REVIEW 2 cited by
Language models and Automated Essay Scoring
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Language models and Automated Essay Scoring
read the original abstract
In this paper, we present a new comparative study on automatic essay scoring (AES). The current state-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) neural network architectures are used in this work to achieve above human-level accuracy on the publicly available Kaggle AES dataset. We compare two powerful language models, BERT and XLNet, and describe all the layers and network architectures in these models. We elucidate the network architectures of BERT and XLNet using clear notation and diagrams and explain the advantages of transformer architectures over traditional recurrent neural network architectures. Linear algebra notation is used to clarify the functions of transformers and attention mechanisms. We compare the results with more traditional methods, such as bag of words (BOW) and long short term memory (LSTM) networks.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Automated Essay Scoring and Language Certification: Assessing Generalizability, Agreement and Validity for French
Enhanced ABV framework applied to French AES, comparing 8 models on 27k and 961-essay corpora to assess generalizability, agreement, and validity.
-
Reconstructing Item Characteristic Curves using Fine-Tuned Large Language Models
Fine-tuned LLMs can reconstruct item characteristic curves from multiple-choice item text, giving useful estimates of IRT difficulty and discrimination without live student response data.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.