Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Combinatorial Testing for Deep Learning Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1806.07723 v1 pith:WDKCLG2Y submitted 2018-06-20 cs.SE cs.AIcs.CR

Combinatorial Testing for Deep Learning Systems

classification cs.SE cs.AIcs.CR
keywords testingsystemscombinatorialstatecoveragedeeplearningrobustness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Deep learning (DL) has achieved remarkable progress over the past decade and been widely applied to many safety-critical applications. However, the robustness of DL systems recently receives great concerns, such as adversarial examples against computer vision systems, which could potentially result in severe consequences. Adopting testing techniques could help to evaluate the robustness of a DL system and therefore detect vulnerabilities at an early stage. The main challenge of testing such systems is that its runtime state space is too large: if we view each neuron as a runtime state for DL, then a DL system often contains massive states, rendering testing each state almost impossible. For traditional software, combinatorial testing (CT) is an effective testing technique to reduce the testing space while obtaining relatively high defect detection abilities. In this paper, we perform an exploratory study of CT on DL systems. We adapt the concept in CT and propose a set of coverage criteria for DL systems, as well as a CT coverage guided test generation technique. Our evaluation demonstrates that CT provides a promising avenue for testing DL systems. We further pose several open questions and interesting directions for combinatorial testing of DL systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Optimal Combinatorial Testing with Constraints: The Balancing Act

    math.OC 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A new exact integer-programming method and structural bounds for pairwise covering arrays with forbidden binary assignments, plus a fast heuristic that often matches optimal solutions.