just KL—yields polylogarithmic regret for greedy sampling and near-dimension-free regret for explore-then-commit.