pith. sign in

arxiv: 1807.10272 · v2 · pith:BWY6SNG6new · submitted 2018-07-26 · 📊 stat.ML · cs.CR· cs.CV· cs.LG

Evaluating and Understanding the Robustness of Adversarial Logit Pairing

classification 📊 stat.ML cs.CRcs.CVcs.LG
keywords adversarialdefenselogitpairingattackconsideredrobustnessthreat
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:BWY6SNG6 Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{BWY6SNG6}

Prints a linked pith:BWY6SNG6 badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

read the original abstract

We evaluate the robustness of Adversarial Logit Pairing, a recently proposed defense against adversarial examples. We find that a network trained with Adversarial Logit Pairing achieves 0.6% accuracy in the threat model in which the defense is considered. We provide a brief overview of the defense and the threat models/claims considered, as well as a discussion of the methodology and results of our attack, which may offer insights into the reasons underlying the vulnerability of ALP to adversarial attack.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Margin-Adaptive Confidence Ranking for Reliable LLM Judgement

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Introduces a margin-adaptive confidence ranking method that learns an estimator from simulated diversity and derives margin-dependent generalization bounds for use in fixed-sequence testing of LLM-human agreement.