Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Scalar-multi-tensorial equivalence for higher order fleft( R,nabla_(μ) R,nabla_{μ₁}nabla_{μ₂}R,...,nabla_{μ₁}...nabla_{μ_(n) }Rright) theories of gravity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1603.01563 v3 pith:OHVFRFMG submitted 2016-03-04 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-thmath-phmath.MP

Scalar-multi-tensorial equivalence for higher order fleft( R,nabla_(μ) R,nabla_{μ₁}nabla_{μ₂}R,...,nabla_{μ₁}...nabla_{μ_(n) }Rright) theories of gravity

classification gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords nablatheoriesleftrightscalar-multi-tensorialbrans-dickeequivalenceformalisms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The equivalence between theories depending on the derivatives of $R$, i.e. $f\left( R,\nabla R,...,\nabla^{n}R\right) $, and scalar-multi-tensorial theories is verified. The analysis is done in both metric and Palatini formalisms. It is shown that $f\left( R,\nabla R,...,\nabla^{n}R\right) $ theories are equivalent to scalar-multi-tensorial ones resembling Brans-Dicke theories with kinetic terms $\omega_{0}=0$ and $\omega_{0}= - \frac{3}{2}$ for metric and Palatini formalisms respectively. This result is analogous to what happens for $f(R)$ theories. It is worthy emphasizing that the scalar-multi-tensorial theories obtained here differ from Brans-Dicke ones due to the presence of multiple tensorial fields absent in the last. Furthermore, sufficient conditions are established for $f\left( R,\nabla R,...,\nabla^{n}R\right) $ theories to be written as scalar-multi-tensorial theories. Finally, some examples are studied and the comparison of $f\left( R,\nabla R,...,\nabla^{n}R\right) $ theories to $f\left( R,\Box R,...\Box^{n}R\right) $ theories is performed.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Starobinsky Inflation and the Latest CMB Data: A Subtle Tension?

    astro-ph.CO 2025-11 conditional novelty 4.0

    When implemented directly in CLASS, Starobinsky inflation remains consistent with Planck+ACT+BAO data at the 2σ level, but the inferred e-fold range sits above the reheating-motivated window, and a fitted R³ correctio...