REVIEW 1 cited by
Scalar-multi-tensorial equivalence for higher order fleft( R,nabla_(μ) R,nabla_{μ₁}nabla_{μ₂}R,...,nabla_{μ₁}...nabla_{μ_(n) }Rright) theories of gravity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Scalar-multi-tensorial equivalence for higher order fleft( R,nabla_(μ) R,nabla_{μ₁}nabla_{μ₂}R,...,nabla_{μ₁}...nabla_{μ_(n) }Rright) theories of gravity
read the original abstract
The equivalence between theories depending on the derivatives of $R$, i.e. $f\left( R,\nabla R,...,\nabla^{n}R\right) $, and scalar-multi-tensorial theories is verified. The analysis is done in both metric and Palatini formalisms. It is shown that $f\left( R,\nabla R,...,\nabla^{n}R\right) $ theories are equivalent to scalar-multi-tensorial ones resembling Brans-Dicke theories with kinetic terms $\omega_{0}=0$ and $\omega_{0}= - \frac{3}{2}$ for metric and Palatini formalisms respectively. This result is analogous to what happens for $f(R)$ theories. It is worthy emphasizing that the scalar-multi-tensorial theories obtained here differ from Brans-Dicke ones due to the presence of multiple tensorial fields absent in the last. Furthermore, sufficient conditions are established for $f\left( R,\nabla R,...,\nabla^{n}R\right) $ theories to be written as scalar-multi-tensorial theories. Finally, some examples are studied and the comparison of $f\left( R,\nabla R,...,\nabla^{n}R\right) $ theories to $f\left( R,\Box R,...\Box^{n}R\right) $ theories is performed.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Starobinsky Inflation and the Latest CMB Data: A Subtle Tension?
When implemented directly in CLASS, Starobinsky inflation remains consistent with Planck+ACT+BAO data at the 2σ level, but the inferred e-fold range sits above the reheating-motivated window, and a fitted R³ correctio...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.