pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1904.05234 · v1 · submitted 2019-04-10 · 💻 cs.CR · cs.GT

Recognition: unknown

Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning, Transaction Reordering, and Consensus Instability in Decentralized Exchanges

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.CR cs.GT
keywords botsfeestransactiondexespgasposespriorityarbitrage
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Blockchains, and specifically smart contracts, have promised to create fair and transparent trading ecosystems. Unfortunately, we show that this promise has not been met. We document and quantify the widespread and rising deployment of arbitrage bots in blockchain systems, specifically in decentralized exchanges (or "DEXes"). Like high-frequency traders on Wall Street, these bots exploit inefficiencies in DEXes, paying high transaction fees and optimizing network latency to frontrun, i.e., anticipate and exploit, ordinary users' DEX trades. We study the breadth of DEX arbitrage bots in a subset of transactions that yield quantifiable revenue to these bots. We also study bots' profit-making strategies, with a focus on blockchain-specific elements. We observe bots engage in what we call priority gas auctions (PGAs), competitively bidding up transaction fees in order to obtain priority ordering, i.e., early block position and execution, for their transactions. PGAs present an interesting and complex new continuous-time, partial-information, game-theoretic model that we formalize and study. We release an interactive web portal, http://frontrun.me/, to provide the community with real-time data on PGAs. We additionally show that high fees paid for priority transaction ordering poses a systemic risk to consensus-layer security. We explain that such fees are just one form of a general phenomenon in DEXes and beyond---what we call miner extractable value (MEV)---that poses concrete, measurable, consensus-layer security risks. We show empirically that MEV poses a realistic threat to Ethereum today. Our work highlights the large, complex risks created by transaction-ordering dependencies in smart contracts and the ways in which traditional forms of financial-market exploitation are adapting to and penetrating blockchain economies.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ClawCoin: An Agentic AI-Native Cryptocurrency for Decentralized Agent Economies

    cs.MA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ClawCoin is a compute-cost-indexed token with oracle, vault, and settlement layers that stabilizes multi-agent workflows under cost shocks better than fiat baselines in simulator tests.

  2. Pricing Innovation Under Latency Constraints: A Mean-Field Analysis of Coded Payload Delivery

    cs.IT 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Mean-field analysis derives price-rate bounds for coded and sharded payload delivery, demonstrating utility gains from adding modest RLNC fast-lane rates under latency constraints.

  3. Arbitrage and the Stability of AMM Price Tracking

    cs.CE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper proves geometric ergodicity of AMM price tracking error under block-level arbitrage correction and derives explicit one-step bounds connecting tracking quality to liquidity and execution quality.